You need to do a bit more homework mate.I doubt it very much tezza

#326
Posted 15 December 2013 - 10:44 PM
#327
Posted 15 December 2013 - 10:51 PM
your just speculating
#328
Posted 15 December 2013 - 10:55 PM
You need to do a bit more homework mate.
Ok so it will be made in china big frOckin deal i wont be buying one
#329
Posted 15 December 2013 - 11:02 PM
#330
Posted 15 December 2013 - 11:08 PM
And it will be a re-bagged Buick design 4cyl
And you forgot one thing not many people are going to buy them what the frOck is holden thinkin ffs
#331
Posted 15 December 2013 - 11:25 PM
Take a look in your driveways gentlemen
Why did you buy that imported thing you drive every day ?
Was it lack of local choice... was it more features for less money ?
We all contribute to the world market and the way companies thrive and die within it
Until we start to support our own economy and not the imported one we are doomed
#332
_LXSS350_
Posted 15 December 2013 - 11:43 PM
Col you say that if holden had changed there ideas on building smaller cars in Australia that holden would not of gone down i beg to differ because nobody knows for sure that even if they did change There is no guarantee that there sales would have changed
your just speculating
No certainties in life besides death and taxes. Of course it depends on what car, what cost, what sized sales etc etc. However many many moons ago in another life I got to spend time with Toyota from national new car distribution, national parts operation right down to dealers showroom sales. In that time I became 150% certain that you must give them what they want in NEW CARS because they will not buy something that is not suitable.
Now forget the Corolla might be the top selling car via the numbers. That's no where near enough info for a manufacturer to base what they should build. Toyota look at colour, trans,options etc etc right down to the interior combos etc. The deal alway is to meet and understand the market.
The key is that Holden and everyone else knew the dunny had been loosing sales dramatically since 2005. I know of NO OTHER CAR MANUFACTURER in the world whom have their main income earner based on a whale. The whole of Holdens existence rested on the titanic sized vf dunny and yet if you go back and read every world market since 2005 they will all say WHALES SELL NOTHING TO SMALL VOLUME.
Yet Holden choose it to be the big local hope and in export. Why shoot yourself in the foot when you can just as easy decapitate the whole thing from the very start.
If your Holden gasping for life why GO AGAINST THE MARKET NUMBERS and then cry when you can't make money.
Boy sure helps to have something buyers want to buy.
#333
_big chris_
Posted 15 December 2013 - 11:44 PM
All good points, well most.
The General Motors directors in Detroit have decided to move the manufacture of Australian GMH to South Korea,
the same place they are moving their USA car plats to. So I have heard in the news.
Dirt cheap labour, and tax breaks from the government of the country.
Just proves that the destiny of the Commodore and Falcon was not in the hands of any Australian,
was all in the hands of people in good old Detroit.
Ford build a lot of cars in South Africia, like my mums Focus.
Now add Falcon and Commodore to the foriegn built list.
#334
Posted 15 December 2013 - 11:52 PM
Google is your friend
#335
_LXSS350_
Posted 16 December 2013 - 12:32 AM
It's easy to simplify everything while not in the heat of battle making the tough calls (so don't think I am saying its otherwise) However much like Air Crash Investigation which happens after the fact the vast majority of times it is a combination of things that cause the crash.
The thing that's slapping me in the face is the business model. For the love of china wtf did they really think they where going to turn the whole world demand 360 degrees and back onto buying big family sedans? That to me just indicates that management have more than a few screws loose in justifying spending all that money on the new VF.
I am still trying to find any other company in the world even in recent history that has a business model like Holden to see how they are doing in comparison?
#336
Posted 16 December 2013 - 12:46 AM
BMW???I am still trying to find any other company in the world even in recent history that has a business model like Holden to see how they are doing in comparison?
