Fastest Holden 6 Powered Sedan
#76 _Bomber Watson_
Posted 05 June 2010 - 06:58 PM
#77
Posted 05 June 2010 - 11:20 PM
[/quote]
Red motor rods and a banjo holding 300 hp?
#78
Posted 06 June 2010 - 12:28 AM
ran 11.55 @114.7mph naturally aspirated in LC 2 door back in 2005 with 9 port, 3 x 45mm webers,flat tappet cam, std crank,rods and cast pistons,trimatic and banjo
[/quote]
Red motor rods and a banjo holding 300 hp?
[/quote]
What thu guy was running "THAT QUICK" with an AUTO ??? Damn right it's an AUTO for all those pedal pushers/auto H8R'ss..
#79
Posted 07 June 2010 - 09:31 AM
[quote name='greens nice' date='05 June 2010 - 11:20 PM' timestamp='1275744053' post='512760']
ran 11.55 @114.7mph naturally aspirated in LC 2 door back in 2005 with 9 port, 3 x 45mm webers,flat tappet cam, std crank,rods and cast pistons,trimatic and banjo
[/quote]
Red motor rods and a banjo holding 300 hp?
[/quote]
What thu guy was running "THAT QUICK" with an AUTO ??? Damn right it's an AUTO for all those pedal pushers/auto H8R'ss..
[/quote]
blue motor rods, and i got the same banjo rear end to run a 9.9 @ 135mph with a 1.36 60ft
#80 _Bomber Watson_
Posted 07 June 2010 - 06:37 PM
Im curious...Is all.
#81 _CraigA_
Posted 07 June 2010 - 07:03 PM
With 300FWHP to get that time/mph you would need a wet weight around 2500 lbs (1100kgs) so its theoretically achievable.
#82
Posted 07 June 2010 - 07:57 PM
^^^ Good question. I'd be very interested too.
With 300FWHP to get that time/mph you would need a wet weight around 2500 lbs (1100kgs) so its theoretically achievable.
oo how i wish that was spot on, dad would be 11.1 by now.
#83
Posted 08 June 2010 - 10:56 AM
#84 _Bad Blood_
Posted 03 July 2010 - 04:06 PM
oh, well i have this fascination with hb's and was wondering what the running gear was lol.
holden blue, 2inch SU's, trimatic, borg warner, nothing to tuff runs 13.8
He ran a 13.3 tonight
I got it down to 12.38 now and its a 1 tonner diff 4.44
#85 _panic_
Posted 21 July 2010 - 05:57 PM
#86
Posted 22 July 2010 - 11:41 AM
hip 6 b s
how so?
#87 _panic_
Posted 23 July 2010 - 09:43 PM
hip 6 b s
how so? 7.2 @92 b s
Edited by panic, 23 July 2010 - 09:45 PM.
#88
Posted 26 July 2010 - 10:02 AM
#89
Posted 26 July 2010 - 12:28 PM
7.20 @ 93MPH on the eighth with a 1.55 60ft, whats so hard to believe?
the part where its a aspo holden 6 on petrol and the banjo part.
#90
Posted 26 July 2010 - 02:00 PM
#91 _1tuff383_
Posted 27 July 2010 - 11:09 PM
was this car orange by any chance???
#92
Posted 28 July 2010 - 09:16 AM
#93 _1tuff383_
Posted 03 August 2010 - 01:34 AM
STOCK or STOCK6???
#94
Posted 03 August 2010 - 09:46 AM
#95 _Drag lc_
Posted 03 August 2010 - 05:29 PM
#96
Posted 03 August 2010 - 05:43 PM
#97 _1tuff383_
Posted 03 August 2010 - 07:18 PM
very impressive what you got out of the combinations.
this car changed my veiws on the little 6's
top work
i would love to pic your brain on the suspension setups tips/hints you have.
i am very slowly between work comittments, kids etc
finalising my 186, tripple webered, trimatic with a borgy.
it made just over 300hp & 300ft lbs on the engine dyno N/A.
it wont leave the line like yours did (or still does?) but should still hammer.
actually i am hoping for similar times to what you have posted for the N/A runs.
Edited by 1tuff383, 03 August 2010 - 07:19 PM.
#98
Posted 04 August 2010 - 09:45 AM
[quote name='CraigA' date='07 June 2010 - 07:03 PM' timestamp='1275901406' post='513205']
^^^ Good question. I'd be very interested too.
With 300FWHP to get that time/mph you would need a wet weight around 2500 lbs (1100kgs) so its theoretically achievable.
[/quote]
oo how i wish that was spot on, dad would be 11.1 by now.
[/quote
now that we may have established my details aren't [b.s] can you explain how low 12's at 108-109 mph equates to 11.1's please.
Edited by hip6, 04 August 2010 - 09:41 AM.
#99
Posted 04 August 2010 - 09:52 AM
#100
Posted 04 August 2010 - 12:56 PM
[quote name='greens nice' date='07 June 2010 - 07:57 PM' timestamp='1275904658' post='513231']
[quote name='CraigA' date='07 June 2010 - 07:03 PM' timestamp='1275901406' post='513205']
^^^ Good question. I'd be very interested too.
With 300FWHP to get that time/mph you would need a wet weight around 2500 lbs (1100kgs) so its theoretically achievable.
[/quote]
oo how i wish that was spot on, dad would be 11.1 by now.
[/quote
now that we may have established my details aren't [b.s] can you explain how low 12's at 108-109 mph equates to 11.1's please.
[/quote]
because it makes more than 300 @ the fly.
i can punch those details in there into all the calcs ive found and it all says 290 @ the wheels.
im not doubting this anymore ive seen and heard enough, but the banjo holding up is very surprising.
4 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 4 guests, 0 anonymous users