235 replies to this topic

[FLY_AGAIN_XU-1]

 post-8884-0-53105200-1625089922.jpg   77.65K   7 downloads

[FLY_AGAIN_XU-1]

To be eligible a manufacturer was required to build and sell a minimum of 200 " BASICALLY IDENTICAL UNITS "

 

 post-8884-0-64101600-1612470834 (3).jpg   53.51K   4 downloads

[LCK186]

hi  s pack I agree with u  regarding  diff ratios    1st 200  cars  homoligated  with  3.36 and 3.08 centres        im still unsure why gmh built 300 71 ck xu1 toranas  does anybody actually know          ford produced 300 xy gtho falcons       chrysler produced  300 plus e 38 chargers   some one out there must know

[FLY_AGAIN_XU-1]

   1st 200  cars  homoligated  with  3.36 and 3.08 centres       

 

The first 200 " BASICALLY IDENTICAL " 1971 CK's were fitted with the 3.36 diff ratio.

 

 LC100 (2).jpg   36.69K   2 downloads

 

The final 100 1971 CK's were fitted with the 3.08 diff ratio.

[S pack]

 Motivated reasoning.png   10.32K   4 downloads

Edited by S pack, 24 November 2021 - 06:19 AM.

[FLY_AGAIN_XU-1]

 DSCN0012 (3).JPG   207.87K   3 downloads

 

Personally, I still much prefer the 1972 version as it tends to simplify things. " Fit 1 ratio to 200 cars & 100 for the other " Much, much simpler to understand.........

[FLY_AGAIN_XU-1]

Quote "Now all you need to do is explain why they were required to build a minimum of 300......"

 

I don't NEED to explain anything to you. 

 

Thank F##k

[Rockoz]

DSCN0012 (3).JPG

 

Personally, I still much prefer the 1972 version as it tends to simplify things. " Fit 1 ratio to 200 cars & 100 for the other " Much, much simpler to understand.........

What this tells me is that there was a required minimum.

If they only built the required minimum, then half of them had to have one of the ratios.

If they produced more than the minimum, then they still only had to have the same number of cars with one of the ratios.

 

If the minimum was 200, then 100 would have to have the alternative ratio.

If they produced 300, then they still only needed 100 of the alternative ratio.

 

Cheers

 

Rob

[FLY_AGAIN_XU-1]

What this tells me is that there was a required minimum.

 

If the minimum was 200

 

Cheers

 

Rob

 

 post-1815-0-25585600-1637633428.jpg   53.51K   1 downloads

 

200 " BASICALLY IDENTICAL UNITS " all fitted with the 3.36 diff ratio

[FLY_AGAIN_XU-1]

 post-1815-0-10820100-1637627769_LI.jpg   867.01K   5 downloads

 

and Rob the 100 + 100 never applied to the Australian 200 basically identical units......

[Rockoz]

post-1815-0-10820100-1637627769_LI.jpg

 

and Rob the 100 + 100 never applied to the Australian 200 basically identical units......

 

Thought it would have been understood that the number was just a number, not referencing any particular requirements.

The numbers I used were just example numbers.

Change them to 20 and 10 if you want, the intent is the same.

 

Cheers

 

Rob

[S pack]

DSCN0012 (3).JPG

 

Personally, I still much prefer the 1972 version as it tends to simplify things. " Fit 1 ratio to 200 cars & 100 for the other " Much, much simpler to understand.........

And you still cannot understand it!

 

How many LJ GTR XU1 did GMH build that were fitted with 3.08:1 ratio rear axles?

Edited by S pack, 25 November 2021 - 06:38 AM.

[LCK186]

s pack  hi as far as I was told all lj xu1 toranas came out with the 3.36 lsd    it is possible that country xu1 cars had the dealers to fit the 3.08 lsd for highway travelling

[WhiteA9XS]

 spoke to two drivers of the day in XU1,s today and told this also noted in log books although some of the books ratios inc LC are noted as VARIOUS .  

