Jump to content


What is a 72 Bathurst XU-1?


  • Please log in to reply
512 replies to this topic

#101 meanmachine72

meanmachine72

    Forum Fixture

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,031 posts
  • Name:Jono
  • Location:Taree Workers club
  • Joined: 12-July 06

Posted 06 February 2007 - 10:08 PM

who drove car 24 when it rolled bruce???

#102 _gtr-xu1_

_gtr-xu1_
  • Guests

Posted 06 February 2007 - 11:22 PM

BOND

#103 FLY_AGAIN_XU-1

FLY_AGAIN_XU-1

    Forum Fixture

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,653 posts
  • Joined: 01-September 06

Posted 22 February 2007 - 05:43 PM

Posted Image
Posted Image

#104 _5752cc_

_5752cc_
  • Guests

Posted 25 February 2007 - 01:36 PM

I have heard/can remember another reason GMH pulled the pin on on the LJ V8 (it may be in Fiv's book) & that was the intended location of the fuel tank(s).

In order to carry enough fuel for Bathurst the fuel tank needed to be bigger so they were going to have twin tanks in the boot wheel arches & Harry/GMH decided that was too dangerous. Probably wouldn't have complied with the ADR's anyway even in those early days.

Not that it affects me - mine is only an April '73

#105 FLY_AGAIN_XU-1

FLY_AGAIN_XU-1

    Forum Fixture

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,653 posts
  • Joined: 01-September 06

Posted 07 March 2007 - 01:39 PM

Recognition (Homologation)
MADE and/or SOLD

June (109)
July ( 10)
August (191)
September (299)

Total (609)

From July to the end of September 500 XU-1s had been produced 250 by each plant.

Friday (30-6-1972) (The V8 LJ is dumped)

Saturday ( 1-7-1972) (Recognition 1/1V Detroit Locker)
(Batch 1 200)

Thursday (10-8-1972) (Recognition 2/2V Sprintmasters)
(Batch 2 200)

Tuesday (29-8-1972) (Recognition 5/5V Cam, Flywheel etc)
(Batch 3 200)

My theory is that Batch 3 cars started at JP216 and finished with the JP222 ! I am still waiting on some letters from C.A.M.S. and Joe Felice but im hoping there are some vin numbers or engine numbers on these letters to once and for all verify this.

#106 FLY_AGAIN_XU-1

FLY_AGAIN_XU-1

    Forum Fixture

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,653 posts
  • Joined: 01-September 06

Posted 19 March 2007 - 03:21 PM

Posted Image
Posted Image
Posted Image


Amendment 1/1V 1/7/1972 - Final drive. Variation in
supplier. May be either "Borg Warner Limited slip" or
"Detroit No Spin"

From the 1/7/1972 to the end of September 1972 Holden had
produced a total of 500 LJ XU-1,s.

Could Holden only have built 100 of the Amendment 1/1V cars ?
Can 1/1V cars be classed as 1972 Bathurst XU-1.s ?
Can 2/2V cars be classed as 1972 Bathurst XU-1,s as they only
had sprintmasters fitted ?
Did sprintmasters become optional after the 200 2/2V cars ?

I would be very interested to hear your thoughts on this !!!!!!!!

Of the 200 5/5V cars 50 had been earmarked for export only leaving
150 in Australia ! :furious:

Looking forward to hearing your thoughts on this subject !

Bruce.

#107 _rorym_

_rorym_
  • Guests

Posted 20 March 2007 - 04:04 PM

The 2 most important questions to be asked about this period are.....

1) When and why was the ' no race car ' policy introduced and how long did it last?

2) Why was the introduction of the ' Special ' XU1 in 72....so underplayed?

Simple..GM had a world wide ban on motor circuit racing...always did...it was from 1966 in the USA and was extended worldwide...GM never raced..at all! Get it?..Hence we invented the DEALER team to uphold the name...GMH never made a race car..thats why there was never...a race car...just a high performance road car.
R

#108 FLY_AGAIN_XU-1

FLY_AGAIN_XU-1

    Forum Fixture

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,653 posts
  • Joined: 01-September 06

Posted 10 July 2007 - 06:00 PM

I have been unable to obtain any paper work from either Holden or CAMS on this matter. So all we have to go on is the rules, homologations and the vin disk. With no concrete proof we can only still theorize what took place in 1972.

