
Liquid intelligence 115
#1
_nodster_
Posted 21 December 2015 - 01:25 PM
#2
_Bomber Watson_
Posted 21 December 2015 - 02:25 PM
THeres a very very long winded thread on waterless engine coolant somewhere, Dave will be along later to link you probably.
End of it everyone was pretty divided, half thought it was a waste of money, the other half seem to have way to much money to waste.
#3
_ljxu1torana_
Posted 21 December 2015 - 04:25 PM
coolant is for alloy head and corrosion.it dosenot make your car run any cooler.
#4
_LS2 Hatch_
Posted 21 December 2015 - 04:54 PM
As noted above, it's a great idea if you have alloy components and the engine sits for long periods without being ran. If it is for normal useage on a regular used engine, there is basically no reason to use it.
The thread did give some good reasons both ways, but as I said, why are you considering it?
#5
Posted 21 December 2015 - 06:44 PM
#6
Posted 21 December 2015 - 08:17 PM
The above thread was about Evans waterless coolant which was proven to have higher corrosion rates and lower cooling capacity than water with no-rosion added.
Liquid Intelligence 115 is a different product to Evans waterless coolant. It may have the same problems as the Evans product or it may actually be better. Only independent testing, as was done with the Evans product would prove it one way or another.
#7
_LS2 Hatch_
Posted 21 December 2015 - 08:51 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users