Jump to content


Photo

Holden Pull Out

ABC report

  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
642 replies to this topic

#501 Bart

Bart

    Shit a brick

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,559 posts
  • Location:Sydney
  • Car:LJ Torana
  • Joined: 20-November 05

Posted 20 December 2013 - 10:50 AM

Plunging into debt with no or little return, to stimulate our then sound economy (SMALL STIMULOUS NEEDED NOT HUGE WASTE PRETEND TO STIMULATE) as we are now means we can no longer do what we need to do with infrustructure we desperately need. When billions go to interest alone those billions could have been used for infrustructure or maybe get Holden out of trouble??

You say the debt is not so big, well it is, but the point is the billions that go into repaying could have gone into a dozen hospitals eg.

Or bail out Holde Ford. You could now borrow more increase debt even more, reduce services we ned and or pay more tax. Theres no magic about it, it costs++++


Edited by Bart, 20 December 2013 - 10:54 AM.


#502 _Lazarus_

_Lazarus_
  • Guests

Posted 20 December 2013 - 10:57 AM

The Right have moved the goalposts so far off field to favour a future of greed and disparity via hardcore extremists such as Bolt, Jones and Murdoch that those who religiouslysupport and vote for them are unable to have any concept of an objective discussion.



#503 Bart

Bart

    Shit a brick

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,559 posts
  • Location:Sydney
  • Car:LJ Torana
  • Joined: 20-November 05

Posted 20 December 2013 - 11:02 AM

Im having an objective discussion, i just dont agree with you. And you cant vote for Bolt, Jones and Murdoch, but you can listen and or read their stuff IF you chose. You have a choice!



Jones and Bolt are hardly extreme



You dont have to agree with them, im sure you dont, but doesnt make them extreme



Their points on Holden are factual and valid



#504 _LXSS350_

_LXSS350_
  • Guests

Posted 20 December 2013 - 01:19 PM



Car manufacturing is ONLY about the numbers. Look at all the points that have been brought up in interviews, market releases etc directly from Holden, GM, Government, Unions, Opposition etc etc

 

The one resounding thing that they all are in 100% agreement about is that Volume (greater sales) would have saved Holden from closing.

 

Even Abbott said multiple times if they can do a good export deal on the VF the government would look at the numbers to see if they could financially help Holden with some short term relief to get the export program underway. But he also made it clear that they wouldn't be pumping endless money that was going into a bottomless barrel........  i.e. Holden have no hope of getting a profit in a 100 yrs.

 

Now as sure as a fresh egg will splatter if you drop it onto a concrete floor the VF dunny might be the best Holden ever built but NO ONE WANTS IT.

 

GM say they will sell between 1700-2000 Chev SS dunnys per year. WTF LOL

 

Put a Camaro body on the same platform you sell 85,000 per year. I mean ffs its that bloody dumb how everyone is playing the blame game when its clear HOLDEN where selling the wrong product that EVEN with $8000-$10,000 off what we pay here in Australia (where we make the bloody things) in a market that is 13 times our market size they are considered by GM to be more NICHE than a VETTE.

 

 

 

 

 

  1. Holden was $152.8 million in the red in the 2012 calendar year despite $73.5 million in government funding.
  2. Its biggest result in the red was $210.6 million in 2009.
  3. The 2012 figure means Holden has lost $730 million over six of the past eight years, and a $202 million profit over the same period.
  4. The last time Holden finished in the black, in 2011, the profit of $89.7 million was identical to the taxpayer funding it received in that calendar year.
  5. Although other General Motors factories in South Korea and Thailand can build cars for $3750 less than Holden does in Australia, the savings likely won’t be passed on because the company made a loss on its locally-made models.
  6. The Chevrolet SS sports sedan will carry a sticker price of US$44,470, including shipping, making it $10,000 cheaper than buying the equivalent VY Commodore in Australia.

 

 

 

It is like the three stooges designed the whole holden business plan, and obviously from decades of running up massive losses while being charity feed into just plain bone lazy all it took was a few market induced changes in a few area's (ex rate, volume) to show the ineptitude of the whole Holden business Model.

