LX pollution gear - ADR27 & A Explained
#26 _Torana482HP_
Posted 05 February 2006 - 09:16 PM
if your car is full pollution, are you allowed to install holley carbs and big cams etc? (not being smart, just wanna know.)
#27 _devilsadvocate_
Posted 05 February 2006 - 09:31 PM
Surfmaster,perhaps more information here.There were sensors on the engine which detected the higher temperature - it advanced the ignition timing when the temps got high to increase the coolant flow which in turn cooled the engine.
Vac advance to the dizzy was engaged once the cylinder head had got to operating temperature, called the cold feed switch(and top gear selected). There was also a thermal switch on top of the thermostat housing which allowed vaccum(advance) to the system to be controlled by manifold vaccum rather than carby vac if the coolant temp exceeded ~95C, (not really sure how that affects the advance here). Coolant flow can only be directly controlled by the engine thermostat and the water pump
Edited by devilsadvocate, 05 February 2006 - 09:31 PM.
#28 _CHOPPER_
Posted 05 February 2006 - 09:34 PM
Basically, no.Also,
if your car is full pollution, are you allowed to install holley carbs and big cams etc? (not being smart, just wanna know.)
Wouldnt mixing exhaust gasses with the inlet charge reduce performance? Replacing fuel + oxygen with Exhaust fumes?
That's why people didn't like the anti pollution stuff. It did make the cars slower. When we got to the Blue motors, they had it sussed out a bit better. Which is why they went harder than the Red motors.
#29
Posted 05 February 2006 - 09:36 PM
No you can't fit hollies ect unless you can plumb it up to your emission controls and be able to prove it works....but there are carb choices out there instead of Holleys. WW Stromberg, Varijets and ADM 34 webers are 3 very good replacements for single strommies on red sixes...on V8 a WW strommy for a 253 or quaddy for a 308...heck ..quaddy on a 253 if its enough.
By the letter of the law you can't change cams..but cams wear out..and there isn't any real way for them to prove what cam you have anyway.
#30 _Torana482HP_
Posted 05 February 2006 - 09:38 PM
#31
Posted 05 February 2006 - 09:38 PM
#32 _Yella SLuR_
Posted 05 February 2006 - 09:44 PM
#33 _CHOPPER_
Posted 05 February 2006 - 09:45 PM
#34 _Yella SLuR_
Posted 05 February 2006 - 09:50 PM
#35 _CHOPPER_
Posted 05 February 2006 - 09:53 PM
#36
Posted 05 February 2006 - 10:33 PM
RACV MAN
#37 _devilsadvocate_
Posted 06 February 2006 - 06:29 AM
I dont think it was a matter of the engineers not having enough time. I would hazard a guess that the australian EPA took their lead from the US and adopted the measures that would have 1st been trialled in California, with GM and Ford simply bolting on the same stuff that the US engineers had developed.The legislation was obviously rushed in and gave GMH little time to work with the requirements. The fact that the Blue motors go harder with greater restrictions tends to make me think along those lines. If GMH were given more notice, the introduction of ADR27A wouldn't have been so bad.
The fact that Ford took basically the same established measures to have their motors meet the guidelines makes it sound like they had an agreement to do as little as possible. Basically, "if we both provide rubbish, well both still be in business". The concept for manufacturer to actually invest in teams of engineers working away getting the emissions of motors down hadnt been born in the early seventies.
Edited by devilsadvocate, 06 February 2006 - 06:34 AM.
#38
Posted 06 February 2006 - 08:50 AM
That would be my option if i had to abide by it all Thankfully mine's a 1972 HQ, and a 4/76 SLR! Charcoal cannister i'm happy with ( i think i really SHOULD put one or two on the HQ... but i just dont want to!).
Cheers.
