Jump to content


Photo

What have I got here...fabricated trailing arms


  • Please log in to reply
27 replies to this topic

#1 Tyre biter

Tyre biter

    Forum Fixture

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 982 posts
  • Name:Craig
  • Location:Canberra
  • Car:Should have gone with Palais...
  • Joined: 08-December 10

Posted 12 January 2012 - 08:06 PM

Some might remember from my build thread that I got my hatch in pieces and some of the supposedly good bits included a fabricated and adjustable rear axle trailing arms; thread http://www.gmh-toran...__fromsearch__1 refers.

Today I dug them out of my lean-to I built several months back so I could store my parts, and here is what I have;

Posted Image
One of the pair of trailing arms with one of each end's pair of metal sleeves fitted.

Posted Image
The sleeved ends - sleeves removed and inside shown. Some sort of bush with circlip retainer is inside.

Posted Image
The nylon bushed end with a fixed metal sleeve inside.

Disregard the black and silver colouring - I began to rub away a little bit of surface corrosion.

A few questions arising from folks who have used these sort of trailing arms;
1. Does the (right hand) end with the existing bush attach to the body as I anticipate, or the axle? Just that it seems to be a tad wide for the boxed body end.

2. Assuming I have it right, it seems the metal sleeved end negates the need for the diff to have a bush fitted?

3. Does anyone know what brand they are as there is nothing on them to indicate the same - they don't appear to be MacDonald Brothers nor Whiteline units bit otherwise I am lost as to their origin? All partts are metal as opposed to alloy if that helps identify the units. And nope, I can't ask the former owner (formerly referred to as 'tosso') as he is impossible to get in touch with, and he cannot be relied upon to tell the truth about anything with this car - oh, and he seems a tad thick as well...

Thanks in advance for any advice and cheers, TB

Edited by Tyre biter, 12 January 2012 - 08:07 PM.


#2 _evil UC hatch_

_evil UC hatch_
  • Guests

Posted 12 January 2012 - 08:19 PM

the way I see it is the upper arm (bottom of pic) has that folded flat bar to attach to the bush thats in the diff housing, meaning the other end (left of pic) wold be attached to body, one could only assume the lower arms (top in pic) are meant to be the same

#3 _Bomber Watson_

_Bomber Watson_
  • Guests

Posted 12 January 2012 - 08:44 PM

How is the suspension supposed to move with solid bushes in a non parrallell four link??

Cheers.

#4 _evil UC hatch_

_evil UC hatch_
  • Guests

Posted 12 January 2012 - 08:53 PM

bush in one end, sleeve with small amount of rubber in other end for a little sideways give. thats how it looks to me anyway

even then thats half of what a conventional set would have, I'd imagine its meant for a setup with little suspension travel

#5 _Bomber Watson_

_Bomber Watson_
  • Guests

Posted 12 January 2012 - 09:06 PM

I would be surprised to see more than 50mm travel with that setup.

Cheers.

#6 Tyre biter

Tyre biter

    Forum Fixture

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 982 posts
  • Name:Craig
  • Location:Canberra
  • Car:Should have gone with Palais...
  • Joined: 08-December 10

Posted 12 January 2012 - 09:19 PM

Thanks Evil - makes sense.

Bomber - your ubiquitous short and snappy one liners again leave me only half enlightened...
Genuine question regarding your post as to movement or lack thereof - accepting Evil's POV the metal sleeved ends attach tot he rear axle; they appear to be able to turn around the bolt/s securing the same and the bush is carried inside the end - between the sleeve and the bondy of the arm end.

Just so I understand your concern - how do you see the movement being restricted exactly?
I ask because the former owner (tosso) had all sorts of plans for a custom street/drag car (locked 9" diff as an example) and so I am now wondering if these trailing arms are more suited to that sort of application.
Essentially, what have I missed/not considered?

Cheers, TB

Edited by Tyre biter, 12 January 2012 - 09:20 PM.


#7 _Bomber Watson_

_Bomber Watson_
  • Guests

Posted 12 January 2012 - 09:28 PM

In a parallel four link they would be fine.