 

The only Hindsight we can take is that in reality the whole loss making show should have closed decades ago because they obviously management inc GM couldn't run a fish and chip shop using one of their business models. Now obviously after its bankruptcy GM has turned around its models and is now making cars people now want to buy. This is just GM continuing to clean house of dead wood and trying to stay on top of things rather than getting lazy and sloppy like it did. With the end of zeta and switch to alfa for the iconic Camaro the timing for closure on a loss making charity precipitant was perfect.

 

Commodore Sales

 

2009 : 44,387

2010 : 45,956

2011 : 40,617

2012:  30,532

 

 

 

 

 

  1. 400px-Australian_large_car_sales_1991_on

 

 

 

 

So at the end of the day Holden needed to sell around 80,000 dunnys per annum. Now its as clear as being hit over the head with a bit of 4x2 Jarrah that No Way In The World could it do that with the dunnydore as its main and volume product.

 

If you open your eyes you can see that in the same enormous (13x our market) that if you give the same platform a different market segment the numbers dramatically change. i.e.

Chev SS = 2000 units pa (even with a $10k discount)

Camaro = 85,000 units pa (more niche market being 2 door)

 

Now this is the key to car manufacturing (POPULARITY) because Chev is massive discounting to try to get someone anyone to buy the unwanted, unloved (except a few fanatics) enormous butt ugly sedan.

 

Forget all the excuses and bs oh the camaro is this and that, the bloody Camaro is not a volume seller and never will be its a very niche limited market product, its only one step down from the vette.

 

The bloody Chev SS (dunny) is a big 4 door sedan just as quick etc etc and should have a bigger market but hell one issue THE WORLD DOEST WANT BLOODY BIG SEDANS.

 

That's why the big whale sized dunny killed Holden and that's why the Alfa platform will be the platform of choice.

 

It's physical size that kills the hope of any volume sales and the big dunny died years ago.

 

 

All this blame cr#p is just knocks, twists and bumps from business and market movements it was not the MAJOR NO1 Problem.

 

The worst part is that these business fools could have fixed it by doing their job, but to me (and will await management departing whistle-blowers for confirmation) it sure looks like GM had this planned and on their agenda straight after they re-worked their business plan to get through Bankruptcy.. I am not an insider but the numbers speak volumes and anyone who knows anything about business esp big business knows its a numbers game.

 

I.E. Giving the market what it wanted to buy.

 

Its not hindsight because the car industry lives its whole life on evolving history data analysis.

 

Its like Holden trying to sell Ice to the Eskimo's -  (wrong product)

 

Holden: Here guys buy our ice "its the worlds best"

Eskimo: We don't want ice but if you have "a good fire place" for sale we might buy that?

Holden: Sorry we only sell ice, everyone needs ice.

Eskimo: You didn't google us to find out what we wanted or might need?

Holden: No we been making the same ice for decades and it normally sells very well.


Edited by LXSS350, 20 December 2013 - 01:26 PM.


#505 _Lazarus_

_Lazarus_
  • Guests

Posted 20 December 2013 - 02:11 PM

I think you may have mentioned those points already.

 

Now please try to take this onboard.

 

Holden does not decide what their factories here produce.

 

That was made crystal clear with the introduction of the Commodore and on other occasions before and since.

 

The Commodore is continued to be made here because that is what GM want the plants to do.

 

With our high wages and dollar the only way a car industry and its many subsidary industries can survive here is with governmental intervention. That is a given.

 

It is also the only way that all automotive industries in First World economies survive, as described in that post about Sweden and in the figures given about subsidies paid in other countries.

 

 

Do we need an automotive industry here or is that just a sentimental dream, that is the real question I guess...



#506 _LXSS350_

_LXSS350_
  • Guests

Posted 20 December 2013 - 02:44 PM

You do realise what GM said before the senate committee about what went wrong and why they are bankrupt? You do know how GM has turned it around and yet we are only in 2013?  The answer of course was making models/cars/trucks that people wanted to buy and being efficient - not belligerent, ignorant and lazy.

