
LC/LJ V8 vs 6 cyl
#76
_JBird_
Posted 29 July 2007 - 01:36 AM
QT would be the prefix for blocks of that period, found in monaros.
AFAIK the XU-1's..the engine's had stronger internals and a modded up head. Nothing fancy to do with the block.
Hope that helped
James
#77
Posted 29 July 2007 - 01:48 AM
Tim
#78
Posted 29 July 2007 - 03:38 AM
#79
Posted 29 July 2007 - 10:56 AM
Last I heard, GTRXU1 wanted to do this as a 2006 version of the XU-2, or Series 2 XU-1 or whatever you want to call it.
Tim
#80
_JBird_
Posted 29 July 2007 - 04:06 PM
What about when you're building a replica of a car that didn't really exist?
Last I heard, GTRXU1 wanted to do this as a 2006 version of the XU-2, or Series 2 XU-1 or whatever you want to call it.
Tim



#81
Posted 29 July 2007 - 04:14 PM

Tim
#82
_why-psi_
Posted 29 July 2007 - 04:26 PM
#83
Posted 29 July 2007 - 06:20 PM
The prototype/s, LC & LJ GTR/XU-1s, designated production LJ GTR/XU-1 coupe.
Duplicate: identical to the original, Replicate: close or identical to original.
If you own genuine examples of LC, LJ GTR�s and XU-1s, Brabham HB and considering a final project: XU-2/ XU-1 series II.
Interpretation (in conjunction with above justification/s): Duplicate=GTR Body, Replica=2 door S
Body: GTR, duplicate body
Driveline: 308 in flesh�bored to capacity of/choice
Body interpretation: AMC Issue 9 pages 66-70, Leo Pruneau, no closer
Wheels: custom sprint masters 7.5� front/ 9� rear.
I believe that constitutes as close to an original duplicate (identical) to prototype than replica interpreted to today�s standards.
#84
Posted 29 July 2007 - 07:05 PM
Tim
#85
_big_als_army_
Posted 29 July 2007 - 08:40 PM
You have no argument, thats the point.CBF'd arguing here...
Tim
#86
Posted 30 July 2007 - 10:08 AM
Fair enough tracking down the original JP for your XU-1, but an LJ or LC with a V8 will never be anything more than a replica.
As for building it with a GTR, why bother when you could sell the GTR, buy an 'S' 2 door and come out with exactly the same result (except you'll have a 6 instead of a 9 on a plate), and have more money to spend on it...
Tim
#87
_dave720gtr_
Posted 30 July 2007 - 11:08 AM
WTF" does all that crap mean. mabe you should go get your head checked outPrototype that didn�t reach production, created undeniable, still original.
The prototype/s, LC & LJ GTR/XU-1s, designated production LJ GTR/XU-1 coupe.
Duplicate: identical to the original, Replicate: close or identical to original.
If you own genuine examples of LC, LJ GTR�s and XU-1s, Brabham HB and considering a final project: XU-2/ XU-1 series II.
Interpretation (in conjunction with above justification/s): Duplicate=GTR Body, Replica=2 door S
Body: GTR, duplicate body
Driveline: 308 in flesh�bored to capacity of/choice
Body interpretation: AMC Issue 9 pages 66-70, Leo Pruneau, no closer
Wheels: custom sprint masters 7.5� front/ 9� rear.
I believe that constitutes as close to an original duplicate (identical) to prototype than replica interpreted to today�s standards.
i think you have lost it

and we all ready have a member using gtrxu1

#88
_threeblindmice_
Posted 30 July 2007 - 11:14 AM
#89
Posted 30 July 2007 - 06:31 PM
#90
Posted 30 July 2007 - 07:06 PM
Tim
#91
_big_als_army_
Posted 30 July 2007 - 10:19 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users