Jump to content


Oil Catch Can


  • Please log in to reply
50 replies to this topic

#1 _Viper_

_Viper_
  • Guests

Posted 27 November 2008 - 11:05 PM

Hey all, Is a oil catch can a positive thing even on a new motor? Or are they only for motor with worn rings with have blowby and are just to catch the oil and stop it going into your intake?

Or would a motor even with perfectly sealed rings still blow out some oil vapour just from all the movement inside the motor causing windage etc causing negative performance?

Just trying to decide If I should get one or not...

#2 TerrA LX

TerrA LX

    Fulcrum Fixture

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,241 posts
  • Location:Sid 'n' knee
  • Joined: 31-May 06

Posted 27 November 2008 - 11:10 PM

Nothing wrong with a good catch can system.

#3 Litre8

Litre8

    Thrillseeker

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,399 posts
  • Name:Howard
  • Location:Melbourne, Victoria
  • Car:1976 LX SLR8000
  • Joined: 05-February 07

Posted 28 November 2008 - 08:07 AM

What's the intended use? For normal driving the factory fitted PCV system handles these duties ok.

#4 _SS Hatchback_

_SS Hatchback_
  • Guests

Posted 17 June 2009 - 08:55 PM

What's the intended use? For normal driving the factory fitted PCV system handles these duties ok.


Is there much of a gain running oil catch can? Debating whether i should run one or not?

#5 _ova budget_

_ova budget_
  • Guests

Posted 17 June 2009 - 10:20 PM

guys, posted similar question myself recently and after much debate and looking around i went the catch can route. If nothing else it looks the business. Heaps of other options out there but i really like the polished alloy can with K&N filter on top connected to the rockers with a couple of braided lines. There is no perfomance gain, but it look fantatsic.

#6 _Squarepants_

_Squarepants_
  • Guests

Posted 17 June 2009 - 10:30 PM

Theoretically it will give you better fuel economy and emissions as the engine is breathing cleaner air and not having to burn oil residue.
A good thing, I reckon.

#7 TerrA LX

TerrA LX

    Fulcrum Fixture

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,241 posts
  • Location:Sid 'n' knee
  • Joined: 31-May 06

Posted 17 June 2009 - 11:05 PM

Burning oil is not a good thing.

#8 _SS Hatchback_

_SS Hatchback_
  • Guests

Posted 17 June 2009 - 11:40 PM

Burning oil is not a good thing.


Yeah thats what i was thinking , what about running 2 breathers like the one i have on my drivers side rocker, put one on the passenger side?

Posted Image

#9 _GMHTORI_

_GMHTORI_
  • Guests

Posted 18 June 2009 - 12:08 AM

Hi all, Correct me if iam wrong guys but the main use of oil catch cans is for high reving & compression motors to help ventilate the positive crankcase pressure at high revs, So to a mild streeter they would be no benifit.






#10 TerrA LX

TerrA LX

    Fulcrum Fixture

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,241 posts
  • Location:Sid 'n' knee
  • Joined: 31-May 06

Posted 18 June 2009 - 12:18 AM

^^ IMO better than just plumbing the PCV straight into the manifold but I prefer to have a sealed system with a PCV and a catch can for registered street cars.

FWIW any car will benifit in more than one way if you can stop oil entering the combustion process.

#11 _SS Hatchback_

_SS Hatchback_
  • Guests

Posted 18 June 2009 - 12:34 AM

So there are breather types and ones i have seen without breathers , the sealed types still have to vent somewhere though dont they?

#12 Litre8

Litre8

    Thrillseeker

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,399 posts
  • Name:Howard
  • Location:Melbourne, Victoria
  • Car:1976 LX SLR8000
  • Joined: 05-February 07

Posted 18 June 2009 - 12:54 AM

With a proper dry sump setup on a fresh engine you can effectively seal the engine....no breathers required, the scavenge effect of the pump should pull a vacuum in the crankcase..

#13 TerrA LX

TerrA LX

    Fulcrum Fixture

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,241 posts
  • Location:Sid 'n' knee
  • Joined: 31-May 06

Posted 18 June 2009 - 04:05 AM

So there are breather types and ones i have seen without breathers , the sealed types still have to vent somewhere though dont they?



