Half Track (660ft) E.T. & MPH
#26
Posted 10 March 2007 - 10:43 AM
It also sticks with my preferred philosophy of "street car" as the only change is the tyre!
Cheers, and the thought HAD crossed my mind.. Struggler bought my 4.11 Spooled centre to take the temptation away from me
#27 _MAWLER_
Posted 12 March 2007 - 01:30 PM
#28 _LXXX308_
Posted 13 March 2007 - 11:36 PM
Haven't tested at WSID yet but this TCE locked up so well at powercruise.
#29 _MAWLER_
Posted 23 April 2007 - 07:41 PM
60ft 2.1123 2.0203 1.9744
330ft 5.4936 5.3892 5.325
660ft 8.2719 8.1869 8.1097
660ft MPH 87.87 87.29 87.72
1000ft 10.6985 10.6247 10.5475
ET 12.7691 12.6825 12.6117
MPH 117.16 110.19 112.53
What is the difference supposed to be between the first 1/8 and the second 1/8th? My quickest time saw a first 1/8th 8.1 @ 87.72mph while the second 1/8th took 4.5 @ 24.81mph, looking at the splits the 60-330ft is also slower than the rest. I was attributing both these to lack of grip early on, would this be a fair conlcusion?
Any other observations are welcome.
Cheers,
#30
Posted 20 May 2007 - 02:11 PM
#31
Posted 20 May 2007 - 08:07 PM
Your eighth mile times and quarter times add up OK, but your terminal speeds should be closer. The 117mph one is obviously incorrect, and even 112 is weird.What is the difference supposed to be between the first 1/8 and the second 1/8th? My quickest time saw a first 1/8th 8.1 @ 87.72mph while the second 1/8th took 4.5 @ 24.81mph, looking at the splits the 60-330ft is also slower than the rest. I was attributing both these to lack of grip early on, would this be a fair conlcusion?
Any other observations are welcome.
Cheers,
#32 _MAWLER_
Posted 21 May 2007 - 05:38 PM
So the terminal speeds should be closer, how much closer? And what do you mean by the 112 being weird, as in the splits should just be closer?
Cheers,
#33
Posted 21 May 2007 - 06:04 PM
#34
Posted 22 May 2007 - 10:15 AM
JMHO
#35 _MAWLER_
Posted 23 May 2007 - 10:45 PM
Cheers,
#36 _lurkin308_
Posted 23 May 2007 - 11:18 PM
cheers caine
#37 _MAWLER_
Posted 24 May 2007 - 11:06 AM
What about cooler engine/trans temps? On the dyno we were running 212rwkw at about 200df, let it sit for a bit without changing anything and hit it again at about 160df and got 216rwkw.
Thanks.
#38 _devilsadvocate_
Posted 24 May 2007 - 03:06 PM
Are wind speed and direction recorded for these events?.......that is going to have a bigger effect on the the second half than the 1st.
Just in passing: The ideal result would be to accelerate at a constant rate from start to finish. Something with jet/rocket engines and a very streamlined shape would be needed to achieve this!
The 1/8 ET would be 71% of the 1/4ET for this ideal.
Figures of ~64% have been quoted (does this figure hold for <6 sec passes?) revealing that acceleration in the 2nd half decreases.........this is no surprise since we have increased air resistance as we go faster.
Edited by devilsadvocate, 24 May 2007 - 03:07 PM.
#39
Posted 24 May 2007 - 08:23 PM
As for your dyno results..... anything with a physically smaller converter will heat the transmission fluid rapidly, causing a loss of gearbox efficiency and consequently a loss in rear wheel power. Allowing the trans to cool will always give a higher reading after a few power runs. Engines usually make a bit more power when hotter, probably because the oil is thinner, creating less parasitic drag on rotating masses. Getting the engine hot then feeding it cold air will make the most power (usually).
Hope I have explained this in english and you get something from it.
#40 _MAWLER_
Posted 24 May 2007 - 10:12 PM
I'll be back with more questions tho, rest assured of that, hehe
DA - no the temps were'nt that different between runs or even between the track and dyno. Wind speed was actually more for 112 run that 110.
Cheers,
#41 _maxpower1000hp_
Posted 29 June 2007 - 11:30 PM
that 1/8 mile time, times 1.555 = 1/4 time
but they are all in the same ball park as for those 4 into 1 pipes,
had a set of 4 into 1, 1'' 3/4 pri`s in a commodore, put the whole running gear in a Lj, got a set of 1" 7/8 pri`s, basiclly that was the only differents and on the dyno it had an extra 10kw(woopy) but it lost a shit load of torque
#42 _MAWLER_
Posted 12 April 2008 - 06:17 PM
So I went up to Heathcote a couple of weeks ago, this time with a better setup that included stepping up to 26x10.5 ET Streets and 90/10s and I managed to run a 12.16@115 (last time out 12.6@110). Naturally the gains were made in the extra traction that saw a 1.78 60ft, instead of the previous 2's.
My question is in regards to RPM crossing the line, where I am way down - crossing at 6000rpm when peak power is 6600rpm. Obviously tire and diff ratio and lots of things play a part in this equation but I was wondering what I should be doing to cross at the right spot.
