2 inch SU info
#76
Posted 28 February 2016 - 09:06 AM
I'll apply the same expertise getting some more su flow figures shortly.
#77 _oldjohnno_
Posted 28 February 2016 - 10:27 AM
I might see if I can borrow a 2" SU (unmolested) and a DCOE or two and test them as well.
I'm extremely sceptical of some of the popular mods - if I was considering them I'd test them first on a disposable carb and only carry them out on the "good" carbs if they proved to be worthwhile. Seems a lot of traditional mods have little or no basis in reality and are only done because that's what everyone else does. So unless I had hard data showing otherwise I'd keep my die grinder away.
I've always liked the SU's but for some reason I had it in my head that their strong midrange performance was at the expense of a slight loss of top end. What the tests have shown however is that a properly sized SU will give up absolutely nothing - as in zero cfm - in top end to a fixed choke carb. It also shows that the 1-3/4" SUs are simply too small for anything more than say a warm 149.
#78
Posted 28 February 2016 - 10:33 AM
Including me that is.
#79
Posted 28 February 2016 - 01:52 PM
#80
Posted 28 February 2016 - 02:04 PM
I could also supply a 2 inch SU... I could lend the weber but its on the car and need it etc... however if it was planned out I could whip off the weber, test it and put it back on...
Anyone else have a 45dcoe sitting on a bench?
#81
Posted 28 February 2016 - 03:07 PM
#82
Posted 28 February 2016 - 03:23 PM
I have some 36s sitting on my bench JD. Happy to supply them for the test...
#83 _oldjohnno_
Posted 28 February 2016 - 03:50 PM
I think I could borrow some locally if you really want to see what DCOEs flow. But I won't have time to do it for another couple of weeks anyway so we'll revisit it then.
I got a fresh supply of playdoh today so retested the SU with a fairly generous radius - it didn't quite crack 200 (199) but it's close enough for me.
#84
Posted 28 February 2016 - 04:17 PM
If it helps, I have an assortment of 2 in SU's in unmolested and tickled condition as well as some 45 dcoe's & various chokes.
My flowbench is a pitot style with digital manometer, repeats to <1%.
You have me curious now, using the pitot sensor to the bottom of the jet tube we could see what effect modifications to the slide & jet bridge have on fuel metering
#85 _oldjohnno_
Posted 28 February 2016 - 05:03 PM
Feel free to add to the database Kevin, or I'll see what I can scrounge and add it later.
You can buy brand new HSR42s for under $400, so for that price I'm not sure I'd even consider secondhand.
I've never understood the need for slide modifications with SU's - at WOT the slide is out of the picture anyway so it doesn't really matter what it looks like. And when the slide is only partly open then it obviously means that you don't want or need maximum flow anyway, making the slide mods pointless.
I'm not convinced that grinding the bridge is a good idea either, but maybe a few cfm could be found by adding material. A short ramp on the approach side along with a long, tapered tail on the downstream side could help flow but again I'm not sure the small gains would be worth the effort and possible complications. There's a reason these things are made the way they are and I suspect that it's much easier to make them worse than better.
#86
Posted 28 February 2016 - 05:51 PM
great info here! well done...
#87 _rich243_
Posted 29 February 2016 - 03:55 PM
Yep great info. Im certainly keen to see the 2" SU and Webers tested when time permits.
#88
Posted 29 February 2016 - 08:04 PM
But you're out west are you oj?
Also some 48mm dellortos
#89 _oldjohnno_
Posted 01 March 2016 - 04:51 AM
I've got a question for you guys: suppose we compile a table listing the flow rates of all the carbs that we think might work OK.
What are you going to do with it?
#90 _oldjohnno_
Posted 01 March 2016 - 05:11 AM
From David Vizard's carburetor book his formula for choosing the correct size chokes for an IR set up is as follows :
Single cylinder capacity (550 for a 202) multiplied by the the max rpm
(let's say 6000),divided by 2600 and then the square root of this answer is the preferred choke size, but drop the decimal places.
This is 35mm from memory which just happens to be a sweet spot on my engine.
The correct size of carb to suit the choke size is the choke should be approximately 80% of the throttle plate size.
You need to subtract the restriction caused by the spindle from the throttle plate size and not fit chokes any bigger than that. For example on a 40mm dcoe if you fit a choke bigger than 34mm there will be only very minimal increase in airflow for the above reason and there's no point going bigger than 40mm chokes in a 45mm dcoe.
I admire David Vizard immensely, and don't for a nanosecond pretend to have even a fraction of his experience. But he himself is the first to admit that some of the information in his books is greatly oversimplified just to make it more easily usable by ordinary racers. Sometimes it goes too far - the cam recommendation formulas come to mind - and he admits to this.
