Jump to content


Photo

2815843 27F3 cylinder heads factory fitted ?


  • Please log in to reply
27 replies to this topic

#1 Kockum

Kockum

    Forum Fan

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 477 posts
  • Location:Southern NSW
  • Joined: 27-September 07

Posted 30 November 2015 - 04:43 PM

Some on here say  - no .

 

I say - yes.

 

There are two versions of this head .

 

Version -1

 

Standard LJ XU1 inlet valve 27F3 heads. 

 

This is what I have .

 

Why ? there were no more C233 heads left when my engine was factory assembled.

 

 

Version - 2

 

large inlet valve 27F3 heads fitted to some of the listed type cars.

 

Remaining listed type cars had large inlet valve 20F3 heads .

 

Were there standard LJ XU1 20F3 inlet valve heads made ? - I don't know .

 

These 27F3 heads were factory fitted to a number of good honest cars with known documented history so no tainted 'RESEARCH'  is required.

 

If you have a 7/8/9 month car with a SINGLE OR DUAL DATE CODED ENGINE BLOCK THAT HAS AN UNTAMPERED WITH ENGINE NUMBER PAD AND THEREFORE GENUINE HOLDEN ENGINE NUMBER STAMPING TNEN CONGRATULATIONS. Ditto for all earlier LC/J XU1 cars.

 

However if you have a restamped engine number and try to pass it off as a GENUINE ENGINE NUMBER STAMPING THEN YOU ARE LOWER THAN A SNAKES BELLY SO SLITHER BACK UNDER THE ROCK YOU CAME FROM.

 

One more point - if any forum members that are currently on a well deserved  holiday from the forum want to get down into the gutter upon returning I will not join you in the gutter.



#2 _sunburst73-xu1_

_sunburst73-xu1_
  • Guests

Posted 30 November 2015 - 06:58 PM

Like

#3 _hommie1973_

_hommie1973_
  • Guests

Posted 19 December 2015 - 09:10 PM

Hi Kockum, I can tell you that I once bought an xui head from a guy that had been useing solid lifters and he was going to change the head on his engine. I bought the head from him while it was still on the motor and the reason I wanted the head was that it was a 2of3 casting as my mate had one of these heads and it had the big valves. Well when I received the new head I was disappointed as it was a standard xui valve size head. Up until then I thought I was getting a big valve head but it proves that they were made with the small standard valves. Not only that the valves were so badly pocketed the engine reconditioner advised me it could not be repaired And that my friend was the only time I ever scraped an xui cylinder head. Yes I felt pretty bad about having to scrap it but I did salvage the springs. Just thought I would let your know as that is what I found out. Regards Graham

#4 S pack

S pack

    Scrivet Counter

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,693 posts
  • Name:Dave
  • Location:Luggage Point
  • Car:73 LJ
  • Joined: 25-January 10

Posted 19 December 2015 - 09:47 PM

Hi Graham, I'm surprised your engine reconditioner didn't suggest installing hardened steel seat inserts to remedy the valve shrouding problem.

 



#5 _hommie1973_

_hommie1973_
  • Guests

Posted 19 December 2015 - 10:05 PM

Hi S pack, Believe me I have been mucking around with engines for a long time but have never seen valves recessed as far as this head was. I suggested the inserts but he said there was not enough meat left to fit them. There are a few things that happen in your life but I will always remember that little experience. I thought the guy was mad for even getting rid of it but I guess he knew more about it than me at the time. Any way I can tell you that it only had the standard xui valves. Cheers Graham

#6 S pack

S pack

    Scrivet Counter

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,693 posts
  • Name:Dave
  • Location:Luggage Point
  • Car:73 LJ
  • Joined: 25-January 10

Posted 19 December 2015 - 10:18 PM

Sounds like an expensive lesson learned.

 

Cheers

Dave.



#7 _hommie1973_

_hommie1973_
  • Guests

Posted 19 December 2015 - 10:24 PM

Hi G pack, I don't remember what I payed for it, I just wanted that head. It was a lesson learnt for sure. Cheers Graham

#8 FLY_AGAIN_XU-1

FLY_AGAIN_XU-1

    Forum Fixture

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,653 posts
  • Joined: 01-September 06

