Jump to content


XU-1 replacement and HQ block changes


  • Please log in to reply
91 replies to this topic

#1 _Mike73_

_Mike73_
  • Guests

Posted 19 July 2011 - 01:22 PM

Hello everyone,
Can anyone tell me if they can confirm if NP 7000R engine numbers were race engines for 1973, and replacement race engines for 1974 or not?

Some blocks also had the three external ribs near the oil filter in the 1974 XU-1 NP replacement short motors which seemed to have started about July 1974 and may have finished in Aug 1974.

Posted Image

If anyone has an earlier QL or NP block than July 1974 or a later NP number than August with these external ribs, could you please post or PM me, then the real mystry of this block change might be a step closer to being solved?

( interesting thing, Aug is the annual aniversary of the beginning of the red motor and many changes took place at this time of the year also )

Mike

#2 _Mike73_

_Mike73_
  • Guests

Posted 17 December 2011 - 12:23 PM

Hello again,
a bit more information, there are two main red 202 blocks ones with a X and others with two horizontal lines inside the crankcase, variations from these are experimental ones which come up very occasionally.

Not all XU-1 engines have an X inside the crankcase, but most do.

Not all HQ 202's have the same markings, some share the X marking and others have the two horizontal lines.

The two different marking may be because of two different foundary areas used, or two different teams making up the sand moulds.

For more on this topic see the New Torana book due out in Februray.

MIke

#3 Bazza

Bazza

    ǝɹnʇxıɟ ɯnɹoɟ

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,295 posts
  • Location:Outer Melb West Vic
  • Car:ɐuɐɹoʇ
  • Joined: 11-November 05

Posted 17 December 2011 - 12:55 PM

Hi Mike

Any ideas on what these markings mean?

Cheers

Bazza

Attached Files



#4 _sunburst73-xu1_

_sunburst73-xu1_
  • Guests

Posted 17 December 2011 - 01:05 PM

Hi Bazza,I've seen Engine Rebuilding shops stamp blocks and Heads like that to identify each job.When my block came back from the machine shop it had an E stamped in the a similar spot.Could also mean something else but.
cheers Dane

#5 S pack

S pack

    Scrivet Counter

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,721 posts
  • Name:Dave
  • Location:Luggage Point
  • Car:73 LJ
  • Joined: 25-January 10

Posted 17 December 2011 - 01:39 PM

Hello again,
a bit more information, there are two main red 202 blocks ones with a X and others with two horizontal lines inside the crankcase, variations from these are experimental ones which come up very occasionally.

Not all XU-1 engines have an X inside the crankcase, but most do.

Not all HQ 202's have the same markings, some share the X marking and others have the two horizontal lines.

The two different marking may be because of two different foundary areas used, or two different teams making up the sand moulds.

For more on this topic see the New Torana book due out in Februray.

MIke


Seriously Mike, you haven't actually convinced Norm to waste space, in what promises to be a great Torana book, on this ^^^?
As I have said before, these X and = marks inside the crankcases are nothing more than quality control marks.

Whoopee, GMH might have had 2 teams of vietnamese workers or maybe even more casting engines and related components.
In what way are these markings or the number of workers or the number of foundry casting lines relevant?
Is my 202 block better than Joe Blogs' 202 because mine has the X markings and his has the = marks?

If these markings were unique to the XU1 blocks then I would applaud your research, but they are not, and can be found in other garden variety 202's.

Now, I do not intentionally wish to offend you, and therefore apologise in advance if I have, but why not research something that is more relevant to the uniqueness of the XU -1's.

Regards
Dave.

#6 _Ozzie Picker_

_Ozzie Picker_
  • Guests

Posted 17 December 2011 - 01:45 PM

i really don,t think norms proof readers would accept to much of this crap,as alot has been ditched.

#7 S pack

S pack

    Scrivet Counter

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,721 posts
  • Name:Dave
  • Location:Luggage Point
  • Car:73 LJ
  • Joined: 25-January 10

Posted 17 December 2011 - 01:57 PM

i really don,t think norms proof readers would accept to much of this crap,as alot has been ditched.


Hopefully Craig, hopefully.

I'm still going to order a copy of the book, regardless.

Cheers
Dave.

