

Cop's that target Race-Tracks
#51
_MYLJ_
Posted 05 May 2006 - 07:14 PM

#52
Posted 05 May 2006 - 07:24 PM
Maybe the same letter written to the victorian police minister might be the way to go seeing as youve been told its their issue!
Cheers
#53
_TORANASS_
Posted 07 May 2006 - 11:44 PM
Maybe someone might listen? Lets see what Jon Davison has to say after his meeting..
John
Edited by TORANASS, 07 May 2006 - 11:45 PM.
#54
Posted 08 May 2006 - 12:58 AM
#55
_Yella SLuR_
Posted 10 May 2006 - 03:56 PM
#56
_JBM_
Posted 11 May 2006 - 11:26 PM
If you car is not street legal you risk getting defected.
If you have an accident and your car is deemed to be in an unsafe condition or modifications haven't been noted on your policy the insurance company won't pay, is having a modified car more important than someones life or an expensive repair bill for your car and perhaps someone elses?
Laws are there to protect you and other road users, and I know that obeying the law won't stop you from being killed or injured, but it reduces the risks.
If you have a modified show car keep it on the trailer and don't register it as a street legal car if its not.
James
#57
_TORANR AMORE_
Posted 12 May 2006 - 10:03 AM

#58
_Yella SLuR_
Posted 13 May 2006 - 07:31 PM
#59
_CHOPPER_
Posted 13 May 2006 - 09:44 PM
#60
_Yella SLuR_
Posted 13 May 2006 - 10:10 PM
Make sure you make reference to that letter, i.e. Thankyou for your letter of ??/??/??.
Edited by Yella SLuR, 13 May 2006 - 10:11 PM.
#61
_devilsadvocate_
Posted 13 May 2006 - 10:40 PM
For example, if an insurance company finds that pink cars have a significantly higher rate of accidents then they will charge a higher premium for pink cars or even refuse to insure them entirely. It may well be that the reason for this is that bad drivers buy pink cars��.rather than pink cars are inherently unsafe��.either way the insurance company isn�t into reasons��just stats and money!
I believe they are well within their rights to refuse a payout if information about the car and or the driver has been withheld regardless of whether the mod was the reason for the claim.
#62
_TORANASS_
Posted 14 May 2006 - 05:50 PM
Simple fact is that there theifs, and criminals...Cos i dont care what they say im just purly stating fact and i have a reliable cause and effect also..
John
#63
_TORANASS_
Posted 14 May 2006 - 05:51 PM

Edited by TORANASS, 14 May 2006 - 05:52 PM.
#64
_devilsadvocate_
Posted 14 May 2006 - 09:19 PM
Same reason they dont give you back your money if you dont make a claim......After all if they dont pay you out why do they keep your money?...
Edited by devilsadvocate, 14 May 2006 - 09:22 PM.
#65
_Yella SLuR_
Posted 14 May 2006 - 11:29 PM
#66
_TORANASS_
Posted 15 May 2006 - 02:29 AM
Yeh but the only reason you pay the suckers is incase, ill say it again INCASE you have an accident. Look in the dictionary for the word insurance.. Im tellin ya there theifs and criminals..Same reason they dont give you back your money if you dont make a claim......After all if they dont pay you out why do they keep your money?...
Why pay them if there not gona pay up, doesnt that defeat the purpose, might as well save your money in a jar and label it Insurance fund..
I bet they wouldnt cover you if you said to them ill pay u if i have an accident in 12 months, and not pay them once you have claimed and been paid out.. Just like a booky, you make a bet and pay later and if you lose he sends the thugs..
As yella said luck of the draw same as playing black jack..
John
Edited by TORANASS, 15 May 2006 - 02:33 AM.
#67
_devilsadvocate_
Posted 15 May 2006 - 07:38 AM
John, you have had a bad insurance experience?.........just letting you see how it is from the running a business side........................Perhaps look in the dictionary for "theif"?Look in the dictionary for the word insurance.. Im tellin ya there theifs and criminals..
If you had a suby wrx and only insured it as a regular suby, would you expect them to refund the regular premium if you made a claim?, its the same with mods.
Its as silly as insuring something you dont even have, then asking for a refund because you never owned the item. ie one's car isnt a bog standard torrie.....
You are right, if you arent going to be honest with the insurance company about what you are insuring, then save your money in a jar.
We'd all be paying sky high premiums unless to support the 'hoons' if they didnt operate like this.
Edited by devilsadvocate, 15 May 2006 - 07:39 AM.
#68
_TORANASS_
Posted 15 May 2006 - 08:43 PM
A young kid i know 18year old at the time was heading down a road and was cut off by a new merc doing a right hand turn into a driveway in front of him, well to cut it short cos he was on P's and the merc driver was an elderly lady he got the short end of the stick and his insurance didnt pay up cos he had mags on his gemini witch he never told them about, now his stuck with a 30k bill he cant pay.. Oh and mind you these so called mags are from a CDT(country dealer team) gemini, bathurst globes like on the Xu1s but to them mags are mags even tho they are a factory item..I still have the rims in my back yard..
John
#69
_CHOPPER_
Posted 15 May 2006 - 09:02 PM
Whether the modification adds value to the car or not is beside the point. Every policy I have ever taken out has made it quite clear that if you fail to inform insurance about modifications and/or your driving history, the policy can be deemed null and void. Which means they don't have to pay out in the event of a claim....if you insure you LX SL for market value and dont tell them it had extractors, and once you claim they refuse to pay you out cos of your mods you never told them about to me is an act of theft, not like you asked them to pay you extra for the extractors..
AND BY PAYING THE PREMIUM, YOU HEREBY AGREE TO THAT!
This legally gives you no leg to stand on. And they would then probably sue you for your wheel chair.
#70
_TORANR AMORE_
Posted 16 May 2006 - 10:32 AM
Anyway John, I can see your point, and your simply debating the morality of the matter, and again your wasting you time as others here will simply miss that point and quote the law and the legal rights that insurance companies and what they can get away with due to their cleverly structured contractual agreements that will work in their favour most of the time.
You're just simply saying that it's moraly WRONG.
#71
Posted 16 May 2006 - 02:39 PM
Thread Closed

1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users