
Group C/A Replica Racing - There must be a way!
#201
_rorym_
Posted 20 December 2007 - 09:21 PM
R
#202
_TJ253_
Posted 20 December 2007 - 10:01 PM
#203
_82911_
Posted 20 December 2007 - 10:19 PM

#204
Posted 20 December 2007 - 11:04 PM
#205
_82911_
Posted 21 December 2007 - 07:00 AM
After all one day we will be the premier historic category anyway.... That is after all the original cars have been retired to automotive nursing homes (museums).

#206
_rorym_
Posted 21 December 2007 - 07:14 AM
Although we will get some I think Group As will be minimal so am happy to leave their rules as is..So are we happy to run with the group a rules as they were or do they need changing?
By the way I copped a mouth full from some guy on the Ford Forums.
http://www.fordforum....php?t=11201871
R
Edited by rorym, 21 December 2007 - 07:15 AM.
#207
Posted 21 December 2007 - 07:20 AM
I couldn't access without logging in (which I have no interest in doing) but remember you are dealing with a lower life form.By the way I copped a mouth full from some guy on the Ford Forums.
http://www.fordforum....php?t=11201871
R

#208
Posted 21 December 2007 - 07:30 AM

#209
_rorym_
Posted 21 December 2007 - 07:57 AM
R
#210
Posted 21 December 2007 - 07:58 AM
By the way I copped a mouth full from some guy on the Ford Forums.
Cut and past Rory

I wanna see what this peanut has to say...
#211
_rorym_
Posted 21 December 2007 - 09:43 AM
I think the idea of replica Group C is fine for what you are currently doing, but if you want to go racing historics I reckon you should go to hell. These cars are not historic and should not be treated as such. The vast majority of historic cars have to work bloody hard to prove their provedence in order to get a Certificate of Description and you guys feel hard done because you can't race your old family sedan. Excuse me if I don't shed a tear.
The only reason for the Appendix J categories was because there were bloody few original cars left, yet now we are seeing full Grids of Group C cars. At Phillip Island this year they split the car up into two grids, one being the lower capacity cars and the other being the higher capacity cars. Next year the Group P,Q, R cars are not even getting a run as the program is full. These cars are the real big bangers and they have history. They include F5000's, Formula 1's, Formula Atlantics, Formula 2's etc. You can run your Group C replicas in all sorts of events, but if you own a Group PQR there is bloody all events available to run. For instance:
Heathcote Sprint - No group R, no Fomula Ford
Morwell - Q & R must run as Libre (has a FF class or any FF)
Rob Roy - Sports and racing are mixed in one class
Tarrengowa - No Q, R or FF
Given the addition of Sports Sedans and Group T into historics, programs are only going to get tighter, so please tell me why genuine race cars with a real history of racing should make way for a bunch of family sedans with no history at all?
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2speed
Not actually CAMS...well could be...but the Group C guys are Oh! so protective of running their elite..genuine status ...
I bet if you owned a real Group C you would be protective too. Why would you want your car devalued by having a host of replicas made? Would you really want to race your genuine Group C against a host of Group C wannabees? They won't even race against the Appendix J cars after some of the incidents which have occured in the past.
If you really want to go racing a Group C, go and buy one. The Appendix J cars are not that much cheaper to buy/build than a Group C anyway. V8 Nc cars are going for $80 to $130k and Toranas are going for $40k. You could buy a genuine Group C Escort for the same amount as a Torana.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2speed
This is the link for the regs we have done so far..
http://d4.myfreefile...Regulations.pdf
Looks more Biante than CAMS to me. Bigger wheels, bigger discs, different gear boxes etc.
__________________
Edited by rorym, 21 December 2007 - 09:43 AM.
#212
_rocket_
Posted 21 December 2007 - 10:18 AM
#213
_rorym_
Posted 21 December 2007 - 10:25 AM
R
#214
Posted 21 December 2007 - 12:08 PM
I think you guys will enhance their image - The NZ Muscle car series have proven this at this years Muscle Car Masters that the crowd loves close racing between cars of a bygone era. I say get out there and prove them all wrong.
Cheers
Mick
#215
Posted 21 December 2007 - 04:19 PM
If I had bothered to save up and buy an ex Group C car so I could go racing in that class, I would also feel a bit miffed if someone started talking about a replica class,
But I didn't so roll on the Replica Racing !!!!!
Which was the best looking VH Commodore ?
I watched a dvd last night called Commodore-The early years and the 1983 VH HDT car didn't really turn me on. I think I liked the '82 VC better. I guess I can always turn it back into a VC......
#216
Posted 21 December 2007 - 04:31 PM
No one has said anything about running with the current group c/a guys, and they are not interested in that anyway (which is fair enough) so I dont understand why there is so much concern - they keep doing what they are doing and we dont have anything to do with them....
The whole idea is to allow guys to run cars that are "in the spirit" of group c, with some allowences to make them easier to maintain IN A SUBCLASS WITHIN SPORTS SEDANS. We are not claiming that they will be historic, only that they are a replica of a historic car. I dont want to race a lower spec original car eg Gemini or similar, I want to race a V8 Torana, and I'd like to do it to a set of rules that allow me to runs slicks, BUT I dont want to race a full house sports sedan... so thats where our proposed class fits in.
I invite anyone who has had a desire to compete in cars of this type, but have been unable to locate a car (or cant afford) to run an original to support this idea, it would be great to see replica's of all the different makes running! The spectators will love it, and we want to encourage a fun, help each other attitude - like it used to be back in the old days

Rory, feel free to paste this back in your thread on the Ford forum

#217
_rorym_
Posted 21 December 2007 - 04:48 PM
R
Interesting thing is...the above Ford man doesnt own a Group C...He has a F3 Cheetah....but I guess everyone has an opinion.
Edited by rorym, 21 December 2007 - 04:51 PM.
#218
_rorym_
Posted 23 December 2007 - 08:55 AM
R
That's cool. It didn't real come across that way in your original post. Remember that Sport Sedans have now been approved for historics, which can also add some confusion to the subject.
__________________
#219
_rocket_
Posted 24 December 2007 - 07:05 PM
#220
_rorym_
Posted 24 December 2007 - 07:17 PM
R
#221
_rocket_
Posted 24 December 2007 - 07:35 PM
has to be one of the best tracks we have up here in Qld , its just been resurfaced, looks like a million bucks, plenty of sheltered area. The Warwick car club do a great job out there, these are the places that we should support, the places that have an interest in historic racing, and not just in making a pile of cash.
#222
_rorym_
Posted 24 December 2007 - 08:08 PM
R
#223
_rocket_
Posted 24 December 2007 - 08:30 PM
2008, at Symmons plains. The guy was from the Group C Assoc. He said he has the Everlast commodore. (Allan Polglase), and was only interested in showing the car, not racing it, just to keep the heritage alive with these cars, for people to see
and appreciate the era, of course I cant afford to go, but it would have been good.
There is definately a interest in what we are doing, and its worth the effort. I know that I will be given my best effort to promote this class in QLD or where ever. BRING IT ON !
#224
_rorym_
Posted 24 December 2007 - 08:53 PM
R
Edited by rorym, 24 December 2007 - 08:55 PM.
#225
Posted 26 December 2007 - 06:52 PM
and if I wanted to race a LH would it have to be flared or could I go SLR 5000 style and have no flares?
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users