I think his choke size formula is another one that is simplified to the point of being useless. There's no mention at all of the shape of the lift/duration curve - or what we'd call the "gulp factor" in the bike world - and this has quite a significant influence over carb sizing.
Similarly the choke size vs. throttle bore size might be relevant with Webers but they don't really apply to anything else. Many modern carbs don't even have a venturi - despite what many still believe you don't actually need one in order to meter fuel. All you need is sufficient air speed to pull fuel from the nozzle.
#91
Posted 01 March 2016 - 09:48 AM
Hi Oldjohnno,
I would say the information will make people feel at ease with their own set-up,
given the comparison vs other carburettors,
and can also give members an insight into which way they would like to spend their money,
for capacity per dollar value.
In saying that, we would need to have the motor modifications needed to accept the carburettor sizing,
added to the chart.
I've got a question for you guys: suppose we compile a table listing the flow rates of all the carbs that we think might work OK.
What are you going to do with it?
#92
Posted 01 March 2016 - 09:58 AM
I've got a question for you guys: suppose we compile a table listing the flow rates of all the carbs that we think might work OK.
What are you going to do with it?
Well I don't know what everyone else is doing with the info, but for me comparing su's actually relates to my engine so I appreciate getting a 1 3/4" baseline flow rate. I'll be flowing all of mine regardless & providing figures when I do, then see what sort of power difference it makes.
For my own personal pleasure of course, and a few interested parties.
#93 _Bomber Watson_
Posted 01 March 2016 - 11:21 AM
#94
Posted 01 March 2016 - 11:28 AM
#95
Posted 01 March 2016 - 01:21 PM
Hi All,
All the information in these pages are of great value,
so I have numbered and lettered them for the carburettor flowbench discussion.
See what you think is needed to add, for a cross-examination graph,
which I don't mind helping out with:-
Edited by NA-PWR, 01 March 2016 - 01:25 PM.
#96 _Agent 34_
Posted 01 March 2016 - 02:11 PM
helping out, starter list - OMG- that's not simple there dave.
Old Johono will have to employ a full time staff member to sort through that list and test.
Could you Imagine the amount of plasticine he would have to purchase, his local toy shop would start to look at him a bit strange.
jesus - lets stick to - about 4 or 5 carbs as we are only trying to establish the following
" air flow through a shaped opening".
lol
#97
Posted 01 March 2016 - 02:24 PM
Hello Grant,
did I forget to mention deleting anything too?
I say Oldjohnno has already explained a few flow figures which will be in the chart,
and has offered to do a couple more.
All I was merely doing was putting in other specifications that are talked about by others,
and if any of them were mentioned in a test, the chart would show.
Sorry if I started something to big.
helping out, starter list - OMG- that's not simple there dave.
Old Johono will have to employ a full time staff member to sort through that list and test.
Could you Imagine the amount of plasticine he would have to purchase, his local toy shop would start to look at him a bit strange.
jesus - lets stick to - about 4 or 5 carbs as we are only trying to establish the following
" air flow through a shaped opening".
lol
Attached Files
#98 _rich243_
Posted 01 March 2016 - 04:04 PM
For me OJ its like the other have said. Im keen to see how they all compare for a future engine build. I like webers purely for the sound and look, which Im sure you hate to hear but its how it is for some, but its interesting to see how well the simpler SU does stack up.
Im also interested in the Mikuni/Keihn multi carb idea as i have experience tuning and jetting these both on 2 stroke and 4 stroke motor bikes over the years, Just not sure if they are the exact type your talking about, On the + side with these carbs is they are quite easy to oval bore and ive seen some decent gains doing this on the motos over the years.
#99 _oldjohnno_
Posted 01 March 2016 - 05:27 PM
I intend to use the information for my own personal gain and become a multi gazillionare stomping anyone who helped me in the past into the ground in the process.
Ha ha, best answer yet! BTW it wasn't a trick question, I was just curious.
#100 _oldjohnno_
Posted 01 March 2016 - 06:14 PM
Hi All,
All the information in these pages are of great value,
so I have numbered and lettered them for the carburettor flowbench discussion.
See what you think is needed to add, for a cross-examination graph,
which I don't mind helping out with:-
1-Flowbencha-maximum flowb-head port sizec-valve sized-valve lifte-durationf-orifice sizeg-cylinder sizeh-standard pressures (1.5" or 3"hg)j-12" water (about 0.8" hg)k-digital manometerl-pitot stylem-pitot sensorn-sweet spoto-midrange performance................................Or what needs changing around - this is just a start list.
Jesus Christ Dave I had to have 7 Red Bulls, 4 lines of coke, 9 pingas and an apple turnover (with cream) just to read that lot...
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users