#337
_ChaosWeaver_
Posted 16 December 2013 - 06:24 AM
LSSS350, I don't disagree with a lot you have said, but i do think your wrong with the size being the issue, as i said if you check the Vehicle sales I posted, the Commodore while its numbers are down, is still the biggest seller in the Holden range, with only the Cruz and Captiva selling in any numbers.. and don't forget GM spent $1billion developing the ALPHA PLATFORM, not only for our market, but for there own US market with the Camaro, At the time this car was made the Commodore was very popular, and I would say by the sales figures, they are still fairly popular if they can be the 4th biggest seller in Australia, I don't know how popular or successful the Camaro is, but I think they sold OK.. If you look at what holden are selling now, they definatly are playing catch up, releasing 4 or 5 SUV's in the range from small, the Trax up to the big, the Colarado 7. so yes I think Holden are trying to meet the markets demands..... But I still think deep down most Aussie'e would by Holden's, but the Commodore is the only car in the range that is Holden, the rest are, Isuzu"s, or Dawoo"s, or some other Asian built car .. Size does matter, and has had its effect in the 5 year since the Commodore was released, but the Holden's death has come about from poor decision making by all the people who are in charge for sure... and poor support from the Australian people has been the final straw.........
#338
Posted 16 December 2013 - 06:45 AM
#339
Posted 16 December 2013 - 07:15 AM
Take a look in your driveways gentlemen
Why did you buy that imported thing you drive every day ?
Was it lack of local choice... was it more features for less money ?
We all contribute to the world market and the way companies thrive and die within it
Until we start to support our own economy and not the imported one we are doomed
You are right Datto. I'm a big advocate for buying Aussie, I look at every product I buy at the supermarket and always pay more for Aussie made especially food. But sometimes what you want/need isn't made here or what is being sold is cr@p. Our last cars were a V2 CV8 and a VZ Cross8. Now we have Toyotas (Lexus RX350 and SR5 Hilux). Holden or Ford do not make or sell anything close to either. I don't need a twin cab 4x4 anymore so next year i'll replace the Hilux with a Falcon ute before those are gone.
#341
Posted 16 December 2013 - 08:34 AM
For those who keep pushing the line that the Commodore was the wrong car to build here because of its size, I have a simple question for you. What car could you build here & make a profit ? Given no tariffs, high $A exchange rate, highest factory wages in the world & a carbon tax (that nobody else pays).
One of the best kept secrets of the car industry is that it costs not much more to build a $35,000 car, than it does to build a similarly equipped $25,000 car. It's just that a larger car 'looks' to be more for your money, so the retail margin is better (read profitable). Why do you think Toyota shifted Corolla manufacture off shore so long ago, to concentrate on the Camry/Aurion ? The only reason Cruze was built here was to keep faith with one of the Govt. agreements in order to get the subsidy $$$ to pay the wages. You don't think that Holden make a profit making a 4-cyl car here if Japanese manufacturers have to resort to building their small cars in Thailand, do you ? You don't see Ford building lots of Focus & Fiesta cars here either.
You don't need a crystal ball to see Toyota shutting up shop. The cars they make are not even in the Top 10 (unlike Holden's 2 cars). Their only lifeline is their exports. Given that Camrys are built in 7 other countries (most likely at a profit) then why bother ? They could import Camrys & Aurions at the drop of a hat.
Someone on here pushes the BMW 3-series, their volume seller. BMW gets these made in places like South Africa, & SE Asia, so they can compete against other smaller 4 & 6 cylinder cars, while the lower volume, higher margin vehicles (5 & 7 series) get built in the 'father-land'.
When you drive thru Sydney, the streets a swarming with 4-cyl cars, like, Barina, Corolla, Jazz, Mazda 2/3, Kia, Hyundai etc. & also smaller SUVs, like Rav4, Forester, X-Trail, Tucson, Tiguan, Escape, Tribute, CRVs etc. This is where the volume is. The market these cars sell into, is so competitive & fragmented that nobody is making much margin at all. How would an Aussie-built Holden fare with all the extra Aussie on-costs ?
They could try building a large 4WD, Landcruiser, Patrol, Pajero style, but this market has tanked more than the large sedan market.
What was GM to do ? They had both hands tied & the unions were bashing them at the same time, it doesn't get much worse does it ?
Dr Terry
#342
Posted 16 December 2013 - 08:44 AM
Hi Dr Terry,
Great master of points which I see putting all into one car to be made.
