Jump to content


Photo

The Great L34 A9X debate


  • Please log in to reply
582 replies to this topic

#451 a9x868

a9x868

    maurice mead of hatchbacks

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,418 posts
  • Name:facebook dave
  • Location:perth miles n miles from shiney
  • Car:valencia holden torana a9x hatch ultimate improvement on the barbados L34
  • Joined: 24-July 11

Posted 26 March 2012 - 08:20 PM

Jesus !! After reading all these pages and the schoolgirl biatching about the L34 and A9X I've come to the conclusion ur all gay ! I love Toranas ! Period. Whoo my c$@k is bigger than yours ! Blah ! Blah F ing Blah!
I'm a member of a Torana club and attend as many meetings and shows as I can. Why? Because I love to see everyone else's Torries in all their glory and enjoy just as much hearing from their owners and their love affair for their baby.
P.S who gives a dogs ball bag about the p3!

i for one would love to have an xy phase 3
sitting in the shed next to my a9x hatch
but could not agree more with all your other statements
cheers
davemc

#452 _outer control_

_outer control_
  • Guests

Posted 26 March 2012 - 09:29 PM

Standard 1975 L34. Please keep some reality.

The issue is 143MPH is Fraud Phase3 territory (2mph faster with rev limit)
No one takes that seriously

Maybe when you beat your brothers plane that day it was battling a huge head wind Jeff

#453 _outer control_

_outer control_
  • Guests

Posted 26 March 2012 - 09:38 PM

I agree of course 130mph Torana's existed just they where not from the Holden's Factory.

Cars varied greatly i had a 4.2 SLR dual 2 in system and a holley 2 barrel and on BP Marlestone,s dyno it would put out the same HP as a healthy 308. The propritor said it was a friek engine.[Before anybody says anything] maybe like its owner. Some motors go others need to be kept on a chain.Todays computerised machining things are more even maybe.

#454 xu2308

xu2308

    Grail Hunter

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,704 posts
  • Name:AL
  • Location:Belconnen ACT
  • Car:SMP LJ GTR V8 Prototype-Confirmed By HHS and Ex GMH XW7 Engineers
  • Joined: 09-April 09

Posted 26 March 2012 - 10:19 PM

The big spoiler kit was to hide its real reason for been there, Harry was sly testing it for the Bathurst Race later in the year, he put it in the sports sedan race so the press and ford dident know what he was upto, them big spoilers were for disguise nothing else, and not for the road production car.
I guess ask Larry if u ever run into him red, he was the driver of it on open roads testing, and conrod straight was alot longer in 72 than the V8 Supercars use now, and Mark Skaife hit 300 km/h on conrod in 2006 at Bathurst on a demo lap, its on youtube

#455 _outer control_

_outer control_
  • Guests

Posted 26 March 2012 - 10:24 PM

There,s one major design fault with the XU1 they left off 2 spark plug leads and still managed to beat the fastest 4 door car in the world at the time

#456 _LXSS350_

_LXSS350_
  • Guests

Posted 26 March 2012 - 10:41 PM

With the advent of racecam and us being able to see and hear the Williamson Celica get Torana windburn, came a wealth of information. Red is dead right 260kph (+/-5kph) was as fast as any legal racing Torana was going down the old straight conrod. Even then that was pushing the old 308 to reliability danger levels of 7000rpm. The cars used the T10 and unlike the bathurst myths actually used a 3.08 final ration with a variety of rear tyre sizes/compounds depending on team/setup. You can see the different tyre sizes and profiles in the old photos. In 1979 race the 308 was making 400hp. That was the peak of 308 development back in 1979 which was up 50hp from the racing engines starting point of 350hp back in 1974. Funny you look at that hp today and say WTF, but that's the reality of where we where. Old grumble bum (I am coming though that mousehole gap) Grice would never had cheated, perhaps it was just a bottle of Red Bull ..... LOL

#457 _LXSS350_

_LXSS350_
  • Guests

Posted 26 March 2012 - 10:58 PM

There,s one major design fault with the XU1 they left off 2 spark plug leads and still managed to beat the fastest 4 door car in the world at the time

I was fist pumping after that win. On the build up I lost a lot of confidence and was hoping for rain. When it started and the race developed my confidence grew. I reckon I never sat down for the last 50 laps as I watched little thomas the tank engine carve those fat frauds up. Great race where the baby Torana stuck a stake right into the heart of the blue oval and did the Torana name proud. Boy bring back those years of real racing and cheering for your brand, not this crud they serve up today. V8 superboring and Nascar what a total waste of time.

