So now we know Thank You

CK Xu1
#101
Posted 06 December 2021 - 02:32 PM
#102
Posted 06 December 2021 - 07:23 PM
LOL. I think they're worth a bit more than $350. Odd that you've used a third decimal place.$350.000
#103
Posted 06 December 2021 - 07:44 PM
400 bucks if it's one of the 100 fitted with the 3.08 "Bathurst" ratio.......
#104
Posted 06 December 2021 - 11:45 PM
What a total load of bullshit.
In 1972 (as in previous years) manufacturers were allowed to homologate TWO final drive ratios for the minimum production of the model. However in 1972 (and only 1972) for the 1st time they were now required to fit the minimum production of 200 cars one of the those two ratios, which automatically homologated the other optional/alternative ratio. Having to build 300 cars for homologation of two ratios is pure fiction. The LJ XU1 and XA GT homologations documents don't lie.. For the minimum production for recognition of the respective models both manufacturers homologated TWO final drive ratios.
post-1815-0-35059300-1637714571.jpg 207.87K
2 downloads
What this tells me is that there was a required minimum.
If they only built the required minimum, then half of them had to have one of the ratios.
If they produced more than the minimum, then they still only had to have the same number of cars with one of the ratios.
If the minimum was 200, then 100 would have to have the alternative ratio.
If they produced 300, then they still only needed 100 of the alternative ratio.
Cheers
Rob
#105
Posted 07 December 2021 - 06:25 AM
The FIA rules for Transmissions 1970
FIA Transmissions Grp1 1970.jpg 380.72K
3 downloads
For the minimum production, 5000 cars for FIA Group 1, it was possible for a manufacturer to homologate TWO gearboxes and TWO final drive ratios.
The the wording of the CAMS Transmissions clause for 1970 1971 was almost word for word identical.
CAMS Trans Grp E 1970.71.jpg 119.15K
2 downloads
CAMS ratios Grp E 1970.71.jpg 90.14K
2 downloads
In 1971 the FIA added this little bit of wording to their Transmission clause.
FIA 1971 basic series 2 ratios.jpg 45.9K
2 downloads
Which clearly states for the minimum production TWO gearboxes & TWO final drive ratios.
The CAMS for the most part just copied the FIA rules.
As I said earlier the LJ XU1 and XA GT homologations in 1972 are hard and true evidence that the minimum production of TWO HUNDRED cars was all that was required to homologate TWO final drive ratios.
If Ford and GMH were required to build 300 cars to homologate TWO ratios then the Certificate of Description would say 300 hundred not 200 hundred.
300 cars to homologate two ratios is pure fiction.
Edited by S pack, 07 December 2021 - 06:31 AM.
#106
Posted 07 December 2021 - 06:30 AM
Once more the debate on the little Toranas goes round and round and round.
To continue the reference from the 12th Man, this is just so frocking boring.
Billy Birmingham was a legend.
Cheers
Rob
Agree Rob, totally agree.
#107
Posted 07 December 2021 - 06:42 AM
Toyota Celica 1971. Minimum production 5000 IDENTICAL cars
Toyota Celica 1400 1971 P1.JPG 114.31K
3 downloads
Two final drive ratios homologated.
Toyota Celica 1400 1971 P9.JPG 127.41K
3 downloads
Ford Capri 3 litre 1970. Minimum production 5000 IDENTICAL cars
Ford Capri 3 litre 1970 P1.JPG 125.37K
2 downloads
Two final drive ratios homologated.
Ford Capri 3 litre 1970 P11.JPG 123.98K
1 downloads
Just a couple of examples from the FIA.
Edited by S pack, 07 December 2021 - 06:43 AM.
#108
Posted 07 December 2021 - 07:50 AM
Ok round 2 has gone long enough, ding ding the bell has rung for round 3, remember lads no blows under the belt, lets see who throws the first blow,
#109
Posted 07 December 2021 - 09:55 AM
PI5Send2.jpg 72.72K
4 downloads
Clearly Holden produced over 5000 LC GTR's but well under 5000 LC GTR XU-1's.....
PI5Send1.jpg 59.87K
5 downloads
#110
Posted 07 December 2021 - 10:48 AM
The FIA rules for Transmissions 1970
FIA Transmissions Grp1 1970.jpg
For the minimum production, 5000 cars for FIA Group 1, it was possible for a manufacturer to homologate TWO gearboxes and TWO final drive ratios.
In 1971 the FIA added this little bit of wording to their Transmission clause.
FIA 1971 basic series 2 ratios.jpg
Which clearly states for the minimum production TWO gearboxes & TWO final drive ratios.
5000 models (3).jpg 115.16K
3 downloads
#111
Posted 07 December 2021 - 10:08 PM
200 cars, with 2 different ratios, that's all you need to show us.........
#112
Posted 08 December 2021 - 06:41 AM
200 cars, with 2 different ratios, that's all you need to show us.........
That's your fantasy, you go find it.
#113
Posted 08 December 2021 - 10:59 AM
I read a storyline on fakeache the other day from 7 of 9. Jeri Ryan
If you are a trekkie you will know her for sure.
But basically it was about a study.
The study worked out that there are people around who just arent smart enough to realise that they are pretty much stupid.
They actually think that they are pretty smart too. But sadly they are wrong.
Kind of relates to an older saying I remember.
Got no brains and happy about it.
Anyways............................
