Edited by gtrboyy, 29 November 2008 - 08:20 PM.
porting pre VN V8 heads
#51
Posted 29 November 2008 - 08:15 PM
#52 _JBM_
Posted 29 November 2008 - 11:04 PM
The reason pre VN heads are good for the street is power and torque are at usable RPMs for cars that go round corners and up and down hills.
Chasing peak horsepower can be waste of money for a street engine the never revs past 5 grand.
The large inlet runners and ports in VN heads are excellent for high revving engines, much like 4V Cleveland heads.
James
#53 _azureblueslr_
Posted 07 December 2008 - 07:11 AM
eugene from flowcraft has built more 308,s and ported more holden heads than most of us here have had hot dinners
he always reccomends red heads on street driven holdens ,the smaller ports when ported make for a faster reving engine and ive been in some of the cars with engines he has done that run 11 sec with red heads (why spend the money on vn heads and all the accesories you need to run them when good ported red heads will run these sorts of times)
some of you guys are stuck on the more flow must be better thing but there is much more to it than outright flow
id stick with the red heads and get flowcraft to port them he will also modify the stock holden manifold and quaddy if you like as a comp-lete package that will blow your mind once you drive it
#54 _SS400_
Posted 08 December 2008 - 07:05 PM
yeah well, I got VN heads now, just gotta decide on a manifold!
my old 308 had vn heads ported by superflow at cost of $1000 assembled with standard size valves ,the engine had a harrop single plan manifold flat tappet cam which was 272/282 @0.050 figures engine made max power at 7800 and torque at 5500 it made 488hp 390l/b .i ran 11.12@119 ten years ago the only down fall with vn heads is you need 5000+ converter to make them work as for hq heads peter michaels at PM ENGINES in s.a is your man has his own intake stripmaster,he has mad well over 550hp on 308 cubes so the hq heads mustn't be that bad.cheers rick
#55 _moot_
Posted 09 December 2008 - 06:23 AM
red heads are so much better that guys pull off all there injected heads on there vn's and repalce them with red heads to get more torque.
atfer owning 20+ holden v8's in various forms of stock to 500hp,i can honestly say that i've never seen a stock early head out perform a vn one.infact,i'd go as far as saying the stock roller cam motor i have in my vs ute would out torque my old red headed 355.
#56
Posted 09 December 2008 - 07:19 AM
infact,i'd go as far as saying the stock roller cam motor i have in my vs ute would out torque my old red headed 355.
Oooo! Not knowing your red headed 355, but i reckon thats a pretty big statement! LOL! What are you willing to dare? LOL. Nudey Run? hahaha
#57 _1QUICK LJ_
Posted 14 April 2009 - 12:25 AM
#58
Posted 14 April 2009 - 11:40 AM
VNs win hands down
thats why i sold my early heads to MRLXSS and bought VN's!
#59
Posted 14 April 2009 - 11:54 AM
thats why i sold my early heads to MRLXSS and bought VN's!
For WILDUC's 308... LOL
#60 _Allports_
Posted 15 April 2009 - 12:52 AM
As far as flow figures go HQ 2184 head with 1.94 valves go 480-497 flow potential. 2.02 valves go 490-515 flow potential.
Vn pocket ported with 1.94 stock valves will go 500-515 , Stainless valves will go 520-530. 2.02 pocket ported go 560 no drama
2.02 full port job go 610-630. 2.05 go 620-640. 2.08 go 640-660 flow potential.
Manifolds I prefer the Harrop to anything else in a carb application, unless you want to stay under the bonnet in that case a ported hywinder is a good thing.
#61 _Jims engines_
Posted 08 February 2013 - 09:47 PM
2 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users