Fitting Original Rear Discs to UC
#26
Posted 26 October 2009 - 09:04 PM
So HZ seals and new bearings and I'm good to go. Thanks all.
#27
Posted 26 October 2009 - 10:19 PM
To fit the seals requires removing the bearings
So they can't just "fit the seals"
So its new bearings and seals time
And since HQ never had disc rears... try HZ or WB rear
Most diff shops aren't as knowledgable as you Neil
#28 _torana50_
Posted 28 October 2009 - 07:06 PM
To fit the seals requires removing the bearings
So they can't just "fit the seals"
So its new bearings and seals time
And since HQ never had disc rears... try HZ or WB rear
Thanks for that. It does get a bit confusing.
I have no probs getting new bearings and seals, I'd rather new stuff going into the car anyway.
I am still curious about the discussion with chopper and others about getting new rotors to suit in a limited run.
No one seems to respond to the question about if, when and how much.
#29
Posted 29 October 2009 - 06:06 AM
#30
Posted 29 October 2009 - 09:26 AM
Especially ones with the cash in hand to pay upfront
Chopchop would be the best to answer this though as he did the research
#31 _CHOPPER_
Posted 01 November 2009 - 01:02 PM
#32
Posted 01 November 2009 - 04:02 PM
#33 _CHOPPER_
Posted 04 November 2009 - 02:27 PM
However, I will start a new thread to discuss interests and options.
#34
Posted 01 January 2010 - 09:58 AM
#35
Posted 04 January 2010 - 05:09 PM
#36
Posted 04 January 2010 - 06:15 PM
#37
Posted 04 January 2010 - 06:19 PM
Edited by Steve TPF, 04 January 2010 - 06:27 PM.
#38
Posted 04 January 2010 - 06:45 PM
Matter of opinion which is better, I along with some believe the captive type you have to be superior, as would have the supplier, that's probably why he gave this type to you,
Other people believe the tapered two piece bearing to be better...
#39
Posted 04 January 2010 - 07:09 PM
#40
Posted 04 January 2010 - 07:35 PM
Except the axle housing has a tapered receiver...
Just take it out.
#41
Posted 04 January 2010 - 07:37 PM
Ok, so if I take out the inner receiver I still need a spacer to take up the extra thickness of the caliper mounting plate. I'm guessing these aren't readily available...
Edited by Steve TPF, 04 January 2010 - 07:39 PM.
#42
Posted 04 January 2010 - 07:49 PM
tapered bearings
Either bearing will need the spacer.
Edited by TerrA LX, 04 January 2010 - 07:47 PM.
#43
Posted 04 January 2010 - 08:03 PM
#44
Posted 04 January 2010 - 10:02 PM
2 different depths/widths/thicknesses if that makes sense?
You need the disc brake ones (thicker/wider) if converting from drum to disc.
Edited by rodomo, 04 January 2010 - 10:07 PM.
#45
Posted 05 January 2010 - 06:40 AM
#46
Posted 05 January 2010 - 08:11 PM
Checked today and the new seals don't make up the difference. A spacer will be needed. But that's now a moot point. With the standard axle in place, the disc sits too far out - there's no room for the pad between the caliper and the disc. The disc brake axle must have the wheel mounting flange set in closer to the axle housing (which makes sense now I think about it because this will maintain the same track width). So fitting new seals and bearings to the original axles won't help at all - the disc brake axles will be required.
#47
Posted 06 January 2010 - 12:33 PM
I hate to double-post, but i can't add to my previous one.
Checked today and the new seals don't make up the difference. A spacer will be needed. But that's now a moot point. With the standard axle in place, the disc sits too far out - there's no room for the pad between the caliper and the disc. The disc brake axle must have the wheel mounting flange set in closer to the axle housing (which makes sense now I think about it because this will maintain the same track width). So fitting new seals and bearings to the original axles won't help at all - the disc brake axles will be required.
I think the problem is you are getting advice to get HZ - WB disc bearings. They will need the 1/4 inch spacer. To do the conversion without the spacer you need the later commodore VB-VK salisbury kit which has the sam bearing but a thicker seal. You may be able to buy the seals. Alternaively I think others have cut down an old bearing ring for the spacer.
#48
Posted 06 January 2010 - 08:30 PM
#49
Posted 17 January 2010 - 03:27 PM
I would suggest you check to ensure the bearing that has been pressed on is correct. �I have LX Drum and UC Disc axles here and the bearing is identical. �The wheel track will be slightly wider (<1/4" I think) with the discs.
Grant..
#50 _UC HATCH_
Posted 25 January 2010 - 08:04 PM
First thing I would do is get the tapered bearings, I have never seen other than tapper on older Holden (I could be wrong)but that's what you had on there.
Why go for the HZ - WB seals or commodore VB-VK Salisbury kit? Isn't there a UC disc brake rear bearing and seal kit?
Or did the UC have a spacer and the thicker seals came out later, or was the spacer a workaround someone came up with?
Mark
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users