Cheers
Rob
#114
Posted 08 December 2021 - 03:24 PM
thumbnail__20171201_122022 (2).jpg
How many cars would it take to complete amendment 6/6V ? Rob ?
Go on Rob, you've got some brains and feeling bored, have a crack......
#115
Posted 08 December 2021 - 05:45 PM
Attached Files
#116
Posted 08 December 2021 - 06:51 PM
Hi there
A Lc Xu1 bathurst or Ck car i would say could go as high as 400k for the right car . i will try and explain
If it has everything eg block correct cast dates , Head A28 or A29 cast head with the correct thumb print.
Alternator is another special part on these .
Radiator H1 stamped into top tank and brass tag soldiered onto fan plate or Surround
Correct date code on the m21 gearbox .
Orig front guards not Repo ones
That is to list some items i hope this helps
Color is the next thing icing on the cake as the CK car was the first lc xu1 with a full list of colors
Note the most common color in a CK is Lone O Ranger
Trim from my research there was one only Adel built Ck with Houndstooth trim
all these items add more $$$$$$$$
i Know of Three Cks in Melb which would tick most of the boxes
Thanks for looking
Sorry if spelling is not the greatest
#117
Posted 08 December 2021 - 07:57 PM
Current market suggests..
He needs a lot more money than that Col me thinks
#119
Posted 08 December 2021 - 11:51 PM
Rockoz nailed it
I read a storyline on fakeache the other day from 7 of 9. Jeri Ryan
If you are a trekkie you will know her for sure.
But basically it was about a study.
The study worked out that there are people around who just arent smart enough to realise that they are pretty much stupid.
They actually think that they are pretty smart too. But sadly they are wrong.
Kind of relates to an older saying I remember.
Got no brains and happy about it.
Anyways............................
rockOz nailed it , Jerri, was my fav and she was Jerri Ryan and pointed her options twice, lke a left and right opinon
As a funna how many now just for fun, have driven drove or burned out both an LC and LJ GTR and XU1
Without giving a frOck about diffs, we knew . Big tell is if you owned one in the old days what was your diff, maybe replaced and left on the ground. Going back to the 70's. Lucky we have wilknots ready to make our old cars worth a million dolars now , cracks me uo, And to be honest I'd pay money for a v8 faker little one before i paid a money for orig I want to drive A CAR
Muz
Apolgies to OP of track if I had millions I'd pay what you wanted for a CK and seroiusly someone has and will,
wait for that dude
Edited by muzzta, 08 December 2021 - 11:57 PM.
#120
Posted 09 December 2021 - 12:55 AM
ok lads looks like I'm out of this one too, I was on a fishing forum full of wonderfull people til a dickhead came on, I just called him out and left, I can't show my pics of old torries or edit my mistakes , I never showed many or the stories of our torry days in respect for owners and drivers. i tried to put a few pics up, didn;t work so all the best to the ones who still care about Torries.
Luv em til they rust
Cheers
Lowndesy
#121
Posted 09 December 2021 - 06:26 AM
I've edited out Joe's superfluous general advice about the production breakdown to make the important info of his letter clearer.
Joe is advising D.K Thompson of The CAMS that GMH have already sold in excess of the required number of cars (100) for recognition of the CK XU1 evolutionary changes.
It is perfectly clear, the number of CK XU1's GMH had to make & sell to gain recognition of the CK evolution was a minimum of 100 cars, not 200, not 300 but only 100.
Joes letter high.jpg 45.44K
9 downloads
As I have said before, the first 200 3100X cars built in 1970 homologated both the 3.36:1 and 3.08:1 final drive ratios and once homologated DID NOT require homologation over and over again for an evolution of the model.
#122
Posted 09 December 2021 - 07:37 AM
And to be honest I'd pay money for a v8 faker little one before i paid a money for orig I want to drive A CAR
Muz
I love the original ones, they are a credit to those who own them, but....agree 100% with the above.
#123
Posted 09 December 2021 - 07:38 AM
Hi after s pack has hi lighted the GMH letter from joe to Thompson I now understand that the required number cars in excess of 100 have already been sold which is the total amount required, I had to read the letter slowly a few times before I understood what Joe was saying, So the minimum no of cars to be built is 100 units not 300. what do u guys think
Edited by LCK186, 09 December 2021 - 07:46 AM.
#124
Posted 09 December 2021 - 08:12 AM
If you discount the number in brackets, because it is only an estimate. To me it says that the required amount has been sold. Then it says that the initial production batch is 200 cars with the two different ratio's. To me it seem the total number of cars from the initial production was 200 cars. I think it says they met the requirements by selling (in excess of 100 cars) the initial batch was 200 cars. 100 had 3.36. the other 100 had 3.08 ratio. but thats just my take on it..
Edited by IanC, 09 December 2021 - 08:19 AM.
#125
Posted 09 December 2021 - 08:21 AM
Stop looking, found it.
Anyone counted the ratios on those first 300 1970 LC XU-1's ?
yes i have ROCKY..go back to page one you will also see S Pack saying same thing, reason you never saId anything back then was because you
where caught out trying to bullshiting everyone and changed tact and started to talk 73 cars
226 cars fitted with 3.36, 73 cars fitted with 3.08 and 1 car fitted with 2.78..if you have bothered to research the count yourself you would know
vin ck.png 7.45K
3 downloads
this one is 35 cars into your supposed first 200 3.36 ratio and there are many others to...go and have a look yourself
as i wont be posting anymore vins with 3.08 diffs in them for you
2 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users