Posted 20 December 2015 - 04:13 PM

Over a 35 year period I have owned 14 second hand 27F3 heads with all having the larger inlet valves fitted. I have also owned 6 second hand 20F3 heads with all having the smaller inlet valves fitted. I have also owned 3 NOS bare 27F3 heads. I have never heard or seen of a NOS 20F3 head. Over this period I have seen around 6 NOS C233 heads with the last being for sale on ebay. A forum member " Fat Tony " had it. Of the last 30 1973 homologation specials I have viewed being genuine cars with their original dual cast blocks they have all had 20F3 heads fitted. I have been lucky enough to have been able to remove 2 heads off these cars. One being a non listed 8/73 and the other being a listed 8/73 car. Both were found to have the smaller inlet valve with no fly cuts. Speaking to Dave Bennett from Yellow Terror who was assigned with the machine work for these heads, he told me that he never started work on these heads until September 1973. Which makes it all but impossible for any production XU-1 to have one of his heads fitted while these cars were being produced. Dave Bennett also told me he was still doing these XU-1 heads when he was assigned with doing the L34 heads. He handed around 75 bare 27F3 heads back to GMH. Over a 35 year period I have owned 3 NOS bare 27F3 heads but have seen close to 40. I only know of 1 complete NOS 27F3 with the larger inlet valves which is owned by a former racing identity in Sydney. These were the heads he used on his Group C race car through out 1973, 1974 and 1975. The 27F3 also has a higher deck height compared to the production 20F3 and was available as a spare part in 2 forms, a complete head with larger inlet valves or a bare head. Please refere to homologation 9/2E. Your call to what you want to believe, this is just where my research has lead me.........



#9 FLY_AGAIN_XU-1

FLY_AGAIN_XU-1

    Forum Fixture

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,653 posts
  • Joined: 01-September 06

Posted 20 December 2015 - 04:24 PM

The 27F3 is the perfect head if you want to run the larger inlet valves ( More Meat ) and combined with a duel cast block ( More Meat ) forms a great basis for a very strong high performance Group C engine............



#10 Kockum

Kockum

    Forum Fan

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 477 posts
  • Location:Southern NSW
  • Joined: 27-September 07

Posted 20 December 2015 - 05:07 PM

hommie1973,

 

thanks for confirming you had a 20F3 with standard LJ XU1 inlet valves .


Edited by Kockum, 20 December 2015 - 05:11 PM.


#11 Kockum

Kockum

    Forum Fan

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 477 posts
  • Location:Southern NSW
  • Joined: 27-September 07

Posted 20 December 2015 - 05:50 PM

FLY_AGAIN_XU-1

 

I have a 27F3 2815843 head with standard inlet valves.

 

These may be hard to find - there must be more out there.

 

Comparing the bolt boss width of my head to photos of other 2815843 heads up to and including C233 this head has a thinner bolt boss.

 

No grinding of inlet port area evident at all.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FLY_AGAIN_XU-1

 

ALL I can tell you is that I have a 27F3 2815843 head with  standard inlet valves .

 

They may be hard to find and there would have to be more out there.

 

Mine has the reduced cylinder head bolt boss when comparing it to photos I have of 2815843 heads up to and including C233 .

 

No grinding of the inlet port area at all .

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-


Edited by Kockum, 20 December 2015 - 06:01 PM.


#12 Kockum

Kockum

    Forum Fan

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 477 posts
  • Location:Southern NSW
  • Joined: 27-September 07

Posted 20 December 2015 - 06:06 PM

Buggered this post up - the first part or the second part should be there .

 

NOT BOTH.



#13 _hommie1973_

_hommie1973_
  • Guests

Posted 20 December 2015 - 07:33 PM

Thankyou all for your input on this topic, I have found it very interesting especially the bit on Dave Bennett and what he did with these heads. Boy I had a mate who had one of these late 73 big valve engines in a 4 door could it go! Paid $600 for the motor came out of a white nsw police gtr that had been totalled. I was very keen to see what cam was in it when he pulled it apart, turned out to be an XH. It always had 180 plus compression and the old clunk clunk idle. It's a shame you can't still get those Pistons! Cheers Hommie1973

#14 FLY_AGAIN_XU-1

FLY_AGAIN_XU-1

    Forum Fixture

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,653 posts
  • Joined: 01-September 06

Posted 21 December 2015 - 09:04 AM

Of the second hand 27F3 heads I have owned over the years, all had been modified in some way. Some had mild port work, some had wild port work. Some had there posts die grinded for better air flow, some had even had there cast posts totally removed and a very thin type pipe inserted. Most had also been heavily decked.

 

Quote 9/2E

 

revised o,all height - as per dimension supplied herewith 3.15+.020 (was 3.18+.010).

 

End Quote 9/2E

 

Even though the 27F3 had more meat in standard form, with this homologation the race teams were then able to deck there heads even further than before, thus adding extra compression and horsepower.

 

Of the 20F3 heads I have documented, they have had 2 different numbers next to the H at the back of the head, 8H and 9H.

Of the 27F3 heads I have documented, they have had 4 different numbers next to the H at the back of the head, 9H, 10H, 11H and 12H.