#458 _LH8VD69_

_LH8VD69_
  • Guests

Posted 27 March 2012 - 08:48 AM

Cars varied greatly i had a 4.2 SLR dual 2 in system and a holley 2 barrel and on BP Marlestone,s dyno it would put out the same HP as a healthy 308. The propritor said it was a friek engine.[Before anybody says anything] maybe like its owner. Some motors go others need to be kept on a chain.Todays computerised machining things are more even maybe.


I won't doubt or bag u on this Outta as I had a similar expeirience with a 74 LH 4 speed and a lil 253. All it had was a mild cam , Torker manifold and a 2 1/2" single out the side and it used to whoop lots of 308 worked cars. Why I'll never know?

#459 REDA9X

REDA9X

    Removed

  • Inactive
  • Pip
  • 0 posts
  • Joined: 08-November 05

Posted 27 March 2012 - 09:18 AM

My 253 SS was a great little car and was certaily a better performer than the larger cars with the 308. It was just a 253 bored 40thou, mild cam, bigger valves, flat tops and L34 rods, standard 308 intake manifold, rochestor and VK Group A aircleaner, standard exhaust manifolds.

#460 REDA9X

REDA9X

    Removed

  • Inactive
  • Pip
  • 0 posts
  • Joined: 08-November 05

Posted 27 March 2012 - 07:07 PM

The big spoiler kit was to hide its real reason for been there, Harry was sly testing it for the Bathurst Race later in the year, he put it in the sports sedan race so the press and ford dident know what he was upto, them big spoilers were for disguise nothing else, and not for the road production car.
I guess ask Larry if u ever run into him red, he was the driver of it on open roads testing, and conrod straight was alot longer in 72 than the V8 Supercars use now, and Mark Skaife hit 300 km/h on conrod in 2006 at Bathurst on a demo lap, its on youtube


A V8 Supercar has 650HP, it's more aerodynamic, has more downforce, handles better, has more grip and has 6 gears to get it up to speed final ratio 1:1 and revs to 7500RPM. Diff ratio is 3.15:1 at Bathurst and yes Mark Skaife hit 300km/h, but Glenn seton was the first in a touring car to do it back in 1996. The fact is though the majority of the time they are hitting about 288km/h down Conrod under the current rules.
The XU1 V8 would have 350HP if lucky considering Harry was getting that from the race L34 on a good day, it would be lighter than the V8 Supercar, but have far less grip and would be no where near as stable at speed, 4 speed gearbox with 2.78 ratio diff, lets call it 7000RPM max and all the aerodynamics of a brick.
A9X race car in 79 with 400HP, fatter tyres so more grip, maybe a little heavier, 3.08 ratio rear 4 speed gearbox 1:1 final ratio 7000RPM absolute maximun revs and 260KM/h down Conrod.

Even with the extra length of Conrod, the car would not get up to speed anywhere near as quick as a V8 Supercar, would have to brake much earlier not to mention be unstable and you'd have to back off just before the last hump.

#461 _LXSS350_

_LXSS350_
  • Guests

Posted 28 March 2012 - 04:28 AM

Its little wonder that a dunny is more stable and cuts through the air better. Hell we love a car that thinks that a wind tunnel is crossing the harbour bridge......LOL ..... Poor old girl is 30yrs+ behind the times, but hell they look a finer than a miss universe bikini parade. No dunny could ever outshine a Torana in my eyes.