In a non parallel setup like our Toranas run, the top arms are on a large angle, and the lowers are on a small angle (opposite way)

This eliminates the need for a panhard rod, kinda.

But, as the suspension moves up and down, the angle of incidence between the bolt and the control arm changes HORIZONTALLY, not just vertically.

Limiting the amount of movement "side to side" will limit the suspension travel and introduce a form of bind.

This is why most guys who are half serious about turning stick to rubber in the top arms, to allow them to move a lot, and go to a urethaine bush in the lower arms where the increased stiffness doesnt affect the movement so much.

Putting urethaine bushes in the top arms seems to be relatively well known to be a large cause of shithouse suspension movement.

This applies no matter what the application, you want the rear end to move properly and control ably whether your going in strait lines or around corners.

That said, im a relative suspension noob, so may be totally wrong.

Cheers.

#8 _evil UC hatch_

_evil UC hatch_
  • Guests

Posted 12 January 2012 - 09:38 PM

I am left wondering if the car has been fitted with a parralell setup, hence the custom made arms? if not I probably wouldnt use them on a street car...

#9 _Bomber Watson_

_Bomber Watson_
  • Guests

Posted 12 January 2012 - 09:39 PM

Or a race car...

Thats the only reason why you would run something like that, but a panhard rod or watts linkage would be a neccessity.

picks of the undercarrage!!!

Cheers.

#10 _Bomber Watson_

_Bomber Watson_
  • Guests

Posted 12 January 2012 - 09:46 PM

Found this pick in TB's build thread.

Posted Image

Definitally doesnt have a parallel setup. most certainly stock.

Cheers.

Edited by Bomber Watson, 12 January 2012 - 09:47 PM.


#11 76lxhatch

76lxhatch

    That was easy!

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,195 posts
  • Location:Unzud
  • Car:SS
  • Joined: 04-August 08
Garage View Garage

Posted 13 January 2012 - 07:07 AM

I don't see the problem, if those bushes (would be nice if they were proper rod ends, maybe they even are?) have any give at all they will probably twist further with less resistance than any full sized bush. It probably won't last as long, but it looks fine from what I can see. Its a bit strange that the eye of the arm appears to shroud the entire sleeve - hopefully they stick out a bit to give clearance, you could always trim them a bit if not.

This is a rod end version but same basic thing, its completely solid longitudinally but provides more twisting movement (we don't want sideways movement at all) than any bush:
Posted Image


If in good condition and they clear OK I'd definitely use them. I'd put the eye ends onto the car and the bushes at the diff end.

#12 S pack

S pack

    Scrivet Counter

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,649 posts
  • Name:Dave
  • Location:Luggage Point
  • Car:73 LJ
  • Joined: 25-January 10

Posted 13 January 2012 - 07:34 AM

G/day Craig

The bushes with the metal sleeves (the ends that attach to the body mountings) at the left hand end of the arms in your pics. Are they fairly solid or does the metal inner sleeve of the bush spin freely like a needle roller bearing?

Cheers
Dave.

#13 Tyre biter

Tyre biter

    Forum Fixture

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 982 posts
  • Name:Craig
  • Location:Canberra
  • Car:Should have gone with Palais...
  • Joined: 08-December 10

Posted 13 January 2012 - 11:16 AM

Thanks for all of your interest and advice - much appreciated.

Bomber, your account seemed to me to hold water - sufficiently so that I went and visited a local suspension store just now to discuss the same. I learned the enclosed end contains a 'spherical bush' or something like that. Essentially it does allow some 'flex' as you alluded was needed, but not enough in a real word (road) environment - better suited to track work I was told. Also advised that with road use the bush only needs to wear a poofteenth before it becomes noisey and the ride is also pretty harsh - significant NVH.

The advice fromt he suspension store was not to fit them to a road car unless I was prepared to put up with the harshness and noise. Plan B is now in play and I'll clean up the original trailing arms including replacing the bushes. I'll also clean up the fabricated arms and attempt to sell them off to someone looking for more of a track application item.

