Javascript Disabled Detected

You currently have javascript disabled. Several functions may not work. Please re-enable javascript to access full functionality.

KPI variations in ball joint Holdens.

Started by wot179 , Dec 31 2011 10:42 AM

Prev

Please log in to reply

62 replies to this topic

#51 TerrA LX

Fulcrum Fixture

Members
14,241 posts

Location:Sid 'n' knee
Joined: 31-May 06

Posted 06 January 2012 - 06:13 AM

As above, RTS was achieved by offsetting the actual mounting position of the top arm, unlike a UC torana where the b=top ball joint was offset.

I can tell you in the HJ-HZ range did use different length steering arms between manual and power steering.

Back to top

#52 A9X

A fortunate run

Members
5,024 posts

Name:Welby
Location:Perth
Joined: 09-November 05

View Garage

Posted 06 January 2012 - 07:57 AM

Also the shock mount points are different

Back to top

#53 Toranamat69

Forum R&D Officer

Members
2,117 posts

Location:Brisbane
Joined: 07-November 05

Posted 06 January 2012 - 08:54 AM

Excellent workshop manual scans - unfortunately I can't read all the dimensions on the LC one.

LH/LX and UC RTS ones would be excellent to complete the set.

Which workshop manuals are you guys scanning these from? They look like they must be from factory holden manuals.

Back to top

#54 _CHOPPER_

Guests

Posted 06 January 2012 - 12:27 PM

i Have the HZ sup and also a LH workshop manual and nether have these images unfortunately.
My understanding with late HX / HZ RTS is that all the arms and stubs are the same it is the chassis that gives the changes.
in geometry.
Cheers Paul.

I have several GM-H WB books, and all they mention is the spring, shocker and sway bar specs.

Back to top

#55 _HQ SS_

Guests

Posted 07 January 2012 - 09:12 AM

Hi Dave.
Any chance of a higher DPI or larger version of that image at all.
I would be very interested in the actual dimensions on it.

This is what the HZ sup says are the RTS changes other than the frame.

Posted Image

Strange thing is they do not say about the drag link/cross shaft being different and it is.
Cheers Paul.

Back to top

#56 _CHOPPER_

Guests

Posted 28 July 2012 - 01:33 PM

LC 6cyl Torana

Edit: Can anyone else read the dimensions? I might have to do a zoom scan or something.

So what's the chance of getting a better resolution image of this?

And some for the LH - UC Toranas?

Back to top

#57 _Skapinad_

Guests

Posted 29 July 2012 - 10:44 AM

Clearer?

Back to top

#58 _CHOPPER_

Guests

Posted 29 July 2012 - 03:43 PM

The pics I can see, it's just the numbers I'm having trouble with.

Back to top

#59 Dr Terry

Technical + Numbers Guru + Moderator

Moderators
3,325 posts

Location:Eastwood (Sydney) NSW
Joined: 13-November 05

Posted 10 August 2012 - 07:56 AM

Strange thing is they do not say about the drag link/cross shaft being different and it is.
Cheers Paul.

Hi Guys.

The drag link change took place in early 76 at the same time that the longer steering arms were introduced.

Dr Terry

Back to top

#60 _CHOPPER_

Guests

Posted 28 September 2012 - 08:37 PM

OK it's a bit old, but does somebody have a clearer image of the LC/LJ diagram and is ther an image out there somewhere for the LH-UC?

Back to top

#61 S pack

Scrivet Counter

Members
15,726 posts

Name:Dave
Location:Luggage Point
Car:73 LJ
Joined: 25-January 10

Posted 28 September 2012 - 09:02 PM

OK it's a bit old, but does somebody have a clearer image of the LC/LJ diagram and is ther an image out there somewhere for the LH-UC?

Hi Chopper

I tried to enlarge the LC/LJ diagram on the scanner but to get it large enough to read the dimensions the image data size was too large for the scanner to handle.

I'll have try close up pics with the camera instead.

Cheers
Dave.