Jump to content


Peter Brock Race XU1 Prototype

Bathurst XU1 Race Prototype

  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
94 replies to this topic

#76 _Jessy_

_Jessy_
  • Guests

Posted 05 July 2012 - 03:19 PM

Me too grant ;)

#77 _RichoX1_

_RichoX1_
  • Guests

Posted 05 July 2012 - 03:38 PM

Hello Potta , I had my thongs on when I posted above , my steel cap boots are within easy reach if need be .

Ha yeh i new a guy that wore steel caps and thongs all the time but he only stumbled over his own feet.
Attached File  stumbling block 1.jpg   35.48K   1 downloads
STUMBLING BLOCK #1 No Rapport

A sale requires trust. Trust requires comfort and confidence. Comfort and confidence requires building rapport. Building rapport requires your time and effort to engage your prospect and provide value through your actions and conversation. Unfortunately, many people think the presentation is the first step in making a sale. However, without rapport, you have not earned the opportunity to deliver your presentation.

#78 _big jack_

_big jack_
  • Guests

Posted 05 July 2012 - 04:21 PM

I'm finding richos threads very hard to read. Any chance of a spell check and some punctuation?


+1

#79 _big jack_

_big jack_
  • Guests

Posted 05 July 2012 - 04:34 PM

Either he is trolling successfully or Richo X1 is from a parallel universe and things don't quite line up.

#80 S pack

S pack

    Scrivet Counter

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,727 posts
  • Name:Dave
  • Location:Luggage Point
  • Car:73 LJ
  • Joined: 25-January 10

Posted 05 July 2012 - 05:39 PM

Ha yeh i new a guy that wore steel caps and thongs all the time but he only stumbled over his own feet.
Attached File  stumbling block 1.jpg   35.48K   1 downloads
STUMBLING BLOCK #1 No Rapport

A sale requires trust. Trust requires comfort and confidence. Comfort and confidence requires building rapport. Building rapport requires your time and effort to engage your prospect and provide value through your actions and conversation. Unfortunately, many people think the presentation is the first step in making a sale. However, without rapport, you have not earned the opportunity to deliver your presentation.


OMG you really can spell. And I was thinking you didn't make it past kindergarten. Bravo!!!

#81 xu2308

xu2308

    Grail Hunter

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,704 posts
  • Name:AL
  • Location:Belconnen ACT
  • Car:SMP LJ GTR V8 Prototype-Confirmed By HHS and Ex GMH XW7 Engineers
  • Joined: 09-April 09

Posted 05 July 2012 - 05:59 PM

yeah S pack
i think the person is playing the bad speller, for what ever reason, or reasons unknown as they say

#82 _RichoX1_

_RichoX1_
  • Guests

Posted 06 July 2012 - 12:43 AM

Hear Guys i have a few questions that mabe need answering, im refering to a production car and wont make it to hard for you all to answer
Did the 72 XU1 have the revized body shell ?
Did the 73 XU1 bathurst have windage sections in the diff?
Did the 73 XU1 bathurst have exstrackers or headers?

#83 xu2308

xu2308

    Grail Hunter

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,704 posts
  • Name:AL
  • Location:Belconnen ACT
  • Car:SMP LJ GTR V8 Prototype-Confirmed By HHS and Ex GMH XW7 Engineers
  • Joined: 09-April 09

Posted 06 July 2012 - 01:36 PM

Richox1
Go to the LJ Tech Articles section on the forum page
Look up What is a 73 Bathurst XU-1 on that page, get your popcorn and drink, and sit it for along read, and when you get to the last few pages it will be a eye opener for you, it gets to the truth of the Bathurst Nickname Coined by the Press of the Day, and never by GMH at all ever, confirmed by Joe Felice the Chief of Holden's Motorsports 1969-1980

Edited by xu2308, 06 July 2012 - 01:44 PM.


