who has challenged a speeding fine or red light fine
#1 _kaz from adelaide_
Posted 31 August 2009 - 05:50 PM
I saw yesterday on the ninemsn home page that NSW ppl lead the 'challenge and win' ratio.
Whats your experiences
XXKAZXX
#2
Posted 31 August 2009 - 06:19 PM
Police were supposed to estimate your speed and use handheld radar to check their estimate. This copper was sitting in the car facing the same direction as me with the K band radar facing backwards (on a VK Commodore from memory). Probably reading the paper.
What happened was I was in the RH line closest to the median strip. His line of vision from the front seat of the LH lane was obscured by power poles. Car sped up the inside of me, set off his radar and he got out, saw me in the RH lane and pulled me over.
In court he testified that he was standing on the kerb side of the road in front of the car pointing the radar, doing what he was supposed to do.
I testified how it really happened, which the Prosecutor and copper denied. Then I showed photos of how it was from where the car was reported to be and how the inside lane was obscured.
He also testified that it was Lake Street (not road), 11:15am (it was 8:15am) and that I was in the LH lane. Also that there was no other cars on the road at the same time.
I argued that he THOUGHT I was in the LH lane because he couldn't see it from inside the car via the rear vision mirror or if he'd been standing where he was supposed to be, although the gutter mounted radar could "see" both lanes.
I also asked them to pull up the booking records for the brown VC Commodore with licence plate xxx-xxx that shows it was pulled over at the same time as me (about 5 seconds after me) to refute the statement that there were no other cars on the road at the time.
Magistrate said that there was no need to pull up the records as given the amount of discrepency in the Police record the case was dismissed.
When I left the court the copper came up to me. I expected him to say "see you on the road", but he shook my hand, said well done. Good to see someone with the guts to defend themselves (I had no Barrister). I told him sorry for making him look bad, and he said no worries.
#3 _rorym_
Posted 31 August 2009 - 06:41 PM
R
#4
Posted 31 August 2009 - 06:57 PM
#5
Posted 31 August 2009 - 07:21 PM
#6 _L32M20_
Posted 31 August 2009 - 07:24 PM
i was followed along a side street i knew they were following me 4 kms up the road they pull me over and say we estimate you were doing 80 in a 60 zone!! i said no way why would i be speeding when i know you have been following me for 4-5kmhs the cop says to me well take it to court who do you think the judge is going to believe you or me!! i payed the fine but if i had my time again i would have fought it!! good luck kaz if your going to fight it your going to need it!!
me too ,very similar circumstances,in mt gravatt brisvegas. the judge knew the cops and their boss ,the cops lied through their teeth and and gave two different accounts, even though i had a witness in the car with me who also gave evidence,they fabricated theirs to suit ,a doctored recording,i kid you not,they recorded everything i said on the road side and cleverly twisted it and used it against me.to cut a long story long,i copped the ruff end o the pineapple that day,and it was a long day,cost me double,and my faith in the law.my arse is still sore. so go ahead youve got a 50/50 chance.but if your car is a bit special or you ve ever had a couple of speeding fines id be thinking about the cost of a good solicitor vs the time off work ,and the extra costs incured to you if you loose, and your particular circumstances.do you have an impeccable driving record?
#7
Posted 31 August 2009 - 07:30 PM
Suffice it to say My brother got stopped for doing 147 in a 60 zone, Copper lied his ass off on the side of the road.
they took it to court, got a good lawyer.. and the cop eventually had to eat his hat because he DID lie and as above - too many discrepancies in the story.
The moral of the story is.. get a good lawyer. theyre trained liers and will be able to bullshit the bullshitters on the other team!
Good luck with it Kaz!
#8 _L32M20_
Posted 31 August 2009 - 07:36 PM
#9 _Woodsy_
Posted 31 August 2009 - 07:46 PM
#10
Posted 31 August 2009 - 08:22 PM
While most councils have permanent parking cops,many regular coppers work a second job as a casual parking cop.
