PCV valve
#1 _the gts_
Posted 06 August 2010 - 10:08 PM
cheers
#2 _the gts_
Posted 07 August 2010 - 12:43 PM
#3
Posted 07 August 2010 - 01:27 PM
Hard to find one of those covers now days I'd reckon but you might be able to tap some fittings into the same area on a late cover?
My Range Rover V8 runs the breather off the webbing across the "V" below the inlet manifold at the rear of the engine (standard)
Attached Files
Edited by rodomo, 07 August 2010 - 01:28 PM.
#4 _greenmachine215_
Posted 07 August 2010 - 04:40 PM
#5 _Squarepants_
Posted 07 August 2010 - 05:01 PM
id put it in the bin, run a catch can system instead
Yeah, all good and well until you get pulled over by the fuzz and defected 'cause you have engine gasses venting to atmo.
I have the same issues atm trying to hook up all the crap on my triple webered 202.
I don't know much about the v8 breathers but on the 6's I have seen them run into the fuel pump blanking plates (if running an electric pump) and into the side plates.
However I think PCV's have to be mounted vertically so the valve works properly.
Maybe you could weld a fitting onto the back/side of the rocker covers with an elbow facing vertically??? Dunno, just a suggestion.
#6 _the gts_
Posted 07 August 2010 - 05:59 PM
yea squarepants that was one of my ideas out the back of the rocker cover.
Isnt a PCV only a check valve? if so it would be possible to source ones that work in any mounting position.
#7 _Squarepants_
Posted 07 August 2010 - 06:17 PM
Isnt a PCV only a check valve? if so it would be possible to source ones that work in any mounting position.
Yeah, but they are supposedly calibrated to suit the flow of the engine blowby and manifold vacuum.
There's a bit of an art to setting them up properly, which is why most people get rid of them and use the catch can breather system.
Read this:
http://www.gmh-torana.com.au/forums/index.php?showtopic=47546
As I am in the process of doing the same thing to my 202 and this is what I've come up with so far... Not ideal, but will suit a road car... Hopefully.
#8
Posted 07 August 2010 - 09:25 PM
#9
Posted 07 August 2010 - 10:46 PM
Yes, in the valley, but tapped into the block, not the inlet manifold.Are you saying that the rover V8's have them in the valley on the inlet manifold?
This pic shows the boss where mine is tapped. This must be a later block.
Attached Files
#10 _the gts_
Posted 07 August 2010 - 11:53 PM
Squarepants - i read that topic, it all has me confused at the moment but i like your drawings!!
Anyone know where timed vacuum comes from? can the PCV be plugged into that on a Demon carb?
#11
Posted 08 August 2010 - 12:25 AM
so in theory drilling and tapping one into the centre of the manifold hidden just behind the carb would be a good spot and work well?
What my pic shows is where to drill the block to draw the fumes FROM.
Where the fumes GO TO would be somewhere on your induction (manifold if PCV or aircleaner if breather)
You would need to tap the block twice.
Edited by rodomo, 08 August 2010 - 12:28 AM.
#12 _the gts_
Posted 08 August 2010 - 12:51 AM
I was thinking of drilling a hole in the manifold valley behind the carb for the PCV to come FROM
It will GO TO manifold vacuum either the vacuum port on the carb or possibly the timed vacuum port on the carb or even a hole drilled into
If the PCV is basically only a breather with for the block with a check valve in it then this should be ok shouldnt it?
#13
Posted 08 August 2010 - 01:02 AM
Attached Files
#14 _the gts_
Posted 08 August 2010 - 02:04 AM
Just read that the early corvette's had the 'in side' tapped into the oil fill tube which is in the manifold. Trick flow also do a ford manifold with the pcv in it. so that has got to be a good hiding spot for it!!!!!!
Thanks for you help rodomo
hey why did you put 3 holes on your picture? it should only need 2 shouldnt it?
#15
Posted 08 August 2010 - 08:04 AM
#16
Posted 08 August 2010 - 08:30 AM
hey why did you put 3 holes on your picture? it should only need 2 shouldnt it?
