
group c cams
#1
Posted 07 June 2006 - 12:50 AM
#2
_valencia_
Posted 07 June 2006 - 04:26 PM
#3
Posted 08 June 2006 - 08:03 PM
Ron Spencer at Crow once told me about a grind they developed for Alan Grice in '83 (Dayglo VH c/dore). It had 264 @ 050 and about 580 lift on 106 - single pattern. He did warn it was a qualifying grind only. I had to have one !!!! I was severely disappointed. NO torque at all and needed the rings revved out of it to go, sounded awesome though !!!!
If your keen I can look up the part numbers, I have them written down somewhere.
#4
Posted 08 June 2006 - 09:28 PM
#5
Posted 09 June 2006 - 12:31 AM
Edited by ALX76, 09 June 2006 - 12:32 AM.
#6
Posted 09 June 2006 - 08:01 AM
Both cams are single pattern (intake and exhaust lobes are identical)
Camshaft Engineering (Qld) - CE684A - 254 @ 050, 0.335" lift at lobe, 108 LSA, installed at 104.
Crow Grice stick - 5681 - 268 @ 050, 0.378" lift at lobe, 106 LSA, installed at 105
Like I said earlier, the Crow had a demonic idle but was way behind the CE until about 6000 rpm. Above 6000 rpm the sound from the side pipe was pure bliss.
#7
Posted 09 June 2006 - 04:26 PM
Hi ALX76, The camshaft you should get is a clive cam 629B it makes good HP and low down Torque approx 400 @ 6500 RPM, The other cam is the 729A ?? this cam will make good power and torque upto 7200 RPM both have big lifts and are serious race cams, call Ian Tate re spec's.
629B - 265 @ 050, 0.346 lobe lift, 100 LSA
789A - 276 @ 050, 0.347 lobe lift, 100 LSA, both are single pattern. (I assume valencia meant the 789A rather than 729A, couldn't find a 729A and the 789A is a popular grind with drag racers.)
I would suggest either of these cams would be extremely peaky due to their narrow LSA. I have driven a 326 stroker 308 with the 789A, it had nothing until about 5500, then it went like a champ. Ran 11.1 in a UC sedan with a 5500 convertor.
#8
_Dirty Deeds_
Posted 09 June 2006 - 08:25 PM
Thanks Valencia, I thought I was the only one with those specs - only kidding..Hi ALX76, The camshaft you should get is a clive cam 629B it makes good HP and low down Torque approx 400 @ 6500 RPM, The other cam is the 729A ?? this cam will make good power and torque upto 7200 RPM both have big lifts and are serious race cams, call Ian Tate re spec's.
The cam in my L34 has the same specs, 264 @ 050 and about 580 lift on 106. It made 391 on Kim Bakers's Dyno. Standard Stroke, not bad ayy !!! Goes hard, just ask QIKSLR.
Only problem is that only a Top Loader and a nine inch can hold it ( and mine have cost me plenty ).
Cheers
DD
#9
Posted 10 June 2006 - 04:14 PM
handy stuff to know. I thought some teams used an Isky cam in their cars, I could be wrong though
#10
Posted 10 June 2006 - 09:33 PM
I thought some teams used an Isky cam in their cars
makka, the Camshaft Engineering grind I spoke of is a Z50 copy, Isky made the original Z50.
#11
Posted 11 June 2006 - 02:35 PM
#12
Posted 15 June 2006 - 04:59 AM
i take it that lift is on the nose not the valve. any sort of piston relief going on there?[The cam in my L34 has the same specs, 264 @ 050 and about 580 lift on 106. It made 391 on Kim Bakers's Dyno. Standard Stroke, not bad ayy !!! Goes hard, just ask QIKSLR.
#13
_Dirty Deeds_
Posted 15 June 2006 - 09:58 PM
Sorry mate, but I dont undertstand technical talk, I just pay the big bucks and drive the suckers.i take it that lift is on the nose not the valve. any sort of piston relief going on there?
#14
Posted 16 June 2006 - 02:37 PM
#15
Posted 17 June 2006 - 09:00 PM
If it was at the lobe valve lift would be 580x1.65=0.957" !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
#16
_[BOTTLEDUP]_
Posted 18 June 2006 - 12:46 PM
#17
Posted 20 June 2006 - 01:12 AM
my fourm oppotunitys are late night early morning, still no excuse for that one.
thanx for all the info guys.
#18
_ultrabluea9x_
Posted 12 August 2006 - 08:33 PM
man at 7000 pure bliss
#19
_tori75_
Posted 13 August 2006 - 08:11 PM
#20
_[BOTTLEDUP]_
Posted 13 August 2006 - 08:41 PM
#21
_TORANASS_
Posted 08 September 2006 - 10:30 AM
what are they like for a street combo 308, i was planing on using a crane 286. Another thing is what would they work like with VN Heads and a big single plain?
Struggler when you say installed @ 105 are you saying dailed in at that deg.. Im not too technical on this subject.
Thanks in advance you guys seem to realy know your shit..
John
#22
Posted 08 September 2006 - 03:10 PM
All these discussed cams are fairly distant from street use (and all are solid lifter grinds). Stick with your plan of the 286 Crane.what are they like for a street combo 308, i was planing on using a crane 286. Another thing is what would they work like with VN Heads and a big single plain?
Struggler when you say installed @ 105 are you saying dailed in at that deg.. Im not too technical on this subject.
If a cam is ground with an intake centreline angle of 110 degrees and it is installed at 105 then basically I am saying it was installed 5 degrees advanced. Just advancing cams for the sake of it is unwise, you should really be looking at where the maximum lift point or lobe centreline is in relation to the piston. This is why some cams respond really well to being advanced 6 degrees and others with similar 050 duration go backwards. Install according to the manufacturers specs and you can't go too far wrong.
#23
_rorym_
Posted 21 January 2007 - 12:08 PM
The Crane 288 for VN heads would be similiar to your Bathurst cam? (252 Inl/260 exh @.50 108 LSA)I am running Torque Power Dual plane, BG 750 Mighty and porting the heads to suit and flow 500HP..CE extractors..Hoping it will be NOT like the spaceship 264 cam you described to drive!
R
Edited by rorym, 21 January 2007 - 12:10 PM.
#24
Posted 21 January 2007 - 02:54 PM
The Crane 288 solid is the most popular solid for 308's of all sizes, and for good reason.
#25
_rorym_
Posted 21 January 2007 - 05:08 PM
R
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users