Anyone who has had a Torana cruising over 200kph knows very well how light they get. Now can you say crosswind? If you watch the bonnet once your in that 200kph range you will see the trapped air lifting the front end. One of the biggest issues to get to 300kph and beyond is to find ways to increase downforce and streamline the underbelly airflow. In about 1978, Holden parts sold me a sheet of about 2mm plate that sat between the lower splash guards. It was the use of that plate years ago that spurred me on to look at ways to improve the cars high speed stability (more like a brick). Its also important that the air being forced in via the radiator flows through and gets directed by the firewall out and back under the car. I am playing with this in the design stage, and got inspiration from those ram air systems they used on the racing dunnydores. By sealing of the nose cone to the radiator support panel (full carbon bonnet no latches/hinges) I am hoping I can direct the flow of the air out with minimum disturbance. Standard front air dam is also not deep or effective enough and that's been a very difficult task without dramatically changing the cars appearance.

Hell maybe I should go back down the shed at get some inspiration

Posted Image

#462 TerrA LX

TerrA LX

    Fulcrum Fixture

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,241 posts
  • Location:Sid 'n' knee
  • Joined: 31-May 06

Posted 28 March 2012 - 07:02 AM

Anyone who has had a Torana cruising over 200kph knows very well how light they get. Now can you say crosswind? If you watch the bonnet once your in that 200kph range you will see the trapped air lifting the front end. One of the biggest issues to get to 300kph and beyond is to find ways to increase downforce and streamline the underbelly airflow.


I had never had any problems with cruising at the 200kph range.

#463 _LXSS350_

_LXSS350_
  • Guests

Posted 28 March 2012 - 08:30 AM

Not saying its alarming. Just that obviously there are issues that 30yrs ago ..... I would have never noticed, mentioned or bother about. But that's just advancement and development. I am just bloody fussy bastard and always try to make things faster, brake better, corner better, accelerate better etc etc. Just plain like trying to improve things (to my taste) plus with me being retired I like tinkering and doing stuff others have not tried. Spoke to the carbon fibre guy on the phone yesterday who weighed up our new LH and RH doors for the new hatch, and std they weighed in at 30kgs each, the new ones weighed in a 4.5kgs each. So I am happy with that because same old story less weight = more speed, quicker acceleration and less braking (+ better fuel economy)

If you jump in say a dunnydore (yuk) and then your Torrie and get it cruising at say 200 and come into a long sweeping corner. Now hows the stability and road feel ..... not talking of the obvious aerodynamic advancement of wind noise or general isolation in all of a late build (NHV). You can't do anything about body shape or flush glass etc but you can improve other areas for drivers satisfaction and confidence.

Edited by LXSS350, 28 March 2012 - 08:32 AM.


#464 xu2308

xu2308

    Grail Hunter

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,704 posts
  • Name:AL
  • Location:Belconnen ACT
  • Car:SMP LJ GTR V8 Prototype-Confirmed By HHS and Ex GMH XW7 Engineers
  • Joined: 09-April 09

Posted 28 March 2012 - 10:35 AM

Harry would of used the old formula of 7000 rpm in top gear and 13" wheel size and diff ratio of 2.78 etc to give him his theoretically high speed of 170 mph, then put Larry Perkins in the Car to test it on open road testing in 1972 to see if it would do it, as highways in 1972, in Australia had open speed limits, now there stories the A9X's only used the 3.08 diff ratio at the bathurst race track and not the 2.60 ratio, so no wonder its top speed was not as fast as a car with a 2.78 ratio diff

#465 REDA9X

REDA9X

    Removed

  • Inactive
  • Pip
  • 0 posts
  • Joined: 08-November 05

Posted 28 March 2012 - 11:40 AM

Harry would of used the old formula of 7000 rpm in top gear and 13" wheel size and diff ratio of 2.78 etc to give him his theoretically high speed of 170 mph, then put Larry Perkins in the Car to test it on open road testing in 1972 to see if it would do it, as highways in 1972, in Australia had open speed limits, now there stories the A9X's only used the 3.08 diff ratio at the bathurst race track and not the 2.60 ratio, so no wonder its top speed was not as fast as a car with a 2.78 ratio diff


