
The Great L34 A9X debate
#176
Posted 07 April 2009 - 10:12 AM
Ok, maybe I�m just thick but that�s not what I�ve understood your posts to mean or how I read them.
To tell you the truth I don�t read many of yours because of that reason. Maybe if you stick to the main points slow people like me will be able to understand them and probably agree with them.
Kind regards������
Ps. By the way it may not be a huge gap but it�s not a small one either, it�s a clear win.
#177
_Herne_
Posted 07 April 2009 - 11:24 AM
I think that put your point across quite well Red (although perhaps Herne won't read it
), good stuff
Hahha, let it be known that Herne really has little interest in this thread as there are NO winners. Both are desirable cars in my book IF you can get them at a realistic price. My idea of realistic differs vastly from those with money to burn who pay hundreds of dollars for an authentic bolt. I am and never was that pedantic about anything in this world. This crap about which one is faster is just that, with the right amount of work they will both perform far better than off the showroom floor.
I still refuse to read any block text, trust me that will never change 'cos I could care less.
I browse this thread from time to time and enjoy seeing the wankfest even if I am not overly interested.
But its nice to see this has not become another shit fight

As for me I am happy to improve my Torana to the point where if needed it would blow the doors off of many and thats good enough for me.
The public enjoying my car is what drives me on regardless if they know anything about cars or not. They enjoy what they see and they let me know that

Have a good day
Herne
#178
Posted 07 April 2009 - 11:25 AM
#179
_Herne_
Posted 07 April 2009 - 11:29 AM
Yep, maybe next time I'll just write a load of crap and tell everyone to get a life, that will come across much better
hahahaaha now you are talking

Cheers
Herne
#180
_chrome yella_
Posted 07 April 2009 - 11:35 AM
the A9X is a nicer car to drive round corners.
the L34 is quite a bit more powerfull.
everyones happy
#181
Posted 07 April 2009 - 11:56 AM
And still not sure weather we are talking the race versions or road versions of each model car
But in my eyes the figures speak for themselves
In the 4 years that the Torana's won Bathurst 2 for L34 and 2 for A9X
The qualifying times set were as such
'75 L34 driven by Brock / Morris --- 2min.28.6
'76 L34 driven by Morris / Fitzpatrick --- 2min 26.4
'78 A9X driven by Brock / Richards --- 2min 20.6
'79 A9X driven by Brock / Richards --- 2min 20.5
These are only qualifying times for the winning cars not nessesarily fastest qualifying for that year
The mountain has it all braking, top speed, cornering etc
Basicly the same drivers
Please feel free to flame me and i will go away
Both great cars and i would be proud to own either ( stick with and are happy with my LX 5000)
Great debate but leave the boots out of it
D
#182
_Pallbag_
Posted 07 April 2009 - 01:30 PM
However, using the above quote, I am curious if this relates to the road going versions or is it referring to the track versions, and if it is the track versions, why did the persist with using the hatches for racing ?Harry did go on to say ......... he also added that the 4 door was the quicker of the A9X�s
#183
Posted 07 April 2009 - 01:37 PM
#184
Posted 07 April 2009 - 02:04 PM
Maybe Red could answer when both occasions occurred for you it�s more his expertise, I didn�t ask Harry, I wasn�t particularly interested in hearing that as I have the hatch version�����.regards
#185
Posted 07 April 2009 - 05:58 PM
Kind regards������
He was sticking to the main points

#186
_waz355_
Posted 07 April 2009 - 06:16 PM

#187
Posted 07 April 2009 - 06:39 PM
#188
Posted 07 April 2009 - 07:22 PM
I wasn't going to post anymore..but this thread got me..
What a shit fight..no wonder people are leaving..NOS and me included.
RED..It's a no win argument....
Thank you for your knowledge of the past and present...enjoy your car...nothing to prove.
R
It is sad people want to leave but if that's what you have to do to avoid crap in life then so be it.
I myself usually just stick to the tech section for this reason but this one slipped thru the cracks.
What I don't understand is why it was allowed to get to this?
Least we forget 6 laps.
#189
Posted 07 April 2009 - 07:27 PM
however a sedan has more flex in the rear end due to the doors.
And less flex in the rear due to the parcel shelf and boot/windscreen channel???
#190
Posted 07 April 2009 - 07:50 PM
Always Value your opinion and you having one of each would be the best to ask here.
Axistr
#191
Posted 07 April 2009 - 08:09 PM
#192
Posted 08 April 2009 - 02:43 PM
hsvgts, Pete you have two great examples, which one do you enjoy driving the most? and thats what it's all about not the best cornering or outright straigth line performance. Just the best enjoyable drive on any Sunday.
Always Value your opinion and you having one of each would be the best to ask here.
Axistr
G'day Axistr, My favorite is the A9X hatch it's easier to drive and rides better than the L34, I've owned plenty of 4 door 5000's but not many hatches and I recon the A9X hatch is the toughest looking muscle car produced, only my opinion of course as there's lots of nice Toranas out there.........regards

