
Biante Series is further away than ever
#26
Posted 01 March 2007 - 08:36 AM
distribute flyers at meetings explaining why some cars have bright pink bands on the windscreen,tell the scrutineers and organisers its because somebodys missus has breast cancer.
sort of like a tear away group without the super league style antics.
if the "tear away " group sat out a year would it get any recognition?
#27
_scalpa1_
Posted 01 March 2007 - 09:41 AM
cheers tony
ps in case you didnt already know i work for traction tyres in vic we are the yokohama motorsport dealer .
#28
Posted 01 March 2007 - 10:28 AM

#29
_rorym_
Posted 01 March 2007 - 11:04 AM
On the contrary Greg.Rory, are you saying that I'm NOT a genius?Dont have to be a genius to work it out.
![]()
![]()
Cheers Greg..
R
#30
Posted 01 March 2007 - 11:20 AM

You're right of course, but i don't know the answer.
Which is why i drive an STi and play with it in local club events, and am building my Hatch for Targa events.
Eventually, i will find a niche, but there is nothing out west as yet. The closest is the number of club events being run for modern 'sports' cars. Between these clubs, there is enough to keep me busy for a while.
Spoken to the condescending pricks at CAMS, there is no help there, they only recognise club stuff as an income stream, not a genuine grass roots base to build from.
They need a member shakeup, and there are too many people who are happy to whinge rather than riot.
Welby
#31
Posted 01 March 2007 - 11:21 AM
#32
_73LJWhiteSL_
Posted 01 March 2007 - 11:55 AM

For me I just want to get out there in a fairly cheap car (I couldn't build a $100,000 race car if i robbed every bank on this side of Melbourne... or could I?

I can see the point in making the car safe by upgrading brakes etc, but maybe we do need a production historic category. Completely stock cars. Sure things are fragile and would break, but well maybe people need to learn to race a little more carefully. It may not be as fast and as impressive to watch, but it would be like the way racing was... if you didn't have some mechanical sympathy you ended up parking it.
Steve
#33
_rorym_
Posted 01 March 2007 - 12:39 PM
Exactly Steve...we are back to the skill of bringing it home in one piece..It will be spectaular..its was back in 1970..dont see what would have changed..Fords sideways smoking everywhere..Torries taking them under brakes then getting smoked on the straights..Chargers somewhere in between..Bring it on!Sure things are fragile and would break, but well maybe people need to learn to race a little more carefully. It may not be as fast and as impressive to watch, but it would be like the way racing was... if you didn't have some mechanical sympathy you ended up parking it.
Steve
Welby..Always

