Jump to content


XU-1 replacement and HQ block changes


  • Please log in to reply
91 replies to this topic

#76 _Mike73_

_Mike73_
  • Guests

Posted 06 December 2012 - 11:17 PM

They'd be Nasco supplied NP pefix as well.

If you look at the 1971 parts books you will find in section 0.00 "Current production engine assemblies will be supplied on a firm order basis"
It was quite evidently by both the engine numbers below six digits and the cast date and the dates of the carbies fitted to those XU-1 engines that these JP 202's were also fitted in the second part of 1971 as warranty replacements.
We can continue to talk in circles here or someone can actually start to look at the documented information and use this to come to lodical conclusions.
Posted Image
Mike

#77 _Mike73_

_Mike73_
  • Guests

Posted 06 December 2012 - 11:36 PM

optional XH cam 2823364. In an LC XU1? Really? I thought that was the part number for the LJ XU1 XH camshaft.
The LC XU1 XH camshaft was part number 2822075, it first became available as a dealer fitted performance upgrade for LC XU1 in March 1971, it was subsequently called up in production as the Std factory fitted LC XU1 camshaft in July 1971.

Yes I made the mistake of quoting from the 1972 print book that is why it came up a later number, one difference there of course will be the con rod clearance groves in the LJ camshaft, they may well be ground the same.
It is good to see that you are quoting part numbers as they were produced.

Simarly in the later produced LC GTR cam replacements they were from the 202 cam blanks and incorperated the clearence machining.

Mike

#78 S pack

S pack

    Scrivet Counter

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,722 posts
  • Name:Dave
  • Location:Luggage Point
  • Car:73 LJ
  • Joined: 25-January 10

Posted 07 December 2012 - 12:13 AM

Judging from warranty info about many subjects, GMH didn't like Dealers replacing more than they had to for warranty repairs.
I'm willing to bet not that many complete engines would have been replaced under warranty. eg: if all that was required was a block & piston kit or a short motor then that's only what would have been used.

GMH made it clear to dealers on numerous occasions that reimbursement for warranty repairs could be rejected if GMH guidlines weren't followed.

Edited by S pack, 07 December 2012 - 12:26 AM.


#79 yel327

yel327

    Oh My, Don't you post alot

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,633 posts
  • Joined: 10-February 08

Posted 07 December 2012 - 07:12 AM

I don't agree that it is clear at all! I read "current production engine assemblies" as being complete engines purchased by the aftermarket industry. I don't imagine these would be used for warranty purposes in many/any cases. Engines supplied under warranty as either short or service engine should be a Nasco numbered item, not a production engine number. GMH did sell engines out of another division as well, can't remember the name, for use in concrete mixers, forklifts etc. These may even be the current production engines referred to in the parts catalogues.

Dave, you have it spot on from what I have been told as well. Only what was needed got replaced. The dealer was only given a certain amount of $/time and were dictated as to how to repair. Same seems to happen today, we had a Mitubishi Triton V6 in my business. Engine died, and the gearbox died and different times. Both were fully rebuilt under warranty, no replacements allowed.

Edited by yel327, 07 December 2012 - 07:13 AM.


#80 S pack

S pack

    Scrivet Counter

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,722 posts
  • Name:Dave
  • Location:Luggage Point
  • Car:73 LJ
  • Joined: 25-January 10

Posted 07 December 2012 - 08:42 AM

Byron

Nasco, then changed to GMP&A, then responsibilty for marketing of complete engines changed to GM Allied Products through a network of GM Allied Distributors.
Supply of stripped engines, shorts and blocks remained with GMP&A.

The times dealers were allowed in the Standard Times Catalogues to carry out repairs are ridiculous. To say GMH were careful with expenditure would be an understatement.

Edited by S pack, 07 December 2012 - 08:48 AM.


#81 yel327

yel327

    Oh My, Don't you post alot

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,633 posts
  • Joined: 10-February 08

Posted 07 December 2012 - 09:33 AM

^^That is what I thought. When exactly did Nasco become GMP&A? Prior to this I assume Nasco sold complete engines that were later sold by GM Aliied?

I have an LH standard times manual here. Operation number 061-001 - Engine Assembly R&R. Inl.cudes R&R engine assembly, Transfer parts not furnished with new engine. V8 is 6.9 hours. Given all the right equipment on hand I reckon I could do that. Same thing but for short engine is 13.7 hours. I might struggle with that one, but I guess it means 2 x people for just under a day. Block and piston kit is 18.3 hours.