An all wheel drive, slightly jacked up, V8 XU2 Torana
#343
Posted 16 December 2013 - 08:50 AM
or the GTR-X would be cool
#344
Posted 16 December 2013 - 10:10 AM
Point remains for me though, I wanted to buy a Holden product for myself and my wife, but they did not build or even sell suitable cars for us. The Hilux is a tough criteria and no manufacturer sells a dual cab leaf sprung rear ute with a decent engine and transmission apart from Toyota. My needs have now changed and when the lease is up next year i'll be happy and proud to have an Aussie made XR6 ute.
I did look at a 6cyl Territory but there was no 5 seater and it was slightly too big. The only other comparable cars available were way overpriced BMW and Audis, and the top spec Kluger was also not a 5 seater. Everything else were grossly underpowered. Lexus RX350 was way overpriced too but when we got offered an 11 month old demo for half new price it was a done deal.
#345
_LXSS350_
Posted 16 December 2013 - 01:01 PM
One of the best kept secrets of the car industry is that it costs not much more to build a $35,000 car, than it does to build a similarly equipped $25,000 car. It's just that a larger car 'looks' to be more for your money, so the retail margin is better (read profitable).
So what you are saying is Holden choose to base its main income earner on a super large car to be more profitable? From that same statement a dunnydore has more profit in it because its bigger and that was Holden's Business Model?
Holdens Big Car = Bigger Profits???
So in the same logic small cars would have lost them more money far faster and Holden would have been even more uncompetitive in selling similar cars that where in high demand and on any of the Top 20 in every world car market (from Istanbul,USA,Europe to China) over the last 10yrs of car world sales.
What is very clear that Holden where the only manufacturer in the whole wide world over the past 10yrs+ that based its business directly against all world car market demand and flew solo with a big sedan mentality as its major breadwinner.
Its extremely hard to understand how things have gone so pear shaped at Holden and how 2017 has occurred.
Dr Terry again I am having trouble justifying what you are saying about the business model they used. Your saying that cars that the market where buying in volume where not going to help Holden over its chosen path of selling the niche whale? They did this not for volume as that from any chart was obviously a dead end, ............ but because in choosing the niche large whale sedan (as its saviour) they retained a higher profit ratio that they couldn't do with basing the company on a car/s that sold in greater volume??
Personally I still think that by Holden taking the gamble like EVERY OTHER MANUFACTURER DID with basing your companies income on cars that people buy in numbers had a far bigger chance than selling them cars people are not interested in buying? Just a matter of getting your business model right.
Take the fleet and business sales out of dunnys and its even worse.
Just strange that nobody else in the whole wideworld in any market had the Holden Business Model of basing its manufacturing on a bloody enormous sized sedan.
You would think ONE other manufacturer in the world would have cottoned onto this untapped market that Holden was aiming its vf business model onto?
Edited by LXSS350, 16 December 2013 - 01:04 PM.
#346
Posted 16 December 2013 - 02:56 PM
LXSS350 you are missing the point.
1. Yes, bigger car = higher margins = more profits.
2. It wasn't Holden's 'business model', it was GM's plan to develop & manufacture their Zeta RWD platform in Australia, for all global markets, because of our expertise in this type of car. It would've been pointless getting us to design & build a low cost/low margin FWD shopping trolley or an SUV against the Asian competition, we've had next to no experience with those.
3. Several unforeseen things conspired against that plan. The artificially high $A, The GFC causing several things to go awry, Pontiac closure, wages out of control (not going down like everyone else in the world) & the fall off in demand for their large car (both here & overseas - principally due to the GFC). You seem to dwell on the fall off in demand, when in fact it's a combination of all 5, especially the 2nd, 3rd & 4th items. Both of Holden's local products were consistently in the Top 5 sellers (unlike Ford or Toyota), even if they were no. 1 & 2 Holden were still not profitable.
4. You are losing credibility by denigrating the Commodore by calling it a dunny or a whale. It still happens to be one of the best RWD cars (of any size) in the world, especially at its price point, Australians should be proud of it.
Dr Terry
#347
Posted 16 December 2013 - 03:17 PM
Take the fleet and business sales out of dunnys and its even worse.
Fleet & business sales have been the backbone of Holden's existence since 1917.
Dr Terry
#348
Posted 16 December 2013 - 03:52 PM
LXSS350 you are missing the point.