R
#34
_rorym_
Posted 01 March 2007 - 01:31 PM
No..Biante has the windscreen.would it be possible for those in the series against the way things are going to wear a coloured band across the windscreen and print out their own results page?
distribute flyers at meetings explaining why some cars have bright pink bands on the windscreen,tell the scrutineers and organisers its because somebodys missus has breast cancer.
sort of like a tear away group without the super league style antics.
if the "tear away " group sat out a year would it get any recognition?
R
#35
_draglc_
Posted 01 March 2007 - 02:38 PM
morgan park has had a half a million $ resurfacing job, and have built more pit area and a small grandstand right on the straight.
To give you an idea of the amount of people, well id say there were maybe 10 spectators, and the rest were drivers and crew.
At one stage there were 28 geminis on the track, but only 5 hq racers...
They also had group nc, formula vees, supercarts, saloon cars etc..
Def worth heading out there for a look, what they really need is some tv coverage, the locals really dont even care about the racing, my dad lives there and says that the locals dont even go to the track.
edit - also gotta plug the price, $10 a day or $25 for the weekend.. try and get into qld raceway for that!
the food is also great, $3.50 for a steak burger, the most expensive meal there!
A1
Edited by draglc, 01 March 2007 - 02:39 PM.
#36
_rorym_
Posted 01 March 2007 - 03:34 PM
R
Edited by rorym, 01 March 2007 - 03:35 PM.
#37
Posted 01 March 2007 - 03:38 PM
#38
Posted 01 March 2007 - 04:57 PM
Collie is undergoing extensions and Bunbury Bullshit is having earthworks completed at the moment.
Welby
#39
Posted 01 March 2007 - 04:59 PM
#40
Posted 01 March 2007 - 06:30 PM
if you are still comtemplating going Historic it is still available and affordable forget about the " biante Boys " they are not a poart of the historic movement
I speak with some qualification as I race a genuine LC XU 1 in the NC category
cheers
peter sneddon
#41
_rorym_
Posted 01 March 2007 - 06:43 PM
Triple webers should be out..triple SUs ok on XU1s..std inlet manifold, extractors ok.etc etc..I can write the supp regs right now..and they...the paying public...would come in droves..
R
#42
Posted 01 March 2007 - 07:36 PM
the NC regulations are a conglomerate of the Improved production regulations that were used in the period 1964 -1972. Over that time there were at least 3 sets of Imp Production regualations in force. In the period 1964-72 Improved Production was the "premier" touring car category in the Country. The Australian Touring car Championship was open to both IMP touring cars abd Series Production cars.
When it was mooted that a Historic category be opened up for cars beyond 1964 extensive consultation was done to get the regulations some where near right. I was on the Committee that did a lot of the ground work at the time.
Series production like you are advocating was considered and eventually ruled out for several reason not the least being where do you get all the various components 30 years down the track to run any car in the old series production trim.
Original spec brakes, clutches. pressure plates etc are not available. Original spec suspension bushes are also not available. Technology has moved on.
Do we really want to go back and rece 5 inch steel wheels with original btrakes that even in their day were only just adequate.
Eventually after a lot of lobbying from NSW the NC category was opened up to cars that competed in the Series Prod trim but gave them the freedom to mod the car to the NC regualtions not stay as per the series prod regulations
If the category was to have gone down the way that you want there would have been no Mustangs no comaros, no HQ 308 or HQ 350 racing in Nc as none of them raced in series production in the period. Ther would also have been the situation that some of the NC cars would have ben slower than the Appendix J/ NB cars. that is a real possibility as even now some of the NB Mustangs are as fast as and in some cases faster that the NC Toranas.
Series Production in 2007 cannot work for 1964-72 cars and in my humble opinion, having raced in both NB and now NC category. we have a great set of regulations that can and does represent the premier tin top racing category
of the period 1964-72. Albeit being the fact that the technology available and the cars changed so much from 1964 until the inception of Group C in January 1973.
cheers peter sneddon
#43
_rorym_
Posted 01 March 2007 - 09:08 PM
Sorry Peter..we have to agree to disagree..Where were you guys looking when you couldnt find LC/J front disc brakes? Antarctica??just a bit of the history of the NC category
the NC regulations are a conglomerate of the Improved production regulations that were used in the period 1964 -1972. Over that time there were at least 3 sets of Imp Production regualations in force. In the period 1964-72 Improved Production was the "premier" touring car category in the Country. The Australian Touring car Championship was open to both IMP touring cars abd Series Production cars.
When it was mooted that a Historic� category be opened up for cars beyond 1964 extensive� consultation was done to get the regulations some where near right. I was on the Committee that did a lot of the ground work at the time.
Series production like you are advocating was considered and eventually ruled out for several reason not the least being where do you get all the various components 30 years down the track to run any car in the old series production trim.
Original spec brakes, clutches. pressure plates etc are not available. Original spec suspension bushes are also not available. Technology has moved on.
Do we really want to go back and rece� 5 inch steel wheels with original btrakes that even in their day were only just adequate.
Eventually after a lot of lobbying from NSW the NC category was opened up to cars that competed in the Series Prod trim but gave them the freedom to mod the car to the NC regualtions not stay as per the series prod regulations
If the category was to have gone down the way that you want there would have been no Mustangs no comaros, no HQ 308 or HQ 350 racing in Nc as none of them raced in series production in the period. Ther would also have been the situation that some of the NC cars would have ben slower� than the Appendix J/ NB cars. that is a real possibility as even now some of the NB Mustangs are as fast as and in some cases faster that the NC Toranas.
Series Production� in 2007 cannot work for 1964-72 cars and in my humble opinion, having raced in both NB and now NC category. we have a great set of regulations that can and does represent the premier tin top racing category
of the period 1964-72. Albeit being the fact that the technology available and the cars changed so much from 1964 until the inception of Group C in January 1973.
cheers peter sneddon
Clutches and pressure plates were free..from my understanding.
Bushes can be nolathene, no drama there..the committee didnt serious consider using std rubber ones did you?
Wheels as per current 7 x 13,7 x 14, 7 x 15. That will not in anyway hurt the catagory.
Replacement parts are currently totally available ..or similiar ..to the originals..eg XU1 intake manifolds..etc
Diffs would be allowed Detroit Lockers..must be in std housing. No full spools allowed.
HQ could be allowed..but must run under the above rules..std intakes..7 x 14 etc etc..wouldnt be competative so cant see many coming..
The race cars in 1971 with todays tyre technology would be just as fast..but again..you miss the point..it would be closer racing than the current rich boys games being played..even seen Bruce Dummet drive?..Imagine him in a proddy car on A032Rs?..I think the so called wallet racers out there would shit themselves if Bruce was on equal terms..ask anyone that was at Speed On Tweed..(GML-31? MRNOS?)
Last but not least....THATS THE BLOODY POINT!! NO MUSTANGS OR CAMAROS!! ....DID YOU SEE ONE IN A SERIES PRODUCTION RACE IN 1971??? If you did..we were obviously in a different time warp..They were Improved Production/Aust Touring Car runners..Totally different class..as they should be!
Personally..I think your committee got it wrong...WAY wrong..It is about to suffer..HRCCQ are stuffed why the fields are not coming..and why guys like me are entering every sprint /hillclimb we can find...think about it..doesnt take a lot of nouce to work it out! But you guys and CAMS must be getting the message..no one is coming to enter..tracks are leaving at a rate of knots..Sometimes the obvious is on the end of your nose..
Down off soapbox
Rory McDonald