 

 LCXU1  3.36 and 3.08 ratios were the only ratios homologated 

 

 LJXU1 3.90 , 3.55 and 2.78 added ratios were homologated in January 1972 commencement of the LJ 

 

 Interesting to note these 72  LJ,s were delivered to some race drivers in Nov Dec 1971 but had to be kept under wraps . 

[LCK186]

hi      round 2 has ended    round 3   the bell has rang    question   in the  xu1 toranas  I was informed moons ago that the 3.08 lsd were factory fitted  to 10 to 15 Adelaide cars approx.      and  5 or so cars in the brissi built approx.      can any forum member shed some light on this   

[meanmachine72]

 spoke to two drivers of the day in XU1,s today and told this also noted in log books although some of the books ratios inc LC are noted as VARIOUS .  

 

 LCXU1  3.36 and 3.08 ratios were the only ratios homologated 

 

 LJXU1 3.90 , 3.55 and 2.78 added ratios were homologated in January 1972 commencement of the LJ 

 

 Interesting to note these 72  LJ,s were delivered to some race drivers in Nov Dec 1971 but had to be kept under wraps . 

thats right Shaun..only 2 ratios in LC series..both ratios 3.36 and 3.08 where homologated with the very first 200 xu-1 in 1970, no need to re-homologate again for the 300 CK xu-1s in 1971 as its all ready been done in 1970, as for Rockys claim the first 200 CK cars where 3.36 is also another false claim as thats not the case as there where 3.08 ratios in first 200 as well thus being not identical at all..its all to see if he was good enough to fact check with vin disc before he quoted the 200 identical units....

Edited by meanmachine72, 26 November 2021 - 10:41 AM.

[FLY_AGAIN_XU-1]

 

 LJ XU1 3.90 , 3.55 and 2.78 added ratios were homologated in January 1972 commencement of the LJ 

 

 thumbnail__20171201_122022 (2).jpg   152.77K   7 downloads

 

How many cars would it take to complete amendment 6/6V ? Rob ?

[FLY_AGAIN_XU-1]

hi im not smoking any weed guys      lets see if members  join in and give some input 

 

 post-1815-0-00278100-1624577940.jpg   66.29K   5 downloads

[FLY_AGAIN_XU-1]

 731-1-1_LI.jpg   949.93K   5 downloads

[FLY_AGAIN_XU-1]

thumbnail__20171201_122022 (2).jpg

 

How many cars would it take to complete amendment 6/6V ? 

 

 identical (2)_LI.jpg   1.06MB   13 downloads

 

DING, DING

[Zook]

can any forum member shed some light on this

I couldn't understand the question but my CK was Brisbane built.

[LCK186]

zook hi    I cant figure out why   u couldnt understand my simple question      what part didn't u get regarding the 3.08 lsd in the brissi or Adelaide cars       may be its because I don't use full stops       as for your ck xu1 what colour was it   as there were 2 ck xu1 toranas in act    and I knew both owners  u were not 1 of them     so what colour was it

[FLY_AGAIN_XU-1]

and my simple question.....

[Zook]

... as there were 2 ck xu1 toranas in act and I knew both owners u were not 1 of them so what colour was it

Hi. Yes. Unfortunately for you, you don't know as much as you think you do.
Edit. I'm sorry, but I had to come back. Nothing makes me laugh more than illiterate clowns like you claiming to know...well....stuff. It was advertised in the Trading Post. I kept the ad.

Edited by Zook, 01 December 2021 - 06:47 PM.

[jjtheboss]

ROUND FIVE WILL BE A KNOCK OUT .

IF YOU HAVE  THE DETAILS  ON THE ADEL AND BRIS CARS  AND HISTORY ON THEM .

YOU ARE TALKING  ABOUT A UNICORN THESE CARS ARE LIKE GOLD THAT ALL I AM SAYING .

AND THEY DONT EXIST IN COMPLETE FORM .

AND ONLY A  FEW IN COMPLETE CONDITION .......

CHEERS 

..