#15 S pack

S pack

    Scrivet Counter

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,693 posts
  • Name:Dave
  • Location:Luggage Point
  • Car:73 LJ
  • Joined: 25-January 10

Posted 21 December 2015 - 10:24 AM

Of the second hand 27F3 heads I have owned over the years, all had been modified in some way. Some had mild port work, some had wild port work. Some had there posts die grinded for better air flow, some had even had there cast posts totally removed and a very thin type pipe inserted. Most had also been heavily decked.

 

Quote 9/2E

 

revised o,all height - as per dimension supplied herewith 3.15+.020 (was 3.18+.010).

 

End Quote 9/2E

 

Even though the 27F3 had more meat in standard form, with this homologation the race teams were then able to deck there heads even further than before, thus adding extra compression and horsepower.

 

Of the 20F3 heads I have documented, they have had 2 different numbers next to the H at the back of the head, 8H and 9H.

Of the 27F3 heads I have documented, they have had 4 different numbers next to the H at the back of the head, 9H, 10H, 11H and 12H

There is a good reason why the larger inlet valve heads had their overall height reduced straight out of the box.

Also, where does it say in the CAMS regs that the race teams could run a compression ratio higher than that specified on the Cert of Description?



#16 jd lj

jd lj

    Forum Fixture

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,112 posts
  • Name:James D
  • Location:in the shed
  • Car:LJ SVO
  • Joined: 03-December 10

Posted 21 December 2015 - 12:49 PM

In reference to the above post I know of two 27f3 LJ GTR heads one is 10L and the other has 11L at the rear. Moulds 10 and 11 (or whatever this signifies) must have been popular on that day.

#17 FLY_AGAIN_XU-1

FLY_AGAIN_XU-1

    Forum Fixture

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,653 posts
  • Joined: 01-September 06

Posted 21 December 2015 - 01:47 PM

cams1-3.jpg

 

cams2-2.jpg

 

cams3-4.jpg

 

 

I am sure you all can make up your own minds........

 

 

In reguards to the LJ GTR heads jd lj, were these off late 1973 GTR,s ?



#18 S pack

S pack

    Scrivet Counter

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,693 posts
  • Name:Dave
  • Location:Luggage Point
  • Car:73 LJ
  • Joined: 25-January 10

Posted 21 December 2015 - 01:48 PM

In reference to the above post I know of two 27f3 LJ GTR heads one is 10L and the other has 11L at the rear. Moulds 10 and 11 (or whatever this signifies) must have been popular on that day.

 

James

 

LJ GTR cyl heads are different to XU1 cyl heads so having the same pattern numbers is more coincidence than anything.

 

Cheers

Dave.


Edited by S pack, 21 December 2015 - 01:50 PM.


#19 _ChaosWeaver_

_ChaosWeaver_
  • Guests

Posted 21 December 2015 - 04:09 PM

Fly Again, in which bit does it talk about compression ratio's being changed or otherwise....  I read it and didn't see anything..?? 



#20 RallyRed

RallyRed

    Oh My, Don't you post alot

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,115 posts
  • Name:Col
  • Location:NSW
  • Car:LC GTR etc
  • Joined: 02-October 11

Posted 21 December 2015 - 06:13 PM

Hi Fly,

Sorry mate, but I did hope to read the part you refer to....but cant see it?

Can you detail the part where the comp. ratio modification is mentioned.

Thanks



#21 yel327

yel327

    Oh My, Don't you post alot

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,603 posts
  • Joined: 10-February 08

Posted 22 December 2015 - 07:32 AM

It is there from what I can see. The words say: "The engine shall be unmodified except for...". Meaning you couldn't touch compression, not legally anyway.



#22 _ChaosWeaver_

_ChaosWeaver_
  • Guests

Posted 22 December 2015 - 08:00 AM

That's what I thought when I read it......  But I was confused, as I thought Fly Again posted that information to support his claim ??



#23 yel327

yel327

    Oh My, Don't you post alot

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,603 posts
  • Joined: 10-February 08

Posted 22 December 2015 - 08:04 AM

More misinformation?



#24 S pack

S pack

    Scrivet Counter

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,693 posts
  • Name:Dave
  • Location:Luggage Point
  • Car:73 LJ
  • Joined: 25-January 10

Posted 22 December 2015 - 08:15 AM

There's no mention on the 9/2e amendment form about an increase in the compression ratio for the 150 list engines.

The  Cert of Description (Recognition form) dated 3rd February 1972 states the XU1 202 compression ratio is 10.3:1  + .5:1 = max allowed comp ratio is 10.8:1 for all LJ XU1 202 engines.


Edited by S pack, 22 December 2015 - 08:15 AM.


#25 FLY_AGAIN_XU-1

FLY_AGAIN_XU-1

    Forum Fixture

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,653 posts
  • Joined: 01-September 06

Posted 22 December 2015 - 09:34 AM

That's why GMH homologated a completely new engine............






2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users