Jump to content


Roller Lifters into 202 Block


  • Please log in to reply
46 replies to this topic

#26 _oldjohnno_

_oldjohnno_
  • Guests

Posted 17 August 2013 - 08:39 PM

And to balance with the above, you need to get enough load on the motor to bed in the rings. Sometimes I think it is better to bed in the rings with an old cam before putting in the 'big' cam and running in that.

 

Agreed. Which is why I'd much rather break in the cam with the engine in the car (or on a dyno) than just have it sitting there spinning over unloaded on the floor. You get to put a bit of load on it for the rings and run a few rpms for the cam, and without pissing off the neighbours like you would with an engine running at 3500 for two hours in your garage.

 

But really, with modern rings and automatic hones you have to try pretty hard to not get a good ring seal these days.



#27 _STRAIGHTLINEMICK_

_STRAIGHTLINEMICK_
  • Guests

Posted 19 August 2013 - 10:34 AM

Mee too ,I always start the engine with oil that will protect the cam lobes (running in oil cannot protect agressive lobes) ,run the cam in for the recommended 20 mins , after the fire is out and it has cooled down and if there are no leaks just put a muffler on and drive for about 500 miles varying between light cruising and pulling hard up hills to bed in rings .The only thing that can hurt it is high temps and high rpm .



#28 _Ned Loh_

_Ned Loh_
  • Guests

Posted 20 August 2013 - 10:02 AM

But alas lots of people have been running stupid cam profiles without checking the lifter bore alignment, lobe taper, lifter crown, quality of lifter or quality of cam core without issues.........Few have excessive idling....Why do you have this issue?

 

because I find it hard to drive past a maccas drive through???  :D

 

The idling happens if there is a line before the start.  In particular if there has been a problem on a stage and cars bank up.  You might end up with say 20 x cars, going at 2 minute intervals, so 40 mins of idling and creeping forward say 8 meters every two mins until you start.  A bit like this pic (borrowed from the web)

 

Also, I thnk we might have a different idea of stupid cam profiles. I'm not that well connected, but I enough enough guys who have trouble with aggressive flat tappet lobes to know it's not just me. 



#29 _Ned Loh_

_Ned Loh_
  • Guests

Posted 20 August 2013 - 10:17 AM

Great stuff.

 

Could it be me? Possibly.  Oldjohnno, I’ve made heaps of junk through my own ignorance, stupidity, stubbornness (why else would I be playing with a 202!?), and sometimes bad luck.  Why do I have the issue?  Dunno for 110% sure, but I know for fact I am not the only one, and plenty of smarter blokes than me.

 

I wasn’t particularly trying to bring up a solid lifter / cam / break in / failure discussion.  I had already decided to groove the lifter bores and use a soft stock type spring for the next run in as opposed to removal of the inner spring only, but I like some of your thinking, in particular probably the suggestion to use three diferent springs (soft -> intermediate -> final springs).  It’s not really that much more work, say most of day by the time you get the springs changed and drive for 3 to 4 hours.  I could also borrow some 1.5 ratio rockers and that would give over 0.050” less lift and subsequently less lbs.

 

FWIW - I’m currently assembling a modest engine.   It’s only going to be a short term thing, but if it goes and hangs together ok might end up as a spare.  I’ve got a couple of cam options, one nicely broken in (but relatively less intensity) cam that has about 12 hours on it, and two agrresive  comp cams (one of which is a little out there in terms of design).  I haven’t decided yet, but I think I’ll run the broken in cam and new/refaced EDM lifters.  There is a deadline for this so time will dictate exactly how I run the cam in.  Most likely on stock type springs for a few hours (on the road), change springs, another run and then onto dyno for a very quick check/tune of high rpm. I will groove the lifter bore, and I’m thinking about modding some side plates to watch lifter bore rotation on initial start up / first 30 mins stationary run.

 

…I’ve got another block out for machining that will be getting built to a better level.  It’s getting 7/8” lifters which will run in the correct alignment to the cam. It was harder to find someone to do this than I thought it would be.   The comp cams will be tried in this on the dyno.  Will be a pain in the arse to break them in before dyno but there no way around it.