#84 _RichoX1_

_RichoX1_
  • Guests

Posted 06 July 2012 - 07:13 PM

WOW i have seen it befor, going over that thred starting at 03 February 2007 and ending at 18 March 2012 and still no verification of what a bathust XU1 is or when the 3 Proyotyps were acturly build what a mess what a XU1 MYTH Holden and this forum has created.
I supose it does Raise the Value of the 150 XU1 list bit doesnt it.
Attached File  Parts and accessories news Bulletin NO.136.jpg   50.03K   4 downloads
Its probly safe to say that the 150 list is legit but it either refers to the cars given to the guys hoow wanted to race them or they are the only praposed LJ XU2 prototypes that didnt make the cut and withdrawn from production dew to the ADR change and the news papers sceary adverts as the charger 340 allso and many others in America in 73.
These cars were perpasly hidden by sulecting at randem intervals which of them of the production line are the 150.
bosably becouse of the coulor.
Just geusing of couse since this forum is a mess with triva and myth
:driving: You still cant drive past that 73 was the year where the race to create the farstest street production cars was whear it all stoped

Edited by RichoX1, 06 July 2012 - 07:18 PM.


#85 _RichoX1_

_RichoX1_
  • Guests

Posted 06 July 2012 - 08:12 PM

Richox1
Go to the LJ Tech Articles section on the forum page
Look up What is a 73 Bathurst XU-1 on that page, get your popcorn and drink, and sit it for along read, and when you get to the last few pages it will be a eye opener for you, it gets to the truth of the Bathurst Nickname Coined by the Press of the Day, and never by GMH at all ever, confirmed by Joe Felice the Chief of Holden's Motorsports 1969-1980

XU2308
when i said to you about the adverts in the news papers were 73 i was mearly building a fence in front of you that you just couldnt get over,you didnt wont to focus on any thing els that was evadence to the mater all you could focus on was that fence not the faks that 73 was where all these companies with the highest output engine transplants all decided to can there projects for that year.
Attached File  photo.jpg   2.34K   10 downloads
Nice pic by the way jessy

#86 xu2308

xu2308

    Grail Hunter

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,704 posts
  • Name:AL
  • Location:Belconnen ACT
  • Car:SMP LJ GTR V8 Prototype-Confirmed By HHS and Ex GMH XW7 Engineers
  • Joined: 09-April 09

Posted 06 July 2012 - 08:54 PM

Richox1
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa the 1973 Supercars story so you reckon, it was 1972, 1972, 1972, 1972
Sydney Sun-Herald, Sunday June 25th 1972 thats when the 160MPH SUPERCARS SOON front page of the Newspaper came out, im guessing you were looking hard at jessy pic, you might of seen that date :) lol

#87 xu2308

xu2308

    Grail Hunter

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,704 posts
  • Name:AL
  • Location:Belconnen ACT
  • Car:SMP LJ GTR V8 Prototype-Confirmed By HHS and Ex GMH XW7 Engineers
  • Joined: 09-April 09

Posted 06 July 2012 - 08:58 PM

WOW i have seen it befor, going over that thred starting at 03 February 2007 and ending at 18 March 2012 and still no verification of what a bathust XU1 is or when the 3 Proyotyps were acturly build what a mess what a XU1 MYTH Holden and this forum has created.
I supose it does Raise the Value of the 150 XU1 list bit doesnt it.
Attached File  Parts and accessories news Bulletin NO.136.jpg   50.03K   4 downloads
Its probly safe to say that the 150 list is legit but it either refers to the cars given to the guys hoow wanted to race them or they are the only praposed LJ XU2 prototypes that didnt make the cut and withdrawn from production dew to the ADR change and the news papers sceary adverts as the charger 340 allso and many others in America in 73.
These cars were perpasly hidden by sulecting at randem intervals which of them of the production line are the 150.
bosably becouse of the coulor.
Just geusing of couse since this forum is a mess with triva and myth
:driving: You still cant drive past that 73 was the year where the race to create the farstest street production cars was whear it all stoped


The old 150 JP Engine List, not cars, i say again, not cars, just JP Engines.

Edited by xu2308, 06 July 2012 - 08:59 PM.


