No thats bloody skillNo genius here, I just know how to weld and hammer things into place.
love this build
Posted 25 June 2017 - 11:27 PM
No thats bloody skillNo genius here, I just know how to weld and hammer things into place.
Posted 12 September 2017 - 08:47 PM
Had the beam and torsional test done today. The engineer now needs to graph the results to check if it passed but it looks good.
Posted 12 September 2017 - 09:02 PM
Posted 12 September 2017 - 09:32 PM
Interesting, I'm really surprised he tested the bare body shell.
I know all opening panels (if fitted) have to be ajar during testing but I would've thought the front end panels would lend some strength to the front chassis rails, plus an engine and trans should help tie everything together, and even the glass is structural in some cars? Still I suppose if it passes without those fitted then it should only be stronger when they are?
Did you need to make some weight allowance for all the missing stuff? There is roughly 1000kg difference between a shell and a complete car after all!
Posted 12 September 2017 - 09:50 PM
What exactly is involved with that test?
If you're interested Brad, here's some light reading for ya...
https://infrastructu...1Jan2011_v3.pdf
Pretty much the entire first half of this document (section LT1) covers beaming and torsion testing.
Posted 12 September 2017 - 10:01 PM
The beam test was all 4 wheels on the stands 6 dial indicators along each side of the car and load 135kg into each
passengers seating position and record the results.
The torsional test, the rear wheels are fixed down, a beam is attached to the front wheels with a pivot point between the
wheels to the ground and weight is applied to the beam to twist the car with 6 dial indicators along each side of the car.
Posted 12 September 2017 - 11:30 PM
Did it pass?
Posted 13 September 2017 - 08:18 AM
Posted 13 September 2017 - 09:50 AM
My test was very similar, but I had to have the driveline in? With the car so light would it move much? or does he calibrate that to the movement?
Posted 27 September 2017 - 07:40 PM
Started fixing the rust in the tail light bucket.
First had to get dogs ok on the tail light bucket from the spare parts car.
Only going to replace the bottom half but had to do a small repair first.
Had to repair some rust in the corner.
Bottom replaced.
Posted 28 September 2017 - 11:06 AM
Posted 28 September 2017 - 01:00 PM
Have you got your results yet? I want to know the results.
Posted 28 September 2017 - 08:43 PM
Yes Pete I got the result today and it is all good.
This is part of the report.
Posted 29 September 2017 - 06:29 PM
Should that be 12489 nm/degree?
Im strugglign to get my head around it the other way.
Posted 29 September 2017 - 07:53 PM
Yes I think that's what it means, I know the weight that was applied worked out to 6240nm which twisted the car only 0.5 deg.
Fixed some more rust fixed under the hatch seal channel and fitted a replacement channel.
Decided to put it back on the rotator to make it easier to start fixing some of the rust and dints in the body.
Posted 29 September 2017 - 10:31 PM
Posted 29 September 2017 - 10:56 PM
As above.
Posted 02 October 2017 - 08:42 PM
Mmmmmmm sun roof.
Only kidding just re-doing the sun roof patch, I rushed it the first time and got a little to much distortion.
Posted 02 October 2017 - 08:59 PM
I would leave it in hahaha.
Posted 02 October 2017 - 09:26 PM
Holy shit. I thought I'd clicked on Heaths build thread for a second....lol
I'd leave it in too.
Posted 02 October 2017 - 09:35 PM
Posted 03 October 2017 - 11:46 AM
Results aren't too bad, at 12,489 Nm/degree the stiffness is roughly was cars around the late 90s early 00s were. I'd imagine a standard Torana would be around 6000Nm/degree?
Posted 03 October 2017 - 05:36 PM
Pete I think a standard torana is a bit below the 6000 nm/deg.
Here's a link to a few other cars torsional rigidity.
http://beautifullyen...-of-known-specs
http://youwheel.com/...rehensive-list/
Posted 03 October 2017 - 07:51 PM
Does anyone else find it amusing that a Daewoo Lanos has more Torsional rigidity than a Ferarri 355, three times as much as a BMW Z3 and four times as much as a Lambogini Countach?
Posted 04 October 2017 - 11:50 AM
You're probably right hence the question mark. Toranas are pretty good for their age however and I reckon they would be better than an old Ford Maverick at 4400, they were basically an old Ford Mustang structure.
Having said that the Torana sedans would be better than the hatches though
Edited by Peter UC, 04 October 2017 - 11:51 AM.
General →
General Discussion →
Factory 202 Turbo option and id plateStarted by _Holden red sponge_ , 06 Dec 2018 Turbo |
|
|
||
Holden Tech →
Engine →
Phenomenal 202 buildStarted by _RedKobra_ , 10 Jan 2016 202, EFI, Turbo |
|
|
||
Holden Tech →
Engine →
Poll
ENGINESStarted by N/A-PWR , 04 Sep 2015 Motor, Torque, Horsepower, Turbo and 6 more... |
|
|
||
Holden Tech →
Engine →
Heat proofing manifolds / wiringStarted by RallyRed , 01 Aug 2015 LS1, Turbo |
|
|
||
Holden Tech →
Engine →
Strata turboStarted by _luva15_ , 27 Jan 2014 Turbo |
|
|
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users