Harry would have used a formula ? So what you're saying is it's a theory not fact. As I said before, rolling tyre diameter has a lot to do with your final rev's VS Speed. When I brought the arguement up a few years ago about the A9X not using the 2.60 diff at Bathurst everyone said i was wrong because Brock said thats what they used. It was holomogated with the A9X to use at Bathurst beacuse the L34's were running out of revs with the 2.78 diff, but the rear tyres rollong diameter also changed with the A9X being able to fit bigger bag tyres. Bigger rolling diameter meant being able to change the diff ratio. The 2.60 diff was tried in 1977 and found to be too tall with the new bigger tyres. Harry swapped the diff out of the promo car and it failed in the race. Bob Morris tried the 2.60 diff in practice and found it too tall, but they had the 3.08 centre in amongst their spares.
Read the story on the Bowdens running the A9X at bathurst with Brock in 2004 and again later with Dick Johnson and the diff ratio they used on each occasion.

#466 xu2308

xu2308

    Grail Hunter

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,704 posts
  • Name:AL
  • Location:Belconnen ACT
  • Car:SMP LJ GTR V8 Prototype-Confirmed By HHS and Ex GMH XW7 Engineers
  • Joined: 09-April 09

Posted 28 March 2012 - 11:44 AM

No its was fact, the car hit 7000 rpm in top gear at the Easter Bathurst in 1972, and on road tests in 1972

#467 _LXSS350_

_LXSS350_
  • Guests

Posted 28 March 2012 - 12:22 PM

Red it was you that set me straight about the 3.08 final ratio. I didn't initially believe you because Brock had said 2.6 and everyone else kept telling me the same thing. Funny how the snowball of that simple mistake kept going. Even with the release of the A9X ..... Holden kept my speculation going .... as they referred to the 2.6 ratio option as the Bathurst ratio.

But when you do the math it never did make any sense with the revs they where saying on the race broadcast and in driver interviews. Not during qualifying but in the actual 1979 race most teams where using around 6400/6500rpm max down conrod and yet in the next breath they where saying 260kph.

Obviously some smallish variations existed with the difference in rear tyre diameters but not difference in ratios (0.48)

For all those years I just never gave it a second thought and just presumed they used 2.6.
But you blew that out the water LOL

Edited by LXSS350, 28 March 2012 - 12:23 PM.


#468 REDA9X

REDA9X

    Removed

  • Inactive
  • Pip
  • 0 posts
  • Joined: 08-November 05

Posted 28 March 2012 - 12:41 PM

I still seriously have my doubts it would be anything close to 170MPH on Conrod. Where does it say it hit those speeds, sounds like Harry being a little generous with the facts to me.

#469 xu2308

xu2308

    Grail Hunter

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,704 posts
  • Name:AL
  • Location:Belconnen ACT
  • Car:SMP LJ GTR V8 Prototype-Confirmed By HHS and Ex GMH XW7 Engineers
  • Joined: 09-April 09

Posted 28 March 2012 - 07:13 PM

Hi Red
Harry says it on page 53 in issue 9 the V8 XU-1 Story (A.M.C Mag) its at the start of the page and Harry talks about it in the HDT Chevron DVD and talks about Larry Perkins road testing the V8 XU-1 Prototype at high speed road testing.
Now maybe the "H" is talking it up, or maybe not, a XU-1 with its light weight and small frontal area with a modified 308 V8
will achieve high speeds easy, i have had my V8 LJ to 6500 rpm in top gear, running a 2.75 ratio 9" diff, and it feels like its doing 150 mph or faster, so the 'H' might be correct if they did get 7000 rpm in top gear.

