What is a 71 Bathurst XU-1?
#1
Posted 11 April 2010 - 04:02 PM
#2
Posted 11 April 2010 - 08:50 PM
What is a 71 Bathurst Xu-1?
#3
Posted 12 April 2010 - 12:40 AM
What is a 71 Bathurst Xu-1?
Reinforced front lower control arm.
Baffled diff housing.
New CK engine prefix.
Increased lift camshaft with revised valve timing.
Inlet and exhaust valves with slightly larger head diameter.
New cylinder head with reduced valve guide heights.
New balanced section molybdenum filled cast iron barrel laped top piston ring.
Improved attachment of oil pan baffle - brazed as well as spot welded.
Oil pump pickup set closer to base of oil pan.
New Zenith metering needles 5H in lieu of 6E.
New Aussie XU1 M20 close ratio gearbox.
New clutch plate.
New road wheels with thicker wheel disc and no hubcap nibs.
Radiator core now has 14.5 fins per inch, in lieu of 12 fins per inch.
Revised centrifugal advance and vacuum advance settings, initial timing setting now 10deg BTC at 900 rpm.
Larger 2" exhaust system in lieu of 1.3/4"system. Muffler is one 2" pipe in with two straight tips out.
Head restraints fitted to front seats??????
Extractors - NO.
Revised centre floor console (carried over to LJ model) with shift pattern plate to suit Aussie M20.
#4
Posted 12 April 2010 - 08:23 AM
They had cast iron headers 2 into one,
And a single 2" tail pipe with a chrome extension.
Cheers.
#5
Posted 12 April 2010 - 10:42 AM
200 (2/71)
200 (3/71, 4/71)
300 (9/71, 10/71, 11/71)
Can you tell me which batch of cars were responsible for the homologation of the XH cam and 5H needles ???
#6 _oz772_
Posted 12 April 2010 - 10:44 AM
Hi,
They had cast iron headers 2 into one,
And a single 2" tail pipe with a chrome extension.
Cheers.
The CK LC's were the first to use the twin tail pipes. They also used a resonator aft of the engine pipe, which the first two batches of LC's didn't have.
#7
Posted 12 April 2010 - 10:59 AM
When i was at xu-1's on the mountain,
all of the ck 9/71 i saw on that day,
no resonators were fitted on any of them,
and i know of one in sydney also and hasn't,
got one fitted also,the same as a 9/72 bathurst.
Cheers.
#8
Posted 12 April 2010 - 11:12 AM
I can tell ya,s this (According to the vin disc) Holden produced 700 LC XU-1,s in 1971 :
200 (2/71)
200 (3/71, 4/71)
300 (9/71, 10/71, 11/71)
Can you tell me which batch of cars were responsible for the homologation of the XH cam and 5H needles ???
the 200 3/71 4/71 cars...............
#9
Posted 12 April 2010 - 11:15 AM
The LC parts catalogue lists "pipe and resonator assembly" for the XU-1 (186X). It has the same P/N 2823705 as for the LJ XU-1. If this wasn't for the CK LC XU-1, what was it for??
Cheers
Bazza
#10 _oz772_
Posted 12 April 2010 - 11:16 AM
Hi oz772,
When i was at xu-1's on the mountain,
all of the ck 9/71 i saw on that day,
no resonators were fitted on any of them,
and i know of one in sydney also and hasn't,
got one fitted also,the same as a 9/72 bathurst.
Cheers.
I am going off the parts manual. It is a long time since 1971, so I guess they may have had several exhaust systems in their lives. Or, maybe the parts manual is wrong - that can happen.
The early cars (up to 5/71) didn't have the resonator fitted according to the parts manual I have. They also had the single outlet at the rear.
Edited by oz772, 12 April 2010 - 11:18 AM.
#11
Posted 12 April 2010 - 11:50 AM
I can tell ya,s this (According to the vin disc) Holden produced 700 LC XU-1,s in 1971 :
200 (2/71)
200 (3/71, 4/71)
300 (9/71, 10/71, 11/71)
Can you tell me which batch of cars were responsible for the homologation of the XH cam and 5H needles ???
the 200 3/71 4/71 cars...............
200 (2/71) Eligibility H2-2
200 (3/71, 4/71) Homologation 1/1E
300 (9/71, 10/71, 11/71) Homologation 1/2E
#12
Posted 12 April 2010 - 01:36 PM
#13
Posted 12 April 2010 - 02:29 PM
Nothing in the rules requiring them to be fitted in production only that 200 basically identical units were required. According to GMH Dealer Service Letter 141 they went into production on the CK,s. Were,nt the 200 (3/71 & 4/71) 1/1E cars responsible for the resonators anyhow...........
#14
Posted 12 April 2010 - 03:04 PM
Mayby the resonators were fitted lc xu1 3100's,
And on the lc xu1's ck's weren't fitted they were deleted,
And all of the 34 ck lc xu-1's were at xu1's on the mountain,
They all had single out let tail pipes with chrome extensions.
