#1
Posted 30 January 2013 - 12:17 AM
Cheers
#2
Posted 30 January 2013 - 11:37 PM
Toranas on the production line 1.PNG 486.58K 24 downloads
Toranas on the production line 2.PNG 440.63K 22 downloads
Part 2.
Toranas on the production line 3.PNG 358.23K 12 downloads
Toranas on the production line 4.PNG 447.54K 15 downloads
#3
Posted 31 January 2013 - 10:47 PM
Maybe I'm raking up the wrong tree and they didn't have them?. Would love to know though.
Cheers
#4
Posted 31 January 2013 - 11:06 PM
#5
Posted 31 January 2013 - 11:27 PM
There will be a homologising document in place, perhaps Red can help you
Homologating, friggin auto correct
Edited by A9X, 31 January 2013 - 11:28 PM.
#6
Posted 31 January 2013 - 11:38 PM
#7
Posted 31 January 2013 - 11:52 PM
http://www.gmh-toran...spacing-bonnet/
Hi Again.
The A9X is a good example of what has been done by the factory.
Remember that a stock road going A9X should have a plate to block off the air hole. These plates were introduced after the cars left the factory, when the problem was found. I think from memory they used the excuse of water entry. If it just has a standard air cleaner & the hole is left open, you most certainly will an overheating issue at speed.
When the scoop & hole are utilised on the track, a cold air box if fitted around the carby & sealed to the underbonnet with foam. This way only cold air enters the carb & the air flow thru the radiator is not reduced.
It's amazing how increasing the air pressure under the bonnet has such a huge effect on the radiator air flow. Undertray & spoiler & radiator air intake design is one of those areas that has improved greatly on late model cars
Dr Terry.
Edited by ls2lxhatch, 01 February 2013 - 12:03 AM.
#8
Posted 01 February 2013 - 12:00 AM
#9 _1973bathxu1_
Posted 01 February 2013 - 06:04 AM
the reason im asking is that i have a friend that purched an a9x new and still ownes it and there has never been a plate over the hole,
regards aldo
#10
Posted 01 February 2013 - 11:19 AM
Dr Terry indicates that the cover plate was introduced as an afterthought to fix cooling issues with A9X road cars. It was probably up to the dealer to drill the holes and mount the plate if required.
I think the cover plate was also required for rego in WA as at the time WA did not allow rear opening bonnet scoops. There may have been other states that had the same requirements.
Edited by ls2lxhatch, 01 February 2013 - 11:20 AM.
#11 _sloper35_
Posted 01 February 2013 - 03:13 PM
#12 _The Baron_
Posted 01 February 2013 - 05:12 PM
Well that's my understanding but I wasn't around the factory/Paterson's/dealer pre-delivery at the time and there will alway be the exception.
#13
Posted 01 February 2013 - 07:58 PM
As I mentioned before, if anyone has paperwork or other evidence, it would really help?
#14 _The Baron_
Posted 01 February 2013 - 08:28 PM
I happen to have a photo copy of the CAMS Homologation Amendment number 21/12E for the A9X and it lists the "Air duct and entry to engine compartment added to engine hood" which is further backed up by a photo on page 10 titled "Air duct added to engine hood" . The photo is from the underside and it shows a hole.
As far as I understand it, If it was not on the production cars you can't homologate it. So therefore it was how the production cars manufacture.
Is the IPRA run by ford fans?
#15
Posted 01 February 2013 - 09:30 PM
You know, I have thought the same thing, Ford people!! Their not really, but rules and regulations seem to dominate right down to nuts and bolts.
#16
Posted 01 February 2013 - 10:07 PM
original hole in bonnet on my a9x
i have also seen the patch plate supplied in the boot
on someones car but cam't find the photo
plate was supplied loose and not fitted to the road cars
when sold as far as i know
someone may correct me if i'm wrong!
got a yellow lickie for that years ago from the w.a cops
hence my home made bonnet cowl induction setup
works well and sucks through the top of the carb like a bit#h
specially with no radio
it's music to my ears!
photo stolen from gm forum members run posts
oh and i know the radiator overflow bottle should not have the
black seal
or the second thermo fan and schroud fitted
but it gets fuc@#n hot here!
cheers
davemc
#17
Posted 01 February 2013 - 10:27 PM
#18
Posted 01 February 2013 - 10:42 PM
i could ask my broHi Dave, interesting you got a defect notice back in the day. What did you say to the cop?? One bloke from WA on the IP forum knows of an A9X sold new in WA that had no hole. At least that is what he says. Do you know what ADR number covers this particular issue? It might be years ago, but do you remember if the cop told you what ADR you violated?
but it's something to do with if you burst any of the coolant hoses
there is no restriction to getting fluid on the windscreen
5am in kellerberrin and 50 kph in town
the cop waved me over and
was walking back to his patrol car for his sticker
and infringement books before i had even stopped!
prick grabbed the only hose on the carb that was not secured properly
hole in the bonnet
8in hotwires
didn't have the heart to tell him the rears were tens
only needed 3 things in those days for a yellow lickie
didn't even know what adrs were in those days!
good luck with your ipra cause!
#19
Posted 01 February 2013 - 11:36 PM
Here is the main page showing the bonnet scoop, the bonnet hole , and the block-off plate. This page was used in the A9X parts supplement, as shown above. Were road cars meant to get the round hole in the bonnet while the race cars got the bigger rectangular hole?
A9X bonnet scoop 2.jpg 293.99K 17 downloads
This is a page i found in some paperwork sent to Allan Grice as a package to upgrade L34s to A9X specs. It's a little hard to read but all the important dimentions are there.
A9X bonnet hole.jpg 267.7K 23 downloads
Here is a page i just found, it shows a preliminary idea for sealing the air cleaner to the bonnet. Note the date and the page title in the title block for the page at the bottom (77 styles means hatchback). Looks like they had the idea for a bonnet scoop early on but it didn't make it onto the L34.
A9X bonnet scoop 1.jpg 237.71K 15 downloads
#20
Posted 01 February 2013 - 11:53 PM
#21 _The Baron_
Posted 02 February 2013 - 09:40 AM
#22
Posted 02 February 2013 - 11:19 AM
"on the tset car the bonnet scoop wasn't scooping anything, it was a dummy, with a blanking plate where the air access hole into the engine bay should be" the report also said :
"if you see one for sale, buy it. Don't even hesitate. Even if you hate driving it - which you won't - you will have bought a classic car that wii be worth a fortune in 20 years time."
#23 _The Baron_
Posted 02 February 2013 - 05:04 PM
As for the scoop, well it did face backwards when most other cars faced forward at the time and they would appear to "scoop" air but as the A9X was backward, that may justify in part the scribe's comment that it would not scoop anything.
Anyway mine was never fitted (no holes) and I have never seen one fitted to a car yet or ever taken notice of mounting holes on any others.
#24
Posted 02 February 2013 - 08:34 PM
#25
Posted 02 February 2013 - 08:41 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users