#82 S pack

S pack

    Scrivet Counter

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,722 posts
  • Name:Dave
  • Location:Luggage Point
  • Car:73 LJ
  • Joined: 25-January 10

Posted 07 December 2012 - 10:08 AM

^^That is what I thought. When exactly did Nasco become GMP&A? Prior to this I assume Nasco sold complete engines that were later sold by GM Aliied?

I have an LH standard times manual here. Operation number 061-001 - Engine Assembly R&R. Inl.cudes R&R engine assembly, Transfer parts not furnished with new engine. V8 is 6.9 hours. Given all the right equipment on hand I reckon I could do that. Same thing but for short engine is 13.7 hours. I might struggle with that one, but I guess it means 2 x people for just under a day. Block and piston kit is 18.3 hours.


Nasco changed to GMP&A in late 1973. Not sure of the exact date, maybe November.

I suppose with full workshop facilities at your disposal the standard times might be reasonable. I just find it hard to imagine how the work could be carried out with proper care and attention.

#83 yel327

yel327

    Oh My, Don't you post alot

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,633 posts
  • Joined: 10-February 08

Posted 07 December 2012 - 10:12 AM

If all went OK, and there was nothing wrong with the bits that came off the eengine they'd probably pull it off. But if they had problems and had to go troubleshooting (like leaks, valve problems on the original head (short motor)), malfunctioning carby or dizzy etc they'd be screwed!

#84 _Mike73_

_Mike73_
  • Guests

Posted 07 December 2012 - 07:26 PM

I don't agree that it is clear at all! I read "current production engine assemblies" as being complete engines purchased by the aftermarket industry. I don't imagine these would be used for warranty purposes in many/any cases. Engines supplied under warranty as either short or service engine should be a Nasco numbered item, not a production engine number. GMH did sell engines out of another division as well, can't remember the name, for use in concrete mixers, forklifts etc. These may even be the current production engines referred to in the parts catalogues.

Dave, you have it spot on from what I have been told as well. Only what was needed got replaced. The dealer was only given a certain amount of $/time and were dictated as to how to repair. Same seems to happen today, we had a Mitubishi Triton V6 in my business. Engine died, and the gearbox died and different times. Both were fully rebuilt under warranty, no replacements allowed.


It is my understanding that there were several ways to repair or replace an engine.
1.
Block and piston set No engine number up to July 1973

2.
Short motor two seperate types, previous to 1970, and after 1970 eg 186N and NK etc.

3.
Nasco service engines up to 1970 ( were these a short motor or whole motor? )

4.
Differently marked Nasco engine from 1970 ( were these a whole motor or a short motor? )

5.
Whole engines supplied after mid 1971 supplied from Holden spare parts and refered to as engines for service, these are not the same as previous service engines.


Whole engines not listed in my GMP & A Catalogue, just short motors and Block and piston sets.

I have a HQ standard rate magazine here, I will look that up too.

Mike.
GM P & A

#85 _pgb73_

_pgb73_
  • Guests

Posted 07 December 2012 - 08:01 PM

Q. were there any nasco replacement engines with engine No ending in other than S. IE mine is 308N32**S installed 21/5/71. certificate states produced in general motors holden plant at port melbourne.then description of brand new parts fitted.

#86 _pgb73_

_pgb73_
  • Guests

Posted 07 December 2012 - 08:19 PM

to the above if no S prehaps long engine ie sump to head.service engine.

#87 yel327

yel327

    Oh My, Don't you post alot

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,633 posts
  • Joined: 10-February 08

Posted 08 December 2012 - 05:07 PM

Q. were there any nasco replacement engines with engine No ending in other than S. IE mine is 308N32**S installed 21/5/71. certificate states produced in general motors holden plant at port melbourne.then description of brand new parts fitted.


Ken, all the HK-HG Nasco blocks I have found so far have had the S on the end, not 100% sure if S actually means SHORT, but that document you have that you sent me a copy a few years back certainly points in that direction. I have yet to see one without the S.

#88 yel327

yel327

    Oh My, Don't you post alot

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,633 posts
  • Joined: 10-February 08

Posted 08 December 2012 - 05:10 PM

It is my understanding that there were several ways to repair or replace an engine.
1.
Block and piston set No engine number up to July 1973

2.
Short motor two seperate types, previous to 1970, and after 1970 eg 186N and NK etc.

3.
Nasco service engines up to 1970 ( were these a short motor or whole motor? )

4.
Differently marked Nasco engine from 1970 ( were these a whole motor or a short motor? )

5.
Whole engines supplied after mid 1971 supplied from Holden spare parts and refered to as engines for service, these are not the same as previous service engines.


