12 Port Injection manifold
#1 _Inj gtr202_
Posted 13 July 2011 - 09:39 PM
After going back and forth with Oldjohnno about the flow capabilities of the VK Injection system it was decided that it was not gonna be up to pulling any more power than the high 100's.
So it was decided I had to make my own.
I thought I'd throw a few progress pic's up for everyone to see where I'm at and how I'm making it. (if you ever want to make one yourself)
Below is a wedge used to bash the pipe to the same shape as the inlet ports, used a test piece of alloy pipe.
Next I milled out some mild steel to roughly the same as the head for a flange. (leaving about 5mm for fine tuning later on).
#2 _Inj gtr202_
Posted 13 July 2011 - 09:45 PM
#3 _Inj gtr202_
Posted 13 July 2011 - 09:52 PM
Sat them next to the VK Manifoild to get a feel for how they are going to be layed out.
Did a few measurements so see how long I need for the 2nd Harmonic and it turns out is almost identical to the VK length (about 20" total)
so the Mandrel bends are cut 110mm from the Radius at the bottom and pretty much at the tengent up the top.
Cheched clearance etc. and made a jig to hold it all together while it gets fabricated.
#4 _Inj gtr202_
Posted 13 July 2011 - 09:58 PM
Still need to make the Plenum chamber and finish welding it all together.
#5 _73gtr_
Posted 13 July 2011 - 10:01 PM
Look forward to more photos
#6
Posted 13 July 2011 - 10:21 PM
keen to see it progress!
#7
Posted 13 July 2011 - 10:39 PM
#8
Posted 13 July 2011 - 11:02 PM
#9 _nicko61_
Posted 13 July 2011 - 11:46 PM
#10 _Inj gtr202_
Posted 14 July 2011 - 12:43 AM
is it possible to make them shorter as in height so you can install them under the hood of older Holdens,
Not really, the throttle body will only just clear the rocker cover as it is, you could easily make them shorter to pick up the 3rd Harmonic and have them coming straight out the side with a front mount TB style plenum (aka RB26).
I made them out of steel because I have no access to a TIG welder (not that I know how to weld ally anyway).
Plan on putting the injectors close to the head because I want to use the same rail and injectors that I already have. (unless there is a very good reason to move them)
Should weigh less than the VK system anyway
Adam
Edited by Inj gtr202, 14 July 2011 - 12:46 AM.
#11 _Gunmetal LH_
Posted 14 July 2011 - 05:51 AM
#12 _Ned Loh_
Posted 14 July 2011 - 08:52 AM
Why not go IR? Cost and complexity?
What�s the brief for the motor (what are you aiming for)?
#13 _mick74lh_
Posted 14 July 2011 - 11:24 AM
#14 _Bomber Watson_
Posted 14 July 2011 - 05:49 PM
Cheers.
#15 _Inj gtr202_
Posted 15 July 2011 - 02:54 AM
Great work & thanks for posting up. Will be watching with interest.
Why not go IR? Cost and complexity?
What's the brief for the motor (what are you aiming for)?
I chose not to go with the IR system because I already had all the bits to put together a Single TB Plenum type manifold. If I was doing it from scratch (from a carby) The Sonic IR system would definitely be a consideration.
[IMG]http://i1100.photobu...t=HeadFlow1.jpg[IMG]
I'm also trying to gain a few extra HP through having the longer runners (like tunnel ram)
I'm aiming for about 250hp from the motor and still have it reasonably street friendly.
I'm running the Camtech Solid CT35 634A-107 My link
The head flow figures (minus the manifold) are as below.
Edited by Inj gtr202, 15 July 2011 - 03:08 AM.
#16 _Inj gtr202_
Posted 15 July 2011 - 05:55 AM
#17 _Ned Loh_
Posted 15 July 2011 - 03:50 PM
I'm aiming for about 250hp from the motor and still have it reasonably street friendly.
Sounds like FUN.
You may wish to investigate holding the exhaust back a bit.
#18 _Inj gtr202_
Posted 17 July 2011 - 11:10 PM
I'm aiming for about 250hp from the motor and still have it reasonably street friendly.
Sounds like FUN.
You may wish to investigate holding the exhaust back a bit.
The original plan was to have a cam ground with .453" lift on the exhaust (instead of .519"), but for some reason it did'nt happen.
Tony (from Knight Engines) assured me the extra exhaust made very little difference.
other than different ratio rockers what else could be done to pull it back a bit?
#19
Posted 18 July 2011 - 12:06 AM
#20 _jabba_
Posted 18 July 2011 - 12:13 AM
Its not too late to go ITB . ITB with shower injection, ducati style.
Edited by jabba, 18 July 2011 - 12:14 AM.
#21 _Ned Loh_
Posted 18 July 2011 - 05:18 PM
The original plan was to have a cam ground with .453" lift on the exhaust (instead of .519"), but for some reason it did'nt happen.
Tony (from Knight Engines) assured me the extra exhaust made very little difference.
other than different ratio rockers what else could be done to pull it back a bit?
My earlier post for you to investigate holding back exhaust rather than giving a definitive answer was because I don't know the full details of your combo, and your into my grey area of experience. Now, my quick answer to your above question to my way of thinking the best way to compensate for an over ported exhaust would be camshaft...but...in my view you really need to look at optimising the whole package in relation to your aims to work this sort of stuff out. EG, running a reverse pattern cam to compensate for an over ported exhaust will be counterproductive if your headers are too small (say 1-1/2" where they would optimally be 1-5/8") and you are building for max HP.
Mate, not trying to cast doubt. At 250 odd hp as per your aim, I'd expect (but have never tested) that there would be very little difference like your man says.
If anyone has tested back to back a single pattern against a reverse pattern with a similar head would be great to hear from you here...
#22 _oldjohnno_
Posted 18 July 2011 - 06:52 PM
A couple of comments on some of the replies. I too would have preferred a fair bit less exhaust lobe, and would definitely be using as little rocker as possible on the hot side. From what I've seen, at least 90% of ported Holden heads seem to be overported on the exhaust, and often overcammed on that side too. Don't be tempted to "underpipe" it to compensate - the pipe size has to be what it has to be and fudging it will only make it worse.
Plenum rams generally make more top end than ITB's, though the latter will usually have a bit more fill at the lower end of the curve for a given cam. Horses for courses..
The theory about hot spots with steel is horseshit. I actually prefer steel for this kind of thing - if you need to "adjust" things on the dyno or after track testing then it can be done quickly and easily with basic equipment. And I think the photos prove that steel isn't necessarily ugly...
#23 _jabba_
Posted 19 July 2011 - 12:01 AM
#24 _70rey_
Posted 19 July 2011 - 02:46 PM
#25 _Inj gtr202_
Posted 22 July 2011 - 06:27 PM
Turned up some injector bosses.
Welded the runners to the flanges
Cut the holes for the injectors.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users