#8 _Agent 34_

_Agent 34_
  • Guests

Posted 17 December 2011 - 05:37 PM

Hey my 72 B gtr 10 month JL original block has " x " marks the spot on the inside.

was torana fest myths ledgends ?

#9 _Mike73_

_Mike73_
  • Guests

Posted 20 December 2011 - 06:56 PM

Dave,
It would be great if you actually had some information to add to this forum, rather than bagging those who do take the time to look into details that have been obsqure or totally unknown before.
It is because of outrageous claims made by others that these details become relevant, not that we are trying to make our cars something special.
I have information from the guy who put those marks in the blocks in 1973, do you think he knows why he did this, or would you just preferr to make something up?

Details appart from proving a point, can also be used to work out what is actually relevant, and yes I agree with you that these markings are of little consequence, however there are those who will find these markings of interest when compared to their cars.

You do not know what you do not know, and you do not know what information I have kept to myself to protect the privacy of special XU-1 owners.
You obviously do not know the extent of my extensive research either.

Mike

#10 _hutch_

_hutch_
  • Guests

Posted 20 December 2011 - 07:32 PM

Ok after reading this thread i just went and had a look at my engine (not an XU1) but just to confuse the issue it is a 3.3 red 6, has the prefix VL and has the 3 external bars you where talkin about,dunno whats inside, and no i wont pull it apart to find out LOL
Phillip

#11 _Mike73_

_Mike73_
  • Guests

Posted 21 December 2011 - 12:10 PM

Ok after reading this thread i just went and had a look at my engine (not an XU1) but just to confuse the issue it is a 3.3 red 6, has the prefix VL and has the 3 external bars you where talkin about,dunno whats inside, and no i wont pull it apart to find out LOL
Phillip

No confusion at all, what you have is a Commodore engine painted red.
3.3 = after 1979, V = V series commodore, L = 202, and the three external ribs mean that it was built after mid 1974, but given it is a commodore engine it was obviously well after 1974.
These are the details that I have learned, despite what some think, I happen to think this information is usefull, perhaps others do too.
Probably too much information but if your 202 Commodore engine is an earlier one it could have two long horizontal lines inside the crankcase, and if it is latter it will not be likely to have any marking at all because they did away with these markings by the end of the "blue" engines.

Mike

#12 _hutch_

_hutch_
  • Guests

Posted 21 December 2011 - 06:50 PM

when i brought the donor car that this engine come out of the guy told me it was a blue engine with a YT head on it........WRONG,the crank has not got any counterweights and the engine has a 9 port head on it.....the engine machine shop told me it was the last of the reds fitted to a commodore.
Phillip

#13 S pack

S pack

    Scrivet Counter

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,721 posts
  • Name:Dave
  • Location:Luggage Point
  • Car:73 LJ
  • Joined: 25-January 10

Posted 21 December 2011 - 10:09 PM

when i brought the donor car that this engine come out of the guy told me it was a blue engine with a YT head on it........WRONG,the crank has not got any counterweights and the engine has a 9 port head on it.....the engine machine shop told me it was the last of the reds fitted to a commodore.
Phillip


The VB Commodore had the 3.3 Red engine. The 3.3 Blue engine was released in the VC Commodore.

#14 _Mike73_

_Mike73_
  • Guests

Posted 25 January 2012 - 12:35 PM

Hi Mike

Any ideas on what these markings mean?

Cheers

Bazza


Hello Bazza,
It could be that the R is the inital of the original engine builder, or someone who has reconditioned it since, I have three lots of initals now ; P, BZ and another R like yours.
As we live on opposite sides of the country I think it is unlikely that the R stamped on the sump gasket face is from a reconditioner and more likely to be from the original builder at Holden's engine plant in Melbourne.
This R may or may not be related to the R on the engine number pad, in time it may become more clear.

If, as I suspect the R on the engine pad is from the engine builder at Holden, this may account for different engine specs having the R and this would have been placed there prior to the engine number and may account for why it is not in the same allignment.

Mike

#15 _Mike73_

_Mike73_
  • Guests

Posted 25 January 2012 - 12:55 PM

Hi Mike

Any ideas on what these markings mean?

