Ring busted over Fake Musclecars in Melbourne
#376
Posted 29 October 2014 - 02:07 PM
The person at the dealership reading the engine number correctly.
Then writing it down against the PSN of the car, again getting both right.
Person at the GMH IBM terminal then reading the PSN correctly and entering the numbers right to open the record for that PSN.
Then reading the engine number right, and typing it in correctly.
Lots of scope for errors. Hence there are so many L's instead of R and T, digits missing (keystroke missed) hence a leading 0 added in the MSD spot.
#377
Posted 29 October 2014 - 03:02 PM
^ you'd wonder if the mechanic doing the pink slip would pick up on this, 'gee mate this chassis no. doesn't match'
Yeah, no worries, it's a typo.
Yeah okay.
s
#378
Posted 29 October 2014 - 05:09 PM
In over 30 years of rego renewals, only time an engine or chassis number has been checked was for a blue slip
#379
Posted 29 October 2014 - 07:02 PM
^ you'd wonder if the mechanic doing the pink slip would pick up on this, 'gee mate this chassis no. doesn't match'
Yeah, no worries, it's a typo.
Yeah okay.
s
It ill be right on the rego, just wrong in GMH's records.
#380
Posted 12 November 2014 - 08:23 PM
Flying very close to the sun there Adam...
#381
Posted 12 November 2014 - 08:49 PM
Closer than he realised...lol
#382
Posted 12 November 2014 - 08:59 PM
#383
Posted 12 November 2014 - 09:05 PM
#384
Posted 18 November 2014 - 03:41 PM
Any QLD arrests yet?
#385
Posted 18 November 2014 - 04:25 PM
Any QLD arrests yet?
What or who are you getting at ?
#386 _Skapinad_
Posted 18 November 2014 - 05:40 PM
Edited by Skapinad, 18 November 2014 - 05:43 PM.
#387
Posted 18 November 2014 - 06:27 PM
#388 _threeblindmice_
Posted 18 November 2014 - 06:37 PM
#389
Posted 18 November 2014 - 07:09 PM
Since there is no new info to add I'll close this down for awhile
If anything comes to light and I don't see it let me know and I'll open it up again for discussion
#390
Posted 19 February 2015 - 07:32 AM
#391 _threeblindmice_
Posted 19 February 2015 - 09:05 AM
Thanks Adam , most legal things are not quick , two years seems to be a common time period .
#392
Posted 19 February 2015 - 11:00 AM
Well done Adam, you just copped a ban from the site!
#393 _Bomber Watson_
Posted 19 February 2015 - 11:26 AM
#394
Posted 19 February 2015 - 11:28 AM
Well done Adam, you just copped a ban from the site!
Why?
I didn't think Skaps comments incriminated the member at all. If anything they cleared the air for him?
#395
Posted 19 February 2015 - 11:49 AM
#396
Posted 19 February 2015 - 11:58 AM
One message would confirm it...
#397
Posted 19 February 2015 - 12:02 PM
#398
Posted 19 February 2015 - 12:03 PM
I just read what Adam wrote and has he been charged yet?
No one has been charged let the law take its course
#399 _LS1 Taxi_
Posted 19 February 2015 - 12:04 PM
Why? He posted information gathered from a person and reposted said information with said persons blessing?
+1
#400
Posted 19 February 2015 - 12:09 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users