481 replies to this topic

[FLY_AGAIN_XU-1]

Afaik,

 

Copied from Dr Terry.

 

As a motoring journalist Byron you simply copy what other motoring journalists have written before you and then just add your name to it. What a shame all the so called motoring journalists before you wrote nothing but a whole heap of crap and bullshit. Now all you do is simply reuse there crap and bullshit as your own. Do you actually do any research or just copy from others.  I know who the one is publishing a whole heap of reused misinformed information. Could this be proven in a court of law ? Easily, Yes. I hope it was not you that wrote the article in a particular magazine about ( Goose ) scooters old car but would not surprise me if that total piece of crap was your work.

By me and the other 2 amigo,s trying to tell you the truth about how to pick a restamped block, it has upset a whole lot of people as you could imagine.. Death threats, accusations, being called every name under the sun. Not only have we unearthed restamped blocks but rebirthed cars, fake tags etc etc. So im afraid the truth really does hurt..........

I had no idea just how large this fraud and deception of Australian muscle cars had become.

 

 

 

Are these two blocks the same ?

[FLY_AGAIN_XU-1]

What engine is in your 1973 Bathurst Homologation Special Kockum ?

[yel327]

Bruce

 

You are an idiot. How many times do you need to be warned about trying to undermine other people's credibility when you simply cannot win an argument. IT WON'T WORK.

 

But I agree with you that a motoring journalist should not simply copy what others have written, and they should not make up rubbish to suit their own ends. If i'm ever a motoring journalist i'll make sure I never do that, but I certainly ain't taking advice from the like of you!

 

WTF are you waffling about, who is Goose? What article? You are seriously deluded.

 

I'm certainly not interested in your own falsified "research" and wouldn't even take any notice of it. I know how to pick a restamped block I've seen plenty of them posted up here too, mostly covered with paint.

 

I've seen the faked cars, the faked tags etc. Some of them are a bit too close to home are they? Is that what this is all about? Arse covering?

 

You have no idea how large it has become!? I find that very hard to believe.

 

Once again, attempts at character assassination WILL NOT WORK on me. You cannot win, so you try this rubbish.

 

Are what two blocks the same? You haven't posted up any pictures of two blocks?

Edited by yel327, 12 March 2016 - 08:22 AM.

[FLY_AGAIN_XU-1]

The TRUTH hurts........

[Kockum]

Well FLY  ,

 

you already know this -  my ordinary car has the engine block and cylinder head that it left B.A.P with.

[crabba67]

Goose was the original owner of JP389998 of Goose Auto Dandenong..

Cheers

Well FLY  ,

 

you already know this -  my ordinary car has the engine block and cylinder head that it left B.A.P with.

Kockum, is it single cast or dual cast.

Cheers

Edited by crabba67, 12 March 2016 - 08:41 AM.

[yel327]

Goose was the original owner of JP389998 of Goose Auto Dandenong..

Cheers

Kockum, is it single cast or dual cast.

Cheers

 

Never heard of him Anthony.

[yel327]

The TRUTH hurts........

 

Obviously, otherwise you'd not be grasping so badly to cover whatever it is you are trying to hide. Be warned again Bruce, do not try this rubbish again. It is called Slander and it is illegal. I have nothing to hide, so coming after my character will not work anyway.
 

And BTW you'll find it hard to find anything I've written and published. If you do it'll have my name on it and it will not be copied form anywhere or anyone and any information gleaned from another source will be credited. SO go back to your delusions and stop being a keyboard warrior.

Edited by yel327, 12 March 2016 - 08:48 AM.

[yel327]

For anyone watching you see what happens when you dare to show concrete evidence that contradicts the theory? Makes you wonder if something more than research is at stake?

 

I've done enough for now, this thread has to stay up to show real evidence. These clowns will carry on in it so it gets shut down, but it should be cleaned and locked so it is there for all on Google to see.

Edited by yel327, 12 March 2016 - 09:04 AM.

[Kockum]

My  engine block has the oh so controversial second date code and it is of no extra importance to me whatsoever simply because it was built that way .

[S pack]

Not only have we unearthed restamped blocks but rebirthed cars, fake tags etc etc.

Not surprising in the least as there was a certain XU1 club President who got caught and locked up for doing just this sort of shit.

[S pack]

Nothing wrong with this original GMH engine number stamping.

[XU-1 RAT]

What's the cast date

[S pack]

What's the cast date

Why? you not capable of making a judgement based upon the engine number stamping alone?

[xu2308]

Chaos you will make Skaps Day reposting that

[EunUCh]

Here are pictures  of an older block as requested by those for comparison of numbers,all from same engine.

 196.JPG   106.7K   14 downloads

 1862.JPG   108.01K   9 downloads

 1863.JPG   68.01K   6 downloads

 

 

[lj72bathurst]

Here are pictures  of an older block as requested by those for comparison of numbers,all from same engine.
196.JPG
1862.JPG
1863.JPG

Has number 3 so it must be a xu1 block

[xu2308]

Does the photo of the 3 belong to the others photos, just saying. Maybe a Video of it would be better.

Edited by xu2308, 12 March 2016 - 06:47 PM.

[xu2308]

http://www.gmh-toran...engine-rebuild/

Have a look at this thread and take particular note of the first posts photo then post 7 and 8.

 

Spotto the 3 on the 186 in that Photo

[xu2308]

That photo from the other Torana Forum page, hope owner of photo is ok with it to be posted in here.