Would a heavily cropped copy of my drivers license suffice?
STROKER 6 CRANK
#176 _Bomber Watson_
Posted 29 October 2013 - 09:52 PM
#177 _Dansthemanow_
Posted 08 November 2013 - 09:06 AM
#178
Posted 24 May 2014 - 08:47 AM
Just go HSR Mikunis they work very nicely, very good throttle response.
3x 48mm?
or 6x 40mm if you've got a 12 port?
From a previous post:
But yeah, for a maximum effort engine I'd go for the HSRs over anything else - including injection.
Edit: If we're gonna get into this we should follow Ned's suggestion and start a new thread.
Found this:-
http://www.advrider....473&postcount=3
#179
Posted 25 May 2014 - 02:10 PM
Anyway, getting back to stroker cranks, I met a bloke some time ago who used the SM article on the 186-235. Local shop did the work. I went for a ride just after the zorst had been fitted, I helped the guy adjust the timing so it went better... checking the 0-100 with his watch!
Some time later I saw the remains of that engine, gave the new owner a hand to pull it to bits, although it was in enough bits as it was. No 1 cylinder had almost dissapeared... never seen such a big hole!, cam in 3 pieces, 3 rods bent like a real bent thing, bits of pistons in the sump.
Apparently 'made a noise slowing from 220' with a 3 on the tree and 3.08 diff... then went BANG rattle rattle rattle.
But the crank had not broken.
#180 _Bluejinx202_
Posted 25 May 2014 - 06:27 PM
Seeing as this thread came up again, ive had a re-read.... it would seem that for a high power, high rev application the extra stroke makes the rod ratio worst than it already is with the 3.5 stroke. sooo, ive got a box of parts in the corner of the garage for my blown engine (blue 2.8 block, 5.8 corrilo rods, m-90 blower). if we use the 3 inch stroke crank, and the 5.8 rods, could bore out to 3.625(ish) and have a NA 186(ish) with a lot better r/ratio...... Thoughts?
Hang on..... Would i have just built a really expensive stock 186? whats a 186 rod length?
Edited by Bluejinx202, 25 May 2014 - 06:29 PM.
#181 _Bomber Watson_
Posted 25 May 2014 - 06:55 PM
202 stroke is 3.25", not 3.5".
Stock 186 rod lengh is 5.25" same as all the others.
So no, you havnt planned a real expensive stock 186, you have planned something that shoudl be epic.
Cheers.
#182 _Bluejinx202_
Posted 25 May 2014 - 07:14 PM
#183 _Bomber Watson_
Posted 25 May 2014 - 07:25 PM
No, piston compression heights are different.
#184 _AED262_
Posted 17 June 2014 - 06:58 PM
Sorry Heath,
I have never heard so much BS in my whole life. You have obviously never built a quick, big cube six have you? Have you ever used a balancing machine before?
Rod.
#185 _oldjohnno_
Posted 18 June 2014 - 09:23 AM
Calm down, the comments you seem to be referring to were made over four years ago. I'm not even sure if Heath still comes here any more.
#186 _Skapinad_
Posted 18 June 2014 - 09:29 AM
Heath still lurks around here ...
#187 _AED262_
Posted 18 June 2014 - 03:11 PM
I am sorry for that and I should not have posted a reply. You know how it is when you read something and you think, That's BS and you let it slide.
Well I was reading that last night and I just had to say something.
We machine, balance, build, dyno and cnc port heads/ engines all day everyday. I like to think I know what I am talking about. Sometime you have to say something.
Rod.
#188 _oldjohnno_
Posted 18 June 2014 - 04:54 PM
We machine, balance, build, dyno and cnc port heads/ engines all day everyday
It's good to have people with experience like yours here.
2 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users