FACT 1 : On Friday the 30-6-1972 Holden pulled the plug on its V8 LJ programme due to the SUPER CAR SCARE and pressure from government.
FACT 2 : On Saturday the 1-7-1972 Homologation 1/1V becomes effective.
Final drive. Variation in supplier. May be either " Borg Warner Limited Slip" or "Detroit No Spin".
FACT 3 : On Thursday the 10-8-1972 Homologation 2/2V becomes effective.
6" Aluminium Alloy Wheels ( Sprintmasters )
FACT 4 : On Tuesday the 29-8-1972 Homologation 5/5V becomes effective.
Heavy duty coil springs, Lightened flywheel, New camshaft and 3.55 Final drive ratio.
FACT 5 : Holden produces 500 cars between 1-7-1972 and 29-9-1972.
FACT 5 : On Sunday 1-10-1972 Peter Brock wins Bathurst.

MY THEORY

Batch 1 cars Homologation 1/1V 1-7-1972 Diff (Total 100)
With Holden deciding not to go ahead with the "Detroit No Spin" (Detroit Locker) and according to the rules they would of had to produce only 100 cars with the "Borg Warner Limited Slip" It is my belief this target was achieved on Friday the 11-8-1972.

Batch 2 cars Homologation 2/2V 10-8-1972 Sprinmasters (Total 200)
It is my belief that these cars started rolling off the production lines on Friday the 11-8-1972. At the Brisbane plant they were completed on Tuesday the 5-9-1972 while Adelaide continued through out September in finishing off their quota of these batch 2 cars (Sprintmasters)

Batch 3 cars Homologation 5/5V 29-8-1972 Springs, Cam shaft, Lightened flywheel, 3.55 diff ratio.
It is my opinion that these cars started rolling off the production lines on Tuesday the 5-9-1972 at the Adelaide plant and Wednesday the 6-9-1972 at the brisbane plant. With a new camshaft and lightened flywheel needing to be fitted a new batch of engines had to be produced. I believe these engines ranged from JP216 to JP222. For those that have the vin disk check H247797, then check the cars previous to this and you,ll see what i mean. This also fits in the time frame perfectly ! It is also my belief that these cars came standard with nibless rims but could be fitted with the $125 OPTION of sprintmasters.

So in summing up my THEORY i think Holden done well ! Batch 1 cars had a diff change but were still a standard LJ XU-1. Batch 2 cars had sprintmasters fitted but were still a standard LJ XU-1 and the Batch 3 cars had all the go faster bits but looked exactually the same as any other LJ XU-1. I think this was largely due to the SUPER CAR SCARE. Well disguised I think.

So what is a 1972 BATHURST LJ GTR XU-1 ? "My Theory" A car built in September 1972 with an engine number ranging from JP216 to JP222. Batch 1 and 2 cars playing there part as well.

This is only my opinion !!!!!!!

Cheers, B.

#109 meanmachine72

meanmachine72

    Forum Fixture

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,031 posts
  • Name:Jono
  • Location:Taree Workers club
  • Joined: 12-July 06

Posted 10 July 2007 - 07:18 PM

yes bruce....if you have the disc it is easy to follow..!!!
but i agree that on the H247797 page it does "tell" what
happened.......i agree johnno

#110 frash da bucket

frash da bucket

    Forum Fixture

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,890 posts
  • Location:NSW
  • Joined: 23-April 07

Posted 11 July 2007 - 10:08 AM

G'day FLY_AGAIN_XU1 .I sent a pm to you cheers.

#111 _pete09_

_pete09_
  • Guests

Posted 11 July 2007 - 05:28 PM

I`ve been following this topic with interest.

I have owned for some years a 9/72 XU-1 with its original JP 220376 block and H252 head. It has its XH/HX stamped camshaft still but I`d like clarification regarding its flywheel.
It has numbered balance stampings on the pressure plate bolt fixings and flywheel to crank bolts and it is just short of 23lbs in weight so it`s not that light, certainly not 19lbs.
It has H282 cast into the flywheel and the part number 7420116 also but this does not match 7420114 which is the number in the LJ parts book and 7420114 appears to be the standard flywheel number for any 202 equipped 202 LJ.
Would this be usual and is the casting date correct?. Or was this just a normal combination at the time to at least give a factory car some tractability for normal motoring?.
I`d be keen on some educated thoughts. Thanks.