Cheers

Bazza


Hello Bazza,
Just to add to my previous comment, if you look at the area to the left of the threaded sump bolt hole it looks like a small indentation, this will likely be from a Brinell hardness testing machine, it depresses a small steel ball into an object to be tested and measures the penetration depth to determing its hardness and strength.
I have studdied metalurgy and seen this method demonstrated many years ago ( late 70's )
I have also seen this hardness testing marks on Holden crankshafts too, even one on the actual bearing journal which did not grind out!
Mike

#16 _Mike73_

_Mike73_
  • Guests

Posted 26 November 2012 - 02:24 PM

Hello again,
can anyone tell me how long a spare part remains a spare part, and if superseeded spare parts are returned to the Holden factory to be updated with a new part number and cast date ?

I have been able to obtain quite a few new old stock parts and have even heard of some lucky fella buying brand new front guards for his car from Holden at Adelaide in the 1980s, his car was a 1925 Buick which had been out of production for a while! to me this suggests that old parts are kept til elither the buisiness closes or sells on their old stock to a dealer etc.

Can we consider how long an engine block and piston set would remain in stock, taking into account that these items would not sell very quickly at a small country town.

Also if we consider that block and pistons ( for 186 for example ) were all the same between 1966 and 1972 would that not make any N.O.S 186 replacement block and piston set produced at any given date just before or after the manufacture date of that vehicle would be the correct one? for example a 1966 HR 186 could be rebuilt using a 1972 block and piston set, and a 1967 186 could be rebuilt using a 1966 old stock replacement block and piston set?

I would be very interested to know of anyone who has any evidence that an old stock part like a block with pistons cannot be used and be correct after a certain use by date?

Mike 73

#17 _Skapinad_

_Skapinad_
  • Guests

Posted 26 November 2012 - 02:59 PM

I take it your missing your original engine Mike ?

#18 S pack

S pack

    Scrivet Counter

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,721 posts
  • Name:Dave
  • Location:Luggage Point
  • Car:73 LJ
  • Joined: 25-January 10

Posted 26 November 2012 - 09:33 PM

A spare part is just that, a spare part. If the 'spare part' is correct for the model application then it doesn't matter what the manufacture date or cast date is. Remember, it's a spare part.

If a part is superseded it would not be recalled unless there was a design fault or a safety issue with the said part that was the cause for the part to be superseded in the first place.

Most parts are superseded because of product improvement or similar parts in later models are found to be suitable to use in earlier models. I can't imagine any vehicle manufacturer would recall and change the part number on an earlier part to that of the newer improved and slightly different part. You may be able to use the newer release part on an earlier model vehicle but the older superseded part may not be suitable to use on a later model vehicle.
How would you change the cast date on a part? Melt it down and re-cast it?

I believe a spare part is a spare part until it is fitted, then it has become an integral component of a larger assembly.

#19 S pack

S pack

    Scrivet Counter

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,721 posts
  • Name:Dave
  • Location:Luggage Point
  • Car:73 LJ
  • Joined: 25-January 10

Posted 26 November 2012 - 09:35 PM

^^^^ WTF happened when I tried to edit my post???

#20 xu2308

xu2308

    Grail Hunter

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,704 posts
  • Name:AL
  • Location:Belconnen ACT
  • Car:SMP LJ GTR V8 Prototype-Confirmed By HHS and Ex GMH XW7 Engineers
  • Joined: 09-April 09

Posted 27 November 2012 - 10:53 AM

For more on this topic see the New Torana book due out in Februray.

MIke


What new Torana Book due out in Februray, please explain.

#21 yel327

yel327

    Oh My, Don't you post alot

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,633 posts
  • Joined: 10-February 08

Posted 27 November 2012 - 01:02 PM

I think he means Norm's book.

#22 _Mike73_

_Mike73_
  • Guests

Posted 27 November 2012 - 02:19 PM

Sorry about my sarcastic questions,
I am just having a dig on those who stated that an engine block and pistons could not be used as a warranty replacement or a spare part for vehicle manufactured 8 to 10 months later.
This was in the pre 1970 period before Nasco engines started using 186N numbers, and when replacement block and piston sets had no numbers stamped as all 186 engines from 1966 to early 1970 used the same replacement block and piston sets, the only difference being a block rib improvement, The short motor differed in the steel VS cast crank, camshafts and spiggot bush etc, but I am not refering to short motors, these were numbered.

