245 replies to this topic

[FLY_AGAIN_XU-1]

" There has been so much proof put up here "

 

The only proof you turkeys have provided so far is some photos of restamped blocks and claim them to be genuine JP blocks

 

THATS IT, THATS YOUR PROOF............        

 

 

 

Most of these turkeys have never seen a dual cast block let alone understand it............

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[yel327]

The only Turkey here is you Bruce. Replies like the above is enough proof. 

[yel327]

It might be, but to be fair you probably shouldn't use the 3rd last word as it would be offensive to some people.

[UCgazman]

Is my thread closed since I called Rat a Spastic Daisy Chain ?

 

Maybe but I'm still nominating it for post of the year

[EunUCh]

lol , is this great debate still going ?

 

All the so called "turkeys" do not post pictures other than to illustrate that not all JP blocks have a "3" to be legit.

 

The cast date code and the other # are  miles apart of resembling each other , the cast date code was changeable within

the pattern making process for the reason of coding (have a look at the date code , it is generally irregular in terms of lettering 

and numbering size and neatness?.The other number looks more like a neat set # within that part of the pattern?

 

 

 

 

 

[Ice]

" There has been so much proof put up here "
 
The only proof you turkeys have provided so far is some photos of restamped blocks and claim them to be genuine JP blocks
 
THATS IT, THATS YOUR PROOF............        
 
 
 
Most of these turkeys have never seen a dual cast block let alone understand it............
 
 
 
 

Bruce i can get you pics of a one owner LJXU1 original JP engine still in the same family 58000 miles on it with no number 3 on it
but im not goin to waste my time because you will only call it a restamp
i have nothing to gain from it your call

[FLY_AGAIN_XU-1]

Put it up Gene, put it up ! ! !

[crabba67]

Hey Weaver,All we need is the number pad photo time for you to put it up..............and by the way it will be the first JP216### i have seen with a 24H2 cast date the engine came out of a first week 9 month 72 built xu1 the cast date is to late.

 

Attached Files

•  chaosweaver restamp.jpg   180.19K   9 downloads

[joeseph]

In amongst all this crapola, there are pearls of wisdom.. damn hard finding 'em though!

[RallyRed]

Its a test Grant....

[RallyRed]

ok,

 

Attached Files

•  20160410_132840shrink.jpg   384.05K   3 downloads

[RallyRed]

its in an old FB/EK...so assume its a grey motor?

It just interested me as it just seemed to be sitting there hanging off the gearbox...i.e no engine mounts. Maybe thats how it was done back then. or maybe I'm just stuuupid

[yel327]

its in an old FB/EK...so assume its a grey motor?

It just interested me as it just seemed to be sitting there hanging off the gearbox...i.e no engine mounts. Maybe thats how it was done back then. or maybe I'm just stuuupid

 

It is how they were mounted, just like an older SBC or F 'cruisers. Mounts at the front and at the bellhousing.
 

[S pack]

If these #3 pattern blocks are so exclusive to the XU1 then what is so special about them other than the sand core pattern was numbered 3?

Where is the documentation that says GM-H was using the #3 pattern exclusively for the XU1 engines?

Anecdotal evidence does suggest that the #3 pattern does feature on a lot of JP blocks but it is not exclusive to JP blocks.
You dicks have no documentation to prove any of your claims in regards to the #3 or dual cast dates, it's all just a fantasy created in Narnia.

 

It's little wonder Mike Bell is not involved in this crap.

[yel327]

Hey Weaver,All we need is the number pad photo time for you to put it up..............and by the way it will be the first JP216### i have seen with a 24H2 cast date the engine came out of a first week 9 month 72 built xu1 the cast date is to late.

 

Um, why is the cast date too late? I have numerous examples of engines completely assembled within 1, 2, 3 or 4 days of when they were cast. Agree that it may not be the norm but it is a given that there will be engines cast on one day and in a completed car 10-14 days later, sometimes less if the planets align. GMH just like the parent company and sister divisions it was a clone of was a 'just in time" business, and to them every identical part was the same thing - if an engine that arrived today was in front of ones that had been sitting for a week it'd get used first.

Oops, I missed the second bit - "it will be the first....I have seen". There you go. Wouldn't be the first thing that you haven't seen that doesn't fit the story.

And this post has nothing to do with the validity of Ian's engine, it is simply questioning your logic in this post.

[crabba67]

Byron, he knows all there is to know about LJ XU1, he say's so himself...........  got zip proof, and even less credibility ...   But knows all there is to know..   Yet the information he has is not his to give.....  

 

crabba67

Forum Fixture

• 
• Members
• 
• 632 posts

• Name:anthony
• Location:earth
• Joined: 21-July 10

Sent 04 September 2013 - 02:19 AM

ian,i can,t put the information up its part of the book research done back with norm darwin and (graham d) engine production engineer at the time i have the proof and the test done their is a different.ian i have owned xu1S for 30 years and know all their is to know about lj xu1. its not about credibility the information is not mine to show.call me on 0402159xxx

PS ian the original post was DO THEY HAVE DUEL CAST the answer is 228 duel cast blocks from 20.7.73 and NP7001 BLOCKS around (50) all .H3 cast date FACT,FACT

Weaver,It should be 250 9/2e dual cast blocks FACT.