STROKER 6 CRANK
#26
Posted 20 February 2010 - 05:39 AM
#27 _oldjohnno_
Posted 20 February 2010 - 06:06 AM
so why bother with a 355 or 383 holden or chev bomber?
answer cubes and low down torque
You're comparing apples and oranges beery. Both these V8s have the breathing capacity to support the extra cubes; a Holden headed six doesn't. The VN heads plus any number of good Chev heads will flow enough to support well over 400 cubes at high rpms. Even well ported HQ heads will feed 355cu in. On top of that both V8s have a much sturdier block, relatively speaking, than the six.
#28
Posted 20 February 2010 - 09:42 AM
#29 _oldjohnno_
Posted 20 February 2010 - 11:18 AM
#30
Posted 20 February 2010 - 12:59 PM
#31
Posted 20 February 2010 - 01:50 PM
I'd like to hear more about that. What's a BF head?
Ford BF Falcon i'm guessing... I'd love to see some pics
#32
Posted 20 February 2010 - 02:39 PM
#33
Posted 20 February 2010 - 02:45 PM
I can just see the glee on his face:
Ford 221 Crank
Boss head
toploader gearbox
9 inch diff
lucky there is a badge to tell everyone its a Holden!!!
Edited by FastEHHolden, 20 February 2010 - 02:47 PM.
#34
Posted 20 February 2010 - 02:59 PM
I'd like to hear more about that. What's a BF head?
Ford BF Falcon i'm guessing... I'd love to see some pics
+1 for pics
#35
Posted 20 February 2010 - 03:13 PM
#36 _oldjohnno_
Posted 20 February 2010 - 03:23 PM
#37
Posted 20 February 2010 - 03:38 PM
Though, I might log on anonomously from time to time to check out the pics.........
#38 _beergut_
Posted 20 February 2010 - 03:59 PM
so why bother with a 355 or 383 holden or chev bomber?
answer cubes and low down torque
You're comparing apples and oranges beery. Both these V8s have the breathing capacity to support the extra cubes; a Holden headed six doesn't. The VN heads plus any number of good Chev heads will flow enough to support well over 400 cubes at high rpms. Even well ported HQ heads will feed 355cu in. On top of that both V8s have a much sturdier block, relatively speaking, than the six.
don't j zed heads(or even yella terra)heads breathe a little better?
and you can buy stud girdle kits off a forum member now
and there's always grout filling blocks
to overcome these problems
personally i'd just buy/build a chev/holden stroker
but some people have different ideas/agenderas
#39
Posted 20 February 2010 - 05:29 PM
Remember that a Holden 6 isn't exactly SMALL in a Torana - it's just because we are used to them having V8s. There are plenty of cars the size of a Torana that have only been optioned with four cylinder motors. I wouldn't get too caught up in chasing cubes
If you want BIG POWER, you are not going to make it with a stroker, period.
Edited by Heath, 20 February 2010 - 05:35 PM.
#40
Posted 20 February 2010 - 05:58 PM
I always planned having a high compression/low boost turbo system with my 234...from that I was pretty sure of getting the result I was after.
I just need to spend more money...on manifolds...Either "Extrudehone" a VK EFI and get an exhaust manifold to fit with it...or start from scratch...and yes Oldjohno I know your feelings on VK EFI manifold..but I reckon ported how i want them , with boost, it would work great...might need a bigger plenum though.
#41 _Drag lc_
Posted 20 February 2010 - 06:15 PM
from my experiance witch is not a g8 deal i have seen people scratch around putting the early ford heads on red blocks i thought it was the goods but now i have learnt a little more i dont see really why yd bother the looks for startes then for the price and stuffing around mmm realistickly you would really be better of looking at just buying an aftermarket head modified corectly and be done with it i also think that you would be getting away form the hole 202 idea. but then if you were a real 202 fan and didnt want to spend alot of money outright i could see why you would do it.
on another note dad and i talk about this all the time in regards to his flattop ford v8 you can buy aftermarket o/h valve heads for them but that would be getting away from the actual side valve v8 and u would be better of getting a chebby v8...
anyway back to the strokers??????????????????
