Edited by Punchy, 18 March 2017 - 03:05 PM.
Maximum hp output of factory option engine
#1
Posted 18 March 2017 - 03:04 PM
#2
Posted 18 March 2017 - 05:28 PM
Going to be tough nailing down the performance of the L34 option, you could get a high out put option package which took them to just over 300 horses. You'll get many varied reference sources on that one because they were from the dealer but a Holden part.
#3
Posted 18 March 2017 - 07:55 PM
Maybe at 10hp more for LX.
Like I said...wait for the gurus.
Edited by RallyRed, 18 March 2017 - 07:59 PM.
#4
Posted 18 March 2017 - 10:29 PM
L34 the highest, like previously said, the l34 high output is the one, if you can find an actual number.
#5
Posted 19 March 2017 - 08:22 AM
Wasn't the A9X just the same as the SS engine spec? L34 had the good breathing engine that made the berries. I thought the HO versions were 280hp and the normal l34 about 240hp, but thats just from reading shyte in old magazines through the years- doesnt make it correct.
#6 _Lazarus_
#7 _imj411_
Posted 19 March 2017 - 07:47 PM
#8
Posted 20 March 2017 - 09:33 PM
#9
Posted 28 March 2017 - 02:14 PM
Thanks for the info guys. how ever it is all general info without documented reference.
THE general figure that pops up in in 1974 wheels magazine ( yep an original pair of magazines ) and 1974 sports car world mag and gregories workshop manual that i now have is a figure of 240bhp.
There doesn't appear to be any variation to this figure in publicised writing anywhere that I can find.
This 240hp figure I would assume would be rear wheel hp figure too yes ????
I was hoping some of the esteemed genuine owners of a9x l34 and the like, may have documented evidence.
Scott
Edited by Punchy, 28 March 2017 - 02:16 PM.
#10
Posted 28 March 2017 - 02:49 PM
The horsepower figures from GMH were taken from an engine dyno and are SAE net figures. This is the engine with all ancillaries including full exhaust, as opposed to gross figures, which are measured without the water pump, alternator, power steering, exhaust, air cleaner, and may even include revised timing and fuel mixtures. The L.H. workshop manual must have horsepower included in the specs.
#11
Posted 28 March 2017 - 05:30 PM
Thanks for the info guys. how ever it is all general info without documented reference.
THE general figure that pops up in in 1974 wheels magazine ( yep an original pair of magazines ) and 1974 sports car world mag and gregories workshop manual that i now have is a figure of 240bhp.
There doesn't appear to be any variation to this figure in publicised writing anywhere that I can find.
This 240hp figure I would assume would be rear wheel hp figure too yes ????
I was hoping some of the esteemed genuine owners of a9x l34 and the like, may have documented evidence.
Scott
Thanks for the info guys. how ever it is all general info without documented reference.
Theres plenty of original Holden sales literature available that states the figures. Just hope your engineer will accept that the 240-250hp is RWHP and not as above..
Attached Files
Edited by RallyRed, 28 March 2017 - 05:56 PM.
#12
Posted 29 March 2017 - 08:33 AM
Hmmm. I'll have to dig that pamphlet out so I can have a closer look at that motor. Did all LH come out with the single outlet water pump or just L34s?
#13
Posted 29 March 2017 - 08:45 AM
I was told early LH had the single outlet.
#14
Posted 29 March 2017 - 08:37 PM
Hmmm. I'll have to dig that pamphlet out so I can have a closer look at that motor. Did all LH come out with the single outlet water pump or just L34s?
seen a few on cars in sold section of aust musclecar sales
good original early lh slr 5000
#15
Posted 30 March 2017 - 06:08 AM
#16
Posted 30 March 2017 - 08:15 AM
And pre July76 LX v8's as well.
#17
Posted 30 March 2017 - 08:30 AM
Rightio then. This forum continues to teach me stuff every day. Love it.
#18
Posted 03 April 2017 - 07:35 PM
Attached Files
#19
Posted 03 April 2017 - 10:54 PM
Yes 240hp is what i always remembered, its a flywheel figure....no way its rwhp.
#20
Posted 04 April 2017 - 08:44 AM
Not to mention that it was a pretty optimistic figure as well. The same horsepower as a VR Clubsport? I don't think so.
#21
Posted 04 April 2017 - 09:07 AM
It's not common for car manufacturers to quote RWHP. GM-H always quote flywheel HP & in those days it was a 'gross' figure.
The highest figure you'll find in official literature for a 308/5.0 V8 in an LH will be 240, even though the std motor from around Oct 1974 onwards was the HJ version which had 250 bhp.
Dr Terry
#22
Posted 04 April 2017 - 09:13 AM
I have only just bought your book and haven't had a chance to read it yet so stop me if I have got this wrong, but how could the VR/VS motor (180 kilowatts) be rated at less horsepower than the HJ 308?
#23
Posted 04 April 2017 - 09:18 AM
Not to mention that it was a pretty optimistic figure as well. The same horsepower as a VR Clubsport? I don't think so.
As has been said many times on this forum when the topic of HP comparisons with older cars raises its ugly head, prior to around 1976 Australia used GROSS HP figures.
After that they used NET HP figures, which are vastly different & cannot be compared.
Dr Terry
#24
Posted 04 April 2017 - 11:39 PM
I have only just bought your book and haven't had a chance to read it yet so stop me if I have got this wrong, but how could the VR/VS motor (180 kilowatts) be rated at less horsepower than the HJ 308?
The cold skin on my cuppa tea laughs at either engine !
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users