 

Those are the variable costs of doing business (any business tourism,cake shop,wheat farmer etc). Australia is the land of the handout and those pitiful excuses don't excuse the basic facts of business that you first have to have a business model that is viable (with margins). Now sure as ducks going south there was ZERO ZERO viable or rational to produce the VY after the VZ failure.

 

The VE had to happen because of the timing but the VY was the most idiotic suicide mission ever.

 

They still could have done the zeta for GM's Camaro but they needed a smaller better car (than the Cruze) that the oz public would volume buy.

 

You don't have a viable car business with just a few customers.

 

Absolutely GM never gave a rats bum they had their own schizophrenic decision making about having the wrong cars in their own market. It took Bankrupcy and the US Government to get GM to finally pull its head in and clean-up its act while producing cars people wanted.

 

Again it was up to holden to decide its own market needs, that's total rubbish about GM saying Holden had to sell the dunnydore or what sized dunnydore they sell. GM left that to the "num nuts" down here, as long as it made sense on paper and numbers where given to head office.. The idiots down here couldn't run a brothel as is evidence by the local sales numbers falling through the floor before some yelled hey henry go wake the Yellow Wiggle up something's going horribly wrong here that chq for the cleaners has just bounced.

 

At the end of the Day GM had Holden's closure pencilled in at least 6 years ago for just after the swap over of the camaro platform (unless Holden could pull a rabbit out of the hat).


Edited by LXSS350, 20 December 2013 - 02:55 PM.


#507 Dr Terry

Dr Terry

    Technical + Numbers Guru + Moderator

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,324 posts
  • Location:Eastwood (Sydney) NSW
  • Joined: 13-November 05

Posted 20 December 2013 - 03:31 PM

The Right have moved the goalposts so far off field to favour a future of greed and disparity via hardcore extremists such as Bolt, Jones and Murdoch that those who religiouslysupport and vote for them are unable to have any concept of an objective discussion.

Jones & Bolt hardcore extremists ??? Good grief ATM they are talking about the coal-seam gas lobby being to the far right of them.

BTW I'm willing to bet money that you are not a regular listener to either of them & just rely on out-of-context snippets played-back on the ABC.

Dr Terry



#508 Dr Terry

Dr Terry

    Technical + Numbers Guru + Moderator

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,324 posts
  • Location:Eastwood (Sydney) NSW
  • Joined: 13-November 05

Posted 20 December 2013 - 03:36 PM

 All this talk of Holden replacing the RWD Commodore with a Chinese-built FWD 4-Cyl shopping trolley after 2017 seems a bit premature.

 

GM will still require a proper-sized global RWD platform after the demise of the VF. But what ?

 

One of the biggest selling luxury cars in China is the Buick Park Ave, we know it as a Holden Caprice. Currently Holden make all of the parts for these & send them to China in CKD packs for assembly over there. The replacement for this car will be what ? The current Cadillac is mid-way thru its model life & it too will need a successor. Likewise, the Chevy SS & Caprice police pursuit vehicle that we currently export to the US, will still have a market after 2017.

 

My belief is that GM are currently developing the next global RWD platform to serve these requirements. But where do they build it ? They can’t afford to build it here, after all that‘s why they closed the Holden plants. But if you build it Asia, the shipping costs to the USA may still add too much to the equation. It could also be tainted with that ‘Made in China’ tag.

 

They could build it in Mexico, where they currently run several plants. They could build it in Canada, where the Camaro is currently made. From either of those countries, USA sales are on their door-step & they could also probably continue with CKD packs to China as per the current set-up, for the Park Ave. It could also be used as a base, for a proper RWD US Buick, they do need one. Exports to the Middle East should also be back on the agenda, as the GFC softens.

 

Whatever this car is, it has to be a proper-sized (read large if you wish) RWD car to satisfy the needs of those markets mentioned above. It would need to be a step above the current Chevy Impala. Which is their current V6 Camry/Accord competition, but of course that is also FWD.

 

So the new car could be (or should be) a worthy RWD drive successor to the VF.

 

OK, so no V8, no ute & no wagon, but it would be better than no Aussie RWD car at all.

 

Food for thought.

