
Thermo fans
#51
Posted 08 March 2006 - 01:09 PM
oh dear (wipes tears from eyes) anyways...
i have two thermo's on my car one on the front on one side and one on the back on the other side. Any particular reason why i done this set up? because the oil cooler was in the road!
car keeps cool in my usual 43+ degree summer days here
only time it got hot smelling was on a 47 degree day but i figure thats acceptable.
#52
_Herne_
Posted 08 March 2006 - 01:35 PM
As for you Torunya you didn't even have the guts to admit you were wrong.... nuff said about you! Dont let the door hit ya where the good lord split ya on the way out!
Cheers
Herne
#53
_Keithy's_UC_
Posted 08 March 2006 - 02:31 PM
I'll sort my side of the debate out and you lads can argue it out between ya!
Davies Craig supplies and reccommends the fittment of the fans the way i have done it! Through the radiator. They have even included a diagram and a 2year replacement warranty on any parts affected by the thermo fans mounting (i.e. radiator). This is to cover their asses in the event one splits a radiator tube! But if you do it the way they state (and be gentle about it), you wont break anything nor will it be irrepairable damage!
And they say the fans can be used upstream or down, but they reccommend upstream (the way i have em)!!
Keith
#54
_Herne_
Posted 08 March 2006 - 02:40 PM

Make sense?
Cheers
Herne
#55
_Flamenco_
Posted 08 March 2006 - 03:37 PM
A straight thin rod of plastic with cones all the way down the rod, a round clip is pushed onto the rod and tightens up when it goes past each of the cones (like the lines on a zip/cable tie).
Might be the best option if space is at a premium.
#56
_Yella SLuR_
Posted 08 March 2006 - 06:21 PM
#57
Posted 09 March 2006 - 04:42 AM
I have a 16" Davies Craig thermo fan which makes it impossible for me to mount the fan on the front of the radiator due to the bonnet striker so the fan is mounted in the engine bay. I've had the fan for 14 years now and it's still going strong. I previously had the fan mounted through the radiator as per the instructions however after about 3 years the radiator developed leaks. Maybe I installed it incorrectly but when I had my custom PWR aluminium raditor made (at $850 !) I didn't want to risk it so I had brackets fabricated to mount the fan so nothing goes though the raditor core, just for peace of mind.
#58
_Keithy's_UC_
Posted 09 March 2006 - 10:07 AM
#59
_Yella SLuR_
Posted 09 March 2006 - 11:34 AM
#60
Posted 09 March 2006 - 01:06 PM
#61
Posted 09 March 2006 - 11:00 PM

RACV MAN
#62
_Keithy's_UC_
Posted 27 April 2006 - 04:26 AM
Keith
#63
_PAL066_
Posted 19 May 2006 - 05:00 PM
there are two to choose from one at about $80 and the other $30 the cat. no. for the 30 dollar one is KC5381
#64
_devilsadvocate_
Posted 19 May 2006 - 07:48 PM
Things to consider:
Neither look like the are set up to work off your existing temperature sensor, there are others around that can work of this.
Looks like the sensors is thermistor for the cheaper one, which really arent very durable for putting in a moving water flow. How you'd do that is another problem, perhaps putting into radiator hose like the Cdavies capillary switches.....but that's what you want to get away from? Could be taped very hard to the top of the thermostat cover, but not sure how consistent the readings would be.
The more expensive one, quotes temps up to 1200C, which suggests it works with a thermocouple. These are very durable, and not really too much trouble to put inside a rad hose and not cause any troublesome leaks like the capillary tubes.
Ive got one still in the bottom hose on one of my cars.
Trigger on and trigger off temperature, how repeatable are they? and what is the difference between on and off. Suggest that 5C max between on and off is what you want to see otherwise the fans will stay on far too much of the time in warm conditions.
Are the devices suitable for tripping 12V car relays, sometimes the very small current draw of a relay causes problems with some designs especially in switching a relay off.
I couldnt see any info about this on the site so you would need to find this out. The other point is you have to assemble these yourself, do you have experience in constructing small electronic projects?
Edited by devilsadvocate, 19 May 2006 - 07:54 PM.
#65
Posted 19 May 2006 - 11:25 PM
#66
_devilsadvocate_
Posted 20 May 2006 - 12:13 AM
The switch in the bottom of the rad does create its own problems though. Designing the correct trigger temp is tricky as it depends on the coolant flow rate and the size of the engine above it, whereas this is not a concern when a sensor is placed at the exit, as it is responding to the maximum temp of the coolant.
#67
_Yella SLuR_
Posted 20 May 2006 - 01:26 AM
I just love it when things work.
Edited by Yella SLuR, 20 May 2006 - 01:26 AM.
#68
_devilsadvocate_
Posted 20 May 2006 - 07:59 AM
It is still a problem if the fans are wired only to come on with the ignition.If the car is stopped for anywhere from 2 to 10mins the top tank of the rad will get and stay hot enough to trigger the switch and the fans will come on. Restarting the engine within this time frame will see ~ 20-30 secs until the switch is cooled down. While it doesnt sound much,I find the effect annoying and wasteful of energy and causing unnecessary wear and tear. The effect can be minimised to some extent by using a very high temp switch (>105C), but thats not how Id want the setup on my car. Other than the switch being controlled by the temp of the metal in the cylinder head itself, putting the switch in the bottom of the rad is the only real solution to this prob.Just an update on the thermo installation.� ^ only a problem when you have the thermo switch/relay hooked up to constant power supply, i.e. alternator/battery.� I'm running the switch to the relay on an ignition circuit now, works fantastic, and isn't killing the battery anymore from the heatsoak issue.
As Yella points out wiring the fans up live(not recommended by me) would run the fans for up to 15mins after switching the motor off, which wouldnt be brilliant for the battery, along with undesirable effect of the fans starting up without warning when you are poking around under the bonnet with everything supposedly switched off. I actually have mine connected to the distributor pulse sensor so that they will only ever come on if the engine is actually running and also bypassed when the starting circuit is activated.
Edited by devilsadvocate, 20 May 2006 - 08:10 AM.
#69
_Yella SLuR_
Posted 20 May 2006 - 05:36 PM
#70
_Oldn64_
Posted 22 May 2006 - 11:59 PM
Unless you have an electric water pump as well....Also of little benefit once the motor is switched off as there is no water flow. All it does it just makes a whole heap of cold water in the radiator that doesn't go anywhere till you next start the motor.

cheers
#71
_devilsadvocate_
Posted 23 May 2006 - 12:07 AM
and also some reason to be trying to cool it down quickly........overheated motorUnless you have an electric water pump as well....Also of little benefit once the motor is switched off as there is no water flow. All it does it just makes a whole heap of cold water in the radiator that doesn't go anywhere till you next start the motor.
cheers
#72
_Oldn64_
Posted 23 May 2006 - 12:17 AM
Or maybe your crank is driving something more important????and also some reason to be trying to cool it down quickly........overheated motor
Cheers
#73
Posted 23 May 2006 - 12:32 PM
its neat and tidy and doesnt leak.
#74
Posted 23 May 2006 - 08:26 PM
The water will circulate with the motor off, this is called thermo-syphoning. Works on the heat rises theory. Morris Minor side valve engines had no water pump and relied on thermo-syphoning for circulation. Just a bit of triviaAlso of little benefit once the motor is switched off as there is no water flow. All it does it just makes a whole heap of cold water in the radiator that doesn't go anywhere till you next start the motor.

#75
_devilsadvocate_
Posted 23 May 2006 - 09:18 PM
Those older systems only worked if the rad was particularly tall, hence the tall bonnet/nose look of the vintage cars.
2 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users