Jump to content


Photo

A Different Gra Lpg Setup


  • Please log in to reply
16 replies to this topic

#1 LhMusL

LhMusL

    Forum Fan

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 468 posts
  • Location:Melbourne
  • Joined: 08-November 05

Posted 04 March 2008 - 06:01 PM

Just thought i would put up my thoughts on my new take on Gas Research LPG system.
As much as i would love to go Liquid or Vapour LPG injection it seems at the moment that i can't justify spending 5-6g+ on a setup, maybe in 3years + when i can get my next LPG grant and hopefully the prices come down a little :spoton:

But for now i am keen to hear peoples thought and sugestions on a setup simliar to this for my in the build 355 LH. Has to be under bonnet no scoops etc.
Really don't like the look of the standard GRA twin T/B convertor setup, but this i do like the look of :rockon:

Posted Image
Posted Image
Posted Image
Posted Image

Yes i think its a Ford, and know i wont have twin turbo's YET.
Would prob joint the two pipes at the front and run it under the rad hose and into a pod or airbox where the charcoal canister goes or into the guard. Convertors i will try to hide under the guard if the hose isn't deemed to long for this.
Planning to go single turbo later on so this setup should be easily adapted to that at a later stage.
Do you guys think that this "active" style hat will flow ok?? I was thinking of using one of the active hats buy have heard that they don't flow that great in NA.


Also peoples thought on tank location: In the LPG standard under the parcel shelf setup i am told this is good because it keeps the weight over the rear axel, better handleing???????? or does the higher centre of gravity undo any advantages????
Like Knoath, large tank in tub cut into the boot floor, std petrol tank position, were the car was desiged to take the weight??????
Don't care about boot volume loss just wana know whats going to handle better!
Not looking into the manifold tanks coz they have a smaller capacity and are harder to plumb a true twin oulet, twin line setup into which i need for my power levels :D


These look awsome but are not to proven in higher HP NA and Forced induction setups that i know of yet, but will still look into them as i would prefer the stock look. Anyone know of a fitter installer that would fit one of these in Melbourne???
Or any reports on them????
Posted Image
Posted Image
Posted Image
Posted Image
Posted Image

Thoughts people :spoton:

#2 _CHOPPER_

_CHOPPER_
  • Guests

Posted 04 March 2008 - 08:42 PM

Because I used to do around 70,000 KM a year as a courier, I wouldn't hesitate to use the Parnell system. For you,as long as the system is workable and looks the way you want, go for it. Practicality is more important to me than appearance.

#3 _Brewster_

_Brewster_
  • Guests

Posted 04 March 2008 - 09:38 PM

Bloody hell, some seriously nice bling in that engine bay.
I was going to go GAS once, until I found out how much it was going to cost, and my plan was cut out the boot and weld in an open drop tank and place two smaller tanks side by side and have it set up so it drained both tanks at the same time, and not one at a time.

#4 Peter UC

Peter UC

    Forum Fixture

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 770 posts
  • Location:Emerald Vic
  • Joined: 08-November 05

Posted 05 March 2008 - 05:05 PM

I'm working at APA at the moment and have looked into the best tanks to fit into a Torana. The best tanks we have are the manifold tanks. Look a bit like 3 scuba bottles. They hold 59 litres of gas and should go where the standard tank goes. Not entirely sure on the clearance with the spare wheel well but apart from that it would work quite well. Also have a look at the factory Ford LPG tanks. The Wagon and Ute tanks would be the ones to look at and carry about 90 litres of gas. However their size may be a problem.
Although one thing I have looked at is, the Ford ute tanks are two tanks bolted together and linked with external pipes. There are 2 different sizes of the 2 tanks one about 35 litres and the other about 55 litres. So to gain clearance you may be able to use 2 small tanks bolted together with the necessary piping to link the two tanks. The tanks are 285mm in diameter so I'm not sure with clearance underneath however my thinking was it was about the depth of a droptank. This set up will get you a greater volume of gas to the about manifold tank but clearance may be a problem.

Oh and you do want the tank as low as possible so anywhere near the standard tank location will be the best for handling.

#5 LhMusL

LhMusL

    Forum Fan

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 468 posts
  • Location:Melbourne
  • Joined: 08-November 05

Posted 06 March 2008 - 06:45 PM

I guess alot of torana's have drop tanks and still seem to handle ok so extra weight in the std pertol tank location would prob be ok.
Anyone notice a significant difference in there cars handling with a full->empty drop tank? better, worse?????

