Crossmember hassles
#1
Posted 23 September 2010 - 08:40 PM
I recently posted a question on whether or not you can slot a connected 304i and T5 into a LX in one go, and proved that indeed you can, however the first time I had the engine sitting on the mounts, I noticed the gearbox was pointing to the passenger side. Quite a lot. It was the second and third time I tried re-fitting the engine too, as I was thinking I had something skewing it that way. Before I set a few new world swearing records installing it a fourth time (the most in one minute, the most colourful, the most frequent, etc), I had a good look at the crossmember and it finally clicked that the crossmember mounts weren't factory, someone had welded them on. Not only that, but the drivers side mount was sitting an inch shy of the front of the plate, whereas the passengerside was flush. Jee-zuz.
_DB_8155.JPG 1.25MB 7 downloads
Before I go any further, could you guys please help me to:
1. Identify the crossmember (the car was orginally a four cylinder Sunbird, however I thought it is the same crossmember) _DB_8151.JPG 1.31MB 6 downloads
2. Explain why someone would do this (it did have a 350 Chev block sitting in it when I bought it)
3. Tell me if the fix I have decided on - having someone re-weld the driver's side mount in the correct position - is the best option and
4. If anyone knows a trustworthy welder in the Hornsby NSW area who could do a good job.
Sooo glad I wanted to fit everything up and get it running before I touched the paint... Thanks in advance.
#2
Posted 23 September 2010 - 09:17 PM
The best fix would be to get the correct cross member. Having the mounts re-welded may work, but having seen the crummy adapters that Rare Spares sell, there isn't quite enough space available to do it properly without cutting a bit more out of the original mounts. Someone who knows what they are doing could easily replicate the correct/original mounts after cutting the existing ones off completely - that may be a good option, see if you can find a photo or I will take one for you tomorrow.
#3
Posted 23 September 2010 - 09:22 PM
Pictures from parts manual.
The bracket in view A is welded to the k-frame for the Starfire 4 cyl, 6 cyl and V8.
Bracket part #7 in this picture is welded to the k-frame to mount the Opel 4 cyl motor.
#4
Posted 23 September 2010 - 09:48 PM
#5
Posted 23 September 2010 - 10:32 PM
Thanks fellas, though it wasn't the news I wanted, re-welding would have been cheaper. Maybe. If anybody has a V8 crossmember for sale please PM me, I'll hit up EvilBay and keep an eye out on the For Sale section of the forum. My wife has our third on the way, and I need the running gear in and going before the new addition arrives and removes any skerick of spare time I have left... :-)
Thanks again.
Oh, and I now have a good crossmember for sale to suit a 350 Chev install... :-)
#6
Posted 23 September 2010 - 11:30 PM
You don't even need to remove the x-member.
#7
Posted 24 September 2010 - 07:18 AM
#8
Posted 24 September 2010 - 07:07 PM
Mild relief. :-)
Thanks everyone for your help.
#9
Posted 25 September 2010 - 01:56 AM
Why not put an ad in the wanted section?
You might find a forumer with a bent x-member, but good mounts!
Just a note: I've always been led to beleive that if you were building a front end, then the 4cyl x-member is the prefered option.
The reasoning is..... the x-member has only had a light engine bouncing up/down on the mounts & causing less stress to the unit,over the past 30+yrs, & hopefully hasn't 'sagged'.
Apparently the V8 x-members have a reputation of 'sagging' across the chassis mounts.
A quick check with a tape will reveal all.
If there is no major damage to the x-member itself [no big dents or wrinkles], then i suggest you weld on a pair on mounts to your x-member.
it's soooooo much nicer to be able to align the mounts! ... & not rely on the factory alignment.
The bolts go in much easier & it's a cruisier kind of job!
#10
Posted 25 September 2010 - 09:49 PM
I actually had the whole four cylinder thing in mind when I bought the car, reckoning a four cylinder probably had less chassis damage than a V8 - stands to reason it has been under less stress than hotter cars, However...who knows what previous owners had done to it. The crossmember is in great nick, so I'll try and stick with it. Pretty keen to get it happening, hope I don't have to wait too long to find a set.
#11 _Mike73_
Posted 13 October 2010 - 01:21 PM
a couple of points to watch for 1. heavier engines have heavier front springs so fitting a replacement 4cyl UC front end will require a change of springs to suit a V8, 2. UC fronts have a different steering geometry ( including steering racks )
3. if tack welding mounts in using the engine and gearbox to allign make double sure the gearbox X member is not in backwards as some models are possible to install in backwards this has the effect of changing the left right allignment at the gearbox and makes the engine at a slight angle to the chassis.
Mike
#12
Posted 27 October 2010 - 10:00 PM
#13
Posted 28 October 2010 - 04:27 PM
A bare block, a gearbox, & x-member.how did you go with this??what would be the best way to line up the 2 mounts so the v8 can be bolted in and not havin hassles of it being out of whack!!
Happy days.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users