PCV valve
#26
Posted 08 August 2010 - 07:42 PM
"The small amount of filtered air necessary for scavenging the system is drawn into the engine rocker cover from the bottom of the air cleaner. If the engine is being operated under hard acceleration or heavy load conditions, and the generated blow-by gas exceeds that which can be passed through the PCV valve, then the excess gas is pushed through the filtered air hose into the air cleaner and then drawn into the carburettor."
The primary purpose of the PCV system (as opposed to just a breather) is just to ensure that unburnt hydrocarbons (crankcase vapours) are not vented to atmosphere. However the positive ventilation is also a reasonably efficient means of crankcase breathing which works well for a street driven car.
#27
Posted 08 August 2010 - 10:06 PM
#28
Posted 08 August 2010 - 10:42 PM
#29
Posted 08 August 2010 - 11:19 PM
doesnt some of the pressure from compression pass the rings and end up in the crankcase?
If a PCV is a check valve, which it is, it should-
1 - open if the vacuum overcomes the spring in the valve which would may create a vacuum in the crankcase - apparently that is one of the advantages of a dry sump system.
The purpose of the PCV valve is to regulate the airflow through the engine. When vacuum is high the valve reduces airflow, when vacuum is low the valve is fully open allowing maximum airflow. Even under extreme vacuum the PCV valve will not completely close.
The primary purpose of the vacuum is to draw clean air through the crankcase to purge crankcase vapours which reduces oil contamination and emissions. If you were to run breathers instead of a PCV system on a street car then you would need to change the oil more regularly.
#30
Posted 09 August 2010 - 11:45 AM
[quote name='the gts' date='08 August 2010 - 03:49 PM' timestamp='1281246577' post='528793']
so why does the crankcase need fresh air?
Just to dilute the gasses coming from the crankcase through the PCV to reduce pollution and add more clean air to the inlet mixture for a better burn thus better power and economy
[/quote]
Well no it is not to dilute gasses, as Squarepants has previously stated by running two PCV and no breather, you will not get flow thru the crankcase if there is no where for the air to get in, the fresh air is simply to allow the system to flow.
#31 _the gts_
Posted 09 August 2010 - 01:43 PM
I am planning on removing one of the valley breathers which is screwed into the valley inside the engine and run an S/S pipe fom that to the back of the Manifold. Outside the engine hidden behind the carb I will have one hose going from the valley breather to the intake filter. I will also place the pcv behind the carb in the manifold valley and that will go into manifold vacuum.
It would normally be a fair bit of work but my manifold is coming out again for polishing and hopefully a cnc port job.
Will put some pics up when i get a chance to better describe all this
#32 _the gts_
Posted 09 August 2010 - 09:14 PM
I am planning on removing one of these and bending up an S/S tube between one of these breathers and a bulkhead fitting in the manifold, all hidden under the valley.
Above the manifold the tube will be connected to the air cleaner and the PCV will be plummed with the suction from the manifold valley going to the vacuum line under the carb
#33 _Squarepants_
Posted 09 August 2010 - 09:32 PM
But, Damn, that's a good lookin' donk!
Nice work!
#34
Posted 09 August 2010 - 09:50 PM
You will see that air enters "one side" of the motor to "flow through" the crank case then exit out the "other side" of the motor to gain full "Positive Crankcase Ventilation".
#35 _the gts_
Posted 09 August 2010 - 10:07 PM
Terra
I do agree with your statement however that picture is not actually possible with a chev as there is no provision for the head to be able to breathe withought first going through the valley. by tapping into one of those valley breather tubes the breather will be breathing directly into the crankcase just above the cam. the PCV will be in the valley so there 'should' be some flow between the crankcase and valley.
Dont you think that would be similar to going through the rocker covers, which need to go through the valley anyway?
keep in mind that I am prepared to compromise a little to get the clean look that I want but still need all the legal stuff connected.
#36
Posted 09 August 2010 - 10:35 PM
My biggest concern with using one of those tubes would be sucking out too much oil - its always a fine line between removing vapour and taking bulk quantities of oil (which not only depletes the oil supply but also mucks with the intake mixture and burning too much oil can be a pain). I'm guessing you may need to set up some sort of trap and/or baffle to minimise the raw fluid movement.
#37
Posted 09 August 2010 - 10:57 PM
Holden V8's do not usually suffer as much in this department as the valley has a very large opening connecting the crankcase with the valley via the cam shaft so it does not need to be directly connected to the crankcase directly.
Never played with chevs personally but assuming by your statement "the gts" that the chev heads drain to the valley like a holden?
#38
Posted 10 August 2010 - 04:51 PM
by tapping into one of those valley breather tubes the breather will be breathing directly into the crankcase just above the cam.
I think tapping into the valley breather may pickup too much oil spray. I would just position both tubes in the valley as high as possible and position them as far as possible from oil and each other.
The LS2 has a breather connected from the drivers side rocker to the intake and one connected from the front of the valley to the intake manifold.
#39 _the gts_
Posted 22 September 2010 - 11:25 PM
I had to fab up a baffle for under the valley cos there was way too much oil there but that works fine now - no oil in the baffle. I initially tested with a hose to the cam bore but the hose was kinked so that was a failure however once I fitted an SS tube there was still no problems. so now instead of breathing left to right my engine breathes top to bottom which i think should be at least the same as a standard set up
#40
Posted 23 September 2010 - 02:10 PM
I still dont understand why it needs fres air into the crankcase
Seal it all up - then when you crankcase looks liek a crushed beer can, call me and I'll explain
The BEST spot for the PCV is in one (or both) rocker covers, as it doesn't do its job otherwise. If you baffle it so that it only draws air from the TOP of the rocker covera dn can't suck oil, you can put it anywhere. At the back is commonly used, but I've seen underneath, so long as you run a tube into the top of the cover.
That diagram is a bit confusing, as piston movement causes vacuum to switch across banks, which is why some run a PCV with a t-piece plumbed to both covers. One breather and one PCV is an attempt to bias the flow and create it the way the diagram shows......
Really, you need to get a real engine with only one rocker cover, then you'll be less confused
Grant..
#41 _the gts_
Posted 24 September 2010 - 12:17 AM
my engine now breathes from crank case to manifold valley (top to bottom) rather than rocker covers (left to right). The air drawn from the rocker covers must come through the valley anyway
on my first trial with the unbaffled PCV there was engine oil bouncing up from where it exits the rear of passenger side head, thats why the baffle was made and fitted.
What I have is a very modified version of what the rod guys in the states do for bare rocker covers, although their engines breathe from front to back totally within the manifold valley so I feel my set up is slightly better as it breathes from right down in the crank case.
I will post some pics up when I feel the engine bay is worthy
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users