#193
Posted 08 April 2009 - 02:53 PM

#194
Posted 08 April 2009 - 08:02 PM
G'day Axistr, My favorite is the A9X hatch it's easier to drive and rides better than the L34, I've owned plenty of 4 door 5000's but not many hatches and I recon the A9X hatch is the toughest looking muscle car produced, only my opinion of course as there's lots of nice Toranas out there.........regards
HSVGTS mabe I'am a bit bias but the hatch is my first pick, they just look tuff with wide wheels and flares.
Axistr.
#195
_outer control_
Posted 08 April 2009 - 08:09 PM
Hatches are 8kg heavier, however a sedan has more flex in the rear end due to the doors. Holden wanted to promote the hatches, thats the main reason they raced, plus, they looked better
More flex sometimes can mean more traction,just a point.
#196
Posted 09 April 2009 - 07:38 AM
#197
Posted 09 April 2009 - 09:17 PM
Well Red if that pretty much sums up what you�ve been saying all along maybe you should stop writing pages of facts and figures that smoke screen the main point of what you actually mean.
Ok, maybe I�m just thick but that�s not what I�ve understood your posts to mean or how I read them.
To tell you the truth I don�t read many of yours because of that reason. Maybe if you stick to the main points slow people like me will be able to understand them and probably agree with them.
Kind regards������
Ps. By the way it may not be a huge gap but it�s not a small one either, it�s a clear win.
does this mean the L34 won the debate..........(i guess i could have told you all that).............that's all folks
#198
Posted 10 April 2009 - 11:59 AM
does this mean the L34 won the debate..........(i guess i could have told you all that).............that's all folks
Dont think so, keep dreamin !!
#199
Posted 10 April 2009 - 03:34 PM
Dont think so, keep dreamin !!
i didn't need dream like some as i've been blessed to experience it in reality,...hopefully the easter bunny is kind to you...happy easter to all..don't it take to seriously buddy..
#200
Posted 25 April 2009 - 01:20 AM
Red A9X summed up most facts very well, especially the 253 camshaft note in the L34(check the parts catalogue), how else can you produce a car with a better flowing inlet manifold, better ignition systen, more compression, better flowing heads, better exhaust and yet still put out the same output as a stock slr 5000, infact with that camshaft, they were a bit of a dog with the mismatch of parts, but put in context, most people wre used to driving HK-T-G rubbish or smaller 6 cyl Lc-Lj so these things felt like rockets in comparison.
The Mystery High output pack, basically a Nasco box of goodies, Carby: DOZF 4510 Holley 780 vac secondary, same as 302 Z28 Camaro or Phase 3 GTHO, Camshaft : Crane solid, @ 290 duration 108 LSA .500 lift, adjustable alloy roller rockers, Oil cooler: Harrison dual pass alloy, same as Chevrolet Impala/camaro super duty kit, ( or Cessna 6 cylinder or Hercules loading door hydraulic cooler, very common :-), there was a poxy sort of an airhorn like you see on boats, sounded great, looked great, went great, but first carby backfire, it toasted the bonnet :-(. The kit sold for @ $1500 so nowdays that would be like buying a new GTS and getting stung $10k to make it go well.
NO L34 ever left the factory with this kit, adr's etc plus they just nailed the Bango diff and straw axles, the kit bumped them up to @ the 300hp mark if you ordered the extra exhaust extensions from HM headers and changed the exhaust,
L34's in stock form, were fairly dodgy by todays standard, push understeer to snap oversteer, bogged with the normal 2.78 gears, no radio etc, just designed for the homolgation rules.
PROS, Looked better, better brakes, better handling, more power (with cam change) rode better with bigger wheels and NO FN hubcaps that come off the first time you give it a serve.
CONS Diff , diff , diff diff, fn diff, fn axles..........M21 never let me down at all. Steel block on crossmember used to cause severe pad knockoff in tight situations, drums on the back.
A9X a shining light in the era of ADR smog laden shitboxes, so much so that created its own awe, the fact it was just a Torana with a nanna pack smog 5.0 albeit no engine fan, but finally great suspension geometry, better diff and brakes that the L34, it just shone out, then the bathurst victorys etc, so just that in itself eclipsed the L34 for so many years.
Now the big question, what is more collectable, mm A9X Hatchback I would think as was so unique and identifiable, then L34 with 3.08 gears GU4, then the others.
But at least I enjoyed mine when they were "affordable", I put about 30'000k's on it and went through that much fuel and tyres I could cry, but from the beaches of Tasmanian to the topend roads and whatever fun bits in between, it was all about just having fun, so the debate will always go on.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users