#112 _sunburst_metalic_

_sunburst_metalic_
  • Guests

Posted 11 July 2007 - 07:22 PM

I believe there is more than 200 1972 Bathurst XU1s, all the changes made on the 72 Bathurst car carried through to the 1973 car bar the HX race cam. So all 1973 cars are 72 Bathurst cars with a milder cam. Sunburst

#113 FLY_AGAIN_XU-1

FLY_AGAIN_XU-1

    Forum Fixture

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,653 posts
  • Joined: 01-September 06

Posted 12 July 2007 - 12:16 AM

Posted Image

Up until the first homologation 6/6V which became effective on 15-6-1973 Holden had produced a total of 500 1973 LJ GTR XU-1,s. These 500 cars had been produced for one purpose. ^^^^^^^^^^^
1972 Bathurst specials ( No ) 1973 Group C specials ( Yes ).
I suppose the question can be asked as to weather a standard 1972 LJ GTR XU-1 fitted with either a Borg Warner Limited Slip or Sprintmasters can be classed as a 1972 Bathurst special. If we can class these cars as Bathurst specials then yes there certainly was more than 200 produced ?

Edited by FLY_AGAIN_XU-1, 12 July 2007 - 12:21 AM.


#114 FLY_AGAIN_XU-1

FLY_AGAIN_XU-1

    Forum Fixture

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,653 posts
  • Joined: 01-September 06

Posted 16 July 2007 - 01:53 PM

With no CONCRETE proof of what a Bathurst 72 car is, I went back to the 71 Bathurst cars in which we have CONCRETE proof. The similarities between the 71 & 72 cars are very close with camshafts and a new diff ratio playing major parts. Going off the vin disc Holden produced a total of 299 cars in September of 1972. The same amount produced to create the 1971 Bathurst LC GTR XU-1.

Posted Image
Posted Image


In Joe Felice,s letter to C.A.M.S he states that 300 cars are to be produced, 200 with the 3.36 diff ratio and 100 with the 3.08 diff ratio. So what happened to the 300th car ? Straight forward really >>>

21.10.71 T LC 82911 H213674 K046874 (34203C0) 10.71 567 2

This car was marked down as a GTR when clearly it is a XU-1, bringing the total to 300. Also adding one to the total produced.

Adelaide 140
Brisbane 160

(Even concrete can be broken)

If only the 1972 Bathurst LJ GTR XU-1,s were that straight forward !!!!!!!!!

Cheers, B.

#115 _Skapinad_

_Skapinad_
  • Guests

Posted 17 July 2007 - 08:22 AM

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image

Bruce,

Rory was kind enough to fax through these pages he received from holden service dept. when he was investigating a vehicle he owned...the first 2 pages cover the LC and early LJ XU-1's and then goes on to describe the Bathrust 72 run. however there seems to be some contradictory info in here. on the 3rd page it states in early august the vin changed..... this did not occur until October, I think? and then states that all vehicles produced after the Bathurst run were in fact to bathurst specs, apart from Globe mags and firewall return spring and tab....

an interesting read if nothing else.....

Adam

#116 _mars_

_mars_
  • Guests

Posted 17 July 2007 - 04:52 PM

This message is for Fly Again, where did you get your Pink XU1 from, i am trying to track down my old car, can you tell me about it please.

Not sure where you guys are getting your sales figures from, apart from a few XU1's through the Car Clubs that sold for a bit over $100k and the Shannon's auction for $85k, there is not $50k difference between a standard XU1 and a Bathurst car yet been confirmed, possible $20k would be a realistic figure at the moment but that could change.

Mars

#117 _barodaxu1_

_barodaxu1_
  • Guests

Posted 17 July 2007 - 05:07 PM

In relation to the differences in price between the "Bathurst" models and the standard xu-1's. The difference was about $20k three years ago when I had my 72 bathurst valued by shannons. They valued mine at $50k and a mates non bathurst (73 mod) (but one of the best restored cars I have seen) at $30k. I would think that a difference of $50k would be about right now considering the amount the values of all the vehicles have increased.
Regards
barodaxu1

#118 FLY_AGAIN_XU-1

FLY_AGAIN_XU-1

    Forum Fixture

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,653 posts
  • Joined: 01-September 06

Posted 18 July 2007 - 01:23 PM

This message is for Fly Again, where did you get your Pink XU1 from, i am trying to track down my old car, can you tell me about it please.