1. Yes, bigger car = higher margins = more profits.
2. It wasn't Holden's 'business model', it was GM's plan to develop & manufacture their Zeta RWD platform in Australia, for all global markets, because of our expertise in this type of car. It would've been pointless getting us to design & build a low cost/low margin FWD shopping trolley or an SUV against the Asian competition, we've had next to no experience with those.
3. Several unforeseen things conspired against that plan. The artificially high $A, The GFC causing several things to go awry, Pontiac closure, wages out of control (not going down like everyone else in the world) & the fall off in demand for their large car (both here & overseas - principally due to the GFC). You seem to dwell on the fall off in demand, when in fact it's a combination of all 5, especially the 2nd, 3rd & 4th items. Both of Holden's local products were consistently in the Top 5 sellers (unlike Ford or Toyota), even if they were no. 1 & 2 Holden were still not profitable.
4. You are losing credibility by denigrating the Commodore by calling it a dunny or a whale. It still happens to be one of the best RWD cars (of any size) in the world, especially at its price point, Australians should be proud of it.
Dr Terry
And once again Dr Terry has nailed it again
And im proud to have owned a commodore and my dunny is in my house col cant see any wheels on either
#349
_LXSS350_
Posted 16 December 2013 - 03:54 PM
Dr Terry sorry but your dates and numbers are incorrect and misleading because they are from a different era and during different model runs and development period.
The issue is that the fall away of dunny sales was 4yrs before the 2009 GFC and during the VZ era. The VE ran 2007/2012 during the GFC period which hit us in AUSTRALIA mostly in late 2009. Remember politicians saying we will never be effected while USA went collapse mode from greed of the sub prime market, fannie mae, freddie mac etc. Our economy was still growing in 2009 with car sales , consumer confidence etc all strong (except dunny and fraud sales).
House prices everything was strong right up till just after June 30th 2009 and by the end of 2009 then came the " Oh Sh#t you Liars Aust is part of the World Economy".
Mob of simpletons in Canberra with their head up their sun don't shine nether regions and a public that take everything for face value and cheap words.
So WHY DID HOLDEN DO THE VY IN 2013?
When any brainstorm can see that its clear that - pre GFC, pre parity of the oz dollar, pre the conceptual development of the vy that BLOODY BIG SEDANS like the Dunny an Fraud where Dying a bloody big death.
Its BS for anyone to sit here and say Holden had NO CHOICE.
They did have a clear choice as their blood was being splattered on the floors and walls during the massive decline that started with the VZ in 2005 and then got massacred during the 2007-2012 VE Period.
SEVEN BLOODY YEARS OF MARKET CLARITY and this from a company that new it was being spoon feed and hanging on by a finger nail. I suppose while being spoon feed for loosing 100's of millions they would have liked Keating to lock in 0.47c -0.50c exchange rate instead of floating the currency??
I would love to run all this past the head guys at BMW and Merc with full numbers, the costs and timing. My bet is they would say that one ballsy business plan that we would simply never try !!! (to live and exist on our big sedans).
Karim Habib once said it would be totally suicidal for BMW to try to make a living out of a market that has for decades been dying so we are best to move with the market regardless of our pre-conceived notions and experience. We are after all a business that exists for our buyers.
Sure lots of things helped kill Holden, but in the end it was mostly management stupidity and a business plan they found left over from the 80's. But Christ or mighty you think they would know what's selling and what cars are not selling? Car sales are not exactly hidden information.
Edited by LXSS350, 16 December 2013 - 03:58 PM.
#350
_ChaosWeaver_
Posted 16 December 2013 - 04:37 PM
LXSS350, i don't know if you've noticed, but all cars got larger in the period your talking about... have you seen the size of the new Subaru Liberty, or for that matter the Impreza, The Toyota Camry has gotten bigger, and they also made the bigger & uglier Avalon.... The No.1 selling car the Mazda 3 got bigger.. Hell think of any car, they have all got bigger... I guess it may depend where you live as to what you see on the roads, I live in Newcastle, a country area, and I must say the vast majority of the cars I see everyday are large vehicles, lots of large Commodores & falcon's, Large 4x4's & Dual cab utes, sure there are small cars to, but i would say large Vehicles still rule the roads up here..... I cant wait to see the all new Rolls Royce Compact, surely thats a dollar maker ..........
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users