P.S. Just to add to that..The greatest motorcycle racing crowds in this country up to Gardner getting into GPs was Production Racing..20 deep at the fence..then..in the controlling bodies wisedom...they went Superbike as premium class.(as Warren Willing said..Full of un-obtainium!).5 racetracks went broke the following year with 15% gate taking of the proddy era...I rest my case.
Edited by rorym, 01 March 2007 - 09:16 PM.
#44
_Yella SLuR_
Posted 01 March 2007 - 11:59 PM
Tony, PM me some prices please? Car was due to be ready by March. Since it is now March, maybe that is March next year!!!! Guys, do these tyres comply with the IPRA regs, or do you have to go to 16"?.......you can run a 225/50r15 a032r instead which admittedly does have a smaller od 609mm compared to 651mm the 16" you speak of is 633mm for comparison. the 50series tyre will actually has a slightly wider footprint and higher technology in the construction giving it a stiffer and more distortion resistant carcass. this tyre is readily available. if you have any questions you can ring me on 03 9764 2811
cheers tony
ps in case you didnt already know i work for traction tyres in vic we are the yokohama motorsport dealer .
Yup, very werid. Spoke to an old couple at the Muscle Car Masters that have had their HK Monaro stolen twice, and rebuilt it twice from scratch. Must say, it rang bells when they described how racing used to be, all local guys getting out in their cars on the weekend having a blast, then getting together at the pub afterwards. How far is this from Modern Racing? Hillclimb still seems to have the cheap good fun element to it, so maybe I'll stay there, although the car is being built to IPRA specs.
Using modern parts isn't so bad, as it preserves original Torana parts. Our car is running mostly Crummydore brakes, diff, etc if only to conserve Torrie parts.
Yes, CAMS has lost the plot big time. They have not responded to any letters written by myself, the club, or our State Association, only a rude letter saying if you don't pay your fee's your off the list. That was two years after we decided they weren't worth the hassle, or meet the Club's needs. There are a number of breakaway groups, AMRS, and there was another. There was also a grass roots class only requiring bonnet hold down, roll cage & extinguisher for normally road registered cars, but have lost track of that series. I requested to downgrade my license last August from a C3 to a S2. No response, and I've just realised, I've not received my license renewal documentation this year. Funny as CAMS was just in the process of being the one and only recognised racing authority in all of Australia. Somehow think the wheels have fallen off.
As Brocky said at Bathurst in 2004, the big end of town needs to realise the role that our cars and grass roots motorsport played in making V8 Supercars what they are today, i.e. where it all started.
A fark it, going back to building my car. If it only ever does hill climbs, I'm not really fussed, like somebody said earlier, I'm just out there for the buzz, if I get a good result it's just a bonus. Learning on every outing.
A grass roots series wouldn't be hard to start, know of many with track cars that don't race because of the cost/commitment to race in the various series. To make it cheaper, could even organise events during the week, cheaper track hire.
As with anything I've ever raced, it still always seems to be he who has the most bucks wins. Maybe we shouldn't be focussing so much on winning all the time (bit idealistic maybe). At my age, I'm happy for it to just be a fun thing.
Anyways, end of my blab, you guys have been busy today.
Edited by Yella SLuR, 02 March 2007 - 12:03 AM.
#45
_LXChev366_
Posted 02 March 2007 - 07:28 AM
A fark it, going back to building my car. If it only ever does hill climbs, I'm not really fussed, like somebody said earlier, I'm just out there for the buzz, if I get a good result it's just a bonus. Learning on every outing.
Yep Pat its the same for me as well. Last year I was ONLY concetrating on winning my class... thats it! which I managed to do

Yep you can pm me the prices for those tyres the same for what Sam and Pat are asking for as we all race the same car...
I with your on this one rory...

Edited by LXChev366, 02 March 2007 - 07:30 AM.
#46
_rorym_
Posted 02 March 2007 - 09:07 AM

We need to stand up and say what we want..not what is rammed down our throats.
R
#47
_scalpa1_
Posted 02 March 2007 - 09:33 AM
cheers tony
#48
_LXChev366_
Posted 02 March 2007 - 11:12 AM
What similar size can we use in AO48R? if there is such a thing?
Edited by LXChev366, 02 March 2007 - 11:15 AM.
#49
Posted 02 March 2007 - 12:47 PM
Re the tyre sizes, its all still up in the air at the moment..... My suggestion is wait till we hear something official... otherwise for sure you'll get the wrong thing...
The proposal was to allow us to run 225/50/16 (A048R) while the 225/60/15 (A032R) are unavailable, at this stage I'm unsure if they will let us run the 225/50/15 (A048R) which would be okay as it would mean we wouldnt have to change rims... Tony from traction tyres is sure that the 225/60/15 will be available later in the year so CAMs may just put in a rule to allow us to run the different tyres temporarly until the others become available again....
As you can see confusion reigns...... haha
Hopefully there should be a decision next week, I'll keep pestering Peter Lawrence till I get an answer

#50
Posted 02 March 2007 - 02:56 PM
Meaning youd have to change the car for each event with regard to tyres
You'd probably change susp settings and a few other things too ..... but it just keeps adding up don't it ?
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users