#470 REDA9X

REDA9X

    Removed

  • Inactive
  • Pip
  • 0 posts
  • Joined: 08-November 05

Posted 28 March 2012 - 07:33 PM

I was just watching Topgear and they had a Posche twin turbo 3 litre flat six and an Audi 5.2 litre Lamborgini engined R8 on that both topped out at 190MPH. A "factory stock" XU1 V8 doing 170MPH I doubt more than ever. Harry is talking it up. The thing with AMC is they research stories and do a very good job compiling the information, however (and rightly so) they interview people like Harry and put what he says into the magazine. There is no way in Hell they would every interview someone and then quote them and say nah that can't be right. Stories from people like Harry at to the article, whether the facts be right or wrong. We all remember when Brock wrote into AMC and told them the Champion car was the real 05, look how that turned out. Harry also claimed HDT only ever had 2 L34 race cars and thats not true either. Sorry but it's 40 years ago now and no ones memory is that good.

#471 _Got1UR1_

_Got1UR1_
  • Guests

Posted 28 March 2012 - 07:52 PM

Red, you better hope LXSS350 doesn,t read that magazines print articles that are incorrect / inaccurate / wrong / repeat faded memories and myths. After all the quoted articles he has put up here, he will be devastated. :stirpot:

#472 REDA9X

REDA9X

    Removed

  • Inactive
  • Pip
  • 0 posts
  • Joined: 08-November 05

Posted 28 March 2012 - 08:14 PM

The difference is everything he put up was from 40 yers ago when the cars were new, so faded memories really don't count now do they. A bit different to trying to remember it for an article today.

#473 xu2308

xu2308

    Grail Hunter

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,704 posts
  • Name:AL
  • Location:Belconnen ACT
  • Car:SMP LJ GTR V8 Prototype-Confirmed By HHS and Ex GMH XW7 Engineers
  • Joined: 09-April 09

Posted 28 March 2012 - 08:19 PM

The Engine in the V8 LJ XU-1 was not going to be stock, Holden had a letter dated the 30/6/1972 that they were testing the currant model XU-1 with a modified V8 Engine and Brocky told me about the engine in the Pink V8 Prototype was very modified. so not stock the engine in the V8 XU-1 if released, as they had to follow the C.A.M.S Rules of 1972

#474 REDA9X

REDA9X

    Removed

  • Inactive
  • Pip
  • 0 posts
  • Joined: 08-November 05

Posted 28 March 2012 - 08:42 PM

Since you're quoting Harry he says the engine in the car used at Bathurst was basically stock and putting out 290HP. A far cry from a V8 Supercar with more than twice the power. Again, 290HP supposedly reving to 7000RPM pushing the XU1 V8 to 170MPH (273km/h), an A9X race car on the same length of road at 400HP at around 160MPH (260km/h) and a V8 Supercar on a lightly shorter bit of road but with 650HP reving to 7500RPM , six gears to get it up as quick as possible and able to put the power to the ground much better with 11" racing rubber doing 180mph (289km/h).
Reading Harrys story he said Larry held it at 7000RPM for around 30 miles on the way to Bathurst!! Please explain to me how 17 years later while they were still holding the Revs of the 308/304 race cars at no more than 7000RPM peak. It just doesn't add up that 17 years of technology couldn't keep up with harrys basically stock 290HP engine from 1972.

#475 _outer control_

_outer control_
  • Guests

Posted 28 March 2012 - 09:28 PM

The Engine in the V8 LJ XU-1 was not going to be stock, Holden had a letter dated the 30/6/1972 that they were testing the currant model XU-1 with a modified V8 Engine and Brocky told me about the engine in the Pink V8 Prototype was very modified. so not stock the engine in the V8 XU-1 if released, as they had to follow the C.A.M.S Rules of 1972

The Sports sedan had a F5000 engine in it and as i understand it H had a very modified engine with appropriate modified sump. All these mods he also wanted to go into the L34 along with salisbury disc diff etc but it didnt happen because bean counters were only interested in selling stock kingswoods so it would not have happened in v8 xu1

Edited by outer control, 28 March 2012 - 09:29 PM.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users