
Electric water pump and potential heater issues?
#1
_triumph202_
Posted 22 January 2012 - 12:42 PM
I was reading that there can be problems with a lack of water circulation through the heater core; to me, the set up on the 202 engine looks like it might be one of those vehicles? I've got one heater hose coming off the factory water pump inlet and the other off the thermostat mounting block (so, one before the water pump - which I assume is the inlet to the heater core- and the other after the pump.)
With the electric water pump it will be mounted in the lower radiator hose (ie. before both heater hoses.) I was thinking about trying to relocate the heater core inlet hose to the lower radiator hose prior to the electric water pump? Any thoughts?
#2
_oldjohnno_
Posted 22 January 2012 - 04:48 PM
#3
_triumph202_
Posted 22 January 2012 - 05:33 PM

I've just been out fitting the "modified" factory water pump (impellor and shaft removed) and I noticed there is a another small coolant outlet just prior to the pump impellor. This one appears to feed up to the head via a hole about 8-9mm diameter? Given the small size it can't be anything major - like the path for cooling the head?
Edited by triumph202, 22 January 2012 - 05:34 PM.
#4
_oldjohnno_
Posted 22 January 2012 - 06:20 PM
That little hole is a bypass to allow a little circulation through the head and block while the thermostat is closed, thus preventing any hot spots. It also helps a little bit with purging air from the front of the block at the initial fill. Keep it open.
#5
_triumph202_
Posted 22 January 2012 - 09:04 PM
I'll post up some pics in the next couple of days of how it's progressing. The end goal is freeing up enough space to run twin electric thermofans and to improve the currently marginal cooling system. (Marginal due to the cramped set up in the Triumph 2500 engine bay.)
#6
_coupe202_
Posted 22 January 2012 - 09:30 PM
#7
_triumph202_
Posted 23 January 2012 - 01:38 PM
Edited by triumph202, 23 January 2012 - 01:42 PM.
#8
_coupe202_
Posted 23 January 2012 - 07:49 PM
#9
_triumph202_
Posted 23 January 2012 - 08:51 PM
Just did a bit of searching and it seems they're 70mm deep, so no go for me. http://www.gmh-toran...eo-thermo-fans/ It's a shame because they look like a near perfect fit.
#10
_coupe202_
Posted 25 January 2012 - 05:57 PM
#11
_triumph202_
Posted 25 January 2012 - 09:27 PM
I've just ordered two Spal 10" fans which will cover the radiators width perfectly. I know a shrouded twin fan assembly would be a lot better, but there simply isn't the space.

#12
_triumph202_
Posted 25 January 2012 - 09:47 PM
Thermostat housing with the EWP controller temperature sender screwed in; it's screwed in on an angle because it would hit on the bonnet if screwed straight in from the top :

The new water pump (destroyed!) and machined down to allow clearance for the fans:



The chromed brass plugs and stainless bolt to hold the brass "plugs" in place and seal the pump housing. There's also a stainless screw tapped into the water pump breather hole - just in case the inside plug leaks:


The engine bay in front of the engine- you can see the support panel cutout for the radiator, there isn't a lot of space once the radiator is bolted in:

These are the fans I've got on order : http://www.spalusa.c...C.PDF#view=FitH
Tip for the day...... water pumps are very hard to strip down. Even a hydraulic press had trouble pushing the shaft / bearing assembly out of the housing!
And a thankyou to my Father inlaw for "customising" the alloy pump housing on his lathe and the use of his hydraulic presses.

Edited by triumph202, 25 January 2012 - 09:48 PM.
#13
_triumph202_
Posted 04 February 2012 - 12:23 PM



Originally I was going to hang the waterer pump inlet directly off the bottom radiator outlet. But , it would have hung so low that it would have been the first part to hit on a high kerb!
The thermo fans have arrived and will be getting fitted today.
#14
_triumph202_
Posted 07 February 2012 - 09:57 PM

Edited by triumph202, 07 February 2012 - 09:58 PM.
#15
_triumph202_
Posted 23 March 2012 - 01:03 PM
I'm now faced with the problem of the engine running too cool on cold mornings- it struggles to get over 75 unless I get caught at traffic lights. The thermostat has been removed and I'm running the Davies Craig EWP Controller (which "pulses" the pump when under temp.) Fitting a thermostat won't be good (for the EWP) because I've lost the "bypass" circuit using the heater core (due to the location of the standard heater hoses/ location of EWP in the lower radiator hose.)
Considering my options I think the best way to "fix" the problem is either:
a. modify the EWP Controller to slow the water flow further ( at the risk of the head overheating due to the slower water flow?)
b. move the heater core inlet (?) from the (gutted) mechanical water pump housing to before the EWP and install a thermostat in the factory position.
c. Any other suggestions?
PS: Out of interest, in reference to my original post, the heater performance isn't too bad.
Edited by triumph202, 23 March 2012 - 01:04 PM.
#16
_coupe202_
Posted 23 March 2012 - 10:45 PM
#17
_Bomber Watson_
Posted 24 March 2012 - 08:10 PM
Bang a thermostat in there and see how it goes methinks.
Cheers.
#18
_triumph202_
Posted 24 March 2012 - 09:35 PM
#19
_Bomber Watson_
Posted 24 March 2012 - 09:51 PM
Have you considered some kind of controller that may do a better job than the davis craig one?? Ie one that basically stops the coolant untill its up to temp??
And on a side note, if your running 75 deg on a cold morning, thats not to bad really, and iw ouldnt be to worried??
Cheers.
#20
_oldjohnno_
Posted 25 March 2012 - 10:08 AM
...Bang a thermostat in there...
Cheers.
What he said.
It'll run against a dead head with no problems, but a 1/8" hole through the thermostat will allow a bit of circulation and help prevent getting an air lock in the head if the water level is low.
#21
_triumph202_
Posted 26 March 2012 - 05:04 PM

I might investigate the controller side of things to see if that is an option. I'm just no keen on running the pump against a restriction to the flow.
#22
_oldjohnno_
Posted 26 March 2012 - 06:07 PM
I was thinkimg about it and if the heater valve is turned off then there won't be a lot of flow anyway!
I might investigate the controller side of things to see if that is an option. I'm just no keen on running the pump against a restriction to the flow.
One of the characteristics of centrifugal pumps is that they draw less power as the output is restricted. So even though the pressure will be higher the load on the pump and motor will be quite low.
#23
_triumph202_
Posted 15 May 2012 - 08:38 PM
I Emailed Davies Craig and initially the response was very prompt. However, the reply was far from satisfactory - basically the advice was to restrict the coolant flow by with fitting a restrictor in place of a thermostat, or refit the thermostat!?

I responded back that I didn't want to refit a thermostat- and perhaps their engineers could look into a revamp of the EWP Controller software. eg. change the timing of the pump cycling in the area from 20 degrees below the set temp. After that I've had nil response. (I also doubt I would be able to refit a thermostat given I've got the EWP Controller temp sensor tapped into the thermostat housing.)
I'm going to investigate making my own controller using a microcontroller - they're cheap and it shouldn't be too hard to get a more satisfactory result. So, I've now got a new project.....

BTW the heater works reasonably well - providing the coolant gets up to temp.

Edited by triumph202, 15 May 2012 - 08:40 PM.
#24
_coupe202_
Posted 15 May 2012 - 09:15 PM


#25
_triumph202_
Posted 16 May 2012 - 10:15 AM

Edited by triumph202, 16 May 2012 - 10:17 AM.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users