 

Dr Terry



#509 S pack

S pack

    Scrivet Counter

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,722 posts
  • Name:Dave
  • Location:Luggage Point
  • Car:73 LJ
  • Joined: 25-January 10

Posted 20 December 2013 - 04:38 PM

 Now sure as ducks going south there was ZERO ZERO viable or rational to produce the VY after the VZ failure.

 

The VE had to happen because of the timing but the VY was the most idiotic suicide mission ever.

Just so you know, the COMMODORE model run was VB, VC, VH, VK, VL, VN, VP, VR, VS, VT, VX, VY, VZ, VE and currently the VF. (not including ute and statesman model codes).

 

Cheers

Dave.



#510 _slrv8_

_slrv8_
  • Guests

Posted 20 December 2013 - 06:10 PM

Jones & Bolt hardcore extremists ??? Good grief ATM they are talking about the coal-seam gas lobby being to the far right of them.

BTW I'm willing to bet money that you are not a regular listener to either of them & just rely on out-of-context snippets played-back on the ABC.

Dr Terry

Ah yes, I can see clearly now. Jones and Bolt? Really?

 

Do I really need to spend ages on a response to this one?

 

Where to start…..



#511 _LXSS350_

_LXSS350_
  • Guests

Posted 20 December 2013 - 07:22 PM

Just so you know, the COMMODORE model run was VB, VC, VH, VK, VL, VN, VP, VR, VS, VT, VX, VY, VZ, VE and currently the VF. (not including ute and statesman model codes).

 

Cheers

Dave.

 

Yes my fault on the model mix-up vs what I typed. I have never wanted or needed a plastic burger taxi so I will be the first to admit as a buyer I lost total interest in Holden after they introduced the VB dunny.  I have never seen anything remotely interesting in what Holden have had for sale since 1977

 

So sorry that should have read VF after the VZ failure.

And the other should have read "VF was the most idiotic suicide mission ever".

 

GM will still require a proper-sized global RWD platform after the demise of the VF. But what ?

 

Is that what the market requires or is rwd just what we have had in years gone by?

Look at Chev - how many years since they had a big rwd sedan?

Market demand is all that counts and that demand should always dictate what is needed not what has been the case.

 

Once again this towing demand is being filled by 4x4's not big sedans. Too much 80's market thinking going on here.

 

 

If your a farmer its totally useless planting a "Barley" crop when all the demand is for "Wheat"

Holden tried all that looking for buyers to buy the oversized dunny whale but to no avail.

 

Better to seek the answer to layout from the market demand.

 

My god just talking about gay marriage in my days would have gotten you shunned and smacked around.

Now its on the nightly news.

 

My point wis that what's gone on in the past is not relevant to today's market demand.

Want a big whale the market buys 4x4. like the X5, Landcruiser, Cayenne, M Class, Range Rover etc


Edited by LXSS350, 20 December 2013 - 07:25 PM.


#512 _Lazarus_

_Lazarus_
  • Guests

Posted 20 December 2013 - 07:32 PM

I have had the misfortune of working in places where Jones was played at high volume for all to suffer so I know his style all too well. Interestingly, it was clearly obvious that those of lower IQ levels gained the most enjoyment from his apoplectic rants.

 

As for Bolt, I do not have TV and I have not heard his radio show, if indeed he has one, but I have read his 'journalistic' offerrings, heard him speak on RN a few times and seen him on Youtube involved in a number of 'discussion panels'. I find him and his attitude repulsive.

 

The only reason they are not considered extremists is because as I said before the goalposts have been moved so far to the Right.

 

In the 50s when the general population was far more conservative than now, governments of either stripe were implementing policies which would have steam blasting from the ears of Bolt, Jones and Co., such as higher taxation for the very wealthy and public ownership of national assets.

 

And their ridiculous spite fueled ravings would not have been tolerated.  

 

 

 

 

.


Edited by GTR - U9X, 20 December 2013 - 07:35 PM.


#513 S pack

S pack

    Scrivet Counter

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,722 posts
  • Name:Dave
  • Location:Luggage Point
  • Car:73 LJ
  • Joined: 25-January 10

Posted 20 December 2013 - 07:52 PM

Is that what the market requires or is rwd just what we have had in years gone by?

