
Twin 2'' Vs single 3'' exhaust system
#1
_holdon_
Posted 09 July 2007 - 03:35 PM
is there much of a difference with the 2? after doing the sums the twins will actually have a smaller (not by alot) total cross-sectional area. do the duals sound better? do they perform better? will the 3'' system be too big? (approx 330hp)
other specs - 650 carb, performer manifold, 1 1/2 primaries (4-1) to 3'' collectors extractors.
what do you guys run in your v8s?
i understand a new system will cost me more $ but at present im just chasing info on the 'better' system.
cheers
#2
Posted 09 July 2007 - 05:41 PM
Do they sound better? It's a personal preference but I think they do. Plus with a twin system, it will look like a V8! lol...
Performance is disputable and I'm sure others here on the forum will be able to help you out on the pros and cons.
#3
Posted 09 July 2007 - 05:48 PM
I don't think the single 3" would be too big, I know of some mild 308s with 3"s that don't drone or anything really. And the hotter ones don't sound bad either; just different.
Edited by Heath, 09 July 2007 - 05:49 PM.
#4
Posted 10 July 2007 - 10:14 AM
There would be a greater performance difference in reducing the size of your collectors.
I also reckon 2 1/4" is a poor size for muffler selection. There are heaps of quality mufflers available in 3".
JMHO
#5
_1QUICK LJ_
Posted 10 July 2007 - 06:03 PM
#6
_Machine_
Posted 11 July 2007 - 02:40 PM
I havent used it but the guy i got it off had it in his Lj and ran an 11sec pass.
I have a single on my ute and it sounds great.
M.
#7
_doucmyuc_
Posted 11 July 2007 - 05:51 PM
As your would probably know adavnatge of a twin system means increased temperature of gasses, but a single 3 inch system will allow high speed flow for the gases in higher rpm.
VPW (vic performance warehouse) sell Holley Hooker mufflers, and their great quality units at a descent price if you were in the market for a muffler.
Maybe a combination of 2.75 collectors and 3 inch exhaust would do it. The differences you will see would be very minimal between them all though.
#8
Posted 11 July 2007 - 10:11 PM
#9
_the_new_a9x_replica_
Posted 12 July 2007 - 12:57 PM
The car is a lot smaller in lenght than a HQ say
so a 3inch on your hq might be right but a 3inch on a lc might not have enough back pressure (depending on how hotted up your engine is) it is just to short
I found that a stockish 308 with a 3inch system was a little to big used heaps more fuel and lost performance down low
I fitted a 2 1/2 inch single system to mine
It was straight through from the extractors to a hiflow muffler next to the tank with a 3inch outlet it was good and sounded meeeen
And i actually gained bottem end power
Now dont get me wrong BIG is ALWAYS better when the motor is WORKED
But that doesnt apply to basicly stock engines
If you ring its neck you might need a 3inch but i prefer to do burnouts rather than go 100+mile an hour so bottem end is good
#10
_T0rana_
Posted 12 July 2007 - 01:10 PM
does it sound better then just straight 2 1/2"?
#11
Posted 12 July 2007 - 03:06 PM
#12
_timbotorrie_
Posted 12 July 2007 - 06:37 PM
if you have future plans for the motor go slightly bigger, say quarter inch bigger in pipe diameter.
GO THE TWINS!

#13
_lcgtr308_
Posted 23 August 2007 - 08:45 PM
#14
Posted 23 August 2007 - 09:34 PM
X pipes are used on twin systems to try and restore the cross scavenging benefits of a single system.
Cross scavenging is the vacuum created by the exhaust gas of a cylinder that has just fired rushing down the exhaust which helps extract the last of exhaust from the cylinder that fired before it.
#15
_lcgtr308_
Posted 23 August 2007 - 10:21 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users