 

…back to the original topic. the roller cam engine will most likely follow, but in reality that is one to three years away depending on how the above motor goes, and if my wife finds out how much I’ve been spending.  I have started messing around with it.   I’ve got a couple of different types of roller lifter here.  All looks possible depending on final base circle.  High lift may need bushings, and cause tie bar hassles, but I need to get a bigger lift cam into my dummy up block and have a proper look. Tighe will make the blank to the common bored out roller bearing cam tunnel size, but I’m not sure it’s worth the mod.  As per the last line of your first post in this thread - “Only thing I can tell you for sure is that it will be expensive”

 

Bomber makes a good point; if I'd had a series of cam failures after doing much the same things that work for everybody else, I'd be taking a very close look at the common denominator (ie. me) in the failures. I don't mean to sound like a smart-arse saying this either; I've certainly contributed to enough of my own failures.

 

This bit's going to be long winded, so I'll apologize up front. Nearly everything involved in racing engines has been oversimplified to the point where it can be covered in a magazine article or a pub discussion. But I think in reality nearly everything is much more complex. In the case of cams, I don't think it's as simple as saying "if you do X,Y and Z everything will be fine". If we look at cam survival rates, I think that the risk of failure rises pretty dramatically once you go past the typical street and strip profiles. In other words pretty much anyone can take a street and strip cam and provided they don't do anything too stupid it'll survive the break-in and last a reasonable time.

 

But as soon as you start using lobes with higher acceleration rates and spring rates, then the risk of failure rises steeply and I dont believe the usual "20 minutes at 2500" is enough to give a good chance of survival. And even if you do get through the break in phase you won't necessarily get a good life from the cam. Bear in mind that most of the 0.842" lobes that we'd be using would be developed on a gen 1 SBC, and that our Holden six cams are even skinnier than the little Chev camshafts. So a profile that's a bit "iffy" with a smallblock is even more so when it's used in a Holden with a necessarily smaller base circle. If you try to use a profile that's right on the bleeding edge with a smallblock it'll probably fail in a six, so don't get too greedy unless you're prepared to bore out the cam tunnel and use a custom core.

 

The next thing to consider is the break-in process. What we want here is to develop a thin, work-hardened layer on the lobes and lifter faces. With a street and strip or an old-style race cam 20 or 30 minutes seems to be enough but with more agressive profiles I think you need to go to a bit more trouble. The hard skin is going to have to be thicker to survive long-term, and it takes a lot longer to develop it. It might take a couple of spring changes, and the initial run should be on very weak springs. With all of the break-in runs the longer the running time the better. As for rpms you need to be spinning fast enough to ensure lifter rotation but not so fast that you're on the verge of floating the very light springs - you need weight over the nose to bed in the entire lobe, not just the flanks. Around 2000 to 3000 should be ok, and the longer this process lasts the better - with a street car I like to drive it for at least a couple of hours on the soft springs (being careful not to float the valves) and 3 or 4 hours would be even better. Run low ratio rockers if you can.

 

Depending on the cam profile and the springs required for maximum rpms you might need to run it again with intermediate springs before putting the final springs in. Run the revs higher this time to keep the pressure over the nose down (say 4000 or so) and again the longer you can run it the better the sliding surfaces will end up - if you can do this for a couple of hours then that would be good. After this you could fit the final springs and rockers and run it to maximum rpms. Bottom line is that the longer and more gradual the process is then the greater your chances of success are.

 

Everything else (oils, lifter alignment etc) has been done to death. There's no need for a special break-in oil but it wouldn't hurt either if it makes you feel better. Thousands of people have used EDM'd lifters successfully, and if the engine is going to have to run at low rpms I'd use them. But I'd definitely try to limit the low rpms as much as possible, that's what gives the high pressure over the nose.



#30 _Bomber Watson_

_Bomber Watson_
  • Guests

Posted 20 August 2013 - 02:21 PM

because I find it hard to drive past a maccas drive through??? :D

The idling happens if there is a line before the start. In particular if there has been a problem on a stage and cars bank up. You might end up with say 20 x cars, going at 2 minute intervals, so 40 mins of idling and creeping forward say 8 meters every two mins until you start. A bit like this pic (borrowed from the web)

Also, I thnk we might have a different idea of stupid cam profiles. I'm not that well connected, but I enough enough guys who have trouble with aggressive flat tappet lobes to know it's not just me.