Look at Chev - how many years since they had a big rwd sedan?

Market demand is all that counts and that demand should always dictate what is needed not what has been the case.

Does the market really demand front wheel drive cars, big or small???

I don't believe the motoring public forced manufacturers to change to front wheel drive, rather the shitty format was thrust down our throats. I suspect front wheel drive vehicles are cheaper to produce, however they are definitely more expensive to repair and frOcking crap to drive.

 

Give me rear wheel drive any day of the week.



#514 rodomo

rodomo

    To advertise here, call 13TORANA

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 18,037 posts
  • Name:R - O - B Dammit!
  • Location:Way out west of Melbourne Awstraylya
  • Joined: 10-December 05

Posted 20 December 2013 - 08:44 PM

I couldn't agree more. It comes down to manufacturing. Easier to mount an assembly to a subframe and chuck the whole lot in.

Clutch on an Astra? 1/2 the damn car has to come apart!

 

AND while I'm on a rant...........

 

Who the hell voted for electric everything on cars anyway dammit!

More shit to stuff up!

 

Do all the yuppies that read Modern Motor actually write in and say: I want electric damn seat damn warmers that adjust their damn temperature to what phase of my damn cycle I'm in dammit?

 

I went to a breakdown to a bloke that worked for Delphi. While fixing his car (jump start, his battery was stuffed but he couldn't afford one) I asked him what he did at Delphi.

 

Him: I designed the electric steering on the Astra.......

 

Me: What were you thinking?

 

I'm over it, they're all plastic heaps of POO!!!!!!



#515 _Lazarus_

_Lazarus_
  • Guests

Posted 20 December 2013 - 09:21 PM

I'd like a brand new EH Special wagon with a twin cam turbo six and coils all round please Mr Devereaux.

 

 

.



#516 Bart

Bart

    Shit a brick

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,559 posts
  • Location:Sydney
  • Car:LJ Torana
  • Joined: 20-November 05

Posted 20 December 2013 - 09:34 PM

Ill bet my house.
LXSS350 sounds pretty spot on.
I thought the Cruze would have done better being smaller etc

Jones & Bolt hardcore extremists ??? Good grief ATM they are talking about the coal-seam gas lobby being to the far right of them.

BTW I'm willing to bet money that you are not a regular listener to either of them & just rely on out-of-context snippets played-back on the ABC.

Dr Terry



#517 N/A-PWR

N/A-PWR

    CABIN ENGINE CONTROLS GALORE

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,637 posts
  • Name:Dave I
  • Location:Wooroloo, 65km's East of Perth
  • Car:'1969' LC RAT TORANA
  • Joined: 08-December 12

Posted 21 December 2013 - 08:38 AM

There is usually a base model in a vehicles range - manual window winder etc,

so it would be peer pressure that one family say's to the other, look what I've got - electric vibrating seat,

choice is we can choose between a base model 427ci or a self driving 3 cyl.

Holden will go down in history as an icon for Australian conditions and Bathurst. Dave I



#518 Dr Terry

Dr Terry

    Technical + Numbers Guru + Moderator

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,324 posts
  • Location:Eastwood (Sydney) NSW
  • Joined: 13-November 05

Posted 21 December 2013 - 08:44 AM


I thought the Cruze would have done better being smaller etc

You've hit the nail right on its head. Holden make the only small/medium car 4-cyl in Australia & still can't make a profit out of it, even though a lot of the components are imported from Korea. The current model Cruze is quite a good car, but the importers have dropped their price on the equivalent models & GM-H cannot compete on price. Corolla & Mazdas are cheaper today than they were 10-12 years ago.

Dr Terry

#519 Dr Terry

Dr Terry

    Technical + Numbers Guru + Moderator

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,324 posts
  • Location:Eastwood (Sydney) NSW
  • Joined: 13-November 05

Posted 21 December 2013 - 08:48 AM

The Jones/Bolt argument is a bit of a side issue. They are both very polarising characters, so you either like them or loath them. You might disagree with them or you might agree with them. As it happens a lot of people do agree with their stance on many topics & they rate gangbusters.