What I mean is run the factory set up with a sealed (non vented) catch can after the pcv, before the manifold, so you still retain the benifit of the PCV operation.
This alone does not address the high speed operation as this system vents to the air cleaner.

#14 ls2lxhatch

ls2lxhatch

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,332 posts
  • Location:Perth
  • Car:LX Hatch
  • Joined: 29-May 06

Posted 18 June 2009 - 01:49 PM

Yeah thats what i was thinking , what about running 2 breathers like the one i have on my drivers side rocker, put one on the passenger side?


On a V8 the factory system sucks filtered air through the hose connected to the air cleaner, into one rocker cover, through the crankcase to the PCV valve on the other rocker cover and then into the intake manifold. This is called positive crankcase ventilation as clean air is forced through the engine to remove vapours.

Positive crankcase ventilation is vital to maintaining oil quality. A system that has only breathers connected to the rocker covers without a vacuum source will result in contaminated oil.

You need to either use the vacuum from the intake system or you can use the vacuum generated by the exhaust in a vehicle that is not used on the road. When connecting to the intake system make sure that all cylinders are fed by the connection, do not connect to a single intake runner.

This is a good article on the subject.

This is the catchcan system and filter I am considering for my street driven LS2. The filter will guarantee that oil will not enter the intake system which I think is important for fuel injected engines.

On a carburetter engine any oil bypass from the PCV into the intake system will be cleaned by the air/fuel mixture. However port injected engines have nothing but fresh air running through the intake system which will eventually become coated in oil that has bypassed the factory PCV system. It is also worth noting that K&N style filters can also lead to oil buildup in the intake systems of port injected engines.

Edited by ls2lxhatch, 18 June 2009 - 01:55 PM.


#15 TerrA LX

TerrA LX

    Fulcrum Fixture

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,241 posts
  • Location:Sid 'n' knee
  • Joined: 31-May 06

Posted 18 June 2009 - 04:01 PM

On a V8 the factory system sucks filtered air through the hose connected to the air cleaner, into one rocker cover, through the crankcase to the PCV valve on the other rocker cover and then into the intake manifold. This is called positive crankcase ventilation as clean air is forced through the engine to remove vapours.


Not at all RPM/Throttle positions, this is why it is called a PCValve, when it closes the engine still vents to the air cleaner.
Some guys run a single open filter or breather on this side as SS Hatchback has stated.

#16 ls2lxhatch

ls2lxhatch

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,332 posts
  • Location:Perth
  • Car:LX Hatch
  • Joined: 29-May 06

Posted 18 June 2009 - 05:59 PM

The purpose of the PCV valve is to regulate the airflow through the engine. When vacuum is high the valve reduces airflow, when vacuum is low the valve is fully open allowing maximum airflow. Even under extreme vacuum the PCV valve should not completely close.

The primary purpose of the vacuum is to draw clean air through the crankcase to purge crankcase vapours and reduce oil contamination. In a vacuum system changing from a breather connected to the air filter to a single breather on the rocker cover will have little effect as air should be entering via the breather not venting.

Fitting a second filter to the other rocker cover as SS Hatchback suggested in a vacuum system will short circuit the system. The majority of airflow will be through one rocker cover which will reduce the efficiency of vapour scavenging and increase oil contamination.

Fitting a filter to both rocker covers in a system that does not incorporate a vacuum would be an improvement over the single filter.

Many of the catch can systems on race cars are purely designed to relieve crankcase pressure. In those setups crankcase pressure is vented via the filter on the catch can. A vacuum is not used to purge crankcase vapours and as a result the oil will become contaminated. Oil contamination is not a primary concern in a race engine but it should be a primary concern in a street engine. If you fit this type of system to a street car and only change the oil every six months you are asking for trouble.

#17 _Squarepants_

_Squarepants_
  • Guests

Posted 18 June 2009 - 06:42 PM

In QLD (at least) it's illegal to vent any engine gasses to atmosphere, which means you aren't allowed to just put a filter on your rocker cover, or even have a catch can with a filter on it. The vapour must be sucked back into the intake. The more oil you can remove from this vapour, the better.