My idea of stupid is more than 250 @ .050 and more than .550" lift? Like mine :-p

#31 _oldjohnno_

_oldjohnno_
  • Guests

Posted 20 August 2013 - 04:22 PM

I don't think it's the duration or lift thats the problem. Old style cams had a shitload of duration but the acceleration rates were low so they were pretty gentle on the hardware. And I think running the 1.5 rockers for a few hours is a good idea - not only is the lift reduced but the lifter pressure is reduced over the whole range.

 

[email protected]" would be classified as a towing cam for you wouldn't it Bomber? ^_^



#32 _Bomber Watson_

_Bomber Watson_
  • Guests

Posted 20 August 2013 - 07:32 PM

Yeah mate suitable for bedford vans used to tow trailers around paddocks and shit. 

 

LIfe starts at 719 @ .050" :tease:



#33 _oldjohnno_

_oldjohnno_
  • Guests

Posted 20 August 2013 - 08:47 PM

Yeah mate suitable for bedford vans used to tow trailers around paddocks and shit. 

 

LIfe starts at 719 @ .050" :tease:

 

What static CR do you run with that? I imagine it would have to be highish....



#34 _STRAIGHTLINEMICK_

_STRAIGHTLINEMICK_
  • Guests

Posted 20 August 2013 - 08:58 PM

What static CR do you run with that? I imagine it would have to be highish....

 

would have to be in a diesel to work



#35 _Ned Loh_

_Ned Loh_
  • Guests

Posted 21 August 2013 - 09:01 AM

My idea of stupid is more than 250 @ .050 and more than .550" lift? Like mine :-p

 

we are talking apples and oranges.  I have to go out the back in a minute, I'll dig up an old cam to show you what I mean.



#36 _Ned Loh_

_Ned Loh_
  • Guests

Posted 21 August 2013 - 10:57 AM

ok, so I've got a wade 154a here.  it's 260 @50, and 305 or 308 adv from memory. No trouble breaking in or running this cam. See pics (pic is a little dark, cam lobes are ok).  Now to me a stupid cam is would be a comp MH lobe which for 260 @ 50 has 286 rated duration.

 

Disclaimer:  adv and .050" isn't really a measure, and I am sure that the two cams mentioned above have different lift points for their adv / rated duration. Some companies like comp give you .2 lift figures which help make comparisons. Getting slightly off topic but IMHO the best way to compare two cams is by checking the details yourself.  I like to use the "Degreeing Cam" sheet from here http://www.tildentec.../downloads.html but hard to check before purchase...



#37 _Bluejinx202_

_Bluejinx202_
  • Guests

Posted 21 August 2013 - 10:45 PM

Last time I spoke to Clive in ferntree gully about sorting out a roller cam he had a kit together with all the bits to make it work for around $1300 If I remember right. Like you, I'm trying the comp cam cam thing first (waiting for a cam now as they stuffed up the grind on my order). If I can avoid a roller I'd prefer to, my thoughts are that a hot flat tappet cam is hard on the cam, a roller cam is easy on the cam but hard on everything else.

#38 _Ned Loh_

_Ned Loh_
  • Guests

Posted 22 August 2013 - 10:19 AM

You wouldn't meet a nicer bloke than clive plus he's forgetten more about cams than blokes like me will ever know.  I have to pick up from clives in the next few days so will ask him about where he ended up with his roller cams and lifters. 

 

On a $/hp basis it would never stack up, but in my dreams I'm sending the steel billet blank from tighes to the states to get ground...



#39 _toranaracer_

_toranaracer_
  • Guests

Posted 22 August 2013 - 10:28 AM

In our "Folden" race engine we use Isky 1241-R which are a solid roller that fit straight into the lifter bores with the correct tie bars.

These are from a Chevy II so I assume there would also be a hydraulic version available?

The only modification required to the block is to grind a small amount off the bottom of the side plate bolt bosses, and depending on your cam profile you may need to remove some material from the bottom of the lifter cavity to stop the link bars from hitting the block.