Mars

I have tracked my cars history back to 1986. From 1973 to 1986 is still unknown. It was finished on the 4-8-1972, Adelaide built. What one are you looking for Mars ???
We may now of it !!!!!!!!!!!!





Adam
I agree that the vins for October built cars are 8D11P & 82911 for August, September built cars. Maybe this is the defining point when the production cars started and the Bathurst run finished. :clap:

Awsome info Adam & R

#119 _rorym_

_rorym_
  • Guests

Posted 18 July 2007 - 03:38 PM

I had forgotten about it until I was going through my 73 XU1 rebuild file.
R

#120 2600s

2600s

    Forum Fixture

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,172 posts
  • Location:Adelaide
  • Joined: 14-November 05

Posted 18 July 2007 - 06:10 PM

Fly Again, my twin brother sold his 72 XU-1 in Adelaide maybe 1987 or 88. This car was red at the time but was originally SMP. Was your car purchased in Adelaide?? My brother belives he sold the car to a guy who was in the air force, he sold it for $4300 :cry:

#121 FLY_AGAIN_XU-1

FLY_AGAIN_XU-1

    Forum Fixture

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,653 posts
  • Joined: 01-September 06

Posted 18 July 2007 - 11:50 PM

Fly Again, my twin brother sold his 72 XU-1 in Adelaide maybe 1987 or 88. This car was red at the time but was originally SMP. Was your car purchased in Adelaide?? My brother belives he sold the car to a guy who was in the air force, he sold it for $4300 :cry:

My car was painted white and was a WA car. Still had the original 1973 WA registration plates (XBX-414) when sold in 86-87.

Thanks, 2600s.

#122 _gtr-xu1_

_gtr-xu1_
  • Guests

Posted 19 July 2007 - 02:10 AM

back to the original topic. as i just did some figures

LJ XU1s built from Jan72-July72 = 593
( Adelade 267, Brisbane 326)
LJ XU1s with bathurst upgrades Aug72-early Aug73= 1435
(Adelade 682, Brisbane 753)
LJ XU1s with Bathurst 73 upgrades=151
(Adelade 66, Brisbane 85)

A 72 bathurst XU1 is a XU1 built with the upgrades that were implemented August 72

LJ XU1 started in Jan 72 reached minimum number off 200 identical units for homoglation by 3rd feb (model continued to July72) with 593 cars built
Aug 72 bath. upgrades to current XU1 implemented, 200 was reached model continued- 1435 were made till early 8/73 with the 72 bath upgrades
The last 151 LJ XU1s built in Aug/sept73 had the 73 bath upgrades.

#123 _82911_

_82911_
  • Guests

Posted 19 July 2007 - 08:32 AM

^ so if that is accurate, then that makes.............

"73 bathurst the rarest.

"early "72 the next rarest.

"Bathurst "72 the most common.

If Value is decided purely on supply and demand/rarity then,thanks for that!
So now my 6/72 XU1 just became worth more than a "72 Bathurst! :tease:

BTW:... while all you number gurus are checking things....
Can someone fill me in on VIN H291046 ?

Cheers Greg... :D

#124 _mars_

_mars_
  • Guests

Posted 19 July 2007 - 09:48 AM

So where does no 39 off the production line in Feb 72 rate.

#125 _gtr-xu1_

_gtr-xu1_
  • Guests

Posted 19 July 2007 - 04:29 PM

^ so if that is accurate, then that makes.............

"73 bathurst the rarest.

"early "72 the next rarest.

"Bathurst "72 the most common.

If Value is decided purely on supply and demand/rarity then,thanks for that!
So now my 6/72 XU1 just became worth more than a "72 Bathurst! :tease:

BTW:... while all you number gurus are checking things....
Can someone fill me in on VIN H291046 ?

Cheers Greg... :D

try posting the rest of the numbers.

a chassis number and a body number then we can see if things line up.

other than that we dont give out numbers

cheers
Jamie




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users