If your fine is issued by a regular cop,and they are rostered on duty(as a real cop) when the court date rolls around,then they have to stay at work.
If they dont front court,the case is dismissed.
It wont work eveytime,but it might just get you off.
#11
Posted 31 August 2009 - 09:13 PM
Suffice it to say
Well done on the English skills Tiny I'm a fan.
I assume you have shelled out the $13? for the picture? I agree with Woodsy....red light camera would be hard to disprove.
#12 _mdswat_
Posted 31 August 2009 - 09:15 PM
#13
Posted 31 August 2009 - 09:28 PM
Good luck
#14
Posted 31 August 2009 - 09:33 PM
if your plates are covered in shit ,it makes them immpossible to read.now theres a money saving idea for ya girl! you wont find that one in the womans weekly!
untill you get pulled over for obscured number plates as i did
then they did a rbt
then a car search
then a road side roadworthy check
#15 _Baronvonrort_
Posted 01 September 2009 - 08:01 AM
I rang the IPB and asked them if i paid $10 for the photo and if it wasnt my car in the photo would my 10 bucks be refunded?
The lady checked the photo and discovered it was a hilux was speeding and they mis read the number plate which is why i got the ticket.
If i ever get another camera ticket i will check photo before paying up.
#16
Posted 01 September 2009 - 08:17 AM
- The speed you were doing was less than 10km over the posted limit
- you have had a clean record for 3years
All you have to do is write a letter to them saying, I was in the wrong and wont do it again..yad yad yad. Yes I have used this method, old man did too. Might be a little loop hole worth checking for other states.
jim
#17
Posted 01 September 2009 - 09:02 AM
Ruts
#18 _cruiza_
Posted 01 September 2009 - 08:33 PM
#19 _Trentm_
Posted 03 September 2009 - 10:41 PM
Goodluck to those who try.
#20 _tyre fryer_
Posted 03 September 2009 - 11:10 PM
#21 _Trentm_
Posted 03 September 2009 - 11:13 PM
In SA, if you can prove that your car's speedo isn't reading properly (this can be done through the RAA I believe). Will the fine be wavered?
No sorry it won't fryer.
#22
Posted 04 September 2009 - 10:24 AM
#23
Posted 04 September 2009 - 12:35 PM
For a while the cops set up radars here and there with an LED output to tell you your speed so you could check which was quite handy. I haven't seen one for a LOOOOOONG time now...you usually find out when you see the flash followed by the ticket in the mail....
#24
Posted 04 September 2009 - 01:36 PM
The police announced that some 800 vehicles had tripped the advisory signs in excess of the limit - they only light up with a Slow Down - XX Zone when you are over the limit.
I went up and back in a government car, cruise-control locked on the limit ( I know this speedo reads correct) and every second sign lit up!!!
Good to see the plod up here know how to cook the books
I can almost guarantee most radar vans do the same......
Not to mention the Lidar jockey (in training) who got me at 78 in a 60 zone a yr or two ago -
Just took off from the lights, hit a crest after twenty metres (where they reckon they got me),
at 600+ range......................the accuracy of these things decreases significantly after 200m.....
If an 02 Rodeo can get up to 78 in twenty metres, i should have taken it to Willowbank!!
Grant..
#25 _The Baron_
Posted 04 September 2009 - 01:44 PM
His reported speed was just over the limit.
He has found some significant holes regarding equipment calibration requirements.
All of this equipment MUST be calibrated routinely and operated under the established guidelines.
As it is up to the vehicle owner to ensure the speedo is reading correctly.It is also up to the operator of this red light/speed camera/radar equipment to prove that their equipment conforms(read- is calibrated and maintained in accordance with manufacturers guidlines).
So in court, it appears you can challenge the operators to prove this.
But don't was your time if you have a bad record already as the judge probably won't be entertained by this request.
Good luck.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users