It's in the news clip, plain as day for all to see, it's not a 9/72.
Victoria Police Vehicle Crime Squad "Cloned Muscle Cars"
#226
Posted 05 April 2017 - 10:33 PM
#227
Posted 06 April 2017 - 07:00 AM
Edited by r2160, 06 April 2017 - 07:02 AM.
#228
Posted 06 April 2017 - 12:21 PM
The News Report Video has been removed from here, WHY ????????
The Vic Police are on the News reporting this Story, why remove it from here.
#229
Posted 06 April 2017 - 12:24 PM
It's in the news clip, plain as day for all to see, it's not a 9/72.
If you pause that Video where that Pink Car is reversing out of that Brick Shed, ummmm you can see where the rear side Seat Belt is on the rear side panel. Tells you what Month that Body is.
But the Video has been taken down now.
Edited by xu2308, 06 April 2017 - 12:26 PM.
#230
Posted 06 April 2017 - 03:37 PM
Obviously someone got sand in their vaj.The News Report Video has been removed from here, WHY ????????
The Vic Police are on the News reporting this Story, why remove it from here.
I bet channel 9 don't remove it from their page...
It's on utube for the world to see. Madmaxmoviestv is the user
Edited by lx308, 06 April 2017 - 03:54 PM.
#231
Posted 06 April 2017 - 07:34 PM
Those cars will still be in the impound yard.
#232
Posted 06 April 2017 - 07:48 PM
If you pause that Video where that Pink Car is reversing out of that Brick Shed, ummmm you can see where the rear side Seat Belt is on the rear side panel. Tells you what Month that Body is.
But the Video has been taken down now.
The belt mounting position doesn't tell you exactly which build/compliance month it is but it does tell you which months it is not.
Edited by S pack, 06 April 2017 - 07:49 PM.
#233
Posted 06 April 2017 - 08:07 PM
Those cars will still be in the impound yard.
Seems the News report Video is as well
Edited by xu2308, 06 April 2017 - 08:08 PM.
#234
Posted 06 April 2017 - 08:29 PM
must be more to it than previously thought ?
they don't just remove a "news report" for no reason ?
#235
Posted 06 April 2017 - 08:52 PM
#236
Posted 06 April 2017 - 09:53 PM
Who pulled it? Admin? Or Ben McKormack?
Who is Ben McCormack?
#237
Posted 06 April 2017 - 10:00 PM
Obviously someone got sand in their vaj.
I bet channel 9 don't remove it from their page...
It's on utube for the world to see. Madmaxmoviestv is the user
I pulled it from here as requested politely by a member
But as mentioned its still on utube
Usual "i'll consult my legal team" sort of talk
#238
Posted 06 April 2017 - 11:48 PM
Who is Ben McCormack?
A frOckin scumbag reporter
#239 _mikecatts_
Posted 07 April 2017 - 06:46 AM
.Police raided Channel 9’s Sydney headquarters yesterday before charging veteran journalist Ben McCormack, 42, with sending child pornography material.
#240
Posted 07 April 2017 - 07:54 AM
I thought maybe it was on his computer?
#241 _LS1 Taxi_
Posted 07 April 2017 - 08:22 AM
If the friendly user who made legal threats about that video reads this...suck shit. I hope they get all of you.
#242
Posted 07 April 2017 - 10:04 AM
Threats they wouldn't have a leg to stand on in a court of lawI pulled it from here as requested politely by a member
But as mentioned its still on utube
Usual "i'll consult my legal team" sort of talk
grow some
#243
Posted 07 April 2017 - 10:29 AM
Interesting all this forum/ legal threat stuff.......reckon the mods do need to be careful.
On a Landcruiser forum the other day that the guy who runs it, and who put up a library of scanned workshop manuals, has had a case put on him by the Manufacturer...claiming $50k in lost income from sales ( the sale of manuals I assume?). They have started a crowd funding thingo for him to try and cover some legal defence costs. ( from memory, thats the story).
Different to this one obviously...but shows shit can hit the fan from time to time....
2 cents
#244
Posted 07 April 2017 - 10:32 AM
Sorry mate. Don't get paid to take a chance that someone DOES go legal.
People these days, because these things are worth serious coin, and people like to throw around accusations, are quick on the draw with the legal threats. This is about the 5th that I can remember, and I won't be taking a risk for the forum.
I'll pull the plug and shut the joint before I get thrown in a battle - especially over some comment that is placed here.
And don't think it can't happen. The laws are so retarded that just by running a place like this DOES open us up.
And members don't seem to give two fucks. Hence why some are permanently banned.
Fuck. That.
#245
Posted 07 April 2017 - 10:34 AM
As much as "free speech" is wonderful..... it doesn't exist because of the legal system and people who like to make accusations - justified or not - and it can.... and does - come back on the forum.
I personally, and the entire admin/mod team will take NO chances.
#246
Posted 07 April 2017 - 10:35 AM
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk
#247
Posted 07 April 2017 - 11:00 AM
I thought maybe it was on his computer?
That was the impression I had, we'll have to wait and see what comes out.
Keep in mind if he's investigating a case on a paedo and has that evidence on his computer, he can still technically be charged for possession; same as reporters being charged with withholding evidence if they have evidence the police don't have and they plan to air the story before the cops get involved.
Hinch has been in a few times for contempt of court for discussing a case on air before it's been through the courts.
Edit: A Current Affair reporter Ben McCormack has been suspended by the Nine Network after being charged with sending child pornography material.
"Police will allege in court the man was engaged in sexually explicit conversations about children with an adult male and discussed child pornography," a statement from NSW Police said.
s
Edited by StephenSLR, 07 April 2017 - 11:11 AM.
#248 _LS1 Taxi_
Posted 07 April 2017 - 11:18 AM
Sleep is good!
#249
Posted 07 April 2017 - 12:55 PM
On a Landcruiser forum the other day that the guy who runs it, and who put up a library of scanned workshop manuals, has had a case put on him by the Manufacturer...claiming $50k in lost income from sales ( the sale of manuals I assume?).
A company that made 13.8 BILLION dollars in 2016 is going to sue old mate for lost income for a few manuals???????
Christ. Most people would just buy a Gregorys anyway.
#250
Posted 07 April 2017 - 02:45 PM
A company that made 13.8 BILLION dollars in 2016 is going to sue old mate for lost income for a few manuals???????
Christ. Most people would just buy a Gregory's anyway.
They may have on-sold the rights to the old manuals to a small online company, not unlike Gregory's.
s
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users