#39
Posted 06 February 2006 - 10:40 AM
still gotta run PCV
#40 _CHOPPER_
Posted 06 February 2006 - 06:21 PM
#41 _devilsadvocate_
Posted 07 February 2006 - 10:30 PM
#42 _Yella SLuR_
Posted 11 February 2006 - 10:18 PM
Wonder if this was across the range, i.e. 202's included?
#43
Posted 11 February 2006 - 10:49 PM
Not sure Yella if it was across the range, but before it came it we got the big scare tactics about how bad it was going to be........and they ( the qualified guys) weren't far wrong, the bloody things ran like hairy goats, you could not (yeah) take the plug out of the idle mixture screw to adjust the mixture or do anything else that was not according to Hoyle. (Who the hell is Hoyle anyway???)Interesting, never actually read about the LX SL/R 5000, and dunno if anybody has mentioned it here. They upped the compression from 9:1 to 9.7:1 to compensate for the anti-pollution gear. Things ya learn when you read.
Wonder if this was across the range, i.e. 202's included?
My preference would be to:
a) buy a pre 27a vehicle (not easy to do)
put a later blue motor in, still a lot of plumbing but it basically fits and the Varijet Carby was light years ahead of the strangulated single strommy.
#44 _Herne_
Posted 11 February 2006 - 11:21 PM
Cheers
Herne
Edited by Herne, 11 February 2006 - 11:21 PM.
#45
Posted 11 February 2006 - 11:23 PM
You know Herne I think you may have something there, what the hell was he doing down a 27a carby?As far as I know, Hoyle wrote the rules of Poker / card games happy to be corrected on this!
Cheers
Herne
#46 _Herne_
Posted 12 February 2006 - 12:12 AM
Cheers
Herne
#47 _Yella SLuR_
Posted 12 February 2006 - 03:36 AM
We's not experienced (old) enough to know of such motoring pleasures. Did mention that they ran pretty rough whilst reading though, but upping the compression ratio restored previously available horsepower output...... the bloody things ran like hairy goats, you could not (yeah) take the plug out of the idle mixture screw to adjust the mixture or do anything else .....
Mmmm, de-pollutionise an ADR27A engine for maximum grunt!!!!
#48 _CHOPPER_
Posted 12 February 2006 - 01:25 PM
A: Me too.My preference would be to:
a) buy a pre 27a vehicle (not easy to do)
put a later blue motor in, still a lot of plumbing but it basically fits and the Varijet Carby was light years ahead of the strangulated single strommy.
B: Best to use a pre-pollution block with the Perfectune 12 port head. Otherwise it will require ADR27C. Unless you're happy to utilise ADR27C of course. But that would defeat the purpose of purchasing a pre ADR27A vehicle.
#49
Posted 12 February 2006 - 02:30 PM
Yella SLuR said.
'Interesting, never actually read about the LX SL/R 5000, and dunno if anybody has mentioned it here. They upped the compression from 9:1 to 9.7:1 to compensate for the anti-pollution gear. Things ya learn when you read.
Wonder if this was across the range, i.e. 202's included?'
This isn't quite correct, the increase from 9.0 to 9.7 compression only occured in the 308/5 litre V8 & was introduced a long time before the ADR27A anti-pollution laws (1/7/76). This info is very difficult to find in GM-H literature & I would be glad to be proved wrong if that is the case.
Most people believe that the 308 in a stock LH SLR/5000 produced 240 kW because that's what sales brochures say. Fact is, that's what the early '74 cars produced but in late '74 at the release of the HJ, the LH Torana 308 was upgaded to HJ specs. This happened at engine number HT24413 and was the result of smaller dished pistons (9.7) & new camshaft timing (advanced by 5 degrees). You only had to drive an HQ & HJ 5 litre of equivalent spec to feel the difference. I'd be admitting my age if I told you how many of these cars I drove when they were new.
Dr Terry.
#50 _user asked to be removed_
Posted 04 March 2006 - 07:09 AM
performance air filter etc... Im not sure about the polution gear but.
And i'd like to know!
*Liam
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users