#6 Guns n roses

Guns n roses

    Forum Fixture

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 575 posts
  • Joined: 08-November 05

Posted 09 March 2008 - 03:10 PM

lhmusl do u have any more gas pics??or any of ur old set up???

what bout twin 425 impco carbs on a tunnel ram.got pica of this on a 308 and is pretty decent set up!

#7 Guns n roses

Guns n roses

    Forum Fixture

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 575 posts
  • Joined: 08-November 05

Posted 09 March 2008 - 06:29 PM

Posted Image



twin 425s on a 308 with 2 converters.

#8 LhMusL

LhMusL

    Forum Fan

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 468 posts
  • Location:Melbourne
  • Joined: 08-November 05

Posted 10 March 2008 - 12:06 PM

Yeah i would go twin impco 425's IF there was a low rise twin carb manifold for VN heads!! Has to be under bonnet so no tunnel rams for me. Have seen twin 425's on a similar GRA setup but that looks the same as a GRA setup and thats not to my tastes.
Would really like to go the technocarb path so it can look stock, just researching it more. But the twin GRA front mount setup would look killer when i get a turbo though :tease:
Old setup was out the bonnet and a bit of a head F$&k so not doing that again, Here she is
Posted Image
Posted Image
Posted Image

#9 Peter UC

Peter UC

    Forum Fixture

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 770 posts
  • Location:Emerald Vic
  • Joined: 08-November 05

Posted 10 March 2008 - 12:34 PM

I've been doing a bit more research on the tanks and the manifold tank I was talking about doesn't fit under the car as it is too long :cry: and the two Ford tanks would be too low. So unfortunately without more research and expense it seems the only real alternative is the tank in the boot, which would be a A86 which holds 68 litres or a F84 which holds 60 litres.

#10 _CHOPPER_

_CHOPPER_
  • Guests

Posted 10 March 2008 - 12:38 PM

Peter, I have a spare F84 tank at home if you're interested.

#11 LhMusL

LhMusL

    Forum Fan

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 468 posts
  • Location:Melbourne
  • Joined: 08-November 05

Posted 10 March 2008 - 03:51 PM

Smithy's Car Repairs in Bayswater said he fitted a manifold tank in the std torana tank position years ago, although i don't know what other mods were involded. Didn't someone who got there system fitted at Rapid Flow get like a 90ltr tank under the parcel shelf in there LH??????????

#12 Guns n roses

Guns n roses

    Forum Fixture

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 575 posts
  • Joined: 08-November 05

Posted 10 March 2008 - 08:13 PM

im not sure wat size my tank is but its under the parcel shelf and i dont need speaker spacers for 6 x 9s..

hey luke do you know how much those techno carbs are worth??

#13 _73LJWhiteSL_

_73LJWhiteSL_
  • Guests

Posted 11 March 2008 - 07:12 AM

I've been doing a bit more research on the tanks and the manifold tank I was talking about doesn't fit under the car as it is too long :cry: and the two Ford tanks would be too low. So unfortunately without more research and expense it seems the only real alternative is the tank in the boot, which would be a A86 which holds 68 litres or a F84 which holds 60 litres.

Sorry to hear this Peter, I was kinda hopping on getting the tank out of the boot, but i guess I will just have to live with it. :fool:

Steve

#14 LhMusL

LhMusL

    Forum Fan

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 468 posts
  • Location:Melbourne
  • Joined: 08-November 05

Posted 11 March 2008 - 10:12 AM

Think i got quoted about 1500ish for a whole front end setup, then you just get a tank and lines + fitting and tuning, so prob similar to a GRA setup or a bit cheaper.
TorqueGas in QLD is a australian distributor for them :) they seem helpfull but the dude was trying to say how good they are when they got 200 rwHp out of one...... :<_<: i want 270+ rwHp

#15 Guns n roses

Guns n roses

    Forum Fixture

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 575 posts
  • Joined: 08-November 05

Posted 11 March 2008 - 11:35 AM

wonder what the cars are worth on just there own.i got gas research and was looking to do something else cause i really rather a air cleaner or something throught the bonnet.like twin impcos or twin technocarbs on a tunnel ram

#16 LhMusL

LhMusL

    Forum Fan

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 468 posts
  • Location:Melbourne
  • Joined: 08-November 05

Posted 11 March 2008 - 01:01 PM

800cmf techno carb was about $950 i think.

#17 Guns n roses

Guns n roses

    Forum Fixture

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 575 posts
  • Joined: 08-November 05

Posted 11 March 2008 - 06:07 PM

hmm hope the 660s are a bit cheaper!!!




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users