Cheers Hayden
#42 _oldjohnno_
Posted 20 February 2010 - 06:18 PM
But if something like a jzed head (or some sort of blower) was used, and you wanted to fully utilise its potential to make power, then it's gonna take more than a girdle and a bit of grout to keep it together. The crank would have to be billet steel for strength as well as ability to be properly balanced, and you'd want ultralight pistons and custom rods to get a decent ratio that would be gentle on the bores. Even with all this you could probably still kill the block if you rattled it hard or for too long. It'd be a lovely motor no doubt but by the time you add up the cost of the head, crank, rods and pistons (not to mention roller cam, valvetrain and induction etc) it'd be getting pretty pricey.
#43
Posted 20 February 2010 - 09:13 PM
Absolutely, and they have heaps of low down torque. They are great street motors but using a Holden crank with offset ground pins, it will never be a race motor without SIGNIFICANT modifications to the counterweights.Fair enough Heath. I think enough people have successfully used strokers in relatively mild builds to prove they can last - so long as you're prepared to accept their limitations regarding the rpm ceiling and maximum output.
Compare early and late Ford in-line six cranks to see the counterweighting changes, it's quite interesting
I should state here that I don't actually know what the 221 crank is like - what crank it is exactly, how that is weighted and what processes are involved in putting it in the Holden motor. It probably provides a shithouse rod ratio but beyond that I don't know.
Yeah I don't disagree with any of that. You can spend as much time as you want strengthening shit up, and even if you get it so good that nothing will come loose or break, the imbalance that you've ignored is still going to rob huge amounts of power and limit your motor's operating speed. Essentially you need to sort out your balance before anything else happens - there are no two ways about it. I just think that making an offset ground 202 stroker crank is just shooting yourself in the foot if you wanna get to the engine speeds where real power gets madeBut if something like a jzed head (or some sort of blower) was used, and you wanted to fully utilise its potential to make power, then it's gonna take more than a girdle and a bit of grout to keep it together. The crank would have to be billet steel for strength as well as ability to be properly balanced, and you'd want ultralight pistons and custom rods to get a decent ratio that would be gentle on the bores. Even with all this you could probably still kill the block if you rattled it hard or for too long.
The balance factor on a standard 202 crank is woeful (that's why everyone is having huge vibration issues). Offset grind stroking them makes the balance factor even worse obviously
But if all you wanna do is have a Torana that pulls bloody hard down low and doesn't rev any harder than a standard red 202, then ignore my arguments (or just put a supercharger on your car lol!)
#44 _Drag lc_
Posted 20 February 2010 - 09:22 PM
mmm might need to look out for them now........hehe are they more proment with the use of red cranks.
im yet to see an actual half baked stroker perform.
#45 _oldjohnno_
Posted 20 February 2010 - 09:39 PM
...The balance factor on a standard 202 crank is woeful (that's why everyone is having huge vibration issues).
And it's also why so many people using knife-edged cranks are breaking blocks...
The only solution with a factory crank is to use lighter rods/pistons and/or mallory metal.
#46 _Drag lc_
Posted 20 February 2010 - 09:51 PM
well maybe they know the shape but the cosmetic apperance has got alot to do with sales maybe.....
#47 _Bomber Watson_
Posted 21 February 2010 - 04:19 AM
so why bother with a 355 or 383 holden or chev bomber?
answer cubes and low down torque
Mate i think your question has been well answered by oldjohnno, but anyway, BECAUSE THE ROD RATIO WILL BE #@$^%& AND YOU CANT COMPARE A HOLDEN V8 OR A CHEV TO A HOLDEN 6!!!
You really would have to be an idiot to think you could compare them, no offense intended, just trying to clear things up a bit, i get along with you rather well most the time, but yeah, sometimes you say the darndest things.
Cheers.
#48
Posted 21 February 2010 - 09:31 AM
Yeah definitely more prominent with a red 202 crank than a black 202 crank, but I can assure you that neither are great! But the closer the crankpin is to the axis of the main journals, if nothing else changes, the better the balance factor.mmm might need to look out for them now........hehe are they more proment with the use of red cranks.that's why everyone is having huge vibration issues
Is yours a late model 202 crank? What balancer? I don't know what effect a flex plate & stally have (extra weight probably has some advantages). What do you rev it out to?
Edited by Heath, 21 February 2010 - 09:35 AM.
#49
Posted 21 February 2010 - 09:33 AM
...The balance factor on a standard 202 crank is woeful (that's why everyone is having huge vibration issues).
And it's also why so many people using knife-edged cranks are breaking blocks...
The only solution with a factory crank is to use lighter rods/pistons and/or mallory metal.
Old Johnno , What do you recommended for a lightweight piston rod Combo ? If you already have your red crank ? Cheers Biga064
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users