1. Block and piston kits should have got an engine number: the number off the block that was being replaced. They are stamped too neat not to be done in the Nasco facility.
2. 1970 has nothing to do with it.
3. Both.
4. ?
5. They'd be supplied exactly the same, ie as a long motor with a Nasco sequence number applicable to where it was going. Forms 186N or NT as examples.
If you are so sure that block and piston sets had engine numbers stamped then how do you account for engines across different products like the bare blocks for Isuzu trucks and the two blocks I have here, that
all did not have engine numbers when they were obviously supplied as replacements the 161 is dated Jan 1969 and the 186 is December 1969?
The rear main seal did not change to rope till some time in 1974 as far as I know, so wouldn't that mean all the previous engines had neoprene seals of some description? ( I know there were two types )
The last NP ( Nasco ) replacement engines ( or short engines, which ever it was? ) that I know of was Aug 1974 this seems to be about the time Nasco was winding down, and there must have been some overlap between Holden starting to produce whole replacement engines at the beginning of the HK and NASCO starting to sell the 186N****S 308N****S etc, series engines about 1970, which from mid 1971 evolved into the NK, NP etc, There would not have been any NK's from 1970 because the CK which they replaced was not produced at that time, unless the NK was also a replacement for X2 HR and the CK, but I think unlikely because of different engine specifications.
From what I can work out in the HR X2 the 186K defined a performance 186, and the 186A was the uprated standard engines.
Mike
Edited by Mike73, 11 December 2012 - 10:57 AM.