Fabricating a transmission tunnel
#1
Posted 06 August 2009 - 11:28 PM
Just wondering what�s the difference and what is preferred, Cold rolled or Hot rolled sheet metal.
I�m thinking of using 1.6mm-2mm thickness, I�m thinking 2mm may be too thick??
Thanks
Bart
#2
Posted 06 August 2009 - 11:41 PM
#3
Posted 06 August 2009 - 11:46 PM
Thanks mateSome info in this thread, post #6 refers to hot/cold rolled:
http://www.gmh-toran...showtopic=37019
Cold rolled it is
If it turns out i will take some pics
#4
Posted 07 August 2009 - 12:09 AM
http://cgi.ebay.com....=STRK:MESELX:IT
#5
Posted 07 August 2009 - 05:26 PM
Thanks FastEHbuy my EH transmission tunnel off ebay....cut the top off your tunnel and drop it on weld it up.
http://cgi.ebay.com....=STRK:MESELX:IT
I have already cut out the tunnel and bought cold rolled sheet metal, should arrive Tue so I will be withdrawing for a few days for not doing any work on the Torri
The RB25T Nissan box is pretty tall and fat so your tunnel my not be the go.
Thanks anyway, good luck with the sale on fleebay
#6 _2DR_
Posted 09 August 2009 - 11:15 AM
good luck look forward to some pics.
#7
Posted 09 August 2009 - 02:26 PM
Interesting, my tunnel is about 1.8mm thick.as suggested already cold rolled is best 1.15 or .95 is the best (and closest to original thickness) i have found but depends on what shapes your trying to create.2mm will be to thick imo
good luck look forward to some pics.
I want to stay with that roughly
#8 _2DR_
Posted 09 August 2009 - 05:28 PM
1.8 mmm not having measured mine ill have to take your word for it but most of my other panels are about 1 to 1.2mm i wonder if they made the floors thicker than exterior panels?Interesting, my tunnel is about 1.8mm thick.
I want to stay with that roughly
#9
Posted 09 August 2009 - 06:28 PM
Yes I would say so.1.8 mmm not having measured mine ill have to take your word for it but most of my other panels are about 1 to 1.2mm i wonder if they made the floors thicker than exterior panels?
I believe exterior panels are thinner. I had safety in mind so i went 2mm, dont want a fly wheel in my foot. The motor im using is capable of revving over 8000rpm. You just never know.
#10
Posted 09 August 2009 - 10:31 PM
#11
Posted 10 August 2009 - 07:11 PM
The tunnel in my LX varies from about 1.0 mm to 1.5 mm presumably depending on how much the metal has been stretched or shrunk and how cleanly I cut the holes.
#12 _2DR_
Posted 10 August 2009 - 08:47 PM
bart - looks like fun 2mm will be a bartard to shape
#13
Posted 10 August 2009 - 09:07 PM
Yeah it will be but fortunately there wont be too much shaping to do. It�s not too multi dimensionalls2lxhatch - sounds like a good prognosis
bart - looks like fun 2mm will be a bartard to shape
#14
Posted 11 August 2009 - 10:59 PM
#15 _2DR_
Posted 12 August 2009 - 05:08 PM
#16
Posted 14 August 2009 - 01:48 AM
Tunnel progress, i have tappered the back end of the tunnel a little more.
#17
Posted 14 August 2009 - 09:07 AM
#18
Posted 14 August 2009 - 12:24 PM
#19 _2DR_
Posted 14 August 2009 - 02:32 PM
#20
Posted 14 August 2009 - 10:50 PM
Real prick to get my head in there, welded a little blind near the fire wall but got there at the end.
Edited by Bart, 14 August 2009 - 10:52 PM.
#21
Posted 14 August 2009 - 10:59 PM
Love your shed mate. Looks like mine
Better than some of the gurly sheds you see
AND.. I have bent sheets with a bender just like that
#22
Posted 14 August 2009 - 11:12 PM
#23
Posted 15 August 2009 - 10:44 PM
Thanks mate its a little crowded in there but does the job, occasionally trip over shit lolLove your shed mate. Looks like mine
Better than some of the gurly sheds you see
AND.. I have bent sheets with a bender just like that
I have plans on building a 8m X 5m out back maybe a little bigger, have to see what the bloody council allows, damn Nazi's
#24
Posted 15 August 2009 - 10:45 PM
Yeah I know what you mean, as mentioned its a little crowded, but builing something bigger in the future. The damn Pontiac takes a lot of space.LOL I could not work in a shed like that, but clearly Bart can. That looks sensational! Very simple in its form (which I'm sure made it much easier to shape) but it just looks perfect. No excessively large dimensions... looks like there is still a fair bit of room left in the footwell for your feet to operate in etc. Tops!
#25
Posted 15 August 2009 - 11:16 PM
Edited by Bart, 15 August 2009 - 11:16 PM.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users