#88 _RichoX1_

_RichoX1_
  • Guests

Posted 06 July 2012 - 09:20 PM

Ha dude each engine is verified be the vin you should no that but still seace to see throuw the fence paleings dont you
yeh the shirt was hard to read thow the huge lumps where blindeing me
http://www.pic4ever.com/images/245.gif

Edited by RichoX1, 06 July 2012 - 09:34 PM.


#89 xu2308

xu2308

    Grail Hunter

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,704 posts
  • Name:AL
  • Location:Belconnen ACT
  • Car:SMP LJ GTR V8 Prototype-Confirmed By HHS and Ex GMH XW7 Engineers
  • Joined: 09-April 09

Posted 06 July 2012 - 09:29 PM

Dude u dont get the point, the list is about engines and not cars, them engines could of went into a 4-Door LJ Torana, it dident matter, the list is not about Cars, read it, it says Engines

#90 _RichoX1_

_RichoX1_
  • Guests

Posted 06 July 2012 - 09:45 PM

But dude its obvease to me you dont have a Bathurst modle becouse you still dont see the engines have been alacatet for a car not just sitting on the production line whiating for you to deside witch car you wont to put them in and for what reason you like to say they are for :stirpot:
Allso these cars verifeide that there was a 2nd LJ xu1 daveliped with a rvised strenthend chassie as the 308 was propeared for :nopity:
Ha unlike the 72 chassie

Edited by RichoX1, 06 July 2012 - 09:51 PM.


#91 xu2308

xu2308

    Grail Hunter

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,704 posts
  • Name:AL
  • Location:Belconnen ACT
  • Car:SMP LJ GTR V8 Prototype-Confirmed By HHS and Ex GMH XW7 Engineers
  • Joined: 09-April 09

Posted 06 July 2012 - 09:52 PM

There are no Bathurst LJ XU-1 Torana's, Joe Felice has confirmed this.
The Engines on that list were made, cause they had to be made to keep C.A.M.S Happy, not because there were cars made waiting for them.

#92 _oz772_

_oz772_
  • Guests

Posted 06 July 2012 - 10:02 PM

Richox1
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa the 1973 Supercars story so you reckon, it was 1972, 1972, 1972, 1972
Sydney Sun-Herald, Sunday June 25th 1972 thats when the 160MPH SUPERCARS SOON front page of the Newspaper came out, im guessing you were looking hard at jessy pic, you might of seen that date :) lol


Nah, there was no 1972. Don't you know, it went '70, '71, '73....... :banghead:

The original question about the photo was answered early on in this thread.

#93 xu2308

xu2308

    Grail Hunter

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,704 posts
  • Name:AL
  • Location:Belconnen ACT
  • Car:SMP LJ GTR V8 Prototype-Confirmed By HHS and Ex GMH XW7 Engineers
  • Joined: 09-April 09

Posted 06 July 2012 - 10:06 PM

Ha dude each engine is verified be the vin you should no that but still seace to see throuw the fence paleings dont you
yeh the shirt was hard to read thow the huge lumps where blindeing me

http://www.pic4ever.com/images/245.gif


I have got over the blinding shock of them huge lumps, as i get to see them every day lol :)

#94 xu2308

xu2308

    Grail Hunter

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,704 posts
  • Name:AL
  • Location:Belconnen ACT
  • Car:SMP LJ GTR V8 Prototype-Confirmed By HHS and Ex GMH XW7 Engineers
  • Joined: 09-April 09

Posted 06 July 2012 - 10:14 PM


Richox1
here this might help you to get climatized , then you can read 1972 date on the other pic with the white t-shirt on :)

#95 S pack

S pack

    Scrivet Counter

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,727 posts
  • Name:Dave
  • Location:Luggage Point
  • Car:73 LJ
  • Joined: 25-January 10

Posted 06 July 2012 - 10:22 PM

Hey Al, just ignore him, it's not worth the angst, he obviously does not or pretends not to have a clue what he's talking about and is peddling bullshit to stir people up.
Also he is purposely using bad spelling and grammar to hide his true identity.
Richox1 reckons he is'nt Mike 73 but the more he writes about this topic the more underlying similarities there are between the two of them. Maybe just coincidence but certainly got me wondering.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users