I was launching at around 2000rpm and still receiving a bit of slip out of the hole. I'm thinking that better 60fts through playing with tire pressure and higher stall speeds will give me more, is this where I should concentrate? Full time was 60ft - 1.78, 330ft - 5.05, 660ft - 7.77, 660 mph - 89.89, 1000ft - 10.15, ET - 12.16@115. There is easily an 11 second pass in her, I reckon with a few more runs I could have done it!
Cheers,
#43
Posted 12 April 2008 - 08:42 PM
Your times sound very similar to mine with my new engine combo so i'll post up mine and my ideas! I'm no expert to give advise though mate!
My increments:
60' - 1.767
330' - 4.995
660' - 7.659
1000' - .000 - fault
ET - 11.934
MPH - 114.60
i think always work opn your launch, gains made there are carried thru to the other end!
If you launch with higher rpm then you could see an RPM gain over the line too which puts you in your max power zone as well!
Best of luck!
#44
Posted 12 April 2008 - 09:41 PM
What pressure are you running in those slicks ? I would recommend about 12psi.
Leave the line at idle if possible. This gives the engine the biggest pump shot possible out of your carb and hits the convertor hardest to make it work properly. If you don't have a transbrake then stalling the car at the line is a waste.
#45 _pallbag_
Posted 13 April 2008 - 08:48 AM
Leave the line at idle if possible. This gives the engine the biggest pump shot possible out of your carb and hits the convertor hardest to make it work properly. If you don't have a transbrake then stalling the car at the line is a waste.
Hopefuly not a stupid question, but would this also apply to a stock VT V6 with small street tyres on it? (but in reverse)
The 2 times I have run my Commodore, I loaded my revs up slightly to reduce a bit of wheel spin, or did I, I cant really remember why I did it, it just felt better than dumping the accelerator from idle ...
#46 _MAWLER_
Posted 13 April 2008 - 04:38 PM
I was running 18psi. I'm assuming dropping to 12 and leaving from idle to allow greatest torque multiplication will not get me that extra 1000rpm you're recommending
Is there a formula or something to work out the optimal ratio or is it a matter of trial and error? What would you suggest?
Thanks
#47
Posted 14 April 2008 - 10:20 AM
Yes, I always load up the driveline a bit by raising the rpm to about 1200-1500 rpm but there is no point revving it any harder than this, in fact as I said earlier it is a detriment.Leave the line at idle if possible. This gives the engine the biggest pump shot possible out of your carb and hits the convertor hardest to make it work properly. If you don't have a transbrake then stalling the car at the line is a waste.
Hopefuly not a stupid question, but would this also apply to a stock VT V6 with small street tyres on it? (but in reverse)
The 2 times I have run my Commodore, I loaded my revs up slightly to reduce a bit of wheel spin, or did I, I cant really remember why I did it, it just felt better than dumping the accelerator from idle ...
Liam, get a Moroso power speed calculator (its a big slide rule type thing) as it has a rpm V's speed scale on it. Alternately you can access the many calculators online. I use this one.... http://www.wallacera...Calculators.htm
At 115MPH with 26" tyres you will need about 4.56 gears assuming 4-5% convertor slip. If your convertor is looser you will need a taller gear. Yes that is a fairly low gear but thats what you will need to run the best ET.
What gear do you use now ?
Also if running 12 psi in your slicks please use a conventional or bias ply tyre on the front wheels (NO radials).
#48 _MAWLER_
Posted 14 April 2008 - 05:04 PM
Slip would be around the 5% mark considering my 4200 converter. I'm currently running 4.11's
I am running some 165 Michelin radials on the front which made me a bit wary of dropping the rears down much below the 18psi I was using.
What I might do is try and head back out to the track in the next couple of weeks and try and get some more accurate figures to work with. If I leave from idle, try getting the 60fts down with a bigger burnout and maybe little less tire pressure, and really concentrate on hitting the shifts and then take note of what RPM I'm crossing at - I might be a ble to lift if up a little and hopefully have a higher MPH to more accurately calculate the optimal rear-end ratio.
Cheers,
#49
Posted 14 April 2008 - 06:18 PM
My mickey T ET streets like around 17Psi, and SMALL burnouts. I've found even though I prefer a big smokey skid ( cause i'm a hoon!) the tyres seem to grip better if you just give them a little one. Maybe a big skid overheats them? I dont know!
Struggler: I assume your talking about sticking with the same style tyre all round and not mixing bias ply and raidals front/rear? I've run the ET street raidals and my normal street tyres on the front down to around 14Psi at the track ( 14Psi in the rear obviously) . Am i right in saying that your recommendation is to keep the car stable?
#50
Posted 15 April 2008 - 09:06 AM
Exactly.Struggler: I assume your talking about sticking with the same style tyre all round and not mixing bias ply and raidals front/rear? I've run the ET street raidals and my normal street tyres on the front down to around 14Psi at the track ( 14Psi in the rear obviously) . Am i right in saying that your recommendation is to keep the car stable?
Also I found similar results with the Drag Radials..... small burnout and 16psi works for me.
2 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users