Dave in answer to your question - the two halves of the sleeves lay hard up against the centre sleeve contained inside the bush and like lx76hatch suggests, they also protrude outside the housing. I reckon they aren't meant to turn once bolted up - the fit is very tight - I think the the bolt is supposed to turn inside the sleeves if you get my meaning?

Thanks again to all and cheers, TB

#14 ls2lxhatch

ls2lxhatch

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,332 posts
  • Location:Perth
  • Car:LX Hatch
  • Joined: 29-May 06

Posted 13 January 2012 - 11:19 AM

The spherical bush/bearing is basically the bush/bearing out of a rod end. Once bolted up the inner bearing will rotate and swivel.

Posted Image

Posted Image

Edited by ls2lxhatch, 13 January 2012 - 11:24 AM.


#15 76lxhatch

76lxhatch

    That was easy!

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,195 posts
  • Location:Unzud
  • Car:SS
  • Joined: 04-August 08
Garage View Garage

Posted 13 January 2012 - 12:54 PM

the two halves of the sleeves lay hard up against the centre sleeve contained inside the bush and like lx76hatch suggests, they also protrude outside the housing. I reckon they aren't meant to turn once bolted up - the fit is very tight - I think the the bolt is supposed to turn inside the sleeves if you get my meaning?

The bolt and the sleeves should be locked tight and will not move at all, the spherical bearing (what I call a rod end above) as ls2lxhatch says both twists and turns (although it may be a little stiff to move easily by hand). These joints have more movement than bushes and will not be a limiting factor at all. The only concern is harshness for street use, but I haven't found it to be anything noticeable on the top arms.

#16 myss427

myss427

    Forum Fixture

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,636 posts
  • Location:Canberra
  • Car:427 hatch, CV8 Monaro, Ve SSV ute. Was part owner A9X sedan until he sold it without telling me!
  • Joined: 17-November 05
Garage View Garage

Posted 13 January 2012 - 01:09 PM

My top arms have the spherical bush thatn is shown by LS2LXhatch (graphite impreganated), and after 5000km's no noise and lots of hard driving. Also i needed a parnard bar to top sideways movement, was minimal but you could feel it.

#17 Tyre biter

Tyre biter

    Forum Fixture

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 982 posts
  • Name:Craig
  • Location:Canberra
  • Car:Should have gone with Palais...
  • Joined: 08-December 10

Posted 13 January 2012 - 04:32 PM

Back to Plan A it seems...

I put the upper trailing arm into a vice, inserted the sleeves and stuck a screwdriver through the same. It moves just as 76lxhatch suggested it would and the range of movement was suprising, as was how fairly easily it moved. So clearly the trailing arms contain a spherical bush/bearing as depicted in LS2LXhatch's post.

I am also thinking if they are good enough for myss427's car then they ought to be sufficient for mine - the only question I have is did you need a panhard rod because of this type of trailing arm, or was there another reason behind it (likely due to the hp/torque that monster of your's puts out perhaps)?

So pending advice regarding the panhard rod I reckon I have nothing to loose by sticking them in and worse case scenario being if I don't like the NVH or the bushes flog-out quickly, then I merely dig out the OEM trailing arms and take up Plan B - no biggie really.

Again, thanks to all for your help.

Cheers, TB

#18 _Bomber Watson_

_Bomber Watson_
  • Guests

Posted 13 January 2012 - 07:32 PM

I consider myself corrected hehehe.

I see what you guys are on about now, I was thinking that only half the bush was in the arms and there was another half that goes in, but yeah, rod ends, way betterer.

Cheers.

#19 76lxhatch

76lxhatch

    That was easy!

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,195 posts
  • Location:Unzud
  • Car:SS
  • Joined: 04-August 08
Garage View Garage

Posted 13 January 2012 - 08:41 PM

the only question I have is did you need a panhard rod because of this type of trailing arm

Mine has the spherical ends in the top arms (only) and doesn't need any further lateral location - of course the triangulated four link isn't a perfect design but there is about as little movement as you're going to get. The rod ends wouldn't cause extra movement, in fact they should reduce it due to there being less bushes to deflect and alter the arm length.

