One of the problems is, I used to be able to check my car at a few different stores with identical machines ( I worked casual at several different stores ) and would see slightly different toe readings between machines. That was simple fact 20 years ago, it may or may not be different now.
The first thing to remember with an LH front end, is generally they ran a bit of negative castor. This causes the outside edge of the front tyres to roll under during cornering. The taller the profile, the more the tyres will roll under, due to sidewall flex. So the 60 profile tyres you now have will roll under less than the 70 profile tyres you used to have. Having said that, because you now have a wider tyre on the same size rim, that can cause the tyre to walk around on the rim more. Which can give the same end result.
On my 173 LX 4 door (which was totalled by a Mack 22 years ago) It had the stock front end. Maybe RTS, maybe not. I ran 225/50R15 Dunlop W10 on the front on 6" wide rims. Not an ideal combination, but finding a wider wheel wasn't the priority. I set it up with the following settings:
Castor: + 0.5 degrees
Camber: - 4.5 degrees <--- THIS IS NOT A TYPO
Toe in: 2.5 mm total toe in.
I pushed it hard through corners, which it why I set it up that way. The tyres wore fairly even, until the shockers got worn. Then they started to scallop a bit. Even with that amount of negative camber, I could still feel the front understeer (at parking speeds) when I applied full lock. If I backed off a quarter turn of steering, the understeer would go. Not only could I feel it, I could also hear it with the radio off.
In short, the front end may be within factory specs and just scrubbing the tyres a bit due to GMH design.