Yes the Torana Book is "Torana Tough" this book has dispelled some myths and raised some interesting questions, which may be difficult to answer without implicating individuals.

A seperate question?

My friend has a 1971 JP engine that was either a warranty replacement for a LC in late 1971 or an old stock spare part fitted to his August 73 XU-1 at a later date, ( please be aware this is not my car I am refering to ) we have nothing really to go on other than his car was an Adelaide XU-1 sold by Kevin Dennis Motors in August 73 and was Tangerine? Oh he told me it was fitted with a 3.55 diff which was a bit odd!

Mike73

#23 _Mike73_

_Mike73_
  • Guests

Posted 27 November 2012 - 03:12 PM

Hello Bazza,
It could be that the R is the inital of the original engine builder, or someone who has reconditioned it since, I have three lots of initals now ; P, BZ and another R like yours.
As we live on opposite sides of the country I think it is unlikely that the R stamped on the sump gasket face is from a reconditioner and more likely to be from the original builder at Holden's engine plant in Melbourne.
This R may or may not be related to the R on the engine number pad, in time it may become more clear.

If, as I suspect the R on the engine pad is from the engine builder at Holden, this may account for different engine specs having the R and this would have been placed there prior to the engine number and may account for why it is not in the same allignment.

Mike


I think I have finally worked out what the "R" on some engine number pads is all about!

If we consider that the "R" has shown up in forms that could not have been placed there by Holden manufacturing from the period of 1969 to 1974 at least, then this cuts out most theories and leaves one the most likely.

The most likley answer to my own question is that the "R" means replacement engine.

My reasons for this statement is that from a 161 I have here it has a sequential number that would be the same as the original 1969 engine and the prefix is 161R this is of a smaller letter size indicting that it was an unstamped replacement block which had the original engine number and a R stamped by a service person to indicate that it was a replacement block and pistion set, ( not short motor ).

Once NP numbers were used the R also continued to be used, I had wondered if the R stood for relieved block, however as some "R" marked engines do not have the relieved block this does not match, this R looks to have been added later and does not form part of the engine number.

To quote litriture from "Ford" ( sorry about the "F" word ) an "R" was to be used for Ford tractors to indicate a replacement engine, I have two here from the 1930's and they do have an "R" at the beginning of the engine number and these are definately replacement engine blocks with an "R" clearly visable.

To cut a long story short Ford had issued instructions to dealers and agents fitting their exchange new core blocks, that the new engine be stamped with the old number preceeded by an "R" to indicate a new replaced engine block.
In practice not all engines had the old number and the "R" prefix added, which caused no end of problems with parts ordering as the old engine number was the only identifying information available for spare parts ordering.

So the answer to me seems to be that the "R" was likely quoted in a Holden service letter long forgotten, in which dealers were instructed to add an "R" to the engine number pad of Nasco "N" series engines, and that sometimes this was done and at other times it was either forgotten, or the engine fitter could not be bothered.

The case for replacement block and piston sets varied from Short motors, in that the "R" was able to be incorperated into the engine number as the whole number was being restamped.
( some may recall an engine that came up on Ebay a couple of years back that had no engine number, this was likely a replacement block and piston set in which no one bothered to stamp when put into service )

Of course there is always an exception to the rule, and this was that each state had their own Police numbers for a variety of reasons from the old number being obliterated, a recovered stolen engine, to a mechanic fitting a block and piston set and not bothering to transfer the old engine number to the new block.

I hope this goes some way to solving this riddle?

Mike73

#24 yel327

yel327

    Oh My, Don't you post alot

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,633 posts
  • Joined: 10-February 08

Posted 27 November 2012 - 04:01 PM

R on the end of an engine or chassis number normally means REPEAT Mike. This is well documented in GMH literature. If it happened again an R1, then R2 was added. The R that has been seen on at least 1 x XU-1 NP block is not how it normally appears in my experience, and in that case I am not sure what it means. I have seen a few more R's on chassis numbers than I have on engines.

#25 _pgb73_

_pgb73_
  • Guests

Posted 27 November 2012 - 08:50 PM

dont shoot me could R mean original block reconditioned .i have a ql743015 spare used complete,3ribs 13d6 whatever that means.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users