I reckon I have nothing to loose by sticking them in and worse case scenario being if I don't like the NVH or the bushes flog-out quickly

My comment about the bushes not lasting as long was made when we thought the small ends were bushes. The range of motion of the rod ends should look after the remaining bushes at the other end better. The only drawback is the NVH as far as I see it.

#20 Tyre biter

Tyre biter

    Forum Fixture

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 982 posts
  • Name:Craig
  • Location:Canberra
  • Car:Should have gone with Palais...
  • Joined: 08-December 10

Posted 13 January 2012 - 09:06 PM

Bomber - I am hearing you - learning heaps and like you, I wasn't aware the ends had spherical bushes that swivelled either - heck I'd never heard of let alone seen a spherical bush before - the ends seemed fixed to me and not till the above posts did I think to stick a rod in there and attempt t move them about.

76lxhatch - Thanks; it's all sounding better by the minute.
Stupid question time - yep another one...
When you say; "I'd put the eye ends onto the car and the bushes at the diff end."
Do you mean the ones at left with the spherical ends, or the ones at right (nylon bush end on lower trailing arm and the forked end of the upper trailing arm that encompases the bush carried in the top side of the diff housing)?
Posted Image

Cheers, TB

Edited by Tyre biter, 13 January 2012 - 09:09 PM.


#21 355LX

355LX

    Long Term Project

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 611 posts
  • Name:Dave
  • Location:Perth, WA
  • Car:LX hatch
  • Joined: 08-November 05

Posted 13 January 2012 - 10:00 PM

They are made by a company called Tubular Suspension Systems (TSS) in Sydney. They have a spherical ball setup at both the diff ends (for upper and lower).

I have a set of the lowers in my hatch and the machined spacers were not 100% and I had to take a little more off them, and even now one of them is a little bit noisy. There is nothing wrong with them but imho there are possibly better units out there.

Hope that helps.

Dave

#22 S pack

S pack

    Scrivet Counter

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,649 posts
  • Name:Dave
  • Location:Luggage Point
  • Car:73 LJ
  • Joined: 25-January 10

Posted 13 January 2012 - 10:26 PM

Bomber - I am hearing you - learning heaps and like you, I wasn't aware the ends had spherical bushes that swivelled either - heck I'd never heard of let alone seen a spherical bush before - the ends seemed fixed to me and not till the above posts did I think to stick a rod in there and attempt t move them about.

76lxhatch - Thanks; it's all sounding better by the minute.
Stupid question time - yep another one...
When you say; "I'd put the eye ends onto the car and the bushes at the diff end."
Do you mean the ones at left with the spherical ends, or the ones at right (nylon bush end on lower trailing arm and the forked end of the upper trailing arm that encompases the bush carried in the top side of the diff housing)?
Posted Image

Cheers, TB


Put the spherical bearing ends (at left in pic) to the body mounts and the urethane bush and the fork ends to the differential housing.

#23 Tyre biter

Tyre biter

    Forum Fixture

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 982 posts
  • Name:Craig
  • Location:Canberra
  • Car:Should have gone with Palais...
  • Joined: 08-December 10

Posted 14 January 2012 - 04:55 PM

Dave (355LX) thanks - I got in touch with James at TSS and you are spot on - it is one of their's.
Dave (S pack) thanks for your advice.
Cheers, TB

#24 Tyre biter

Tyre biter

    Forum Fixture

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 982 posts
  • Name:Craig
  • Location:Canberra
  • Car:Should have gone with Palais...
  • Joined: 08-December 10

Posted 15 January 2012 - 06:58 PM

Righto then, next question; How does one attach the sway bar to these tubular trailing arms exactly?
Just there is no holes in the lower arms as there is with the OEM items, and so do I drill into them or mount them otherwise?
Cheers, TB

#25 _evil UC hatch_

_evil UC hatch_
  • Guests

Posted 15 January 2012 - 09:15 PM

you would need a sway bar that attaches to the body, uc ones I think are like that, or an aftermarket one




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users