 

One of luxuries of living in Australia, is that it is a free country. If you don't like them or don't agree with them, don't listen to them.

 

Dr Terry



#520 N/A-PWR

N/A-PWR

    CABIN ENGINE CONTROLS GALORE

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,637 posts
  • Name:Dave I
  • Location:Wooroloo, 65km's East of Perth
  • Car:'1969' LC RAT TORANA
  • Joined: 08-December 12

Posted 21 December 2013 - 08:51 AM

In 1970, my Mum bought a brand new White Mazda 2 door for $2000 and only had services done on it over a 14 year period, she traded it in on a New 1984 Corolla and got $2000 trade-in for it - unbelievable 



#521 N/A-PWR

N/A-PWR

    CABIN ENGINE CONTROLS GALORE

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,637 posts
  • Name:Dave I
  • Location:Wooroloo, 65km's East of Perth
  • Car:'1969' LC RAT TORANA
  • Joined: 08-December 12

Posted 21 December 2013 - 09:11 AM

this is what she had and the Bank said to her at the time, you need a reliable car and the Bank loaned the money for the Mazda:-

 

120px-Ford_XP_Fairmont_Sedan_2.jpg                                                 mazda_1000_white_1970.jpg

 

p.s. the banks did their home work in those days



pictures are from Google



#522 Dr Terry

Dr Terry

    Technical + Numbers Guru + Moderator

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,324 posts
  • Location:Eastwood (Sydney) NSW
  • Joined: 13-November 05

Posted 21 December 2013 - 09:13 AM

In 1970, my Mum bought a brand new White Mazda 2 door for $2000 and only had services done on it over a 14 year period, she traded it in on a New 1984 Corolla and got $2000 trade-in for it - unbelievable 

Inflation might have had an influence on that.

 

$2,000 was more than my annual gross income in 1970.

 

Dr Terry



#523 _nowaynicko_

_nowaynicko_
  • Guests

Posted 21 December 2013 - 09:25 AM

LXSS350 did you read the Mark De Wit speech?

 

It reads like you haven't or didn't understand it.

 

The crux of your argument is that holden isn't building a product that satisfies the local customer base.

 

My understanding from reading the speech is that the local customer base is satisfied but that this alone is not a sustainable business model.

 

Export is critical to the success of the business and the federal government has hamstrung the industry by ALLOWING foreign manufacturers cheap trade into Australia but this is not being reciprocated.

 

There were some very well thought out positive changes that could be taken from his speech, I recommend you read it.

 

 

Whilst this is a sad day for Holden in Australia and indeed the manufacturing industry, whats done is done.

 

We need to focus our efforts on the possibilities that this will bring rather than slinging mud and trying to lay blame.

 

Obviously there will be workers who don't want to move on or are unwilling to learn new skills, they will be left by the by.

 

Those willing to better themselves and upskill will find themselves with new opportunities in emerging or growth industries like renewable energy and dare I say it, resources.

 

And those willing to upskill should be assisted to do so, which in turn will grow the vocational training industry.

 

 

I was going to discuss the effect of unions on industry as I have found the union (ETU) to be a very positive influence in my life.

 

But over my time I have found that people form very quick, very strong opinions on unions and its not worth my time to try and argue the point.

 

 

I would urge you all to go back and read the speech prepared by Mark DeWit as it appears as though most looked at it and thought "too long".

 

2c



#524 _ChaosWeaver_

_ChaosWeaver_
  • Guests

Posted 21 December 2013 - 09:42 AM

Totally agree with every thing you've said.........  cheers Nicko



#525 _spanner_

_spanner_
  • Guests

Posted 21 December 2013 - 09:45 AM

Don't think so. Try about $3500. I remember in 73 when I purchased a new van for three grand +, it was about half the yearly wage. Inflation was on the march.

S

Inflation might have had an influence on that.

 

$2,000 was more than my annual gross income in 1970.

 

Dr Terry


Edited by spanner, 21 December 2013 - 09:49 AM.





2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users