186 Engine Rebuild
#76
Posted 25 January 2017 - 08:46 PM
#77 _duggan208_
Posted 25 January 2017 - 11:15 PM
Not a bad guess, Celica ST 204 filters, I have a couple of used ones from my Celica glad I didn't peg them out. There is a hole beside the light, so plenty of nice clean cold air. Trying the spread the air evenly as possible and not just a heavy concentration of air in one part of the box. For that reason I have avoided putting the filter at the front of the box. I might add a scoop on the bonnet later on.
regards
#78 _duggan208_
Posted 09 April 2017 - 11:18 PM
One almost sorted out serpentine belt, i'm gonna do something with those headers. The air box that's drawing out plenty of the Queens english and stretching the patience.
Regards
Attached Files
#79 _duggan208_
Posted 12 July 2017 - 12:06 AM
I've just finished my 6 into 1 merge vanes, a fair bit of mucking around. Just need to finish the collector now and then start on the pipes. No more sort of fitting HM pipes and sloppy matched flanges.
Attached Files
#80
Posted 12 July 2017 - 08:05 AM
#81
Posted 12 July 2017 - 03:50 PM
You had to modify your inner guard for clearance didn't you?
Can you show us the hole you made in the radiator support panel for cold air inlet?
James
#82 _Bomber Watson_
Posted 12 July 2017 - 08:57 PM
I've just finished my 6 into 1 merge vanes, a fair bit of mucking around. Just need to finish the collector now and then start on the pipes. No more sort of fitting HM pipes and sloppy matched flanges.
Yeah these picks aroused me somewhat.
How are you intending to weld the pipes to the collectors?
#83 _duggan208_
Posted 13 July 2017 - 12:31 AM
#84 _duggan208_
Posted 13 July 2017 - 11:52 PM
This is a pic of the hole in the support panel, needs a bit more finishing work and the finished 6 into 1 merge collector yet to be painted.
Attached Files
#85
Posted 18 July 2017 - 10:37 PM
#86 _duggan208_
Posted 19 July 2017 - 12:32 AM
1 and 5/8, I suppose when there is 6 of the bloody things they look huge. I also have one of those small starters gives me a little more room. Gonna try to make up a bracket to hold the collector in place, tighter than a fishers A/hole, but I think I can just make it all fit. Will certainly need a heat reduction design.
regards
#87
Posted 19 July 2017 - 09:14 PM
#88 _duggan208_
Posted 20 July 2017 - 12:14 AM
The collector goes down to 2.5 inch and them up to 3 inch. I don't really know if that will make any gains but worth a try.
Regards.
#89
Posted 21 July 2017 - 08:47 PM
Are you after a torque monster or a quick hi revving 6.
#90
Posted 25 July 2017 - 07:26 PM
Holden used the same size stroke and jurnal size in all engines except the 202/3.3.
Holdens 138 red motor crank fits a 186 perfectly and is far lighter. Fitted with the right rods pistons and flywheel you will be extremely surprised at how quick it revs.
#91
Posted 26 July 2017 - 05:47 AM
#92
Posted 26 July 2017 - 07:46 AM
I for one would be keen to know how much a quick revving 138 crank weighs compared to its identical 3" stroke counterparts?
+1 lol
#93
Posted 26 July 2017 - 11:17 AM
#94
Posted 26 July 2017 - 11:20 AM
#95
Posted 26 July 2017 - 12:56 PM
You will find the cranks are the same not lighter where you getting this info fromFrom memory it was quite a bit 1.5kgs + less in weight. Also when you rolled the 186 crank along flat ground it would go up and dowm in between counter weights and the 138 crank was more even. It's like anything the further out the mass from point of lift the more effort it takes to move. Same goes for tyres. The bigger they are in height the more power it takes to turn them. Yes you can change gear ratio to compensate but its a trade off game all round.
#96
Posted 26 July 2017 - 01:16 PM
You may be comparing a cast crank to a forged crank. Both forged and cast cranks were used in 161 and 186 engines. The cast crank superseded the forged crank in all Holden red 6 in 1967 except for 186s + 3100x and CK engines in LC Torana.
Edited by S pack, 26 July 2017 - 01:17 PM.
#97
Posted 26 July 2017 - 02:15 PM
#98
Posted 26 July 2017 - 07:48 PM
You will find the cranks are the same not lighter where you getting this info from
Edited by Shtstr, 26 July 2017 - 07:51 PM.
#99
Posted 26 July 2017 - 08:17 PM
#100 _Bomber Watson_
Posted 26 July 2017 - 08:46 PM
I'd prefer more rotating mass and more strength any day of the week personally.
The race is won or lost in the 60', and the more rotating mass you have the harder you can hit the tyres in the holeshot....gonna win everytime.
The strength is just a handy side effect.
Edited by Bomber Watson, 26 July 2017 - 08:46 PM.
2 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users