Clive supplies our finished camshaft and we source the lifters from Performance Wholesale in Queensland.

We also machine the cam bearing bores out to suit roller bearings, amongst the other mods to fit the Ford head on the 202..........................

 

toranaracer



#40 Rockoz

Rockoz

    Oh My, Don't you post alot

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,017 posts
  • Name:Rob
  • Location:Cowra NSW
  • Joined: 21-September 08

Posted 22 August 2013 - 11:29 AM

Dont know whether this information will be helpful. I remember a discussion on 308 s in the Toranas in the late 70s about the wear rate of the cams the teams were using. One team decided to grind a 10 thou flat on the side of the lifters. This apparently cured the wear problems of the cam. There was a decrease in oil pressure but that was outweighed by the benefits of cam longevity.

As I said I dont know whether this information will be helpful.



#41 _oldjohnno_

_oldjohnno_
  • Guests

Posted 23 August 2013 - 07:51 AM

Here's a crazy idea:

 

Most of us here have a cam or two or three in the shed; just with those of us here there'd surely be a dozen or more.

 

Many of us would like to have more information on the available grinds than the usual figures at 0.050" and 0.2" (and I'm talking solid flat tappet or roller profiles; I don't think anyone really cares about hydraulics)

 

Anyhow, what if we all took those cams and plotted the lift at say 10 degree intervals, with an allowance for lash. It wouldn't take long, and the data could then be tabled or graphed by someone (I'd be happy to do it) and made available to all for comparison. Anyone interested?



#42 _Ned Loh_

_Ned Loh_
  • Guests

Posted 23 August 2013 - 09:52 AM

Not crazy at all, in fact a brilliant idea.  I'm in.

 

I suggest a new thread though.

 

 

Here's a crazy idea:

 

Most of us here have a cam or two or three in the shed; just with those of us here there'd surely be a dozen or more.

 

Many of us would like to have more information on the available grinds than the usual figures at 0.050" and 0.2" (and I'm talking solid flat tappet or roller profiles; I don't think anyone really cares about hydraulics)

 

Anyhow, what if we all took those cams and plotted the lift at say 10 degree intervals, with an allowance for lash. It wouldn't take long, and the data could then be tabled or graphed by someone (I'd be happy to do it) and made available to all for comparison. Anyone interested?



#43 _oldjohnno_

_oldjohnno_
  • Guests

Posted 23 August 2013 - 10:50 AM

Not crazy at all, in fact a brilliant idea.  I'm in.

 

I suggest a new thread though.

 

Done.



#44 _Ned Loh_

_Ned Loh_
  • Guests

Posted 23 August 2013 - 11:22 AM

great.  give us a little bit (week or two) and I'll get some data in there.

Done.



#45 _Ned Loh_

_Ned Loh_
  • Guests

Posted 23 August 2013 - 11:37 AM

Grooved a couple of lifter bores this morning.  Don't think oil on the lobe is going to be a problem...

 

Pic attached.


Edited by Ned Loh, 23 August 2013 - 11:46 AM.


#46 _Ned Loh_

_Ned Loh_
  • Guests

Posted 25 September 2013 - 01:15 PM

Dont know whether this information will be helpful. I remember a discussion on 308 s in the Toranas in the late 70s about the wear rate of the cams the teams were using. One team decided to grind a 10 thou flat on the side of the lifters. This apparently cured the wear problems of the cam. There was a decrease in oil pressure but that was outweighed by the benefits of cam longevity.

As I said I dont know whether this information will be helpful.

 

missed seeing this earlier.  I have some here.  Pic attached...

 

I like the idea of the grooved lifter bore more though.  The groove in the lifter bore ensures that the lobe is lubricated at exactly the right time.



#47 N/A-PWR

N/A-PWR

    CABIN ENGINE CONTROLS GALORE

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,636 posts
  • Name:Dave I
  • Location:Wooroloo, 65km's East of Perth
  • Car:'1969' LC RAT TORANA
  • Joined: 08-December 12

Posted 24 July 2014 - 12:05 AM

I still have the Cam in the Lathe to Dial in for Oldjohnno's Cam Thread,

 

but how has the grooved lifter bore idea going these day's?






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users