Just showing possible options of where to drill.
You would have to take into account what is under the manifold at those points and how it might also interfere with the distributor.
#17 _the gts_
Posted 08 August 2010 - 11:49 AM
76Hatch, I am not planning on having a breather. as far as I am aware the engine only needs to be able to get rid of remove positive pressure in the crankcase.
my thoughts are that it is probably the same as gearboxes that i build at work. they must have a breather, otherwise when they warm up the air inside expands and creates enough pressure to blow seals out. Although engines have a feww more variables I think it must be along the same principal. I would hate to blow the rear main out!!
#18
Posted 08 August 2010 - 01:46 PM
#19 _the gts_
Posted 08 August 2010 - 01:54 PM
Edited by the gts, 08 August 2010 - 01:59 PM.
#20
Posted 08 August 2010 - 02:00 PM
I hope that helps clarify it.
#21 _the gts_
Posted 08 August 2010 - 02:13 PM
can this be done at the front and back of the intake valley instead of rocker covers? I still dont understand why it needs fres air into the crankcase
Edited by the gts, 08 August 2010 - 02:15 PM.
#22
Posted 08 August 2010 - 02:21 PM
Doesn't really matter where the air enters and exits the motor so long as it is ventilating the crank case.
#23 _Squarepants_
Posted 08 August 2010 - 02:39 PM
The breather is also there for WOT (wide open throttle) conditions where there is very little manifold vacuum and the amount of blow by is greater than what can flow through the PCV.
I don't understand why open engine breather filters are illegal as the standard breather is fitted to the air filter cover which is not sealed from atmosphere at all. Sure, the gasses are more likely to get sucked back into the engine to be reburnt from there but it still has potential to escape to atmosphere.
#24 _the gts_
Posted 08 August 2010 - 03:49 PM
If a PCV is a check valve, which it is, it should-
1 - open if the vacuum overcomes the spring in the valve which would may create a vacuum in the crankcase - apparently that is one of the advantages of a dry sump system.
2 - open with internal cranckase pressure from ring bypass, engine heating up etc
3 - in both of the above situations there is no chance of overpressuring the crankcase.
4 - if there is no vacuum or no crankcase pressure there will be no breathing, the crank case has neutral pressure is that a bad thing?
so why does the crankcase need fresh air?
#25 _Squarepants_
Posted 08 August 2010 - 04:57 PM
doesnt some of the pressure from compression pass the rings and end up in the crankcase?
Yes
If a PCV is a check valve, which it is, it should-
1 - open if the vacuum overcomes the spring in the valve which would may create a vacuum in the crankcase - apparently that is one of the advantages of a dry sump system.
Yes, when the manifold vacuum overcomes the spring pressure, or when crankcase pressure overcomes the spring pressure
2 - open with internal cranckase pressure from ring bypass, engine heating up etc
Yes, but the PCV valve creates a big restriction and apparently the flow from blow by is greater than a PCV system can support
3 - in both of the above situations there is no chance of overpressuring the crankcase.
See #2
4 - if there is no vacuum or no crankcase pressure there will be no breathing, the crank case has neutral pressure is that a bad thing?
I don't think so, but I think you'd only get this scenario when the engine is switched off
so why does the crankcase need fresh air?
Just to dilute the gasses coming from the crankcase through the PCV to reduce pollution and add more clean air to the inlet mixture for a better burn thus better power and economy
I tried running 2 PCV's and no breather and it created massive crankcase vacuum which in turn reduced oil pressure and generally played havoc on the way the engine ran. Potentially it could also damage gaskets/seals. A vacuum in the crankcase is a good thing, I think, but it has to be moderated. I don't know much about how dry sump systems are set up but I imagine there would be a relief valve in there somewhere to prevent too much vacuum in the crankcase. I could be wrong on this, just speaking from my experiences.
Edited by Squarepants, 08 August 2010 - 04:59 PM.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users