Cheers.
#15
Posted 12 April 2010 - 03:30 PM
Hi
The LC parts catalogue lists "pipe and resonator assembly" for the XU-1 (186X). It has the same P/N 2823705 as for the LJ XU-1. If this wasn't for the CK LC XU-1, what was it for??
Cheers
Bazza
Be careful of reliance upon parts catalogue for facts. The catalogues were designed to allow parts dealers to sell bits to keep cars going using genuine parts. I don't know XU-1's real well, but for HK-HG for example the parts numbers changed in later editions to what was available. Example, 1972 HK manual (blue) is full of "wrong" part numbers for a genuine GTS 327. The bits are all later bits that will do the job, like the cylinder heads listed for type 1 GTS327 which are big valve double hump fuellies, yet the original cars had small valve, small port truck heads. I wouldn't be surprised if the same happended to the LC catalogue.
#16 _BATHURST-32D_
Posted 12 April 2010 - 06:23 PM
bathurst colours
plumdinger
rally red
yellow dolly
lunamint
baroda silver
lonoranger
glacier white
kashmir white
amethyst
but with kashmir white i have not seen this in a 71 bathurst color but it is one of only nine lc xu1 colors.
cheers gong
#17 _pipjones_
Posted 12 April 2010 - 09:14 PM
#18 _1973bathxu1_
Posted 12 April 2010 - 11:14 PM
and a twin pipe muffler with chrome tips, same as the LJ XU1s
the 3 choke cables are white on my brisbane car
i hope this helps u
regards aldo
#19
Posted 13 April 2010 - 12:05 AM
Aug71 XU1 p2.JPG 144.04K 305 downloads
Aug71 XU1 p3.JPG 91.54K 263 downloads
Aug71 XU1 p4.JPG 124.48K 252 downloads
Aug71 XU1 p5.JPG 161.01K 265 downloads
Aug71 XU1 p6.JPG 215.18K 258 downloads
#20
Posted 13 April 2010 - 12:29 AM
To my knowledge the first 300 LJ XU-1,s (ie 1/72, 2/72, 3/72) ran the 949 rubber fuel lined 175 CD stromies with white choke cables.........
Certainly according to the GMH Dealer Service Letter 141 dated the 19-8-1971 both the resonator and twin chrome tipped mufflers were a production change for the CK,s with a host of other goodies............
#21
Posted 13 April 2010 - 01:19 AM
I can tell ya,s this (According to the vin disc) Holden produced 700 LC XU-1,s in 1971 :
200 (2/71)
200 (3/71, 4/71)
300 (9/71, 10/71, 11/71)
Can you tell me which batch of cars were responsible for the homologation of the XH cam and 5H needles ???
the 200 3/71 4/71 cars...............
March LC XU1 camshaft p1.JPG 185K 325 downloads
March LC XU1 camshaft p2.JPG 132.61K 309 downloads
GMH must have been telling porkies when they sent this off to the dealers.
Edited by S pack, 13 April 2010 - 01:24 AM.
#22 _BATHURST-32D_
Posted 13 April 2010 - 07:04 AM
frash da bucket, i find it hard to beleave that there was 34 ck xu1s in the one place at the one time,, but as just showing with the choke cables, strang things can happen.
cheers gong.
#23
Posted 13 April 2010 - 09:48 AM
There were 34 cars there you had see it to believe it,
There were 116 torana's that 4 day event at bathurst,
And yes i do have photo's of that event.
Cheers.
#24
Posted 13 April 2010 - 10:57 AM
I can tell ya,s this (According to the vin disc) Holden produced 700 LC XU-1,s in 1971 :
200 (2/71)
200 (3/71, 4/71)
300 (9/71, 10/71, 11/71)
Can you tell me which batch of cars were responsible for the homologation of the XH cam and 5H needles ???
the 200 3/71 4/71 cars...............
March LC XU1 camshaft p1.JPG 185K 325 downloads
March LC XU1 camshaft p2.JPG 132.61K 309 downloads
GMH must have been telling porkies when they sent this off to the dealers.
I cant see any porkies there Dave !!! We must remember that just because a part was homologated for the race teams does,nt always mean that the production variants recieved these changes. Unless specifically stated in the cams rules that these parts were required to be fitted in production Holden were only required to build 200 basically identical units. By Holden building these 200 basically identical units allowed the race teams the use of the homologated parts. The homologated 1970 Bathurst baffled diff housing is a prime example of this. Homologated for the race teams to use in the 1970 Bathurst race but did,nt make the production cars until the 1971 CK,s. So you see for Holden to homologate the new cam (XH), 5H needles, spacers, resonator etc (Homologation 1/1E) they were only required to build 200 basically identical units. These 200 basically identical units have ADR,s of 3/71 & 4/71.........
#25
Posted 13 April 2010 - 11:17 AM
4 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 4 guests, 0 anonymous users