#18 dattoman

dattoman

    Do I feel lucky? Well, do ya, punk?

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,485 posts
  • Name:Neil
  • Location:Perth Western Australia
  • Car:LX SS , 76 Cadillac , 3 x dattos
  • Joined: 04-February 07

Posted 18 June 2009 - 07:05 PM

Most of us aren't dry sumpers

I would assume on an engine with Forgies you'd want a system as you have higher clearances when cold

Most drag cars run breathers as they run a fair amount of blowby on the rings.... you'd be suprised how much actually

#19 _oldjohnno_

_oldjohnno_
  • Guests

Posted 18 June 2009 - 08:14 PM

The primary reason people run catch cans on race cars is that they are required to do so by the class rules in order to keep oil off the track. There are better ways of handling crankcase ventilation for a street engine and if blowby is a problem with a N/A or mildly boosted street car I think you'd be better to spend your time fixing the ring seal and oil control rather than mucking around with shiny oil buckets...

#20 _Squarepants_

_Squarepants_
  • Guests

Posted 18 June 2009 - 08:17 PM

But they're shiney!!! :tease:

#21 Tiny

Tiny

    Oh My, Don't you post alot

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,018 posts
  • Name:Tiny
  • Location:Sydney
  • Joined: 04-February 07

Posted 18 June 2009 - 08:34 PM

And Shiney is GOOD :P

I run a catch can and it does it's job...

I didnt want to run a PCV setup cause i didnt want that crap going hrough my carby and being re-burnt.

However it's illegal in in NSW as well to have it ventilated to atmosphere, You must re-breathe the vapors.

A vac-u-pan setup is another way of using the exhaust gas speed to pull a vaccum on the engine and get rid of the gasses - again not legal in NSW.

I'm going to keep going with mine for now!

#22 Heath

Heath

    I like cars.

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 18,368 posts
  • Name:Heath
  • Location:Eastern Suburbs, Melbourne
  • Car:Heavily Modified UC Sunbird Hatchback
  • Joined: 07-November 05
Garage View Garage

Posted 18 June 2009 - 09:50 PM

Better for the environment with a sealed catch can anyway. It's the way to go as far as I'm concerned.

#23 _UDLOSE_

_UDLOSE_
  • Guests

Posted 18 June 2009 - 10:41 PM

I was told by an engine builder that you'll blow out your rear main seal if you give your motor a hard time with it hooked up. I hooked it up on my 330 stroker years ago in an attempt to make it more legal. Blew the RMS out the moment i did a burnout. My mate got defected and sent thru the EPA for not having it so he hooked it up. blew the RMS shortly after. He's blow out atleast one other one that i know of because he doesn't want to get defected again. I don't know if it's a coincidence but you wont catch me with one hooked up on any V8 of mine, I'll take the couple of hundred dollar fine thanks!

The rocker cover breathers are ok but when u get up it hard the oil spews out on your rockers covers and then burns and stinks.

I just finished the breather setup on my torry, i'll grab a pic soon.

Edited by UDLOSE, 18 June 2009 - 10:43 PM.


#24 _SS Hatchback_

_SS Hatchback_
  • Guests

Posted 18 June 2009 - 11:27 PM

Interesting read, for the moment i wont be changing the way it is , its been like that for 10 years and had no real dramas but it was something i was contemplating if there was a certain advantage. From what i read im best of having a sealed system from both rockers to a tank then plumbed back to the mainfold. That way ill reduce the amount going into the manifold from my current setup and it will keep the greenies happier.

#25 TerrA LX

TerrA LX

    Fulcrum Fixture

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,241 posts
  • Location:Sid 'n' knee
  • Joined: 31-May 06

Posted 18 June 2009 - 11:39 PM

I was told by an engine builder that you'll blow out your rear main seal if you give your motor a hard time with it hooked up.


Thats pretty much why the factory system vents into the air cleaner, when the revs go up and the manifold vacuum goes down the PCV valve closes off, the pressure from the crank case has to go somewhere.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users