Whole engines not listed in my GMP & A Catalogue, just short motors and Block and piston sets.

I have a HQ standard rate magazine here, I will look that up too.

Mike.
GM P & A


1. Block and piston kits should have got an engine number: the number off the block that was being replaced. They are stamped too neat not to be done in the Nasco facility.
2. 1970 has nothing to do with it.
3. Both.
4. ?
5. They'd be supplied exactly the same, ie as a long motor with a Nasco sequence number applicable to where it was going. Forms 186N or NT as examples.

#89 _pgb73_

_pgb73_
  • Guests

Posted 08 December 2012 - 08:22 PM

reverse in a time machine would be handy rightnow. just makes me appreciate forums such as this and the willingness of members to help others.thanks yel327.

#90 _Mike73_

_Mike73_
  • Guests

Posted 11 December 2012 - 10:55 AM

1. Block and piston kits should have got an engine number: the number off the block that was being replaced. They are stamped too neat not to be done in the Nasco facility.
2. 1970 has nothing to do with it.
3. Both.
4. ?
5. They'd be supplied exactly the same, ie as a long motor with a Nasco sequence number applicable to where it was going. Forms 186N or NT as examples.

If you are so sure that block and piston sets had engine numbers stamped then how do you account for engines across different products like the bare blocks for Isuzu trucks and the two blocks I have here, that all did not have engine numbers when they were obviously supplied as replacements the 161 is dated Jan 1969 and the 186 is December 1969?

The rear main seal did not change to rope till some time in 1974 as far as I know, so wouldn't that mean all the previous engines had neoprene seals of some description? ( I know there were two types )

The last NP ( Nasco ) replacement engines ( or short engines, which ever it was? ) that I know of was Aug 1974 this seems to be about the time Nasco was winding down, and there must have been some overlap between Holden starting to produce whole replacement engines at the beginning of the HK and NASCO starting to sell the 186N****S 308N****S etc, series engines about 1970, which from mid 1971 evolved into the NK, NP etc, There would not have been any NK's from 1970 because the CK which they replaced was not produced at that time, unless the NK was also a replacement for X2 HR and the CK, but I think unlikely because of different engine specifications.
From what I can work out in the HR X2 the 186K defined a performance 186, and the 186A was the uprated standard engines.

Mike

Edited by Mike73, 11 December 2012 - 10:57 AM.


#91 _Mike73_

_Mike73_
  • Guests

Posted 11 December 2012 - 11:07 AM

1. Block and piston kits should have got an engine number: the number off the block that was being replaced. They are stamped too neat not to be done in the Nasco facility.
2. 1970 has nothing to do with it.
3. Both.
4. ?
5. They'd be supplied exactly the same, ie as a long motor with a Nasco sequence number applicable to where it was going. Forms 186N or NT as examples.


Obviously some people have exactly worked out the engine sequence for the NASCO numbers and obviously following Holdens protocal of resetting engine numbers to 1001 with a model or engine size. like when 186N****S etc changed to NP etc in mid 1971. this coincidentally gave us JP 1***** in 1971 and JP 2***** in in 72.

I have a few Nasco numbers here and they seem to fit in with the dates of Holdens engine assembly line sequence if only the first four didgits are used, are you saying that that Nasco engines were special ordered and stamped the first four digits of the engine that was being replaced?

Mike

#92 S pack

S pack

    Scrivet Counter

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,722 posts
  • Name:Dave
  • Location:Luggage Point
  • Car:73 LJ
  • Joined: 25-January 10

Posted 16 December 2012 - 04:01 PM

The rear main seal did not change to rope till some time in 1974 as far as I know, so wouldn't that mean all the previous engines had neoprene seals of some description? ( I know there were two types )

The last NP ( Nasco ) replacement engines ( or short engines, which ever it was? ) that I know of was Aug 1974 this seems to be about the time Nasco was winding down

Mike


Introduction of the rope type rear main oil seal was early 1974, but only in HQ 202 blocks. 173, 253 and 308 engines received the rope oil seal a little later. So far I've found 4 variants of rear main oils seals prior to the rope tyoe seals.

NASCO wound up operations in late 1973, by January 1974 it was GMP&A. This obviously had no immediate effect on the supply of 'N' prefix replacement blocks/engines.




2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users